Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable. There >can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the deliberate >hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now.
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral >>>government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" the >>info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable. There can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the deliberate hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now.
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral >>government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" the
info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), TonyStop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a gag order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked rough shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you are Rich! They're not fit to
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable. There
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral >>>government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" the >>info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the deliberate >hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now.
the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the
prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy
some do forget . . .
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), TonyDon't be pathetic. The knowledge that thousands of people were expemted and hundreds of people in the health services included was never published.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable. >>There
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral >>>>government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" the >>>info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the deliberate >>hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now.
Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about
the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the
prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy
some do forget . . .
On 2023-10-05, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:govern!!!
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:45:34 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), TonyStop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a gag order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked rough shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you are Rich! They're not fit to
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable. There
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral
government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" the
info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the deliberate
hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now. >> Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about
prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy
some do forget . . .
Much like Rich, Labour and the left are only happy with free speech that repeats the bullshit they spout! Typical of left wing imbeciles everywhere!So tell me Rich. What does this from the oia mean to a comprehensionless imbecile like you?! :" From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total of 478 applications for Significant ServiceLet us not forget that this came to light via an Official Informantion request. It was not in the public domain until now.
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted, covering approximately
11,005 workers. "
Which Government gives out gaging orders? The Labour Government. Free Speech was not allowed. They would like us to forget.
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:45:34 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:govern!!!
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), TonyStop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a gag order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked rough shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you are Rich! They're not fit to
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable. There
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral
government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" the >> >>info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the deliberate >> >hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now.
the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the
prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy
some do forget . . .
So tell me Rich. What does this from the oia mean to a comprehensionless imbecile like you?! :" From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total of 478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted, covering approximately
11,005 workers. "
On 2023-10-05, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Exactly - disgraceful!
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:45:34 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), TonyStop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a gag >>order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked rough >>shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you are >>Rich! They're not fit to govern!!!
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral
government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable. >>> >Therehttps://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" the >>> >>info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the deliberate >>> >hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now. >>> Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about
prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy
some do forget . . .
So tell me Rich. What does this from the oia mean to a comprehensionless >>imbecile like you?! :" From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total of >>478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted, >>covering approximately
11,005 workers. "
Let us not forget that this came to light via an Official Informantion >request. It was not in the public domain until now.
Which Government gives out gaging orders? The Labour Government. Free Speech >was not allowed. They would like us to forget.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-05, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Exactly - disgraceful!
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:45:34 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), TonyStop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a gag >>>order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked rough >>>shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you are >>>Rich! They're not fit to govern!!!
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral >>>> >>>government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable. >>>> >Therehttps://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" the >>>> >>info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the deliberate >>>> >hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now. >>>> Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about
prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy >>>> some do forget . . .
So tell me Rich. What does this from the oia mean to a comprehensionless >>>imbecile like you?! :" From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total of
478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted, >>>covering approximately
11,005 workers. "
Let us not forget that this came to light via an Official Informantion >>request. It was not in the public domain until now.
Which Government gives out gaging orders? The Labour Government. Free Speech >>was not allowed. They would like us to forget.
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 05:50:58 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:I am not aware of any gaging orders or even gagging orders - do either
On 2023-10-05, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Exactly - disgraceful!
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:45:34 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Stop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a gag
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about >>>> the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral >>>> >>>government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable.https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" the
info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
There
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the deliberate
hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now.
prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy >>>> some do forget . . .
order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked rough
shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you are
Rich! They're not fit to govern!!!
So tell me Rich. What does this from the oia mean to a comprehensionless >>>imbecile like you?! :" From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total of
478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted, >>>covering approximately
11,005 workers. "
Let us not forget that this came to light via an Official Informantion >>request. It was not in the public domain until now.
Which Government gives out gaging orders? The Labour Government. Free Speech
was not allowed. They would like us to forget.
of you have any reference to such a thing during Covid? I think you
are lying - I simply do not believe you. Prove me wrong if you can . .
What we did have was a lot of people that wanted to work while their
normal employer could not use them - that included some government departments as well as many companies. The government needed people to
work from home on things like tracking connections when an infection
was identified - a job that arose very quickly. There would have been
quite a few other circumstances where companies would have encouraged
some people in similar circumstances to work from home.
Coupled with that some people did not want to have vaccinations in the
early stages due to other medical conditions - during that time I
doubt there were 11,000 anti vax nutters, but there were some
legitimate reasons why they may have been advised to wait in isolation
- some may have waited for quite some time before getting vaccinated,
but from that time fully supported the vaccine and kept up to date. No limitations were placed on free speech, but provided someone was
isolating and not putting others at risk then why not grant an
exemption?
