• Re: Rittenhouse Verdict Raises Concerns That It's No Longer Safe To Bea

    From Warhaul@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 6 10:23:17 2023
    XPost: alt.skateboard, alt.skate-board, aus.politics
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    On 21 Nov 2021, Klaus Schadenfreude
    <klaus.schadenfreude.entfernen.@gmail.com> posted some news:s8lkpgtaml3lb7pjoq1ml4cnujtikj243f@4ax.com:

    On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 05:34:26 -0800 (PST), bigdog
    <geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, November 21, 2021 at 7:33:58 AM UTC-5, Klaus Schadenfreude >>wrote:
    https://tinyurl.com/wtend9rr

    U.S.?s Americans deal with the aftermath of the Rittenhouse verdict,
    many are being forced to come to terms with the fact that it's no
    longer safe to beat people to death with a skateboard in America.

    "I'm devastated. I'm terrified. I don't even recognize my own
    country anymore," said local concerned citizen Gail Piddlesnoot.
    "How have we gotten to the point in our nation where people can no
    longer beat someone with a skateboard, or kick someone in the face,
    or threaten to kill them without risk of being shot? It's just
    horrible."

    The American Society of Communist Skateboard Murderers (ASCSM)
    reports that more and more of their members are dropping out, no
    longer confident that they can go out at night, burn down cities,
    and bash in people's skulls with skateboards unmolested.

    "This sets a dangerous precedent," said Piddlesnoot. "It could be
    that in a very short time, we will no longer see gangs of marauding
    skateboard-murdering arsonists roaming our streets at night, and
    that's a very sad thought."

    Experts are recommending that in the near future, for everyone's
    safety, people who own skateboards just ride them for fun instead of
    beating people with them.

    While this is obviously a tongue-in-cheek post, a simple google search
    will reveal dozens of cases in which a skateboard has been used as a
    weapon to inflict death or great bodily harm. That fact alone
    justifies Kyle's use of deadly force against Anthony Huber, a guy with
    a violent criminal history. The left believe it was Kyle's moral duty
    to allow Huber to continue to bludgeon him and take it like a man.
    That was the argument made by the assistant AD at Kyle's trial. I'm
    sure that argument played well with the jury. The last volley fired
    from a sinking ship.

    What they HATE is that Kyle had a better weapon.

    And he used it effectively.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)