An entertaining article is on Stuff:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/133116645/how-103-covid-vaccine-exemptions-covered-11000-healthcare-workers
about how 11,005 health professionals (doctors, administrative staff,
etc.) were waived the vaccine mandate. The article tries its damndest
to put lipstick on this pig. It refers to the 11K as "affected
workers", as though the poor dears somehow couldn't get their
vaccinations which they were clamouring for, through September 2022.
Ha ha -- under the lipstick is that these 11K *refused* the vaccine.
They were granted the emergency exemptions to prevent the vaccine
charade from falling apart publically.
Your doctor may be one of the exempted ones. Even as he/she was
required to counsel you to get vaccinated.
At the bottom of this cloud of fog is this ludicrous addendum:
"Not here for the hate.
We're increasingly concerned by the misinformation and bad behaviour happening over on X (Twitter). So we've left that cesspit to focus on stories and connections that make things better for Kiwis."
I get it -- this story came from Twitter, else Stuff wouldn't have
carried it. But Stuff are stamping their feet like a churlish child,
crying "I'll never look at the Twitter cesspit again, WAAAAHHHH".
No adults in NZ journalism nowadays.
On 13 Oct 2023 22:49:43 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Completely unrelated to Gordon's comment which in turn was unrelated to election day or the election.
On 2023-10-13, Willy Nilly <willynilly@qwert.com> wrote:
An entertaining article is on Stuff:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/133116645/how-103-covid-vaccine-exemptions-covered-11000-healthcare-workers
about how 11,005 health professionals (doctors, administrative staff,
etc.) were waived the vaccine mandate. The article tries its damndest
to put lipstick on this pig. It refers to the 11K as "affected
workers", as though the poor dears somehow couldn't get their
vaccinations which they were clamouring for, through September 2022.
Ha ha -- under the lipstick is that these 11K *refused* the vaccine.
They were granted the emergency exemptions to prevent the vaccine
charade from falling apart publically.
Your doctor may be one of the exempted ones. Even as he/she was
required to counsel you to get vaccinated.
This is pure Government over reach. You go to your Doctor for a consultation >>and all you get is a Government narrative. A great case for less >>Government.
Another case of Free Speech required.
Read: >https://elections.nz/guidance-and-rules/advertising-and-campaigning/rules-once-voting-starts-and-on-election-day/
At the bottom of this cloud of fog is this ludicrous addendum:
"Not here for the hate.
We're increasingly concerned by the misinformation and bad behaviour
happening over on X (Twitter). So we've left that cesspit to focus on
stories and connections that make things better for Kiwis."
It even got better, X stuff claimed it was no longer sharing information >>with X as it was spreading so much mis-information. Stuff then went on to >>list the exceptions which was longer than anyones arm. I could not See >>Labour's narrative on the list.
I get it -- this story came from Twitter, else Stuff wouldn't haveWell there is an exception or two, but they are labelled as FAR RIGHT. Most >>journalists are woke.
carried it. But Stuff are stamping their feet like a churlish child,
crying "I'll never look at the Twitter cesspit again, WAAAAHHHH".
No adults in NZ journalism nowadays.
Anyhow Stuff certainly won an award over it.
On 2023-10-13, Willy Nilly <willynilly@qwert.com> wrote:
An entertaining article is on Stuff:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/133116645/how-103-covid-vaccine-exemptions-covered-11000-healthcare-workers
about how 11,005 health professionals (doctors, administrative staff,
etc.) were waived the vaccine mandate. The article tries its damndest
to put lipstick on this pig. It refers to the 11K as "affected
workers", as though the poor dears somehow couldn't get their
vaccinations which they were clamouring for, through September 2022.
Ha ha -- under the lipstick is that these 11K *refused* the vaccine.
They were granted the emergency exemptions to prevent the vaccine
charade from falling apart publically.
Your doctor may be one of the exempted ones. Even as he/she was
required to counsel you to get vaccinated.
This is pure Government over reach. You go to your Doctor for a consultation >and all you get is a Government narrative. A great case for less
Government.
Another case of Free Speech required.
At the bottom of this cloud of fog is this ludicrous addendum:
"Not here for the hate.
