Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF >sympathisers.
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF sympathisers.
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don'tNats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get done.
Much prefer just Nat/ACT, with Winston offered a bauble or two outside the coalition to keep him occupied and out of trouble.
Perhaps put him in charge of all things Maori.
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45 AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:climate.
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF sympathisers.Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get done.Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers (except for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would promise an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in the current global economic
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive facial tics and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a slumpgut Waste Management driver. No charm, nosophistication, no originality, no sense of direction, no cred.
Much prefer just Nat/ACT, with Winston offered a bauble or two outside the coalition to keep him occupied and out of trouble.
Perhaps put him in charge of all things Maori.
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF
sympathisers.
Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get done. Much prefer just Nat/ACT, with Winston offered a bauble or two outside the coalition to keep him occupied and out of trouble.
Perhaps put him in charge of all things Maori.
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>It is if it fits.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James Christophers wrote: >>> On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:For all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers (except >>>for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would promise
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get done.
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in the >>>current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or >>>statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive facial tics >>>and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a slumpgut Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no sense of >>>direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
forum for medical advice . . .
Much prefer just Nat/ACT, with Winston offered a bauble or two outside >>> >the coalition to keep him occupied and out of trouble.
Perhaps put him in charge of all things Maori.
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James Christophers wrote:climate.
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers (except for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would promise an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in the current global economic
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get done.
sophistication, no originality, no sense of direction, no cred.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive facial tics and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a slumpgut Waste Management driver. No charm, no
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?For all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the
Much prefer just Nat/ACT, with Winston offered a bauble or two outside the coalition to keep him occupied and out of trouble.
Perhaps put him in charge of all things Maori.
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>It is if it fits.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James ChristophersFor all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:(except
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get done. >> >>> Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would
promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in the >> >>>current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or
statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive facial >> >>>tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a slumpgut >> >>>Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no sense >> >>>of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
forum for medical advice . . .
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so >>childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when appropriate, as >here.
Think on.
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>
wrote:
It is if it fits.On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James Christophers wrote:For all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the >forum for medical advice . . .
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would promise
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led >>> > > government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF >>> > > sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get done. >>> Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers (except
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in the >>>current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or >>>statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive facial tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a slumpgut Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no sense of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so childish
of you - a classic symptom.
Do I? Maybe you are indulging yourself.James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48 PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>It is if it fits.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James ChristophersFor all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led >> >> >>> > > government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the >> >> >>> > > election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF >> >> >>> > > sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get
done.
(except
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would >> >> >>>promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in >> >> >>>the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or
statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive
facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a
slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no
sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
forum for medical advice . . .
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so
childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when appropriate, >> >as
here.
Think on.
You know I make no such claim, so why suggest such a thing?
James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48 PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>It is if it fits.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James ChristophersFor all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led >> >>> > > government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the >> >>> > > election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF >> >>> > > sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get done.
(except
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would >> >>>promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or
statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
forum for medical advice . . .
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so >>childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when appropriate, as
here.
Think on.And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.
James Christophers <jmschristophers@gmail.com> wrote:As the tinyurl appears to have expired, perhaps it is time to leave
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:06:23 PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Do I? Maybe you are indulging yourself.James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48 PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>It is if it fits.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James Christophers >>> >> >>wrote:For all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the >>> >> >forum for medical advice . . .
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote: >>> >> >>> > On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:
Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers >>> >> >>>(exceptLooks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't >>> >> >>> > > party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the >>> >> >>> > > election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get >>> >> >>> >done.
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would
promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in >>> >> >>>the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or
statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive
facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a
slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no >>> >> >>>sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so
childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when appropriate,
as
here.
Think on.
You know I make no such claim, so why suggest such a thing?
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:46:34 -0000 (UTC), TonyI don't care about Winston one way or the other. I have one wish - to see this undemocratic government served a thrashing at the election.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
James Christophers <jmschristophers@gmail.com> wrote:As the tinyurl appears to have expired, perhaps it is time to leave
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:06:23 PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Do I? Maybe you are indulging yourself.James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48 PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com> >>>> >> >wrote:It is if it fits.
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James Christophers >>>> >> >>wrote:For all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the >>>> >> >forum for medical advice . . .