As for not having published the data, the reality is that they were incredibly busy, and probably nobody had asked for the data. One it
was asked for, they recognised that it may be of interest to others so voluntarily made the information public - that is hardly consistent
with keeping it secret.
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 9:58:20?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 05:50:58 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:I am not aware of any gaging orders or even gagging orders - do either
On 2023-10-05, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Exactly - disgraceful!
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:45:34?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), TonyStop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a gag
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral >> >>>> >>>government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable.https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" the
info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
There
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the deliberate
hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now.
the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the
prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy >> >>>> some do forget . . .
order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked rough
shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you are
Rich! They're not fit to govern!!!
So tell me Rich. What does this from the oia mean to a comprehensionless >> >>>imbecile like you?! :" From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total of
478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted, >> >>>covering approximately
11,005 workers. "
Let us not forget that this came to light via an Official Informantion
request. It was not in the public domain until now.
Which Government gives out gaging orders? The Labour Government. Free Speech
was not allowed. They would like us to forget.
of you have any reference to such a thing during Covid? I think you
are lying - I simply do not believe you. Prove me wrong if you can . .
Here you go Rich. Have a dead rat to swallow! https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/ Now try and prove it never happened if you can!
Why would you be doing that? You are the only pos I am aware of.
What we did have was a lot of people that wanted to work while their
normal employer could not use them - that included some government
departments as well as many companies. The government needed people to
work from home on things like tracking connections when an infection
was identified - a job that arose very quickly. There would have been
quite a few other circumstances where companies would have encouraged
some people in similar circumstances to work from home.
What we have here is a pos trying to cover up yet another dictatorial and possibly illegal practice by his useless fucking Labour party!
Are you talking to yourself now?
Coupled with that some people did not want to have vaccinations in the
early stages due to other medical conditions - during that time I
doubt there were 11,000 anti vax nutters, but there were some
legitimate reasons why they may have been advised to wait in isolation
- some may have waited for quite some time before getting vaccinated,
but from that time fully supported the vaccine and kept up to date. No
limitations were placed on free speech, but provided someone was
isolating and not putting others at risk then why not grant an
exemption?
Coupled with another load of bullshit in a desperate bid to salve his own guilty consience!
No duplicity at all - and when the figures were put together the
As for not having published the data, the reality is that they were
incredibly busy, and probably nobody had asked for the data. One it
was asked for, they recognised that it may be of interest to others so
voluntarily made the information public - that is hardly consistent
with keeping it secret.
It only came to light because somebody a lot smarter than you can ever hope to be put in an oia and exposed Labours duplicity!
Now either prove this never happened or crawl back under your rock with the other slugs Rich!
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 02:52:14 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 9:58:20?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 05:50:58 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:I am not aware of any gaging orders or even gagging orders - do either
On 2023-10-05, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Exactly - disgraceful!
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:45:34?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >> >>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Stop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a gag
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about >> >>>> the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral
government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable.https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" the
info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
There
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the deliberate
hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now.
prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy
some do forget . . .
order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked rough
shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you are
Rich! They're not fit to govern!!!
So tell me Rich. What does this from the oia mean to a comprehensionless
imbecile like you?! :" From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total of
478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted,
covering approximately
11,005 workers. "
Let us not forget that this came to light via an Official Informantion >> >>request. It was not in the public domain until now.
Which Government gives out gaging orders? The Labour Government. Free Speech
was not allowed. They would like us to forget.
of you have any reference to such a thing during Covid? I think you
are lying - I simply do not believe you. Prove me wrong if you can . .
Here you go Rich. Have a dead rat to swallow! https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/ Now try and prove it never happened if you can!That does not show any gagging order - it shows that when asked a
question, the government answered!
If you want to see a real pos go look in a mirror or look at your glorious leader hipkins!
What we did have was a lot of people that wanted to work while their
normal employer could not use them - that included some government
departments as well as many companies. The government needed people to
work from home on things like tracking connections when an infection
was identified - a job that arose very quickly. There would have been
quite a few other circumstances where companies would have encouraged
some people in similar circumstances to work from home.
What we have here is a pos trying to cover up yet another dictatorial and possibly illegal practice by his useless fucking Labour party!Why would you be doing that? You are the only pos I am aware of.
Rich. You can try and avoid the truth but the only person you fool is yourself!
Coupled with that some people did not want to have vaccinations in the
early stages due to other medical conditions - during that time I
doubt there were 11,000 anti vax nutters, but there were some
legitimate reasons why they may have been advised to wait in isolation
- some may have waited for quite some time before getting vaccinated,
but from that time fully supported the vaccine and kept up to date. No
limitations were placed on free speech, but provided someone was
isolating and not putting others at risk then why not grant an
exemption?
