• Re: Deaths and IVM

    From Tony@21:1/5 to Gordon on Sat Aug 19 04:14:15 2023
    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    Here is a question for Rich, and the others.

    The real point is that IVM saved lives, so less overall deaths and less >demand on hospitals (curve flattening), a win win situation. But Big Pharma >needed the only and only product to be used so it was nessecary to do what >was required to make the mRNA rule at any cost.

    More lives could be saved as well as doing less damage for the living.
    Gordon, Rich will never understand this because he is under the influence of blind obedience to what is effectively a religion to him and his fellow followers.
    They are evil creatures, despicable little people with no integrity. They refuse to look at facts or opinions they dislike, they are barely educated in any real sense and hateful to the core.
    If the current government is re-elected they will think they have won but I am terribly afraid that it will be the beginning of the end of this country.
    This government must be removed and with a considerable majority (albeit in a coalition partnership).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 19 03:45:48 2023
    Here is a question for Rich, and the others.

    The real point is that IVM saved lives, so less overall deaths and less
    demand on hospitals (curve flattening), a win win situation. But Big Pharma needed the only and only product to be used so it was nessecary to do what
    was required to make the mRNA rule at any cost.

    More lives could be saved as well as doing less damage for the living.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)