On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), TonyThe only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could you please re-post in English?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - then who is the "Her" that we go again?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), TonyThe only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could you >please re-post in English?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
The original post stands alone. Your turn.
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertWell you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertWell you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:33:50 -0000 (UTC), TonyIt was a typo - I am staggered that you didn't pick that.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - then who is the "Her" that we go again?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), TonyThe only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could you >>please re-post in English?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
The original post stands alone. Your turn.
Do you not want scientists to track what is happening and keep usI certainly do and have not suggested otherwise. Do you want both sides tracked or just your pet side?
informed?
You appear to be saying that you posted without having anything to sayYou might think I appeared that way but your gibbering led you to that false conclusion (a commomn failure of yours).
- you do not know where you will not be going, or what you know too
much about - such is the gibbering of idiots . . .
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
To date, there is no evidence of significant changes in the public health impact of these sublineages and there is no justification for the assignment of a new “variant of concern”.
COVID-19 recommendations remain unchanged. In particular, PAHO strongly encourages all countries in the Region to continue collecting representative samples for sequencing and to maintain appropriate SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance.
On 25/08/23 17:22, Tony wrote:Others are Dr Jemma Geoghegan for example.
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Where won't you be going? Unlike you, the WHO is not getting stressed
about this. The WHO link in the cited Stuff article says:
To date, there is no evidence of significant changes in the public health >>impact of these sublineages and there is no justification for the assignment of
a new “variant of concern”.
COVID-19 recommendations remain unchanged. In particular, PAHO strongly >>encourages all countries in the Region to continue collecting representative >>samples for sequencing and to maintain appropriate SARS-CoV-2 genomic >>surveillance.
What problem(s) do you see with any of this? IOW, what's your problem?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read thehttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to >>make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand >>bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
into lockdown . . .
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertWell you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
into lockdown . . .
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:33:50 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - then who is the "Her" that we go again?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), TonyThe only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could you >>please re-post in English?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
The original post stands alone. Your turn.
Do you not want scientists to track what is happening and keep us
informed?
You appear to be saying that you posted without having anything to say
- you do not know where you will not be going, or what you know too
much about - such is the gibbering of idiots . . .
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertWell you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
into lockdown . . .
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
On 25/08/23 17:22, Tony wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Where won't you be going? Unlike you, the WHO is not getting stressed
about this. The WHO link in the cited Stuff article says:
To date, there is no evidence of significant changes in the public health impact of these sublineages and there is no justification for the assignment of a new “variant of concern”.
COVID-19 recommendations remain unchanged. In particular, PAHO strongly encourages all countries in the Region to continue collecting representative samples for sequencing and to maintain appropriate SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance.
What problem(s) do you see with any of this? IOW, what's your problem?
On 2023-08-25, Barb Knox <Barb@sig.below> wrote:Careful Gordon, you are giving some fool an idea.
On 25/08/23 17:22, Tony wrote:
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Where won't you be going? Unlike you, the WHO is not getting stressed
about this. The WHO link in the cited Stuff article says:
To date, there is no evidence of significant changes in the public health >>>impact of these sublineages and there is no justification for the assignment of
a new “variant of concern”.
COVID-19 recommendations remain unchanged. In particular, PAHO strongly >>>encourages all countries in the Region to continue collecting representative >>>samples for sequencing and to maintain appropriate SARS-CoV-2 genomic >>>surveillance.
The point is one of the MSM/WHO trying to keep the fear factor up. EG.5 was >just pasin by in the last few weeks, now is BA286, tomorrow it might be that >BA286 causing climate change.
At this stage the MSM should be emphsising that any/all viruses mutate, it
is part of nature. Now if a new virus goes wild it is going to take time >until things settle down.
We also have the case of being able sequence the virus and if we keep
looking at it, we well start to get a bias.
See above.
What problem(s) do you see with any of this? IOW, what's your problem?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:33:50 -0000 (UTC), TonyIt was a typo - I am staggered that you didn't pick that.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - then who is the "Her" that we go again?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:The original post stands alone. Your turn.
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>>article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>>and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>>major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>>this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>The only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could you >>>please re-post in English?
What two sides are you talking about?I certainly do and have not suggested otherwise. Do you want both sides tracked
Do you not want scientists to track what is happening and keep us
informed?
or just your pet side?
You might think I appeared that way but your gibbering led you to that false >conclusion (a commomn failure of yours).
You appear to be saying that you posted without having anything to say
- you do not know where you will not be going, or what you know too
much about - such is the gibbering of idiots . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Irrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is >the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read thehttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>> this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to >>>make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand >>>bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out! >>
into lockdown . . .
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
On 2023-08-25, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Then why publish the article? Okay in a scientic journal might be okay, but >MSM?
