It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), TonyNo it is you that is out of date National announced today (Yes today even) that this is back in train when they get elected.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have >priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events
have made some of that redundant now as well: >https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Do keep up, Tony!
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), TonyNo it is you that is out of date National announced today (Yes today even) that
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have >>priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events
have made some of that redundant now as well: >>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Do keep up, Tony!
this is back in train when they get elected.
Do keep up you nasty little turd.
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 02:13:34 -0000 (UTC), TonyWrong again. National today announced a return to the roads of national significance. It was not the whole announcement but it absolutely was part of it. I suggest you read about it again.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), TonyNo it is you that is out of date National announced today (Yes today even) >>that
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have >>>priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events
have made some of that redundant now as well: >>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Do keep up, Tony!
this is back in train when they get elected.
Do keep up you nasty little turd.
National did indeed make some announcements today, but it was not to
return to the 2009 priorities - it was to deliver to donors in areas
of "National Party" concern, with I suspect deliberately
underestimates for costs, and ignoring priorities such as restoring
roads in areas affected by recent storms. Are National out of touch -
a resounding yes.
For an alternative view (and not necessarily that of the governmentLeft wing propaganda.
parties), see:
https://thestandard.org.nz/nationals-latest-policy-moar-roads/
Also significantly, no indication of how this massive work would beAsk them you fool.
funded, and what they would abandon in consequence - are they looking
around for something to sell off (at high profit to donors as well?)?
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 03:03:51 -0000 (UTC), TonyNo I am not. But you get off thinking that way.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Well so you assert, but without any evidence . . . in that you are
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 02:13:34 -0000 (UTC), TonyWrong again. National today announced a return to the roads of national >>significance. It was not the whole announcement but it absolutely was part of >>it. I suggest you read about it again.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:No it is you that is out of date National announced today (Yes today even) >>>>that
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >>>>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have >>>>>priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events >>>>>have made some of that redundant now as well: >>>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Do keep up, Tony!
this is back in train when they get elected.
Do keep up you nasty little turd.
National did indeed make some announcements today, but it was not to >>>return to the 2009 priorities - it was to deliver to donors in areas
of "National Party" concern, with I suspect deliberately
underestimates for costs, and ignoring priorities such as restoring
roads in areas affected by recent storms. Are National out of touch -
a resounding yes.
Are they out of touch, a resounding no. Is the government out of touch - >>bloody
obvious that they are.
very much in line with the National Party . . .
They are a Labour party shill.Indeed, but did they get anything wrong?Left wing propaganda.
For an alternative view (and not necessarily that of the government >>>parties), see: >>>https://thestandard.org.nz/nationals-latest-policy-moar-roads/
They announced it this morning, read it or piss off.They never give answers to such questions - why don't you try? YourAsk them you fool.
Also significantly, no indication of how this massive work would be >>>funded, and what they would abandon in consequence - are they looking >>>around for something to sell off (at high profit to donors as well?)?
very question is an admission that they have not supported their
headline only announcement with any indication that they have given it
much thought other than attraction to their supporters . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:They certainly appear to support the Labour and Green parties; my
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 03:03:51 -0000 (UTC), TonyNo I am not. But you get off thinking that way.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Well so you assert, but without any evidence . . . in that you are
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 02:13:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Wrong again. National today announced a return to the roads of national >>>significance. It was not the whole announcement but it absolutely was part of
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:No it is you that is out of date National announced today (Yes today even) >>>>>that
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >>>>>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have >>>>>>priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events >>>>>>have made some of that redundant now as well: >>>>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Do keep up, Tony!
this is back in train when they get elected.
Do keep up you nasty little turd.
National did indeed make some announcements today, but it was not to >>>>return to the 2009 priorities - it was to deliver to donors in areas
of "National Party" concern, with I suspect deliberately
underestimates for costs, and ignoring priorities such as restoring >>>>roads in areas affected by recent storms. Are National out of touch -
a resounding yes.
it. I suggest you read about it again.