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote: >>>> >> >>> > On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote: >>>> >> >>> > > Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:
Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers >>>> >> >>>(exceptNats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a
Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't >>>> >> >>> > > party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the >>>> >> >>> > > election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to >>>> >> >>> > >NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get >>>> >> >>> >done.
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers >>>> >> >>>would
promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in >>>> >> >>>the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or
statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive >>>> >> >>>facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a
slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no >>>> >> >>>sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so >>>> >>childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when
appropriate,
as
here.
Think on.
You know I make no such claim, so why suggest such a thing?
the thread which Tony is desperately trying to edge away from the
subject of National and NZF. Start another thread if you wish Tony,
but as Crash said in the initial post, "Looks like Luxon will do a
deal with Winston if he has to: "
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:46:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:As the tinyurl appears to have expired, perhaps it is time to leave
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:06:23 PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Do I? Maybe you are indulging yourself.James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48 PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com> >>> >> >wrote:It is if it fits.
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James ChristophersFor all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote: >>> >> >>> > > Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to: >>> >> >>> > >Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers >>> >> >>>(except
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get >>> >> >>> >done.
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would
promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in
the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or >>> >> >>>statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive >>> >> >>>facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a >>> >> >>>slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no >>> >> >>>sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
forum for medical advice . . .
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so >>> >>childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when appropriate,
as
here.
Think on.
You know I make no such claim, so why suggest such a thing?
the thread which Tony is desperately trying to edge away from the
subject of National and NZF. Start another thread if you wish Tony,
but as Crash said in the initial post, "Looks like Luxon will do a
deal with Winston if he has to: "
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:25:29 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:productivity), Luxon has no way whatever of funding the policies he says he intends to introduce if he becomes PM. The shallow little question-dodger is, essentially, all mouth and trousers. And he knows it - or does he?
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:46:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
New Zealanders don't produce enough of sufficient **real**value to earn their keep. They are, collectively, economically indolent; so much so that, unless and until New Zealand begins to produce higher value from its labour force (increased **real**James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:As the tinyurl appears to have expired, perhaps it is time to leave
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:06:23 PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Do I? Maybe you are indulging yourself.James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48 PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>It is if it fits.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James ChristophersFor all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote: >>> >> >>> > > Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to: >>> >> >>> > >Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get
done.
(except
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would
promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in
the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or >>> >> >>>statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive >>> >> >>>facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a >>> >> >>>slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no
sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
forum for medical advice . . .
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so
childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when appropriate,
as
here.
Think on.
You know I make no such claim, so why suggest such a thing?
the thread which Tony is desperately trying to edge away from the
subject of National and NZF. Start another thread if you wish Tony,
but as Crash said in the initial post, "Looks like Luxon will do a
deal with Winston if he has to: "
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 11:20:53?AM UTC+13, James Christophers wrote:productivity), Luxon has no way whatever of funding the policies he says he intends to introduce if he becomes PM. The shallow little question-dodger is, essentially, all mouth and trousers. And he knows it - or does he?
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:25:29?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:46:34 -0000 (UTC), TonyNew Zealanders don't produce enough of sufficient **real**value to earn their keep. They are, collectively, economically indolent; so much so that, unless and until New Zealand begins to produce higher value from its labour force (increased **real**
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:As the tinyurl appears to have expired, perhaps it is time to leave
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:06:23?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Do I? Maybe you are indulging yourself.James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>It is if it fits.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James ChristophersFor all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote: >> > >>> >> >>> > > Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to: >> > >>> >> >>> > >Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get
done.
(except
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would
promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in
the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or >> > >>> >> >>>statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive >> > >>> >> >>>facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a >> > >>> >> >>>slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no
sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
forum for medical advice . . .
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so
childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when appropriate,
as
here.
Think on.
You know I make no such claim, so why suggest such a thing?
the thread which Tony is desperately trying to edge away from the
subject of National and NZF. Start another thread if you wish Tony,
but as Crash said in the initial post, "Looks like Luxon will do a
deal with Winston if he has to: "
Talking about shallow Keith. You have almost as much depth as Rich when it comes to National/ACT. Jealous that so many of their politicians have been more successful than you?