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
To you it seems has fooled himself, but to others it might be that the boot >is on the other foot.
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 10:44:05?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertWell you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
into lockdown . . .
Why? It isn't pertinent to Ardern dragging her heels. But go for your distraction because the fact is Ardern took two fucking weeks to follow the good advice she was getting from Bloomfield!
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:40:08 -0000 (UTC), TonyMore abuse but well we are used to that from you eh?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:33:50 -0000 (UTC), TonyIt was a typo - I am staggered that you didn't pick that.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - then who is the "Her" that we go again?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:The original post stands alone. Your turn.
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>>>article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>>>>have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>>precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>>>in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>>>and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>>>major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>>happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>>>this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>>The only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could you >>>>please re-post in English?
We are used to your staggering, Tony
The one that you are told to believe by your masters.What two sides are you talking about?I certainly do and have not suggested otherwise. Do you want both sides >>tracked
Do you not want scientists to track what is happening and keep us >>>informed?
or just your pet side?
You might think I appeared that way but your gibbering led you to that false >>conclusion (a commomn failure of yours).
You appear to be saying that you posted without having anything to say
- you do not know where you will not be going, or what you know too
much about - such is the gibbering of idiots . . .
On 25 Aug 2023 22:33:03 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Of course you know.
On 2023-08-25, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Then why publish the article? Okay in a scientic journal might be okay, but >>MSM?
I do not know why Tony posted the link to the article, or what he
meant by saying : "Except we will not be going there - we know too
much now. You can fool (fill in the rest)."
I don't see the article as trying to fool anyone. Our number of cases
/ deaths from Covid are still fluctuating, but the article does not
suggest that anyone is being fooled, or that anyone is going wherever
Tony was referring to, or what he thinks he knows too much about.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
To you it seems has fooled himself, but to others it might be that the boot >>is on the other foot.
Happy for you to explain further, Gordon.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:I don't have masters as you seem to think - but for you I refer again
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:40:08 -0000 (UTC), TonyMore abuse but well we are used to that from you eh?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:33:50 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:It was a typo - I am staggered that you didn't pick that.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - then who is the "Her" that we go again?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:The original post stands alone. Your turn.
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>>>>article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>>>>>have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>>>precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>>>>in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>>>>and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>>>>major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>>>happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>>>>this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>>>The only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could you >>>>>please re-post in English?
We are used to your staggering, Tony
The one that you are told to believe by your masters.
What two sides are you talking about?I certainly do and have not suggested otherwise. Do you want both sides >>>tracked
Do you not want scientists to track what is happening and keep us >>>>informed?
or just your pet side?
You might think I appeared that way but your gibbering led you to that false >>>conclusion (a commomn failure of yours).
You appear to be saying that you posted without having anything to say >>>>- you do not know where you will not be going, or what you know too >>>>much about - such is the gibbering of idiots . . .
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Irrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is >>the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read thehttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>>> in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>>> and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>> happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>>> this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to >>>>make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out! >>>
into lockdown . . .
The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
unnecessary delay . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>>
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Irrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>> article?https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>> in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>> and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>> happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>> this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to >>>make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
unnecessary delay . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 20:37:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:I don't have masters as you seem to think - but for you I refer again
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:40:08 -0000 (UTC), TonyMore abuse but well we are used to that from you eh?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:33:50 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:It was a typo - I am staggered that you didn't pick that.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - then who is the "Her" that we go again?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:The original post stands alone. Your turn.
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>>>>>article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>>>>>>have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>>>>precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>>>>>in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>>>>>and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>>>>>major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>>>>happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>>>>>this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>>>>The only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could you >>>>>>please re-post in English?
We are used to your staggering, Tony
The one that you are told to believe by your masters.
What two sides are you talking about?I certainly do and have not suggested otherwise. Do you want both sides >>>>tracked
Do you not want scientists to track what is happening and keep us >>>>>informed?
or just your pet side?
to this article: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/402555/christopher-luxon-suggests-extension-of-no-jab-no-pay-policy
and from that article:
Speaking on National's social services discussion document released
last week, Mr Luxon told Morning Report he backed the view of a "no
jab, no pay" policy for solo parent beneficiaries.
"It's about a notion of rights and responsibilities. If you want to be
part of New Zealand and a civil society, you have certain inalienable
rights but you also have responsibilities for the collective and in
helping the collective of New Zealand."
Asked if that policy should be extended to working families too, he
said it was a principle that needed to go across all of social and
public policy.
"It should [extend that far] ... that's hypothetical. What you're
asking me about is a principle and what I'm saying is when you go
through all the tactical issues around public policy and social
policy, I want to be guided by principle and the principle very much
is about rights and responsibilities.