Coupled with another load of bullshit in a desperate bid to salve his own guilty consience!Are you talking to yourself now?
Do stop being a pos protecting yet another piece of disgusting totalitarian behaviour from the toxic Labour government! The fact you keep trying to distract from the truth only proves your a trolling pos hell bent on turning NZ into another failed
As for not having published the data, the reality is that they were
incredibly busy, and probably nobody had asked for the data. One it
was asked for, they recognised that it may be of interest to others so
voluntarily made the information public - that is hardly consistent
with keeping it secret.
It only came to light because somebody a lot smarter than you can ever hope to be put in an oia and exposed Labours duplicity!No duplicity at all - and when the figures were put together the
Now either prove this never happened or crawl back under your rock with the other slugs Rich!
people involved made it public! You have shown no duplicity other
than your own, "pos John Bowes"
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 05:50:58 -0000 (UTC), TonyWho are you talking to?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-05, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Exactly - disgraceful!
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:45:34 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Stop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a gag >>>>order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked rough >>>>shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you are >>>>Rich! They're not fit to govern!!!
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral >>>>> >>>government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy >>>>> some do forget . . .Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable. >>>>> >Therehttps://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" >>>>> >>the
info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the
deliberate
hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now. >>>>> Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about >>>>> the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the
So tell me Rich. What does this from the oia mean to a comprehensionless >>>>imbecile like you?! :" From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total >>>>of
478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted, >>>>covering approximately
11,005 workers. "
Let us not forget that this came to light via an Official Informantion >>>request. It was not in the public domain until now.
Which Government gives out gaging orders? The Labour Government. Free Speech >>>was not allowed. They would like us to forget.
I am not aware of any gaging orders or even gagging orders - do either
of you have any reference to such a thing during Covid? I think you
are lying - I simply do not believe you. Prove me wrong if you can . .
What we did have was a lot of people that wanted to work while theirApart from your deliberate and lazy method of discourse you are wrong in your later comments. 11000 people were exempted including hundreds of health department folk - that is now proven. Address that and forget the distractions.
normal employer could not use them - that included some government >departments as well as many companies. The government needed people to
work from home on things like tracking connections when an infection
was identified - a job that arose very quickly. There would have been
quite a few other circumstances where companies would have encouraged
some people in similar circumstances to work from home.
Coupled with that some people did not want to have vaccinations in the
early stages due to other medical conditions - during that time I
doubt there were 11,000 anti vax nutters, but there were some
legitimate reasons why they may have been advised to wait in isolation
- some may have waited for quite some time before getting vaccinated,
but from that time fully supported the vaccine and kept up to date. No >limitations were placed on free speech, but provided someone was
isolating and not putting others at risk then why not grant an
exemption?
As for not having published the data, the reality is that they were >incredibly busy, and probably nobody had asked for the data. One it
was asked for, they recognised that it may be of interest to others so >voluntarily made the information public - that is hardly consistent
with keeping it secret.
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Just another mindless defence of the most useless and dangerous government in NZ history. So typical of the left these days and those who represent and hope to represent them in parliament!
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 05:50:58 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-05, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Exactly - disgraceful!
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:45:34 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Stop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a gag
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral >>>>> >>>government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about >>>>> the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for theNot for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable.https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" >>>>> >>the
info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
There
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the
deliberate
hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now.
prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy >>>>> some do forget . . .
order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked rough
shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you are
Rich! They're not fit to govern!!!
So tell me Rich. What does this from the oia mean to a comprehensionless
imbecile like you?! :" From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total
of
478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted,
covering approximately
11,005 workers. "
Let us not forget that this came to light via an Official Informantion >>>request. It was not in the public domain until now.
Which Government gives out gaging orders? The Labour Government. Free Speech
was not allowed. They would like us to forget.
I am not aware of any gaging orders or even gagging orders - do eitherWho are you talking to?
of you have any reference to such a thing during Covid? I think you
are lying - I simply do not believe you. Prove me wrong if you can . .
I did not write the comments that you appear to be addressing.
Your use of this medium gets worse every year.
What we did have was a lot of people that wanted to work while their >normal employer could not use them - that included some government >departments as well as many companies. The government needed people to >work from home on things like tracking connections when an infection
was identified - a job that arose very quickly. There would have been >quite a few other circumstances where companies would have encouraged
some people in similar circumstances to work from home.