We're increasingly concerned by the misinformation and bad behaviour
happening over on X (Twitter). So we've left that cesspit to focus on
stories and connections that make things better for Kiwis."
It even got better, X stuff claimed it was no longer sharing information
with X as it was spreading so much mis-information. Stuff then went on to >list the exceptions which was longer than anyones arm. I could not See >Labour's narrative on the list.
I get it -- this story came from Twitter, else Stuff wouldn't haveWell there is an exception or two, but they are labelled as FAR RIGHT. Most >journalists are woke.
carried it. But Stuff are stamping their feet like a churlish child,
crying "I'll never look at the Twitter cesspit again, WAAAAHHHH".
No adults in NZ journalism nowadays.
Anyhow Stuff certainly won an award over it.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Of course it was related - you are not just a wilfully ignorant twonk,
On 13 Oct 2023 22:49:43 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Completely unrelated to Gordon's comment which in turn was unrelated to >election day or the election.
On 2023-10-13, Willy Nilly <willynilly@qwert.com> wrote:
An entertaining article is on Stuff:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/133116645/how-103-covid-vaccine-exemptions-covered-11000-healthcare-workers
about how 11,005 health professionals (doctors, administrative staff,
etc.) were waived the vaccine mandate. The article tries its damndest >>>> to put lipstick on this pig. It refers to the 11K as "affected
workers", as though the poor dears somehow couldn't get their
vaccinations which they were clamouring for, through September 2022.
Ha ha -- under the lipstick is that these 11K *refused* the vaccine.
They were granted the emergency exemptions to prevent the vaccine
charade from falling apart publically.
Your doctor may be one of the exempted ones. Even as he/she was
required to counsel you to get vaccinated.
This is pure Government over reach. You go to your Doctor for a consultation >>>and all you get is a Government narrative. A great case for less >>>Government.
Another case of Free Speech required.
Read: >>https://elections.nz/guidance-and-rules/advertising-and-campaigning/rules-once-voting-starts-and-on-election-day/
At the bottom of this cloud of fog is this ludicrous addendum:
"Not here for the hate.
We're increasingly concerned by the misinformation and bad behaviour
happening over on X (Twitter). So we've left that cesspit to focus on >>>> stories and connections that make things better for Kiwis."
It even got better, X stuff claimed it was no longer sharing information >>>with X as it was spreading so much mis-information. Stuff then went on to >>>list the exceptions which was longer than anyones arm. I could not See >>>Labour's narrative on the list.
I get it -- this story came from Twitter, else Stuff wouldn't haveWell there is an exception or two, but they are labelled as FAR RIGHT. Most >>>journalists are woke.
carried it. But Stuff are stamping their feet like a churlish child,
crying "I'll never look at the Twitter cesspit again, WAAAAHHHH".
No adults in NZ journalism nowadays.
Anyhow Stuff certainly won an award over it.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 01:51:02 -0000 (UTC), TonyThat is a deliberate lie - No it is not related, not even vaguely.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Of course it was related -
On 13 Oct 2023 22:49:43 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Completely unrelated to Gordon's comment which in turn was unrelated to >>election day or the election.
On 2023-10-13, Willy Nilly <willynilly@qwert.com> wrote:
An entertaining article is on Stuff:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/133116645/how-103-covid-vaccine-exemptions-covered-11000-healthcare-workers
about how 11,005 health professionals (doctors, administrative staff, >>>>> etc.) were waived the vaccine mandate. The article tries its damndest >>>>> to put lipstick on this pig. It refers to the 11K as "affected
workers", as though the poor dears somehow couldn't get their
vaccinations which they were clamouring for, through September 2022. >>>>>
Ha ha -- under the lipstick is that these 11K *refused* the vaccine. >>>>> They were granted the emergency exemptions to prevent the vaccine
charade from falling apart publically.
Your doctor may be one of the exempted ones. Even as he/she was
required to counsel you to get vaccinated.
This is pure Government over reach. You go to your Doctor for a consultation
and all you get is a Government narrative. A great case for less >>>>Government.
Another case of Free Speech required.