"For example, there's been a reduction in sanctions around people
receiving benefits. If you don't show up for a job interview six or
seven times, we have to have those kinds of conversations, because the
New Zealand taxpayer is helping someone whose in a vulnerable and
difficult situation, but they have a responsibility on their own
personal case to actually do the best that they can."
and from that time: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/402099/national-floats-hard-line-policies-on-social-welfare
from which:
"Speaking to reporters in Christchurch, National leader Simon Bridges
threw his weight behind the proposal
"There is no good reason not to immunise your children in 2019. The
evidence is out and it's clear," he said.
"So if you don't want to vaccinate your child, here's the thing: don't
take taxpayers' money."
National considered introducing a so-called "no jab, no pay" policy in
2012, but then-Social Development Minister Paula Bennett opted against
it, saying it would breach people's right to refuse medical treatment.
In 2015, Australia adopted a policy where parents who refused to
vaccinate their children could be denied up to $15,000 in childcare
rebates.
At the time, then-Prime Minister John Key ruled out revisiting the
idea in New Zealand.
In a statement, Associate Health Minister Julie Anne Genter dismissed
the idea of a "no jab, no pay" policy.
"We will be guided by evidence of what will protect children, not
populist rhetoric," she said.
"We're focused on removing the barriers for people to get vaccinated.
We're making it easier for people to do the right thing, not punishing children for adults working multiple jobs, having poor transport
options, and struggling to see a GP."Speaking to reporters in
Christchurch, National leader Simon Bridges threw his weight behind
the proposal
"There is no good reason not to immunise your children in 2019. The
evidence is out and it's clear," he said.
"So if you don't want to vaccinate your child, here's the thing: don't
take taxpayers' money."
National considered introducing a so-called "no jab, no pay" policy in
2012, but then-Social Development Minister Paula Bennett opted against
it, saying it would breach people's right to refuse medical treatment.
In 2015, Australia adopted a policy where parents who refused to
vaccinate their children could be denied up to $15,000 in childcare
rebates.
At the time, then-Prime Minister John Key ruled out revisiting the
idea in New Zealand.
In a statement, Associate Health Minister Julie Anne Genter dismissed
the idea of a "no jab, no pay" policy.
"We will be guided by evidence of what will protect children, not
populist rhetoric," she said.
"We're focused on removing the barriers for people to get vaccinated.
We're making it easier for people to do the right thing, not punishing children for adults working multiple jobs, having poor transport
options, and struggling to see a GP." "
_________________________
You might think I appeared that way but your gibbering led you to that false
You appear to be saying that you posted without having anything to say >>>>>- you do not know where you will not be going, or what you know too >>>>>much about - such is the gibbering of idiots . . .
conclusion (a commomn failure of yours).
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 20:37:41 -0000 (UTC), TonyOff topic article removed. Try again Rich but on topic this time.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:I don't have masters as you seem to think - but for you I refer again
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:40:08 -0000 (UTC), TonyMore abuse but well we are used to that from you eh?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:33:50 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:It was a typo - I am staggered that you didn't pick that.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - then who is the "Her" that we go again?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:The original post stands alone. Your turn.
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>>>>>article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>>>>>>have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>>>>precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>>>>>in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>>>>>and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>>>>>major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>>>>happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>>>>>this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>>>>The only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could you >>>>>>please re-post in English?
We are used to your staggering, Tony
The one that you are told to believe by your masters.
What two sides are you talking about?I certainly do and have not suggested otherwise. Do you want both sides >>>>tracked
Do you not want scientists to track what is happening and keep us >>>>>informed?
or just your pet side?
to this article:
You might think I appeared that way but your gibbering led you to that >>>>false
You appear to be saying that you posted without having anything to say >>>>>- you do not know where you will not be going, or what you know too >>>>>much about - such is the gibbering of idiots . . .
conclusion (a commomn failure of yours).
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 20:37:41 -0000 (UTC), TonyOff topic article removed. Try again Rich but on topic this time.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:I don't have masters as you seem to think - but for you I refer again
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:40:08 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:More abuse but well we are used to that from you eh?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:33:50 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:It was a typo - I am staggered that you didn't pick that.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - then who is the "Her" that we go again?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:please re-post in English?
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>>>>>>article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>>>>>>>have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>>>>>precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>>>>>>in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>>>>>>and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>>>>>>major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>>>>>happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>>>>>>this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>>>>>The only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could you
The original post stands alone. Your turn.
We are used to your staggering, Tony
The one that you are told to believe by your masters.
What two sides are you talking about?I certainly do and have not suggested otherwise. Do you want both sides >>>>>tracked
Do you not want scientists to track what is happening and keep us >>>>>>informed?
or just your pet side?
to this article:
You might think I appeared that way but your gibbering led you to that >>>>>false
You appear to be saying that you posted without having anything to say >>>>>>- you do not know where you will not be going, or what you know too >>>>>>much about - such is the gibbering of idiots . . .
conclusion (a commomn failure of yours).