Coupled with that some people did not want to have vaccinations in the >early stages due to other medical conditions - during that time I
doubt there were 11,000 anti vax nutters, but there were some
legitimate reasons why they may have been advised to wait in isolation
- some may have waited for quite some time before getting vaccinated,
but from that time fully supported the vaccine and kept up to date. No >limitations were placed on free speech, but provided someone was
isolating and not putting others at risk then why not grant an
exemption?
As for not having published the data, the reality is that they were >incredibly busy, and probably nobody had asked for the data. One itApart from your deliberate and lazy method of discourse you are wrong in your
was asked for, they recognised that it may be of interest to others so >voluntarily made the information public - that is hardly consistent
with keeping it secret.
later comments. 11000 people were exempted including hundreds of health department folk - that is now proven. Address that and forget the distractions.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 05:50:58 -0000 (UTC), TonyWho are you talking to?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-05, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Exactly - disgraceful!
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:45:34 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Stop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a gag >>>>>order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked rough
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral >>>>>> >>>government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy >>>>>> some do forget . . .Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable.https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" >>>>>> >>the
info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
There
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the
deliberate
hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now. >>>>>> Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about >>>>>> the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the
shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you are
Rich! They're not fit to govern!!!
So tell me Rich. What does this from the oia mean to a comprehensionless >>>>>imbecile like you?! :" From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total >>>>>of
478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted, >>>>>covering approximately
11,005 workers. "
Let us not forget that this came to light via an Official Informantion >>>>request. It was not in the public domain until now.
Which Government gives out gaging orders? The Labour Government. Free Speech
was not allowed. They would like us to forget.
I am not aware of any gaging orders or even gagging orders - do either
of you have any reference to such a thing during Covid? I think you
are lying - I simply do not believe you. Prove me wrong if you can . .
I did not write the comments that you appear to be addressing.
Your use of this medium gets worse every year.
Apart from your deliberate and lazy method of discourse you are wrong in your >later comments. 11000 people were exempted including hundreds of health >department folk - that is now proven. Address that and forget the distractions.
What we did have was a lot of people that wanted to work while their
normal employer could not use them - that included some government >>departments as well as many companies. The government needed people to
work from home on things like tracking connections when an infection
was identified - a job that arose very quickly. There would have been
quite a few other circumstances where companies would have encouraged
some people in similar circumstances to work from home.
Coupled with that some people did not want to have vaccinations in the >>early stages due to other medical conditions - during that time I
doubt there were 11,000 anti vax nutters, but there were some
legitimate reasons why they may have been advised to wait in isolation
- some may have waited for quite some time before getting vaccinated,
but from that time fully supported the vaccine and kept up to date. No >>limitations were placed on free speech, but provided someone was
isolating and not putting others at risk then why not grant an
exemption?
As for not having published the data, the reality is that they were >>incredibly busy, and probably nobody had asked for the data. One it
was asked for, they recognised that it may be of interest to others so >>voluntarily made the information public - that is hardly consistent
with keeping it secret.
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 20:27:49 -0000 (UTC), TonyI did not make that assertion you dimwit.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 05:50:58 -0000 (UTC), TonyWho are you talking to?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-05, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Exactly - disgraceful!
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:45:34 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Stop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a >>>>>>gag
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral >>>>>>> >>>government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about >>>>>>> the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the >>>>>>> prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easy >>>>>>> some do forget . . .Not for me - they deliberately withheld this information -https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats" >>>>>>> >>the
info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
unnaceptable.
There
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the
deliberate
hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now.
order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked >>>>>>rough
shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you >>>>>>are
Rich! They're not fit to govern!!!
So tell me Rich. What does this from the oia mean to a comprehensionless >>>>>>imbecile like you?! :" From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a >>>>>>total
of
478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted, >>>>>>covering approximately
11,005 workers. "
Let us not forget that this came to light via an Official Informantion >>>>>request. It was not in the public domain until now.
Which Government gives out gaging orders? The Labour Government. Free >>>>>Speech
was not allowed. They would like us to forget.
I am not aware of any gaging orders or even gagging orders - do either
of you have any reference to such a thing during Covid? I think you
are lying - I simply do not believe you. Prove me wrong if you can . .
I did not write the comments that you appear to be addressing.
Your use of this medium gets worse every year.
Apart from your deliberate and lazy method of discourse you are wrong in your >>later comments. 11000 people were exempted including hundreds of health >>department folk - that is now proven. Address that and forget the >>distractions.
What we did have was a lot of people that wanted to work while their >>>normal employer could not use them - that included some government >>>departments as well as many companies. The government needed people to >>>work from home on things like tracking connections when an infection
was identified - a job that arose very quickly. There would have been >>>quite a few other circumstances where companies would have encouraged >>>some people in similar circumstances to work from home.