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:59:48 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 11:20:53?AM UTC+13, James Christophers >>wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:25:29?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:Talking about shallow Keith. You have almost as much depth as Rich when it >>comes to National/ACT. Jealous that so many of their politicians have been more
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:46:34 -0000 (UTC), TonyNew Zealanders don't produce enough of sufficient **real**value to earn >>>their keep. They are, collectively, economically indolent; so much so that, >>>unless and until New Zealand begins to produce higher value from its labour >>>force (increased **real** productivity), Luxon has no way whatever of funding
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:As the tinyurl appears to have expired, perhaps it is time to leave
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:06:23?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Do I? Maybe you are indulging yourself.James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnOIt is if it fits.
<john...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, JamesFor all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not >>> > >>> >> >the
Christophers
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO >>> > >>> >> >>>wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, CrashAlready damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by
wrote:
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to: >>> > >>> >> >>> > >Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a
Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you >>> > >>> >> >>> > >don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston
after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal >>> > >>> >> >>> > >to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will >>> > >>> >> >>> >get
done.
chancers
(except
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical
chancers would
promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot
afford in
the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or >>> > >>> >> >>>statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of
furtive
facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a >>> > >>> >> >>>slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, >>> > >>> >> >>>no
sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
forum for medical advice . . .
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - >>> > >>> >>so
childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when
appropriate,
as
here.
Think on.
You know I make no such claim, so why suggest such a thing?
the thread which Tony is desperately trying to edge away from the
subject of National and NZF. Start another thread if you wish Tony,
but as Crash said in the initial post, "Looks like Luxon will do a
deal with Winston if he has to: "
the policies he says he intends to introduce if he becomes PM. The shallow >>>little question-dodger is, essentially, all mouth and trousers. And he knows it
- or does he?
successful than you?
Most New Zealanders do not measure a politicians success as coming
from self-enrichment, or enriching foreign owners of banks and other >companies including our electricity companies sold off cheap by
National. An accusation you have made many, many times and never with proof.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Correction.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:59:48 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 11:20:53?AM UTC+13, James Christophers >>>wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:25:29?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >>>> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:46:34 -0000 (UTC), TonyTalking about shallow Keith. You have almost as much depth as Rich when it >>>comes to National/ACT. Jealous that so many of their politicians have been >>>more
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:New Zealanders don't produce enough of sufficient **real**value to earn >>>>their keep. They are, collectively, economically indolent; so much so that, >>>>unless and until New Zealand begins to produce higher value from its labour >>>>force (increased **real** productivity), Luxon has no way whatever of >>>>funding
James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:As the tinyurl appears to have expired, perhaps it is time to leave
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:06:23?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Do I? Maybe you are indulging yourself.James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote: >>>> > >>> >> Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnOIt is if it fits.
<john...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, JamesFor all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is >>>> > >>> >> >not
Christophers
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO >>>> > >>> >> >>>wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, CrashAlready damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by
wrote:
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has >>>> > >>> >> >>> > >to:Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a >>>> > >>> >> >>> > >Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you >>>> > >>> >> >>> > >don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston >>>> > >>> >> >>> > >after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to
appeal
to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will >>>> > >>> >> >>> >get
done.
chancers
(except
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical
chancers would
promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot >>>> > >>> >> >>>afford in
the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma >>>> > >>> >> >>>or
statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of
furtive
facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of >>>> > >>> >> >>>a
slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no
originality,
no
sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
the
forum for medical advice . . .
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - >>>> > >>> >>so
childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when
appropriate,
as
here.
Think on.
You know I make no such claim, so why suggest such a thing?
the thread which Tony is desperately trying to edge away from the
subject of National and NZF. Start another thread if you wish Tony,
but as Crash said in the initial post, "Looks like Luxon will do a
deal with Winston if he has to: "
the policies he says he intends to introduce if he becomes PM. The shallow >>>>little question-dodger is, essentially, all mouth and trousers. And he >>>>knows it
- or does he?
successful than you?
Most New Zealanders do not measure a politicians success as coming
from self-enrichment, or enriching foreign owners of banks and other >>companies including our electricity companies sold off cheap by
National.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:59:48 -0700 (PDT), John Bowesproductivity), Luxon has no way whatever of funding the policies he says he intends to introduce if he becomes PM. The shallow little question-dodger is, essentially, all mouth and trousers. And he knows it - or does he?
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 11:20:53?AM UTC+13, James Christophers wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:25:29?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:46:34 -0000 (UTC), TonyNew Zealanders don't produce enough of sufficient **real**value to earn their keep. They are, collectively, economically indolent; so much so that, unless and until New Zealand begins to produce higher value from its labour force (increased **real**
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:As the tinyurl appears to have expired, perhaps it is time to leave
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:06:23?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Do I? Maybe you are indulging yourself.James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>It is if it fits.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James ChristophersFor all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get
done.
