• Chippie captain's call - dump the wealth and CGTtaxes that they'd been

    From JohnO@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 11 19:08:46 2023
    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/jenna-lynch-chris-hipkins-cowardly-robin-hood-tax-backdown-what-does-labour-stand-for.html

    A sneaky, cowardly government. That from none other than Jenna Lynch.

    Labour really are fucked when even the likes of Lynch are turning on them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to JohnO on Wed Jul 12 03:54:24 2023
    On 2023-07-12, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/jenna-lynch-chris-hipkins-cowardly-robin-hood-tax-backdown-what-does-labour-stand-for.html

    A sneaky, cowardly government. That from none other than Jenna Lynch.

    Labour really are fucked when even the likes of Lynch are turning on them.

    However it does seem that the message is getting through. The Government is
    not the only ones to hand out mandates.

    The question of the tax framework adjustment is one which the Government
    should drag it into the House and the MPs, along with the rest of the
    country have a great mutli-partisan debate on it.

    All interested parties can have their say and there is some hope that the masses would be educated, as well as the elites.

    However this is a forlorn hope as people are greedy as species. Some more so than others.

    People say that Labour loves taxing, I keep asking, yes they do, does do the other parties, what value do we get for our taxes.

    Finally, as the ration between the rich and the poor widen there comes
    a point of instability and the system crashes. There is a need to fix the ceiling and take anything above that in tax.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JohnO@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 11 22:12:18 2023
    On Wednesday, 12 July 2023 at 16:48:25 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On 12 Jul 2023 03:54:24 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2023-07-12, JohnO <john...@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/jenna-lynch-chris-hipkins-cowardly-robin-hood-tax-backdown-what-does-labour-stand-for.html

    A sneaky, cowardly government. That from none other than Jenna Lynch.

    Labour really are fucked when even the likes of Lynch are turning on them.

    However it does seem that the message is getting through. The Government is >not the only ones to hand out mandates.

    The question of the tax framework adjustment is one which the Government >should drag it into the House and the MPs, along with the rest of the >country have a great mutli-partisan debate on it.

    All interested parties can have their say and there is some hope that the >masses would be educated, as well as the elites.

    However this is a forlorn hope as people are greedy as species. Some more so >than others.

    People say that Labour loves taxing, I keep asking, yes they do, does do the >other parties, what value do we get for our taxes.

    Finally, as the ration between the rich and the poor widen there comes
    a point of instability and the system crashes. There is a need to fix the >ceiling and take anything above that in tax.
    I am not concerned about the rejection of a wealth tax in the short
    term (and that is all that is being indicated) - a wealth tax is very complicated to administer, and invites a lot of hiding of assets
    through complicated arrangements by individuals, and in the next five
    to ten years we have other matters that are more urgent to consider.
    As far as Capital Gains tax is concerned we already do have such a tax
    - realised capital gains are taxed as part of income - except that we
    then exempt realised capital gains on most investment properties owned
    by individuals. Those that have a Kiwisaver account will know that
    they provide a default marginal tax rate that the investment manager
    uses to assign a tax liability - and if there are capital gains on
    share sales for example then tax will be paid on those capital gains.

    That is a big distortion of our investment markets, and biases
    investment away from commercial companies towards the ownership of
    rental properties, leading to our companies finding it harder to raise
    share capital - our companies are known for having higher debt levels
    than in other jurisdictions, and we also have a high level of
    companies owned by overseas shareholders.

    We already have the 3rd lowest tax rates in the world in an

    Nobody believes your lies https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/personal-income-tax-rate

    international comparison - I agree that there is no good reason why
    the top tax rate should be lower than most other countries, but I see
    no reason to fix a ceiling on incomes and tax at 100% over that level
    as your suggest - that would just encourage innovative ways of keeping
    total taxable income under that arbitrary level.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to Gordon on Wed Jul 12 16:44:58 2023
    On 12 Jul 2023 03:54:24 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2023-07-12, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/jenna-lynch-chris-hipkins-cowardly-robin-hood-tax-backdown-what-does-labour-stand-for.html

    A sneaky, cowardly government. That from none other than Jenna Lynch.

    Labour really are fucked when even the likes of Lynch are turning on them.

    However it does seem that the message is getting through. The Government is >not the only ones to hand out mandates.