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read thehttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >> >>>> and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >> >>>> this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to >> >>>make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
unnecessary delay . . .
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you Rich!
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >> >>>
On 2023-08-26, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Irrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is >>>the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>>>> article?https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>>>>> have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>>>> in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>>>> and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>>>> major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>>> happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>>>> this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to >>>>>make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out! >>>>
into lockdown . . .
The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
unnecessary delay . . .
History has shown it to be the case.
QED
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>>>
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 22:26:44 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 20:37:41 -0000 (UTC), TonyOff topic article removed. Try again Rich but on topic this time.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:I don't have masters as you seem to think - but for you I refer again
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:40:08 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:More abuse but well we are used to that from you eh?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:33:50 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:It was a typo - I am staggered that you didn't pick that.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - then who is the "Her" that we go again?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:please re-post in English?
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now. >>>>>>>>>>You can fool (fill in the rest).https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>>>>>>>article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>>>>>>>>have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>>>>>>precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>>>>>>>in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>>>>>>>and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>>>>>>>major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>>>>>>happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>>>>>>>this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>>>>>>The only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could >>>>>>>>you
The original post stands alone. Your turn.
We are used to your staggering, Tony
The one that you are told to believe by your masters.
What two sides are you talking about?I certainly do and have not suggested otherwise. Do you want both sides >>>>>>tracked
Do you not want scientists to track what is happening and keep us >>>>>>>informed?
or just your pet side?
to this article:
You might think I appeared that way but your gibbering led you to that >>>>>>false
You appear to be saying that you posted without having anything to say >>>>>>>- you do not know where you will not be going, or what you know too >>>>>>>much about - such is the gibbering of idiots . . .
conclusion (a commomn failure of yours).
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >> >>>> article?https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >> >>>> have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >> >>>> in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >> >>>> major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >> >>>> happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
unnecessary delay . . .
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you Rich! Prove there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
On 26 Aug 2023 22:15:20 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:I did not state that. I merely made you understand that the issue was not what other countries did. You, of course, just barge ahead with your lies.
On 2023-08-26, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Irrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay >>>>is
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>>>>> article?Except we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>>>>>> have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>>>>> in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>>>>> and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>>>>> major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>>>> happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at >>>>>>> this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to >>>>>>make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new >>>>>>zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go >>>>>into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
unnecessary delay . . .
History has shown it to be the case.
QED
A simple assertion does not provide any evidence to support your
assertion.
John, Tony and now Gordon are unable to provide any evidence that
there was an undue delay in the initial closing of borders and
lockdown
It is amusing that they assert that when in other posts they believeCite!
Labour acted too quickly and that Covid provisions should have been
relaxed / removed earlier . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>>>>
On 26 Aug 2023 22:15:20 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-08-26, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Irrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>>>> article?https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>>>>> have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>>>> in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>>>> and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>>>> major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>>> happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go >>>>into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
unnecessary delay . . .
History has shown it to be the case.
QEDA simple assertion does not provide any evidence to support your
assertion.
John, Tony and now Gordon are unable to provide any evidence that
there was an undue delay in the initial closing of borders and
lockdown
It is amusing that they assert that when in other posts they believe
Labour acted too quickly and that Covid provisions should have been
relaxed / removed earlier . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>>>
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Every announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >> >> >>>> article?https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >> >> >>>> have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >> >> >>>> in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >> >> >>>> major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >> >> >>>> happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
unnecessary delay . . .
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you Rich! >> Prove there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
Maybe you can explain why the silly little cow waited two weeks. Oh btw that is a reference to Ardern. Not some smart bovine...
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 01:53:28 -0000 (UTC), TonyNonsense. It is my topic and I know what it was about. You clearly just want to change it.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 22:26:44 -0000 (UTC), TonyCompletely off topic.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 20:37:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Off topic article removed. Try again Rich but on topic this time.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:I don't have masters as you seem to think - but for you I refer again >>>>>to this article:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:40:08 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:More abuse but well we are used to that from you eh?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:33:50 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:It was a typo - I am staggered that you didn't pick that.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - then who is the "Her" that we go again?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:The only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could >>>>>>>>>>you
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now. >>>>>>>>>>>>You can fool (fill in the rest).https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>>>>>>>>>article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>>>>>>>>>>have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>>>>>>>>precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>>>>>>>>>in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>>>>>>>>>major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>>>>>>>>happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about >>>>>>>>>>>at
this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
please re-post in English?
The original post stands alone. Your turn.
We are used to your staggering, Tony
The one that you are told to believe by your masters.