(except
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would
promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in
the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or
statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive
facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a
slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no
sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
forum for medical advice . . .
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so
childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when appropriate,
as
here.
Think on.
You know I make no such claim, so why suggest such a thing?
the thread which Tony is desperately trying to edge away from the
subject of National and NZF. Start another thread if you wish Tony,
but as Crash said in the initial post, "Looks like Luxon will do a
deal with Winston if he has to: "
They also judge them by how much they achieved. Something your left wing mates are incapable of Rich! Most of the left have enriched themselves by sitting on their arses and talking up a storm when NZers were suffering from poverty, storms and governmentTalking about shallow Keith. You have almost as much depth as Rich when it comes to National/ACT. Jealous that so many of their politicians have been more successful than you?Most New Zealanders do not measure a politicians success as coming
from self-enrichment, or enriching foreign owners of banks and other companies including our electricity companies sold off cheap by
National.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 22:22:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowesreal** productivity), Luxon has no way whatever of funding the policies he says he intends to introduce if he becomes PM. The shallow little question-dodger is, essentially, all mouth and trousers. And he knows it - or does he?
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 3:17:21?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:59:48 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 11:20:53?AM UTC+13, James Christophers wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:25:29?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:46:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:New Zealanders don't produce enough of sufficient **real**value to earn their keep. They are, collectively, economically indolent; so much so that, unless and until New Zealand begins to produce higher value from its labour force (increased **
James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:As the tinyurl appears to have expired, perhaps it is time to leave >> >> > the thread which Tony is desperately trying to edge away from the
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:06:23?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Do I? Maybe you are indulging yourself.James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote: >> >> > >>> >> Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>It is if it fits.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James ChristophersFor all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get
done.
(except
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would
promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in
the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or
statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive
facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a
slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no
sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
forum for medical advice . . .
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so
childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when appropriate,
as
here.
Think on.
You know I make no such claim, so why suggest such a thing?
subject of National and NZF. Start another thread if you wish Tony, >> >> > but as Crash said in the initial post, "Looks like Luxon will do a >> >> > deal with Winston if he has to: "
government inefficiencies! And you fucking well know this Rich!They also judge them by how much they achieved. Something your left wing mates are incapable of Rich! Most of the left have enriched themselves by sitting on their arses and talking up a storm when NZers were suffering from poverty, storms andTalking about shallow Keith. You have almost as much depth as Rich when it comes to National/ACT. Jealous that so many of their politicians have been more successful than you?Most New Zealanders do not measure a politicians success as coming
from self-enrichment, or enriching foreign owners of banks and other
companies including our electricity companies sold off cheap by
National.
You are all crap, John. The current government have settled a basis
for dealing with homes that cannot be rebuilt and are getting things
done far faster than National did with Christchurch - some insurance
issues are still not resolved there!
Meanwhile National are still unable to sort out where the money is
coming from to cover the promises they have made - they are waiting
until the last minute; while more economists are saying they have a
big hole and cannot meet their promises. More people trust Hipkins to
know what ordinary people are going through; Luxon is seen as out of
touch. It is still looking like a close election, but National are
losing the polling lead to the undecided . . .
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 3:17:21?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:productivity), Luxon has no way whatever of funding the policies he says he intends to introduce if he becomes PM. The shallow little question-dodger is, essentially, all mouth and trousers. And he knows it - or does he?
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:59:48 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 11:20:53?AM UTC+13, James Christophers wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:25:29?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:46:34 -0000 (UTC), TonyNew Zealanders don't produce enough of sufficient **real**value to earn their keep. They are, collectively, economically indolent; so much so that, unless and until New Zealand begins to produce higher value from its labour force (increased **real**
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:As the tinyurl appears to have expired, perhaps it is time to leave
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:06:23?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Do I? Maybe you are indulging yourself.James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>It is if it fits.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James ChristophersFor all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get
done.
(except
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would
promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in
the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or
statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive
facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a
slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no
sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
forum for medical advice . . .
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so
childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when appropriate,
as
here.
Think on.