    The question of the tax framework adjustment is one which the Government >should drag it into the House and the MPs, along with the rest of the
    country have a great mutli-partisan debate on it.

    All interested parties can have their say and there is some hope that the >masses would be educated, as well as the elites.

    However this is a forlorn hope as people are greedy as species. Some more so >than others.

    People say that Labour loves taxing, I keep asking, yes they do, does do the >other parties, what value do we get for our taxes.

    Finally, as the ration between the rich and the poor widen there comes
    a point of instability and the system crashes. There is a need to fix the >ceiling and take anything above that in tax.

    I am not concerned about the rejection of a wealth tax in the short
    term (and that is all that is being indicated) - a wealth tax is very complicated to administer, and invites a lot of hiding of assets
    through complicated arrangements by individuals, and in the next five
    to ten years we have other matters that are more urgent to consider.
    As far as Capital Gains tax is concerned we already do have such a tax
    - realised capital gains are taxed as part of income - except that we
    then exempt realised capital gains on most investment properties owned
    by individuals. Those that have a Kiwisaver account will know that
    they provide a default marginal tax rate that the investment manager
    uses to assign a tax liability - and if there are capital gains on
    share sales for example then tax will be paid on those capital gains.

    That is a big distortion of our investment markets, and biases
    investment away from commercial companies towards the ownership of
    rental properties, leading to our companies finding it harder to raise
    share capital - our companies are known for having higher debt levels
    than in other jurisdictions, and we also have a high level of
    companies owned by overseas shareholders.

    We already have the 3rd lowest tax rates in the world in an
    international comparison - I agree that there is no good reason why
    the top tax rate should be lower than most other countries, but I see
    no reason to fix a ceiling on incomes and tax at 100% over that level
    as your suggest - that would just encourage innovative ways of keeping
    total taxable income under that arbitrary level.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 12 20:02:26 2023
    On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 22:12:18 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Wednesday, 12 July 2023 at 16:48:25 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On 12 Jul 2023 03:54:24 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2023-07-12, JohnO <john...@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/jenna-lynch-chris-hipkins-cowardly-robin-hood-tax-backdown-what-does-labour-stand-for.html

    A sneaky, cowardly government. That from none other than Jenna Lynch.

    Labour really are fucked when even the likes of Lynch are turning on them.

    However it does seem that the message is getting through. The Government is >> >not the only ones to hand out mandates.

    The question of the tax framework adjustment is one which the Government
    should drag it into the House and the MPs, along with the rest of the
    country have a great mutli-partisan debate on it.

    All interested parties can have their say and there is some hope that the >> >masses would be educated, as well as the elites.

    However this is a forlorn hope as people are greedy as species. Some more so
    than others.

    People say that Labour loves taxing, I keep asking, yes they do, does do the
    other parties, what value do we get for our taxes.

    Finally, as the ration between the rich and the poor widen there comes
    a point of instability and the system crashes. There is a need to fix the >> >ceiling and take anything above that in tax.
    I am not concerned about the rejection of a wealth tax in the short
    term (and that is all that is being indicated) - a wealth tax is very
    complicated to administer, and invites a lot of hiding of assets
    through complicated arrangements by individuals, and in the next five
    to ten years we have other matters that are more urgent to consider.
    As far as Capital Gains tax is concerned we already do have such a tax
    - realised capital gains are taxed as part of income - except that we
    then exempt realised capital gains on most investment properties owned
    by individuals. Those that have a Kiwisaver account will know that
    they provide a default marginal tax rate that the investment manager
    uses to assign a tax liability - and if there are capital gains on
    share sales for example then tax will be paid on those capital gains.

    That is a big distortion of our investment markets, and biases
    investment away from commercial companies towards the ownership of
    rental properties, leading to our companies finding it harder to raise
    share capital - our companies are known for having higher debt levels
    than in other jurisdictions, and we also have a high level of
    companies owned by overseas shareholders.

    We already have the 3rd lowest tax rates in the world in an

    Nobody believes your lies >https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/personal-income-tax-rate

    That table gives New Zealand's Personal Income Tax Rate as "39" -
    perhaps you could explain just what that is made up from . . .

    Personal Income Tax is however not the only tax you pay - we all pay
    GST and various other taxes and levies and charges. John Key increased
    GST for example and used the estimated extra tax income to reduce
    personal income tax rates.