What two sides are you talking about?I certainly do and have not suggested otherwise. Do you want both sides >>>>>>>>tracked
Do you not want scientists to track what is happening and keep us >>>>>>>>>informed?
or just your pet side?
The topic, as any lucid person would know, is about MSM and other media >>talking
up the possibiolity of another (planned?) pandemic. Just scare mongering >>because that sells copy.
STick to topic or start your own.
You are wrong - they were pointing out that we are not facing another >pandemic - at lest not with these variants - there were a few more
deaths one week and a bit of speculation, but the article was
re-assurance that only zombies would have interpreted that as scare
mongering . . .
You might think I appeared that way but your gibbering led you to that >>>>>>>>false
You appear to be saying that you posted without having anything to say >>>>>>>>>- you do not know where you will not be going, or what you know too >>>>>>>>>much about - such is the gibbering of idiots . . .
conclusion (a commomn failure of yours).
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 22:26:44 -0000 (UTC), TonyCompletely off topic.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 20:37:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Off topic article removed. Try again Rich but on topic this time.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:I don't have masters as you seem to think - but for you I refer again >>>>to this article:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:40:08 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:More abuse but well we are used to that from you eh?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 06:33:50 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:It was a typo - I am staggered that you didn't pick that.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - then who is the "Her" that we go again?
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:please re-post in English?
Except we will not be going there - we know too much now. >>>>>>>>>>>You can fool (fill in the rest).https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>>>>>>>>>article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>>>>>>>>>have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>>>>>>>precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says >>>>>>>>>>in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be, >>>>>>>>>>and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>>>>>>>>major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is >>>>>>>>>>happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . . >>>>>>>>>The only person fooled here is you. Your post makes zero sense. Could >>>>>>>>>you
The original post stands alone. Your turn.
We are used to your staggering, Tony
The one that you are told to believe by your masters.
What two sides are you talking about?I certainly do and have not suggested otherwise. Do you want both sides >>>>>>>tracked
Do you not want scientists to track what is happening and keep us >>>>>>>>informed?
or just your pet side?
The topic, as any lucid person would know, is about MSM and other media talking
up the possibiolity of another (planned?) pandemic. Just scare mongering >because that sells copy.
STick to topic or start your own.
You might think I appeared that way but your gibbering led you to that >>>>>>>false
You appear to be saying that you posted without having anything to say >>>>>>>>- you do not know where you will not be going, or what you know too >>>>>>>>much about - such is the gibbering of idiots . . .
conclusion (a commomn failure of yours).
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Prove there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >> >> >>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read thehttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go >> >> >>into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
unnecessary delay . . .
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!Every announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us
which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what
National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence''
Bowes loses again . . .
Maybe you can explain why the silly little cow waited two weeks. Oh btw that is a reference to Ardern. Not some smart bovine...
It seems that you have fooled yourself - fill in the rest, Tony . . .
The only fool is the ever lying fool that you are Rich!
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John BowesShe waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Every announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Prove there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read the >>> >> >>>> article?https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>> >> >>>> have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>> >> >>>> major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
unnecessary delay . . .
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what
National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence''
Bowes loses again . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:She waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Every announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >>announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Prove there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>> >> >>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read thehttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none >>>> >> >>>> have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>> >> >>>> precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for >>>> >> >>>> major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go >>>> >> >>into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
unnecessary delay . . .
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what >>National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence''
Bowes loses again . . .
said to close the boarder. She wanted her March 15th glory event so
that the overseas media could report it. She waited too long and it
got in via tourist and people coming to a conference..
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:32:24 +1200, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>Fantasies don't need cites. But truth stands alone. She waited two weeks too long, that is well understood by all except those that, paradoxically, need cites for fantasies.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:She waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Every announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >>>announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us >>>which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what >>>National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence''
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyProve there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary >>>>> >> >delay is
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>> >> >>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read >>>>> >> >>>>theExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, >>>>> >> >>>>none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>> >> >>>> precautions against widespread infection and death. The article >>>>> >> >>>>says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should >>>>> >> >>>>be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause >>>>> >> >>>>for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what >>>>> >> >>>>is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned >>>>> >> >>>>about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody >>>>> >> >>>weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the >>>>> >> >>>new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new
zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go >>>>> >> >>into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
unnecessary delay . . .
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you >>>>> >Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except >>>>comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
Bowes loses again . . .
said to close the boarder. She wanted her March 15th glory event so
that the overseas media could report it. She waited too long and it
got in via tourist and people coming to a conference..
Rubbish. Give cites for your fantasies . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:32:24 +1200, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>Fantasies don't need cites. But truth stands alone. She waited two weeks too >long, that is well understood by all except those that, paradoxically, need >cites for fantasies.