Read: >>>https://elections.nz/guidance-and-rules/advertising-and-campaigning/rules-once-voting-starts-and-on-election-day/
At the bottom of this cloud of fog is this ludicrous addendum:
"Not here for the hate.
We're increasingly concerned by the misinformation and bad behaviour >>>>> happening over on X (Twitter). So we've left that cesspit to focus on >>>>> stories and connections that make things better for Kiwis."
It even got better, X stuff claimed it was no longer sharing information >>>>with X as it was spreading so much mis-information. Stuff then went on to >>>>list the exceptions which was longer than anyones arm. I could not See >>>>Labour's narrative on the list.
I get it -- this story came from Twitter, else Stuff wouldn't haveWell there is an exception or two, but they are labelled as FAR RIGHT. Most >>>>journalists are woke.
carried it. But Stuff are stamping their feet like a churlish child, >>>>> crying "I'll never look at the Twitter cesspit again, WAAAAHHHH".
No adults in NZ journalism nowadays.
Anyhow Stuff certainly won an award over it.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 01:51:02 -0000 (UTC), TonyNot related at all - your petty snivel at Gordon is transparent and obvious. Just what you do of course - a shame you don't even begin to understand the meaning of the link you posted.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Of course it was related -
On 13 Oct 2023 22:49:43 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Completely unrelated to Gordon's comment which in turn was unrelated to >>election day or the election.
On 2023-10-13, Willy Nilly <willynilly@qwert.com> wrote:
An entertaining article is on Stuff:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/133116645/how-103-covid-vaccine-exemptions-covered-11000-healthcare-workers
about how 11,005 health professionals (doctors, administrative staff, >>>>> etc.) were waived the vaccine mandate. The article tries its damndest >>>>> to put lipstick on this pig. It refers to the 11K as "affected
workers", as though the poor dears somehow couldn't get their
vaccinations which they were clamouring for, through September 2022. >>>>>
Ha ha -- under the lipstick is that these 11K *refused* the vaccine. >>>>> They were granted the emergency exemptions to prevent the vaccine
charade from falling apart publically.
Your doctor may be one of the exempted ones. Even as he/she was
required to counsel you to get vaccinated.
This is pure Government over reach. You go to your Doctor for a consultation
and all you get is a Government narrative. A great case for less >>>>Government.
Another case of Free Speech required.
Read: >>>https://elections.nz/guidance-and-rules/advertising-and-campaigning/rules-once-voting-starts-and-on-election-day/
At the bottom of this cloud of fog is this ludicrous addendum:
"Not here for the hate.
We're increasingly concerned by the misinformation and bad behaviour >>>>> happening over on X (Twitter). So we've left that cesspit to focus on >>>>> stories and connections that make things better for Kiwis."
It even got better, X stuff claimed it was no longer sharing information >>>>with X as it was spreading so much mis-information. Stuff then went on to >>>>list the exceptions which was longer than anyones arm. I could not See >>>>Labour's narrative on the list.
I get it -- this story came from Twitter, else Stuff wouldn't haveWell there is an exception or two, but they are labelled as FAR RIGHT. Most >>>>journalists are woke.
carried it. But Stuff are stamping their feet like a churlish child, >>>>> crying "I'll never look at the Twitter cesspit again, WAAAAHHHH".
No adults in NZ journalism nowadays.
Anyhow Stuff certainly won an award over it.
The rules around
electioneering and advertising clearly need review to allow for an
extended voting period...
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:So here it is again:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 01:51:02 -0000 (UTC), TonyThat is a deliberate lie - No it is not related, not even vaguely.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Of course it was related -
On 13 Oct 2023 22:49:43 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Completely unrelated to Gordon's comment which in turn was unrelated to >>>election day or the election.
On 2023-10-13, Willy Nilly <willynilly@qwert.com> wrote:
An entertaining article is on Stuff:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/133116645/how-103-covid-vaccine-exemptions-covered-11000-healthcare-workers
about how 11,005 health professionals (doctors, administrative staff, >>>>>> etc.) were waived the vaccine mandate. The article tries its damndest >>>>>> to put lipstick on this pig. It refers to the 11K as "affected
workers", as though the poor dears somehow couldn't get their
vaccinations which they were clamouring for, through September 2022. >>>>>>
Ha ha -- under the lipstick is that these 11K *refused* the vaccine. >>>>>> They were granted the emergency exemptions to prevent the vaccine
charade from falling apart publically.