You know I make no such claim, so why suggest such a thing?
the thread which Tony is desperately trying to edge away from the
subject of National and NZF. Start another thread if you wish Tony,
but as Crash said in the initial post, "Looks like Luxon will do a
deal with Winston if he has to: "
government inefficiencies! And you fucking well know this Rich!They also judge them by how much they achieved. Something your left wing mates are incapable of Rich! Most of the left have enriched themselves by sitting on their arses and talking up a storm when NZers were suffering from poverty, storms andTalking about shallow Keith. You have almost as much depth as Rich when it comes to National/ACT. Jealous that so many of their politicians have been more successful than you?Most New Zealanders do not measure a politicians success as coming
from self-enrichment, or enriching foreign owners of banks and other
companies including our electricity companies sold off cheap by
National.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 22:22:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes* productivity), Luxon has no way whatever of funding the policies he says he intends to introduce if he becomes PM. The shallow little question-dodger is, essentially, all mouth and trousers. And he knows it - or does he?
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 3:17:21?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:59:48 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 11:20:53?AM UTC+13, James Christophers wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:25:29?PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >>> >> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 06:46:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:New Zealanders don't produce enough of sufficient **real**value to earn their keep. They are, collectively, economically indolent; so much so that, unless and until New Zealand begins to produce higher value from its labour force (increased **real*
James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:As the tinyurl appears to have expired, perhaps it is time to leave >>> >> > the thread which Tony is desperately trying to edge away from the
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 7:06:23?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Do I? Maybe you are indulging yourself.James Christophers <jmschri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 5:28:48?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
And you are the arbiter of that? Think on.On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 19:30:30 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>It is if it fits.
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 13:28:12 UTC+13, James ChristophersFor all we know Luxon may already be taking them, but this is not the
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:30:45?AM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
On Monday, 25 September 2023 at 18:06:20 UTC+13, Crash wrote:Already damned by its uninspiring collection of drive-by chancers
Looks like Luxon will do a deal with Winston if he has to:Nats/Luxon seem too scared to do that.
https://tinyurl.com/3y4smsw6
While this is undesirable, it is more desirable than a Labour-led
government.
Ultimately though the voters have the final say - if you don't
party-vote NZF, no-one will have to deal with Winston after the
election. I hope that National makes some effort to appeal to NZF
sympathisers.
I fear that under a Nat/ACT/NZF coalition nothing much will get
done.
(except
for Peters), such an ill-assorted ragbag of egotistical chancers would
promise
an era of political instability this country simply cannot afford in
the
current global economic climate.
Worse, Luxon is irredeemably bereft of any hint of charisma or
statesmanship, this only made worse by his repertoire of furtive
facial
tics
and his dullard's one-note persona too tragically redolent of a
slumpgut
Waste
Management driver. No charm, no sophistication, no originality, no
sense
of
direction, no cred.
Have you ever considered anti-depressants?
forum for medical advice . . .
Especially when you deliberately twist who JohnO was talking to - so
childish
of you - a classic symptom.
A well-timed leavening of the discourse is to be welcomed when appropriate,
as
here.
Think on.
You know I make no such claim, so why suggest such a thing?
subject of National and NZF. Start another thread if you wish Tony, >>> >> > but as Crash said in the initial post, "Looks like Luxon will do a
deal with Winston if he has to: "
wing mates are incapable of Rich! Most of the left have enrichedThey also judge them by how much they achieved. Something your leftTalking about shallow Keith. You have almost as much depth as Rich when it comes to National/ACT. Jealous that so many of their politicians have been more successful than you?Most New Zealanders do not measure a politicians success as coming
from self-enrichment, or enriching foreign owners of banks and other
companies including our electricity companies sold off cheap by
National.
themselves by sitting on their arses and talking up a storm when
NZers were suffering from poverty, storms and government inefficiencies!
And you fucking well know this Rich!
You are all crap, John. The current government have settled a basis
for dealing with homes that cannot be rebuilt and are getting things
done far faster than National did with Christchurch - some insurance
issues are still not resolved there!
Meanwhile National are still unable to sort out where the money is
coming from to cover the promises they have made - they are waiting
until the last minute; while more economists are saying they have a
big hole and cannot meet their promises. More people trust Hipkins to
know what ordinary people are going through; Luxon is seen as out of
touch. It is still looking like a close election, but National are
losing the polling lead to the undecided . . .
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 106:13:38 |
| Calls: | 6,661 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,403 |