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:She waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people >>>said to close the boarder. She wanted her March 15th glory event so >>>that the overseas media could report it. She waited too long and it
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Every announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >>>>announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us >>>>which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what >>>>National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence'' >>>>Bowes loses again . . .
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyProve there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary >>>>>> >> >delay is
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read >>>>>> >> >>>>theExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now. >>>>>> >> >>>> >You can fool (fill in the rest).https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, >>>>>> >> >>>>none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>>> >> >>>> precautions against widespread infection and death. The article >>>>>> >> >>>>says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should
be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause >>>>>> >> >>>>for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what
is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned >>>>>> >> >>>>about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody >>>>>> >> >>>weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the >>>>>> >> >>>new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new
zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go >>>>>> >> >>into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
unnecessary delay . . .
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you >>>>>> >Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except >>>>>comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
got in via tourist and people coming to a conference..
Rubbish. Give cites for your fantasies . . .
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:32:24 +1200, Mutley <mutle...@hotmail.com>Bullshit! You disagree with us Rich so it's up to you to provide real cites to back up your typical biased and stupid claims!
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Rubbish. Give cites for your fantasies . . .On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:She waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people >said to close the boarder. She wanted her March 15th glory event so
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Every announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >>announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us >>which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what >>National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence''
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyProve there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>> >> >>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read thehttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>> >> >>>> precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go >>>> >> >>into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
unnecessary delay . . .
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
Bowes loses again . . .
that the overseas media could report it. She waited too long and it
got in via tourist and people coming to a conference..
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 03:59:14 -0000 (UTC), TonyOh please get some English teaching. You say I am wrong and yet you cannot demonstrate that she was not two weeks late. Give up Rich, you are arguing with the adults here and you are not yet ready.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:32:24 +1200, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:Fantasies don't need cites. But truth stands alone. She waited two weeks too >>long, that is well understood by all except those that, paradoxically, need >>cites for fantasies.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:She waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people >>>>said to close the boarder. She wanted her March 15th glory event so >>>>that the overseas media could report it. She waited too long and it >>>>got in via tourist and people coming to a conference..
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John BowesEvery announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >>>>>announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us >>>>>which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what >>>>>National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence'' >>>>>Bowes loses again . . .
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyProve there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an >>>>>>> >> unnecessary delay . . .
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary >>>>>>> >> >delay is
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>> >> >>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read >>>>>>> >> >>>>theExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now. >>>>>>> >> >>>> >You can fool (fill in the rest).https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, >>>>>>> >> >>>>none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>>>> >> >>>> precautions against widespread infection and death. The article >>>>>>> >> >>>>says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant >>>>>>> >> >>>>should
be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause >>>>>>> >> >>>>for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following >>>>>>> >> >>>>what
is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned >>>>>>> >> >>>>about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody >>>>>>> >> >>>weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the >>>>>>> >> >>>new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new >>>>>>> >> >>>zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go >>>>>>> >> >>into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you >>>>>>> >Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except >>>>>>comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
Rubbish. Give cites for your fantasies . . .
So you admit that you cannot provide evidence because it is just your >fantasy; and you are wrong.
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 03:59:14 -0000 (UTC), TonyThe only fantasy is your support of Arderns claim Labour went hard and fast! As we've told you here on several occasions Labour fucked around for a fortnight then took a bloody month to settle what the lock down involved!
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:So you admit that you cannot provide evidence because it is just your fantasy; and you are wrong.
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:32:24 +1200, Mutley <mutle...@hotmail.com>Fantasies don't need cites. But truth stands alone. She waited two weeks too
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:She waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people >>>said to close the boarder. She wanted her March 15th glory event so >>>that the overseas media could report it. She waited too long and it >>>got in via tourist and people coming to a conference..
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John BowesEvery announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >>>>announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us >>>>which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what >>>>National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence'' >>>>Bowes loses again . . .
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyProve there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an >>>>>> >> unnecessary delay . . .
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even readExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now. >>>>>> >> >>>> >You can fool (fill in the rest).https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
the
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, >>>>>> >> >>>>none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article
says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should
be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause
for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what
is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned >>>>>> >> >>>>about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody
weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the
new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new >>>>>> >> >>>zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
into lockdown . . .
delay is
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you
Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except >>>>>comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
Rubbish. Give cites for your fantasies . . .
long, that is well understood by all except those that, paradoxically, need >cites for fantasies.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:English is not the problem - both lies and the truth can be in English
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 03:59:14 -0000 (UTC), TonyOh please get some English teaching. You say I am wrong and yet you cannot >demonstrate that she was not two weeks late. Give up Rich, you are arguing with
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:32:24 +1200, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:Fantasies don't need cites. But truth stands alone. She waited two weeks too >>>long, that is well understood by all except those that, paradoxically, need >>>cites for fantasies.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:She waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people >>>>>said to close the boarder. She wanted her March 15th glory event so >>>>>that the overseas media could report it. She waited too long and it >>>>>got in via tourist and people coming to a conference..