    Now look here: https://taxfoundation.org/2022-international-tax-competitiveness-index/


    international comparison - I agree that there is no good reason why
    the top tax rate should be lower than most other countries, but I see
    no reason to fix a ceiling on incomes and tax at 100% over that level
    as your suggest - that would just encourage innovative ways of keeping
    total taxable income under that arbitrary level.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JohnO@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 12 14:03:06 2023
    On Wednesday, 12 July 2023 at 20:05:54 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 22:12:18 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    On Wednesday, 12 July 2023 at 16:48:25 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On 12 Jul 2023 03:54:24 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2023-07-12, JohnO <john...@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/jenna-lynch-chris-hipkins-cowardly-robin-hood-tax-backdown-what-does-labour-stand-for.html

    A sneaky, cowardly government. That from none other than Jenna Lynch. >> >>
    Labour really are fucked when even the likes of Lynch are turning on them.

    However it does seem that the message is getting through. The Government is
    not the only ones to hand out mandates.

    The question of the tax framework adjustment is one which the Government >> >should drag it into the House and the MPs, along with the rest of the
    country have a great mutli-partisan debate on it.

    All interested parties can have their say and there is some hope that the
    masses would be educated, as well as the elites.

    However this is a forlorn hope as people are greedy as species. Some more so
    than others.

    People say that Labour loves taxing, I keep asking, yes they do, does do the
    other parties, what value do we get for our taxes.

    Finally, as the ration between the rich and the poor widen there comes >> >a point of instability and the system crashes. There is a need to fix the
    ceiling and take anything above that in tax.
    I am not concerned about the rejection of a wealth tax in the short
    term (and that is all that is being indicated) - a wealth tax is very
    complicated to administer, and invites a lot of hiding of assets
    through complicated arrangements by individuals, and in the next five
    to ten years we have other matters that are more urgent to consider.
    As far as Capital Gains tax is concerned we already do have such a tax
    - realised capital gains are taxed as part of income - except that we
    then exempt realised capital gains on most investment properties owned
    by individuals. Those that have a Kiwisaver account will know that
    they provide a default marginal tax rate that the investment manager
    uses to assign a tax liability - and if there are capital gains on
    share sales for example then tax will be paid on those capital gains.

    That is a big distortion of our investment markets, and biases
    investment away from commercial companies towards the ownership of
    rental properties, leading to our companies finding it harder to raise
    share capital - our companies are known for having higher debt levels
    than in other jurisdictions, and we also have a high level of
    companies owned by overseas shareholders.

    We already have the 3rd lowest tax rates in the world in an

    Nobody believes your lies >https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/personal-income-tax-rate
    That table gives New Zealand's Personal Income Tax Rate as "39" -
    perhaps you could explain just what that is made up from . . .

    Personal Income Tax is however not the only tax you pay - we all pay
    GST and various other taxes and levies and charges. John Key increased
    GST for example and used the estimated extra tax income to reduce
    personal income tax rates.

    Now look here: https://taxfoundation.org/2022-international-tax-competitiveness-index/

    An arbitrary formula for "tax competitiveness". I can create a formula too.

    However you said "We already have the 3rd lowest tax rates in the world" which is clearly a lie. We do not have anything like the 3rd lowest. Not for income tax and not for consumption tax. The only things we have a low tax rate on is wealth and land
    taxes.

    You've been caught out lying again. Yet instead of taking the wise option of slinking off in shame, you just stick your head up for another smack. What a slow learner.


    international comparison - I agree that there is no good reason why
    the top tax rate should be lower than most other countries, but I see
    no reason to fix a ceiling on incomes and tax at 100% over that level
    as your suggest - that would just encourage innovative ways of keeping
    total taxable income under that arbitrary level.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Willy Nilly@21:1/5 to JohnO on Wed Jul 12 21:39:26 2023
    On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:08, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote: >https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/jenna-lynch-chris-hipkins-cowardly-robin-hood-tax-backdown-what-does-labour-stand-for.html
    A sneaky, cowardly government. That from none other than Jenna Lynch.
    Labour really are fucked when even the likes of Lynch are turning on them.

    But Lynch is basically a communist who is excoriating Hipkins for
    departing from the Manifesto. A wealth tax is outright theft, which
    Rich covers up when he says it's "complicated to administer".