Coupled with that some people did not want to have vaccinations in the >>>early stages due to other medical conditions - during that time I
doubt there were 11,000 anti vax nutters, but there were some
legitimate reasons why they may have been advised to wait in isolation
- some may have waited for quite some time before getting vaccinated,
but from that time fully supported the vaccine and kept up to date. No >>>limitations were placed on free speech, but provided someone was >>>isolating and not putting others at risk then why not grant an
exemption?
As for not having published the data, the reality is that they were >>>incredibly busy, and probably nobody had asked for the data. One it
was asked for, they recognised that it may be of interest to others so >>>voluntarily made the information public - that is hardly consistent
with keeping it secret.
I gave an example of the sort of jobs that grew quickly for a short
time and have now largely disappeared, which were quite reasonable
exceptions to employer mandates. You and John pos tag team each other- >neither of you have been able to support the assertion that there had
been a gagging order or that free speech was limited - clean up your
own house first, Tony.
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 20:27:49 -0000 (UTC), TonyNo Rich as usual YOU have failed to provide any evidence to support your own unscientific and useless "opinion'. Produce some evidence to support your garbage or be confirmed as the pos that you are beyond any doubt!
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:I gave an example of the sort of jobs that grew quickly for a short
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 05:50:58 -0000 (UTC), TonyI did not write the comments that you appear to be addressing.
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-05, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Exactly - disgraceful!
On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 1:45:34 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:31:00 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Stop talking fucking shit! Those who got the dispensations also got a gag
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-10-04, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah right! What a crock! Labour lied like the secretive and feral
government they are!
https://fyi.org.nz/request/23284/response/88679/attach/html/4/HNZ00023978%20Response%20Letter.pdf.html
But wait there is more
Not deliberately withheld at all. There was a lot of publicity about >>>>>> the ability to seek an exemption, but possibly even more for the >>>>>> prosecution of a "doctor" giving fake exemption certificates. How easyNot for me - they deliberately withheld this information - unnaceptable.https://hatchardreport.com/the-ministry-of-health-granted-vaccine-exemptions-to-hundreds-among-its-key-staff/
Skip the first few paragraphs if you are in a hurry, as it "repeats"
the
info of the link above.
It is hard to find words of the Governments action.
There
can be no possible reason for all those exemptions and all the >>>>>> >deliberate
hiding of the facts. There should be people on their way to prison now.
some do forget . . .
order you pos!!! YOUR useless and dangerous fucking government walked rough
shod over common decency and prove they're even more deceptive than you are
Rich! They're not fit to govern!!!
So tell me Rich. What does this from the oia mean to a comprehensionless
imbecile like you?! :" From 13 November 2021 to 26 September 2022, a total
of
478 applications for Significant Service
Disruption exemption (SSD) were received. 103 applications were granted,
covering approximately
11,005 workers. "
Let us not forget that this came to light via an Official Informantion >>>>request. It was not in the public domain until now.
Which Government gives out gaging orders? The Labour Government. Free Speech
was not allowed. They would like us to forget.
I am not aware of any gaging orders or even gagging orders - do either >>of you have any reference to such a thing during Covid? I think you
are lying - I simply do not believe you. Prove me wrong if you can . . >Who are you talking to?
Your use of this medium gets worse every year.
Apart from your deliberate and lazy method of discourse you are wrong in your
What we did have was a lot of people that wanted to work while their >>normal employer could not use them - that included some government >>departments as well as many companies. The government needed people to >>work from home on things like tracking connections when an infection
was identified - a job that arose very quickly. There would have been >>quite a few other circumstances where companies would have encouraged >>some people in similar circumstances to work from home.
Coupled with that some people did not want to have vaccinations in the >>early stages due to other medical conditions - during that time I
doubt there were 11,000 anti vax nutters, but there were some
legitimate reasons why they may have been advised to wait in isolation
- some may have waited for quite some time before getting vaccinated, >>but from that time fully supported the vaccine and kept up to date. No >>limitations were placed on free speech, but provided someone was >>isolating and not putting others at risk then why not grant an >>exemption?
As for not having published the data, the reality is that they were >>incredibly busy, and probably nobody had asked for the data. One it
was asked for, they recognised that it may be of interest to others so >>voluntarily made the information public - that is hardly consistent
with keeping it secret.
later comments. 11000 people were exempted including hundreds of health >department folk - that is now proven. Address that and forget the distractions.
time and have now largely disappeared, which were quite reasonable exceptions to employer mandates. You and John pos tag team each other- neither of you have been able to support the assertion that there had
been a gagging order or that free speech was limited - clean up your
own house first, Tony.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 119:57:41 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,210 |
| Messages: | 5,334,422 |