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John BowesEvery announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >>>>>>announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us >>>>>>which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what >>>>>>National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence'' >>>>>>Bowes loses again . . .
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>>> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyProve there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an >>>>>>>> >> unnecessary delay . . .
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even readExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now. >>>>>>>> >> >>>> >You can fool (fill in the rest).https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
the
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, >>>>>>>> >> >>>>none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>>>>> >> >>>> precautions against widespread infection and death. The article
says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant >>>>>>>> >> >>>>should
be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause >>>>>>>> >> >>>>for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following >>>>>>>> >> >>>>what
is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned >>>>>>>> >> >>>>about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody >>>>>>>> >> >>>weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the >>>>>>>> >> >>>new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new >>>>>>>> >> >>>zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
into lockdown . . .
delay is
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you >>>>>>>> >Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except >>>>>>>comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
Rubbish. Give cites for your fantasies . . .
So you admit that you cannot provide evidence because it is just your >>fantasy; and you are wrong.
the adults here and you are not yet ready.
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 04:52:44 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou are a liar, not me. The whoile thing was a deliberate beat up and I exposed it. You have failed to show otherwise. Grow up.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:English is not the problem - both lies and the truth can be in English
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 03:59:14 -0000 (UTC), TonyOh please get some English teaching. You say I am wrong and yet you cannot >>demonstrate that she was not two weeks late. Give up Rich, you are arguing >>with
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:32:24 +1200, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:Fantasies don't need cites. But truth stands alone. She waited two weeks >>>>too
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:She waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people >>>>>>said to close the boarder. She wanted her March 15th glory event so >>>>>>that the overseas media could report it. She waited too long and it >>>>>>got in via tourist and people coming to a conference..
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John BowesEvery announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >>>>>>>announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us >>>>>>>which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what >>>>>>>National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence'' >>>>>>>Bowes loses again . . .
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyProve there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an >>>>>>>>> >> unnecessary delay . . .
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 >>>>>>>>> >> >>>wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>readExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now. >>>>>>>>> >> >>>> >You can fool (fill in the rest).https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
the
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>article
says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>should
be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>cause
for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>what
is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two >>>>>>>>> >> >>>bloody
weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of >>>>>>>>> >> >>>the
new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new >>>>>>>>> >> >>>zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to >>>>>>>>> >> >>go
into lockdown . . .
unnecessary
delay is
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like >>>>>>>>> >you
Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except >>>>>>>>comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
Rubbish. Give cites for your fantasies . . .
long, that is well understood by all except those that, paradoxically, need >>>>cites for fantasies.
So you admit that you cannot provide evidence because it is just your >>>fantasy; and you are wrong.
the adults here and you are not yet ready.
- you have provided no evidence of your claim about two weeks - I
suspect you dreamed that claim up and are now feeling guilty when you
know it is a lie . . .
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Isn't it interesting just how desperate Rich is in his drive to prove his stupidity beyond a doubt :)
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 04:52:44 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
You are a liar, not me. The whoile thing was a deliberate beat up and I exposedRich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:English is not the problem - both lies and the truth can be in English
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 03:59:14 -0000 (UTC), TonyOh please get some English teaching. You say I am wrong and yet you cannot >>demonstrate that she was not two weeks late. Give up Rich, you are arguing >>with
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:32:24 +1200, Mutley <mutle...@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:Fantasies don't need cites. But truth stands alone. She waited two weeks >>>>too
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:She waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people >>>>>>said to close the boarder. She wanted her March 15th glory event so >>>>>>that the overseas media could report it. She waited too long and it >>>>>>got in via tourist and people coming to a conference..
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John BowesEvery announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >>>>>>>announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us >>>>>>>which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what >>>>>>>National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence'' >>>>>>>Bowes loses again . . .
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Prove there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>>>>> >> >><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Irrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an >>>>>>>>> >> >unnecessary
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 >>>>>>>>> >> >>>wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>readExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now. >>>>>>>>> >> >>>> >You can fool (fill in the rest).https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
the
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far,
none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>article
says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>should
be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>cause
for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following
what
is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned
about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two >>>>>>>>> >> >>>bloody
weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of >>>>>>>>> >> >>>the
new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new >>>>>>>>> >> >>>zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to
go
into lockdown . . .
delay is
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not. >>>>>>>>> >> The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an >>>>>>>>> >> unnecessary delay . . .