    The day they bring in a wealth tax will also be the day that the
    teachings of Marx & Lenin become mandatory in our schools.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JohnO@21:1/5 to Willy Nilly on Wed Jul 12 21:08:55 2023
    On Thursday, 13 July 2023 at 09:39:33 UTC+12, Willy Nilly wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:08, JohnO <john...@gmail.com> wrote: >https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/jenna-lynch-chris-hipkins-cowardly-robin-hood-tax-backdown-what-does-labour-stand-for.html
    A sneaky, cowardly government. That from none other than Jenna Lynch. >Labour really are fucked when even the likes of Lynch are turning on them. But Lynch is basically a communist who is excoriating Hipkins for
    departing from the Manifesto. A wealth tax is outright theft, which
    Rich covers up when he says it's "complicated to administer".

    The day they bring in a wealth tax will also be the day that the
    teachings of Marx & Lenin become mandatory in our schools.

    I thought the latter was already here. Or something very similar.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 13 21:09:53 2023
    On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 21:39:26 GMT, willynilly@qwert.com (Willy Nilly)
    wrote:

    On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:08, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote: >>https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/jenna-lynch-chris-hipkins-cowardly-robin-hood-tax-backdown-what-does-labour-stand-for.html
    A sneaky, cowardly government. That from none other than Jenna Lynch. >>Labour really are fucked when even the likes of Lynch are turning on them.

    But Lynch is basically a communist who is excoriating Hipkins for
    departing from the Manifesto. A wealth tax is outright theft, which
    Rich covers up when he says it's "complicated to administer".

    They are complicated - most countries do however have estate taxes and
    gift duty that does limit the extent of inherited wealth creating a
    small number of wealthy donors to conservative politics . . .


    The day they bring in a wealth tax will also be the day that the
    teachings of Marx & Lenin become mandatory in our schools.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 13 20:56:34 2023
    On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 21:08:55 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 13 July 2023 at 09:39:33 UTC+12, Willy Nilly wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:08, JohnO <john...@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/jenna-lynch-chris-hipkins-cowardly-robin-hood-tax-backdown-what-does-labour-stand-for.html
    A sneaky, cowardly government. That from none other than Jenna Lynch.
    Labour really are fucked when even the likes of Lynch are turning on them. >> But Lynch is basically a communist who is excoriating Hipkins for
    departing from the Manifesto. A wealth tax is outright theft, which
    Rich covers up when he says it's "complicated to administer".

    The day they bring in a wealth tax will also be the day that the
    teachings of Marx & Lenin become mandatory in our schools.

    I thought the latter was already here. Or something very similar.

    Indeed it has been here for a long time - I learned about marxism and
    Leninism when at secondary school - under National Party governments .
    . .

    There are quite a few countries with a wealth tax - do they teach
    about Marx and Lenin too or is that just a National Party thing?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 13 20:51:01 2023
    On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 14:03:06 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Wednesday, 12 July 2023 at 20:05:54 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 22:12:18 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    On Wednesday, 12 July 2023 at 16:48:25 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On 12 Jul 2023 03:54:24 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2023-07-12, JohnO <john...@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/jenna-lynch-chris-hipkins-cowardly-robin-hood-tax-backdown-what-does-labour-stand-for.html

    A sneaky, cowardly government. That from none other than Jenna Lynch. >> >> >>
    Labour really are fucked when even the likes of Lynch are turning on them.

    However it does seem that the message is getting through. The Government is
    not the only ones to hand out mandates.

    The question of the tax framework adjustment is one which the Government >> >> >should drag it into the House and the MPs, along with the rest of the
    country have a great mutli-partisan debate on it.

    All interested parties can have their say and there is some hope that the
    masses would be educated, as well as the elites.

    However this is a forlorn hope as people are greedy as species. Some more so
    than others.

    People say that Labour loves taxing, I keep asking, yes they do, does do the
    other parties, what value do we get for our taxes.

    Finally, as the ration between the rich and the poor widen there comes >> >> >a point of instability and the system crashes. There is a need to fix the
    ceiling and take anything above that in tax.
    I am not concerned about the rejection of a wealth tax in the short
    term (and that is all that is being indicated) - a wealth tax is very
    complicated to administer, and invites a lot of hiding of assets
    through complicated arrangements by individuals, and in the next five
    to ten years we have other matters that are more urgent to consider.
    As far as Capital Gains tax is concerned we already do have such a tax
    - realised capital gains are taxed as part of income - except that we
    then exempt realised capital gains on most investment properties owned
    by individuals. Those that have a Kiwisaver account will know that
    they provide a default marginal tax rate that the investment manager
    uses to assign a tax liability - and if there are capital gains on
    share sales for example then tax will be paid on those capital gains.