Are they out of touch, a resounding no. Is the government out of touch - >>>bloody
obvious that they are.
very much in line with the National Party . . .
I can't help your inability to follow the daily news but it was on-line this >morning at 8am and still readily available. Lookm it up and stop whining.
They are a Labour party shill.
Indeed, but did they get anything wrong?Left wing propaganda.
For an alternative view (and not necessarily that of the government >>>>parties), see: >>>>https://thestandard.org.nz/nationals-latest-policy-moar-roads/
They announced it this morning, read it or piss off.They never give answers to such questions - why don't you try? Your
Also significantly, no indication of how this massive work would be >>>>funded, and what they would abandon in consequence - are they looking >>>>around for something to sell off (at high profit to donors as well?)? >>>Ask them you fool.
very question is an admission that they have not supported their
headline only announcement with any indication that they have given it
much thought other than attraction to their supporters . . .
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), TonyYup! Labour finally manage to complete several roads started under National. then so typical of them, claimed credit for them. Though they're blaming National for the pot holes rather than making sure they're repaored in a timely manner. Labour: good at
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events
have made some of that redundant now as well: https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Do keep up, Tony!
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 03:43:14 -0000 (UTC), TonyAppear to support? That like you claiming you're not politically biased Red Rich just another lie following the lies you've been pushing in this thread!
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:They certainly appear to support the Labour and Green parties; my
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 03:03:51 -0000 (UTC), TonyNo I am not. But you get off thinking that way.
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Well so you assert, but without any evidence . . . in that you are
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 02:13:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Wrong again. National today announced a return to the roads of national >>>significance. It was not the whole announcement but it absolutely was part of
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:No it is you that is out of date National announced today (Yes today even)
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >>>>>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have >>>>>>priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events >>>>>>have made some of that redundant now as well: >>>>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Do keep up, Tony!
that
this is back in train when they get elected.
Do keep up you nasty little turd.
National did indeed make some announcements today, but it was not to >>>>return to the 2009 priorities - it was to deliver to donors in areas >>>>of "National Party" concern, with I suspect deliberately >>>>underestimates for costs, and ignoring priorities such as restoring >>>>roads in areas affected by recent storms. Are National out of touch - >>>>a resounding yes.
it. I suggest you read about it again.
Are they out of touch, a resounding no. Is the government out of touch - >>>bloody
obvious that they are.
very much in line with the National Party . . .
I can't help your inability to follow the daily news but it was on-line this
morning at 8am and still readily available. Lookm it up and stop whining. >>
They are a Labour party shill.
Indeed, but did they get anything wrong?Left wing propaganda.
For an alternative view (and not necessarily that of the government >>>>parties), see: >>>>https://thestandard.org.nz/nationals-latest-policy-moar-roads/
question was whether in this particular case they said anything that
was not true? You really cannot follow simple arguments, can you
Tony?
They announced it this morning, read it or piss off.They never give answers to such questions - why don't you try? Your
Also significantly, no indication of how this massive work would be >>>>funded, and what they would abandon in consequence - are they looking >>>>around for something to sell off (at high profit to donors as well?)? >>>Ask them you fool.
very question is an admission that they have not supported their >>headline only announcement with any indication that they have given it >>much thought other than attraction to their supporters . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Well so you assert, but without any evidence . . . in that you are
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 02:13:34 -0000 (UTC), TonyWrong again. National today announced a return to the roads of national >significance. It was not the whole announcement but it absolutely was part of >it. I suggest you read about it again.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:No it is you that is out of date National announced today (Yes today even) >>>that
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >>>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have >>>>priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events
have made some of that redundant now as well: >>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Do keep up, Tony!
this is back in train when they get elected.
Do keep up you nasty little turd.
National did indeed make some announcements today, but it was not to
return to the 2009 priorities - it was to deliver to donors in areas
of "National Party" concern, with I suspect deliberately
underestimates for costs, and ignoring priorities such as restoring
roads in areas affected by recent storms. Are National out of touch -
a resounding yes.
Are they out of touch, a resounding no. Is the government out of touch - bloody
obvious that they are.
