GST off fruit and veg won't work as claimed. Robertson knows it. The 2018 Tax Working Group knows it. The economists and tax experts all know it. Even Chipkins knows it.they would spend $2 billion to perhaps give Kiwis back $600 million, and give accountants, lawyers and supermarkets $1.4 billion.
Yet Labour are out there pushing this policy. The policy Robertson called a 'boondoggle'. For the dimwits like Dickbot here's what a 'boondoggle' is:
"Boondoggle" : noun. : "an unnecessary, wasteful, or fraudulent project."
Let that sink in: Grant Robertson is standing up, holding a straight face and telling you that what in his opinion is "an unnecessary, wasteful, or fraudulent project" is now Labour tax policy.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/08/election-2023-brad-olsen-hits-at-labour-s-gst-tax-policy-says-it-abandons-some-economic-credibility.html
Economists are estimating the consumer will get back 30% of the GST removal. The rest is swallowed up by the supermarket duopoly and compliance cost. That's right folks, this Labour government is so bereft of honesty, credibility and intelligence that
These Muppets should be in jail instead of parliament. This is criminal.
On 2023-08-13, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:Spending 2 billion dollars to give people about one tomato is abusive. Robertson knows that but has been overuled.
GST off fruit and veg won't work as claimed. Robertson knows it. The 2018 >>Tax Working Group knows it. The economists and tax experts all know it. Even >>Chipkins knows it.What is going to happen is the the overall cost of this will Cost more to
Yet Labour are out there pushing this policy. The policy Robertson called a >>'boondoggle'. For the dimwits like Dickbot here's what a 'boondoggle' is:
"Boondoggle" : noun. : "an unnecessary, wasteful, or fraudulent project."
Let that sink in: Grant Robertson is standing up, holding a straight face >>and telling you that what in his opinion is "an unnecessary, wasteful, or >>fraudulent project" is now Labour tax policy.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/08/election-2023-brad-olsen-hits-at-labour-s-gst-tax-policy-says-it-abandons-some-economic-credibility.html
Economists are estimating the consumer will get back 30% of the GST removal. >>The rest is swallowed up by the supermarket duopoly and compliance cost. That's
right folks, this Labour government is so bereft of honesty, credibility and >>intelligence that they would spend $2 billion to perhaps give Kiwis back $600 >>million, and give accountants, lawyers and supermarkets $1.4 billion.
These Muppets should be in jail instead of parliament. This is criminal.
the average family than at present. There will be a whole industry built up >about the GST or lack there of. Well for starters there will be whether or >not x or y is a fruit and how the hell do we make sure the the supermarkets >are not playing by the rules. The Supermarkets will also need to ensure that >they are not adding GST to all FAV (fruit and veg).
Now this loss of GST is worth $2billion so where does this come from?
Okay, this is what the people want, so for now Democracy rules. Okay. Governments are allowed to make errors, this one however has overflowed its allocation.
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-08-13, JohnO <john...@gmail.com> wrote:
GST off fruit and veg won't work as claimed. Robertson knows it. The 2018 >>Tax Working Group knows it. The economists and tax experts all know it. EvenWhat is going to happen is the the overall cost of this will Cost more to >the average family than at present. There will be a whole industry built up >about the GST or lack there of. Well for starters there will be whether or >not x or y is a fruit and how the hell do we make sure the the supermarkets >are not playing by the rules. The Supermarkets will also need to ensure that
Chipkins knows it.
Yet Labour are out there pushing this policy. The policy Robertson called a
'boondoggle'. For the dimwits like Dickbot here's what a 'boondoggle' is: >> "Boondoggle" : noun. : "an unnecessary, wasteful, or fraudulent project." >>
Let that sink in: Grant Robertson is standing up, holding a straight face >>and telling you that what in his opinion is "an unnecessary, wasteful, or >>fraudulent project" is now Labour tax policy.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/08/election-2023-brad-olsen-hits-at-labour-s-gst-tax-policy-says-it-abandons-some-economic-credibility.html
Economists are estimating the consumer will get back 30% of the GST removal.
The rest is swallowed up by the supermarket duopoly and compliance cost. That's
right folks, this Labour government is so bereft of honesty, credibility and
intelligence that they would spend $2 billion to perhaps give Kiwis back $600
million, and give accountants, lawyers and supermarkets $1.4 billion.
These Muppets should be in jail instead of parliament. This is criminal. >>
they are not adding GST to all FAV (fruit and veg).
Now this loss of GST is worth $2billion so where does this come from?
Okay, this is what the people want, so for now Democracy rules. Okay. Governments are allowed to make errors, this one however has overflowed its allocation.Spending 2 billion dollars to give people about one tomato is abusive. Robertson knows that but has been overuled.
On 2023-08-13, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:they would spend $2 billion to perhaps give Kiwis back $600 million, and give accountants, lawyers and supermarkets $1.4 billion.
GST off fruit and veg won't work as claimed. Robertson knows it. The 2018 Tax Working Group knows it. The economists and tax experts all know it. Even Chipkins knows it.
Yet Labour are out there pushing this policy. The policy Robertson called a 'boondoggle'. For the dimwits like Dickbot here's what a 'boondoggle' is:
"Boondoggle" : noun. : "an unnecessary, wasteful, or fraudulent project."
Let that sink in: Grant Robertson is standing up, holding a straight face and telling you that what in his opinion is "an unnecessary, wasteful, or fraudulent project" is now Labour tax policy.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/08/election-2023-brad-olsen-hits-at-labour-s-gst-tax-policy-says-it-abandons-some-economic-credibility.html
Economists are estimating the consumer will get back 30% of the GST removal. The rest is swallowed up by the supermarket duopoly and compliance cost. That's right folks, this Labour government is so bereft of honesty, credibility and intelligence that
What is going to happen is the the overall cost of this will Cost more to
These Muppets should be in jail instead of parliament. This is criminal.
the average family than at present. There will be a whole industry built up >about the GST or lack there of. Well for starters there will be whether or >not x or y is a fruit and how the hell do we make sure the the supermarkets >are not playing by the rules. The Supermarkets will also need to ensure that >they are not adding GST to all FAV (fruit and veg).
Now this loss of GST is worth $2billion so where does this come from?
Okay, this is what the people want, so for now Democracy rules. Okay.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 127:46:50 |
| Calls: | 6,663 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,335,183 |