https://co2coalition.org/2021/10/31/97-consensus-what-consensus/?fbclid=IwAR2XQGPDCKpkFfzOMVvntDBz243pUZKMfIKpbirN5JlaLk3cVNCMKq9TMNQ
Nice to see some intelligent journalism again.
https://co2coalition.org/2021/10/31/97-consensus-what-consensus/?fbclid=IwAR2XQGPDCKpkFfzOMVvntDBz243pUZKMfIKpbirN5JlaLk3cVNCMKq9TMNQ
Nice to see some intelligent journalism again.
https://co2coalition.org/2021/10/31/97-consensus-what-consensus/?fbclid=IwAR2XQGPDCKpkFfzOMVvntDBz243pUZKMfIKpbirN5JlaLk3cVNCMKq9TMNQ
Nice to see some intelligent journalism again.
On Sun, 3 Sep 2023 20:28:24 -0000 (UTC), TonyNot for me, I just checked again.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://co2coalition.org/2021/10/31/97-consensus-what-consensus/?fbclid=IwAR2XQGPDCKpkFfzOMVvntDBz243pUZKMfIKpbirN5JlaLk3cVNCMKq9TMNQ
Nice to see some intelligent journalism again.
It said:
"Sorry, something went wrong
Please try closing and re-opening your browser window."
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Works for me as well.
On Sun, 3 Sep 2023 20:28:24 -0000 (UTC), TonyNot for me, I just checked again.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Nice to see some intelligent journalism again.https://co2coalition.org/2021/10/31/97-consensus-what-consensus/?fbclid=IwAR2XQGPDCKpkFfzOMVvntDBz243pUZKMfIKpbirN5JlaLk3cVNCMKq9TMNQ
It said:
"Sorry, something went wrong
Please try closing and re-opening your browser window."
On Sun, 3 Sep 2023 22:59:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Works for me as well.
On Sun, 3 Sep 2023 20:28:24 -0000 (UTC), TonyNot for me, I just checked again.
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Nice to see some intelligent journalism again.https://co2coalition.org/2021/10/31/97-consensus-what-consensus/?fbclid=IwAR2XQGPDCKpkFfzOMVvntDBz243pUZKMfIKpbirN5JlaLk3cVNCMKq9TMNQ
It said:
"Sorry, something went wrong
Please try closing and re-opening your browser window."
--Poor wee Richtheliar. Technical skills now so bad he can't open links he knows are going to make him, look like the imbecile he is:)
Crash McBash
On 2023-09-03, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://co2coalition.org/2021/10/31/97-consensus-what-consensus/?fbclid=IwAR2XQGPDCKpkFfzOMVvntDBz243pUZKMfIKpbirN5JlaLk3cVNCMKq9TMNQ
Nice to see some intelligent journalism again.
That is a power packed site
https://www.ceres-science.com/post/new-study-suggests-global-warming-could-be-mostly-an-urban-problem
There has been an idea that urban centres are hotter than the countryside and as
cities grow the center where the temp readings are taken will increase as
the city gets larger.
Looks from this that more study is needed but there is evidence of this
idea.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-09-03, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Because science does not matter to climate emergency freaks and politicians. >Thanks for that piece of real science Gordon.
On 2023-09-03, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Nice to see some intelligent journalism again.https://co2coalition.org/2021/10/31/97-consensus-what-consensus/?fbclid=IwAR2XQGPDCKpkFfzOMVvntDBz243pUZKMfIKpbirN5JlaLk3cVNCMKq9TMNQ
That is a power packed site
https://www.ceres-science.com/post/new-study-suggests-global-warming-could-be-mostly-an-urban-problem
There has been an idea that urban centres are hotter than the countryside >>>and as
cities grow the center where the temp readings are taken will increase as >>> the city gets larger.
Looks from this that more study is needed but there is evidence of this
idea.
Then there is also this hidden gem
"Climate scientists have determined, and both sides agree, that the warming >>effect of each molecule of CO2 decreases significantly (logarithmically)
as its concentration increases. This is one reason why there was no runaway >>greenhouse warming when the concentration of CO2 was approaching 20 times >>that of today. This inconvenient fact, important though it is, is kept
very well hidden and is rarely mentioned, for it undermines the theory
of future catastrophic climate change. Diminishing returns apply."
https://co2coalition.org/facts/the-warming-effect-of-each-molecule-of-co2-declines-as-its-concentration-increases/
"...both sides agree ". So why are we getting all stressed out?
On 2023-09-03, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Because science does not matter to climate emergency freaks and politicians. Thanks for that piece of real science Gordon.
