"Live: Labour promises 6000 more state homes, National vows to reinstate >100kph highway limits"The 100kph limits on roads designed for that speed makes sense.
Which is more likely to happen? A thought experiement of course as it one >party of the other.
Does anyone know how far 6000 state homes would go to cure the ills of the >housing? As in has the Government compissioned a report on it. This would >give a figure to aim at. Get everyone on the same page and allow
building to continue regardless of the election(s) results.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/300976587/live-labour-promises-6000-more-state-homes-national-vows-to-reinstate-100kph-highway-limits6,000 new houses? Sounds like their promise to build 100,000 houses. They'll wail it's to hard after they haven't built 600 in two years and drop it! Labour promises aren't worth the paper they're not writen on!
"Live: Labour promises 6000 more state homes, National vows to reinstate 100kph highway limits"
Which is more likely to happen? A thought experiement of course as it one party of the other.
Does anyone know how far 6000 state homes would go to cure the ills of the housing? As in has the Government compissioned a report on it. This would give a figure to aim at. Get everyone on the same page and allow
building to continue regardless of the election(s) results.
Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:No problem. We'd be lucky to see 600 from these grifters if they manage to win the election! :)
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/300976587/live-labour-promises-6000-more-state-homes-national-vows-to-reinstate-100kph-highway-limits
The 100kph limits on roads designed for that speed makes sense.
"Live: Labour promises 6000 more state homes, National vows to reinstate >>100kph highway limits"
Which is more likely to happen? A thought experiement of course as it one >>party of the other.
Does anyone know how far 6000 state homes would go to cure the ills of the >>housing? As in has the Government compissioned a report on it. This would >>give a figure to aim at. Get everyone on the same page and allow >>building to continue regardless of the election(s) results.
So does 600 more homes - trouble is this government has failed to produce >anything like the number of homes they have promised in the past - do we trust
them to do it now, when they are desperate to do anything to please? Apology, a typo - 6000 homes of course.
John, if they win the election it will be a sign that armageddon is nigh.Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:No problem. We'd be lucky to see 600 from these grifters if they manage to win >the election! :)
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Apology, a typo - 6000 homes of course.
The 100kph limits on roads designed for that speed makes sense.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/300976587/live-labour-promises-6000-more-state-homes-national-vows-to-reinstate-100kph-highway-limits
"Live: Labour promises 6000 more state homes, National vows to reinstate >> >>100kph highway limits"
Which is more likely to happen? A thought experiement of course as it one >> >>party of the other.
Does anyone know how far 6000 state homes would go to cure the ills of the >> >>housing? As in has the Government compissioned a report on it. This would >> >>give a figure to aim at. Get everyone on the same page and allow
building to continue regardless of the election(s) results.
So does 600 more homes - trouble is this government has failed to produce >> >anything like the number of homes they have promised in the past - do we
trust
them to do it now, when they are desperate to do anything to please?
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/300976587/live-labour-promises-6000-more-state-homes-national-vows-to-reinstate-100kph-highway-limitsApology, a typo - 6000 homes of course.
The 100kph limits on roads designed for that speed makes sense.
"Live: Labour promises 6000 more state homes, National vows to reinstate >>100kph highway limits"
Which is more likely to happen? A thought experiement of course as it one >>party of the other.
Does anyone know how far 6000 state homes would go to cure the ills of the >>housing? As in has the Government compissioned a report on it. This would >>give a figure to aim at. Get everyone on the same page and allow
building to continue regardless of the election(s) results.
So does 600 more homes - trouble is this government has failed to produce >anything like the number of homes they have promised in the past - do we trust >them to do it now, when they are desperate to do anything to please?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 111:27:42 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,950 |