Indeed, but did they get anything wrong?Left wing propaganda.
For an alternative view (and not necessarily that of the government >>parties), see: >>https://thestandard.org.nz/nationals-latest-policy-moar-roads/
They never give answers to such questions - why don't you try? YourAsk them you fool.
Also significantly, no indication of how this massive work would be
funded, and what they would abandon in consequence - are they looking >>around for something to sell off (at high profit to donors as well?)?
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 03:43:14 -0000 (UTC), TonyYes I can. But you are far too simple for me to follow, treatment is available. A shill is unworthy of my attention.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:They certainly appear to support the Labour and Green parties; my
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 03:03:51 -0000 (UTC), TonyNo I am not. But you get off thinking that way.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Well so you assert, but without any evidence . . . in that you are
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 02:13:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Wrong again. National today announced a return to the roads of national >>>>significance. It was not the whole announcement but it absolutely was part >>>>of
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:No it is you that is out of date National announced today (Yes today >>>>>>even)
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >>>>>>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have >>>>>>>priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events >>>>>>>have made some of that redundant now as well: >>>>>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Do keep up, Tony!
that
this is back in train when they get elected.
Do keep up you nasty little turd.
National did indeed make some announcements today, but it was not to >>>>>return to the 2009 priorities - it was to deliver to donors in areas >>>>>of "National Party" concern, with I suspect deliberately >>>>>underestimates for costs, and ignoring priorities such as restoring >>>>>roads in areas affected by recent storms. Are National out of touch - >>>>>a resounding yes.
it. I suggest you read about it again.
Are they out of touch, a resounding no. Is the government out of touch - >>>>bloody
obvious that they are.
very much in line with the National Party . . .
I can't help your inability to follow the daily news but it was on-line this >>morning at 8am and still readily available. Lookm it up and stop whining.
They are a Labour party shill.
Indeed, but did they get anything wrong?Left wing propaganda.
For an alternative view (and not necessarily that of the government >>>>>parties), see: >>>>>https://thestandard.org.nz/nationals-latest-policy-moar-roads/
question was whether in this particular case they said anything that
was not true? You really cannot follow simple arguments, can you
Tony?
They announced it this morning, read it or piss off.They never give answers to such questions - why don't you try? Your
Also significantly, no indication of how this massive work would be >>>>>funded, and what they would abandon in consequence - are they looking >>>>>around for something to sell off (at high profit to donors as well?)? >>>>Ask them you fool.
very question is an admission that they have not supported their
headline only announcement with any indication that they have given it >>>much thought other than attraction to their supporters . . .
On 2023-07-31, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have
priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events
have made some of that redundant now as well:
https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Well that is a real rabbit warren. Keeping up is only possible if one acts
in a crazy way.
Do keep up, Tony!And you to Rich. When on a high horse make sure you are right.
The National RONS announcement was more about we need more RONS for the >improvement of the country. RONS are an investment and will allow the
country to have an improved economy.
Quite frankly the last 6 years have show inclination to do this. Lets do >this, well the ex-PM said it so another failure.Clearly you have not been listening - that is what Labour have been
Labour should be sticking to its roots and helping the poor and huddled >masses not thinking and trying what comes off the top of their head.
Sure National may not care about the huddled masses but the infrastructureSo tell us - why do we need a 4 lane highway from Whangarei to
is needed. That is way we need the other side every so often. To get
balance.
On 2023-07-31, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 02:13:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:No it is you that is out of date National announced today (Yes today even) that
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >>>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have >>>>priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events
have made some of that redundant now as well: >>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Do keep up, Tony!
this is back in train when they get elected.
Do keep up you nasty little turd.
National did indeed make some announcements today, but it was not to
return to the 2009 priorities - it was to deliver to donors in areas
of "National Party" concern, with I suspect deliberately
underestimates for costs, and ignoring priorities such as restoring
roads in areas affected by recent storms. Are National out of touch -
a resounding yes.
To a woke point of view they are. Is an areoplane likely to go on the road
to its destination?