On 2023-09-03, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Nice to see some intelligent journalism again.https://co2coalition.org/2021/10/31/97-consensus-what-consensus/?fbclid=IwAR2XQGPDCKpkFfzOMVvntDBz243pUZKMfIKpbirN5JlaLk3cVNCMKq9TMNQ
That is a power packed site
https://www.ceres-science.com/post/new-study-suggests-global-warming-could-be-mostly-an-urban-problem
There has been an idea that urban centres are hotter than the countryside >>and as
cities grow the center where the temp readings are taken will increase as
the city gets larger.
Looks from this that more study is needed but there is evidence of this
idea.
Then there is also this hidden gem
"Climate scientists have determined, and both sides agree, that the warming >effect of each molecule of CO2 decreases significantly (logarithmically)
as its concentration increases. This is one reason why there was no runaway >greenhouse warming when the concentration of CO2 was approaching 20 times >that of today. This inconvenient fact, important though it is, is kept
very well hidden and is rarely mentioned, for it undermines the theory
of future catastrophic climate change. Diminishing returns apply."
https://co2coalition.org/facts/the-warming-effect-of-each-molecule-of-co2-declines-as-its-concentration-increases/
"...both sides agree ". So why are we getting all stressed out?
On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 03:39:02 -0000 (UTC), TonyWhat physical work has actually been done there Rich? We've had a lot of talk from your Labour government but still seeing a lot of people asking when they're going to stop gaslighting and DO something! Now THAT is a consensus for you :)
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Some may have been too busy sorting out agreements on who pays for
On 2023-09-03, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Because science does not matter to climate emergency freaks and politicians.
On 2023-09-03, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Nice to see some intelligent journalism again.https://co2coalition.org/2021/10/31/97-consensus-what-consensus/?fbclid=IwAR2XQGPDCKpkFfzOMVvntDBz243pUZKMfIKpbirN5JlaLk3cVNCMKq9TMNQ
That is a power packed site
https://www.ceres-science.com/post/new-study-suggests-global-warming-could-be-mostly-an-urban-problem
There has been an idea that urban centres are hotter than the countryside
and as
cities grow the center where the temp readings are taken will increase as
the city gets larger.
Looks from this that more study is needed but there is evidence of this >>> idea.
Then there is also this hidden gem
"Climate scientists have determined, and both sides agree, that the warming
effect of each molecule of CO2 decreases significantly (logarithmically) >>as its concentration increases. This is one reason why there was no runaway
greenhouse warming when the concentration of CO2 was approaching 20 times >>that of today. This inconvenient fact, important though it is, is kept >>very well hidden and is rarely mentioned, for it undermines the theory >>of future catastrophic climate change. Diminishing returns apply."
https://co2coalition.org/facts/the-warming-effect-of-each-molecule-of-co2-declines-as-its-concentration-increases/
"...both sides agree ". So why are we getting all stressed out?
Thanks for that piece of real science Gordon.
what after Gabrielle and slips and flooding; and then getting the
physical work done to be able to reopen roads and rail lines - indeed
some may still be working on those issues while also campaigning for
the election . . . .
On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 03:39:02 -0000 (UTC), TonyWhich has nothing whatsoever to do with the topic or with anything to do with - well - anything.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-09-03, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Because science does not matter to climate emergency freaks and politicians. >>Thanks for that piece of real science Gordon.
On 2023-09-03, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Nice to see some intelligent journalism again.https://co2coalition.org/2021/10/31/97-consensus-what-consensus/?fbclid=IwAR2XQGPDCKpkFfzOMVvntDBz243pUZKMfIKpbirN5JlaLk3cVNCMKq9TMNQ
That is a power packed site
https://www.ceres-science.com/post/new-study-suggests-global-warming-could-be-mostly-an-urban-problem
There has been an idea that urban centres are hotter than the countryside >>>>and as
cities grow the center where the temp readings are taken will increase as >>>> the city gets larger.
Looks from this that more study is needed but there is evidence of this >>>> idea.
Then there is also this hidden gem
"Climate scientists have determined, and both sides agree, that the warming >>>effect of each molecule of CO2 decreases significantly (logarithmically) >>>as its concentration increases. This is one reason why there was no runaway >>>greenhouse warming when the concentration of CO2 was approaching 20 times >>>that of today. This inconvenient fact, important though it is, is kept >>>very well hidden and is rarely mentioned, for it undermines the theory
of future catastrophic climate change. Diminishing returns apply."
https://co2coalition.org/facts/the-warming-effect-of-each-molecule-of-co2-declines-as-its-concentration-increases/
"...both sides agree ". So why are we getting all stressed out?
Some may have been too busy sorting out agreements on who pays for
what after Gabrielle and slips and flooding; and then getting the
physical work done to be able to reopen roads and rail lines - indeed
some may still be working on those issues while also campaigning for
the election . . . .
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 121:09:46 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Files: | 12,212 |
Messages: | 5,334,487 |