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like >>>>>>>>> >you
Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except >>>>>>>>comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
Rubbish. Give cites for your fantasies . . .
long, that is well understood by all except those that, paradoxically, need
cites for fantasies.
So you admit that you cannot provide evidence because it is just your >>>fantasy; and you are wrong.
the adults here and you are not yet ready.
- you have provided no evidence of your claim about two weeks - I
suspect you dreamed that claim up and are now feeling guilty when you
know it is a lie . . .
it. You have failed to show otherwise. Grow up.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Impossible, that would require a small amount of integrity - not happening.
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:32:24 +1200, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:She waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people >>>said to close the boarder. She wanted her March 15th glory event so >>>that the overseas media could report it. She waited too long and it
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Every announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >>>>announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us >>>>which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what >>>>National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence'' >>>>Bowes loses again . . .
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyProve there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary >>>>>> >> >delay is
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read >>>>>> >> >>>>theExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now. >>>>>> >> >>>> >You can fool (fill in the rest).https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, >>>>>> >> >>>>none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>>> >> >>>> precautions against widespread infection and death. The article >>>>>> >> >>>>says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant >>>>>> >> >>>>should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause >>>>>> >> >>>>for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following >>>>>> >> >>>>what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned >>>>>> >> >>>>about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody >>>>>> >> >>>weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the >>>>>> >> >>>new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new
zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go >>>>>> >> >>into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
unnecessary delay . . .
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you >>>>>> >Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except >>>>>comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
got in via tourist and people coming to a conference..
Rubbish. Give cites for your fantasies . . .
You're the one with the fantasies. Take off your Jacinda underwear
and see the real world for a change.
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:32:24 +1200, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:She waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Every announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >>>announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us >>>which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what >>>National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence''
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyProve there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary delay is
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>> >> >>>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even read thehttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alertExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now.
You can fool (fill in the rest).
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good >>>>> >> >>>> precautions against widespread infection and death. The article says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go >>>>> >> >>into lockdown . . .
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
unnecessary delay . . .
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
Bowes loses again . . .
said to close the boarder. She wanted her March 15th glory event so
that the overseas media could report it. She waited too long and it
got in via tourist and people coming to a conference..
Rubbish. Give cites for your fantasies . . .
Mutley <mutle...@hotmail.com> wrote:Plus a modicum of intelligence! Two thing most on the left lack!
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:32:24 +1200, Mutley <mutle...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 19:14:00 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:She waited two weeks Rich after ACT and National and the health people >>>said to close the boarder. She wanted her March 15th glory event so >>>that the overseas media could report it. She waited too long and it >>>got in via tourist and people coming to a conference..
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:36:04?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT), John BowesEvery announcement is two weeks after a day two weeks before the >>>>announcement, John. So identify what it was two weeks after, tell us >>>>which other country or countries were faster, and also tell us what >>>>National were pushing for at the time . . . John ''no evidence'' >>>>Bowes loses again . . .
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:39:10?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>> >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 20:37:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyProve there was any unnecessary delay, John . . .
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:The two are actually related; but prove then that there was an >>>>>> >> unnecessary delay . . .
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:51:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesIrrelevant as you well know. The fact that there was an unnecessary
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:15:30?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 05:22:15 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Well you have clearly fooled yourself, Tony - did you even readExcept we will not be going there - we know too much now. >>>>>> >> >>>> >You can fool (fill in the rest).https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/300957705/a-new-highly-mutated-covid19-variant-ba286-has-scientists-on-alert
the
article?
We know that there have been many variants, and that, so far, >>>>>> >> >>>>none
have emerged that are as concerning as those that we took good
precautions against widespread infection and death. The article
says
in a number of different ways that this particular variant >>>>>> >> >>>>should be,
and is, being monitored, but at this stage does not give cause
for
major concerns. It is good that our scientists are following >>>>>> >> >>>>what is
happening right around the world, but nothing to be concerned >>>>>> >> >>>>about at
this stage.
Good precautions? Pity it took the stupid little girl two bloody
weeks to
make it! After that it was all lies, demands and breaches of the
new zealand
bill of rights! Letting overseas dj's in while keeping new >>>>>> >> >>>zealanders out!
So identify the countries that moved faster than New Zealand to go
into lockdown . . .
delay is
the issue not whether other countries delayed or not.
Only in the eyes of a comprehensionless lying Marxist muppet like you
Rich!
The fact Ardern waited TWO WEEKS is proof enough for anyone except >>>>>comprehensionless, lying, Marxists like you Rich!
Rubbish. Give cites for your fantasies . . .
You're the one with the fantasies. Take off your Jacinda underwearImpossible, that would require a small amount of integrity - not happening.
and see the real world for a change.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 107:01:02 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,478 |