Some of the 2009 RONS have been built. It is time for the web page to be >updated, yes?
For an alternative view (and not necessarily that of the government
parties), see:
https://thestandard.org.nz/nationals-latest-policy-moar-roads/
Also significantly, no indication of how this massive work would be
funded, and what they would abandon in consequence - are they looking
around for something to sell off (at high profit to donors as well?)?
RONS are a long term plan. Something to be built when we have the money to
do so. Long term planning is something woke folks are darn near in capable >of.
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events
have made some of that redundant now as well: https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Do keep up, Tony!
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 02:13:34 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 01:42:42 -0000 (UTC), TonyNo it is you that is out of date National announced today (Yes today even) that
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
It looks like these will be back on track soon."Last updated: 6 October 2009"
Excellent news. >>>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2009-12/roads-of-national-significance/
A lot has happened since then.
I suspect repairing roads affected by Cyclones and land slips now have >>>priority, but some of those listed have now been completed.
This would be better, but I suspect further extreme weather events
have made some of that redundant now as well: >>>https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/national-land-transport-programme-nltp/2021-24/
Do keep up, Tony!
this is back in train when they get elected.
Do keep up you nasty little turd.
National did indeed make some announcements today, but it was not to
return to the 2009 priorities - it was to deliver to donors in areas
of "National Party" concern, with I suspect deliberately
underestimates for costs, and ignoring priorities such as restoring
roads in areas affected by recent storms. Are National out of touch -
a resounding yes.
For an alternative view (and not necessarily that of the government
parties), see:
https://thestandard.org.nz/nationals-latest-policy-moar-roads/
Also significantly, no indication of how this massive work would be
funded, and what they would abandon in consequence - are they looking
around for something to sell off (at high profit to donors as well?)?
https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/national/swarbrick-apologises-after-accusing-pm-of-demonstrable-lie-says-she-did-so-at-earliest-convenience/ar-AA1lOsLA?ocid=winp1taskbar&cvid=936428eef3084351b900fac0481f063e&ei=10
So maybe there is a thread of decency in the greens, when forced on them. >Pity some commentators here and elsewhere cannot also be so fair.
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 20:24:10 -0000 (UTC), TonyAs I pointed out to you in another thread, is it poor memory or just another part of your nastiness?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/national/swarbrick-apologises-after-accusing-pm-of-demonstrable-lie-says-she-did-so-at-earliest-convenience/ar-AA1lOsLA?ocid=winp1taskbar&cvid=936428eef3084351b900fac0481f063e&ei=10
So maybe there is a thread of decency in the greens, when forced on them. >>Pity some commentators here and elsewhere cannot also be so fair.
It is called following the rules, Tony
- her initial statement wasNo proven.
correct
, but the rules of parliament prohibit calling another member aYeah, yeah ,yeah - we all know that, it is not the rest of us that needs childish lessons.
liar. I suspect that if she had said that the statement was totally
untrue it would have passed with little comment; it would have been a
correct statement, but probably does not infringe house rules.
What itArrant nonsense.
did do however is give publicity to the inherent deception behind
statements from this government in general and from CLuxon in
particular.
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 20:24:10 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/national/swarbrick-apologises-after-accusing-pm-of-demonstrable-lie-says-she-did-so-at-earliest-convenience/ar-AA1lOsLA?ocid=winp1taskbar&cvid=936428eef3084351b900fac0481f063e&ei=10
So maybe there is a thread of decency in the greens, when forced on them. >>Pity some commentators here and elsewhere cannot also be so fair.
It is called following the rules, Tony - her initial statement was
correct, but the rules of parliament prohibit calling another member a
liar.
https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/national/swarbrick-apologises-after-accusing-pm-of-demonstrable-lie-says-she-did-so-at-earliest-convenience/ar-AA1lOsLA?ocid=winp1taskbar&cvid=936428eef3084351b900fac0481f063e&ei=10
So maybe there is a thread of decency in the greens, when forced on them. >Pity some commentators here and elsewhere cannot also be so fair.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 115:56:19 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,175 |