    That is a big distortion of our investment markets, and biases
    investment away from commercial companies towards the ownership of
    rental properties, leading to our companies finding it harder to raise
    share capital - our companies are known for having higher debt levels
    than in other jurisdictions, and we also have a high level of
    companies owned by overseas shareholders.

    We already have the 3rd lowest tax rates in the world in an

    Nobody believes your lies
    https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/personal-income-tax-rate
    That table gives New Zealand's Personal Income Tax Rate as "39" -
    perhaps you could explain just what that is made up from . . .

    Personal Income Tax is however not the only tax you pay - we all pay
    GST and various other taxes and levies and charges. John Key increased
    GST for example and used the estimated extra tax income to reduce
    personal income tax rates.

    Now look here:
    https://taxfoundation.org/2022-international-tax-competitiveness-index/

    An arbitrary formula for "tax competitiveness". I can create a formula too.

    However you said "We already have the 3rd lowest tax rates in the world" which is clearly a lie. We do not have anything like the 3rd lowest. Not for income tax and not for consumption tax. The only things we have a low tax rate on is wealth and land
    taxes.

    You've been caught out lying again. Yet instead of taking the wise option of slinking off in shame, you just stick your head up for another smack. What a slow learner.

    From the website:
    "A tax code that is competitive and neutral promotes sustainable
    economic growth and investment while raising sufficient revenue for
    government priorities.

    There are many factors unrelated to taxes which affect a country’s
    economic performance. Nevertheless, taxes play an important role in
    the health of a country’s economy.

    To measure whether a country’s tax system is neutral and competitive,
    the ITCI looks at more than 40 tax policy variables. These variables
    measure not only the level of tax rates, but also how taxes are
    structured. The Index looks at a country’s corporate taxes, individual
    income taxes, consumption taxes, property taxes, and the treatment of
    profits earned overseas. The ITCI gives a comprehensive overview of
    how developed countries’ tax codes compare, explains why certain tax
    codes stand out as good or bad models for reform, and provides
    important insight into how to think about tax policy."

    and about New Zealand in particular:

    "New Zealand ranks 3rd overall on the 2022 International Tax
    Competitiveness Index, the same as in 2021. Learn more about the New
    Zealand tax system here.

    * Some strengths of the New Zealand tax system:

    New Zealand allows corporate losses to be carried forward indefinitely
    and has introduced a temporary one-year carryback provision, allowing businesses to be taxed on their average profitability.

    The VAT of 15 percent applies to nearly the entire potential
    consumption tax base.

    New Zealand property taxes apply just to the value of land rather than
    real estate or other improvements to the land.

    X Some weaknesses of the New Zealand tax system:

    New Zealand has an above-average corporate tax rate of 28 percent (the
    OECD average is 23.6 percent) and relatively poor cost recovery
    provisions for business investments.
    New Zealand has a narrow tax treaty network, with 40 countries.
    The cost of inventory can be accounted for using First-In-First-Out
    method or the average cost method (Last-In-First-Out is not
    permitted)."

    So to summarise for the Johns: New Zealand could increase our tax take
    by quite a bit before individuals or businesses moved from New Zealand
    for tax reasons.

    Yes "third lowest tax rates in the world" is a simplification - but
    perhaps not simple enough for JohnO . . .




    international comparison - I agree that there is no good reason why
    the top tax rate should be lower than most other countries, but I see
    no reason to fix a ceiling on incomes and tax at 100% over that level
    as your suggest - that would just encourage innovative ways of keeping
    total taxable income under that arbitrary level.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mutley@21:1/5 to JohnO on Fri Jul 14 10:21:38 2023
    JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:

    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/07/jenna-lynch-chris-hipkins-cowardly-robin-hood-tax-backdown-what-does-labour-stand-for.html

    A sneaky, cowardly government. That from none other than Jenna Lynch.

    Labour really are fucked when even the likes of Lynch are turning on them.

    Don't worry if they win the election then all these things will be up
    front and center again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)