Your doctor may be one of the exempted ones. Even as he/she was
required to counsel you to get vaccinated.
This is pure Government over reach. You go to your Doctor for a consultation
and all you get is a Government narrative. A great case for less >>>>>Government.
Another case of Free Speech required.
Read: >>>>https://elections.nz/guidance-and-rules/advertising-and-campaigning/rules-once-voting-starts-and-on-election-day/
The rest of your abusive personal diatribe removed.
At the bottom of this cloud of fog is this ludicrous addendum:
"Not here for the hate.
We're increasingly concerned by the misinformation and bad behaviour >>>>>> happening over on X (Twitter). So we've left that cesspit to focus on >>>>>> stories and connections that make things better for Kiwis."
It even got better, X stuff claimed it was no longer sharing information >>>>>with X as it was spreading so much mis-information. Stuff then went on to >>>>>list the exceptions which was longer than anyones arm. I could not See >>>>>Labour's narrative on the list.
I get it -- this story came from Twitter, else Stuff wouldn't have >>>>>> carried it. But Stuff are stamping their feet like a churlish child, >>>>>> crying "I'll never look at the Twitter cesspit again, WAAAAHHHH".Well there is an exception or two, but they are labelled as FAR RIGHT. Most
No adults in NZ journalism nowadays.
journalists are woke.
Anyhow Stuff certainly won an award over it.
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 23:11:16 -0000 (UTC), TonyAll as it should be. Rich 80105 telling lies and defaming people. A loser in every way - and deservedly so.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 01:51:02 -0000 (UTC), TonyThat is a deliberate lie - No it is not related, not even vaguely.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Of course it was related -
On 13 Oct 2023 22:49:43 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Completely unrelated to Gordon's comment which in turn was unrelated to >>>>election day or the election.
On 2023-10-13, Willy Nilly <willynilly@qwert.com> wrote:
An entertaining article is on Stuff:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/133116645/how-103-covid-vaccine-exemptions-covered-11000-healthcare-workers
about how 11,005 health professionals (doctors, administrative staff, >>>>>>> etc.) were waived the vaccine mandate. The article tries its damndest >>>>>>> to put lipstick on this pig. It refers to the 11K as "affected
workers", as though the poor dears somehow couldn't get their
vaccinations which they were clamouring for, through September 2022. >>>>>>>
Ha ha -- under the lipstick is that these 11K *refused* the vaccine. >>>>>>> They were granted the emergency exemptions to prevent the vaccine >>>>>>> charade from falling apart publically.
Your doctor may be one of the exempted ones. Even as he/she was >>>>>>> required to counsel you to get vaccinated.
This is pure Government over reach. You go to your Doctor for a >>>>>>consultation
and all you get is a Government narrative. A great case for less >>>>>>Government.
Another case of Free Speech required.
Read: >>>>>https://elections.nz/guidance-and-rules/advertising-and-campaigning/rules-once-voting-starts-and-on-election-day/
The rest of your abusive personal diatribe removed.
At the bottom of this cloud of fog is this ludicrous addendum:
"Not here for the hate.
We're increasingly concerned by the misinformation and bad behaviour >>>>>>> happening over on X (Twitter). So we've left that cesspit to focus on >>>>>>> stories and connections that make things better for Kiwis."
It even got better, X stuff claimed it was no longer sharing information >>>>>>with X as it was spreading so much mis-information. Stuff then went on to >>>>>>list the exceptions which was longer than anyones arm. I could not See >>>>>>Labour's narrative on the list.
I get it -- this story came from Twitter, else Stuff wouldn't have >>>>>>> carried it. But Stuff are stamping their feet like a churlish child, >>>>>>> crying "I'll never look at the Twitter cesspit again, WAAAAHHHH". >>>>>>> No adults in NZ journalism nowadays.Well there is an exception or two, but they are labelled as FAR RIGHT. >>>>>>Most
journalists are woke.
Anyhow Stuff certainly won an award over it.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 102:29:00 |
| Calls: | 6,660 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,994 |