1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • Re: Ineffective, Expensive, inequitable

    From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Wed Jun 28 05:01:24 2023
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/26/ineffective-expensive-inequitable-expert-on-nats-crime-policy/

    Apparently the NZ Taxpayer Union does not object to a promise to waste
    money by National . . .
    You don't learn do you?
    The tax payers union is apolitical. Period!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 28 16:35:35 2023
    https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/26/ineffective-expensive-inequitable-expert-on-nats-crime-policy/

    Apparently the NZ Taxpayer Union does not object to a promise to waste
    money by National . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 27 22:50:14 2023
    On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 4:37:13 PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/26/ineffective-expensive-inequitable-expert-on-nats-crime-policy/

    Apparently the NZ Taxpayer Union does not object to a promise to waste
    money by National . . .
    Thought for a second your header was about your inglorious Labour government. Besides it may have slipped your notice yet again. but National isn't government yet...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 28 21:13:15 2023
    On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 16:35:35 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/26/ineffective-expensive-inequitable-expert-on-nats-crime-policy/

    Apparently the NZ Taxpayer Union does not object to a promise to waste
    money by National . . .

    Rich you don't get it despite repeated and very pointed advice. The
    Taxpayers Union is not necessarily concerned about political parties
    that are not a part of the Government.

    National are the opposition. Their promises are not a concern unless
    you believe they are certain to form or lead our next government. Are
    you criticising the Taxpayers Union for not critiquing the next
    government's policies?


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Wed Jun 28 08:24:25 2023
    On 2023-06-28, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/26/ineffective-expensive-inequitable-expert-on-nats-crime-policy/

    Apparently the NZ Taxpayer Union does not object to a promise to waste
    money by National . . .

    You win Rich. Darned if I can see how the man in the moon has anything to
    do with this.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 28 22:49:37 2023
    On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 21:13:15 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 16:35:35 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/26/ineffective-expensive-inequitable-expert-on-nats-crime-policy/

    Apparently the NZ Taxpayer Union does not object to a promise to waste >>money by National . . .

    Rich you don't get it despite repeated and very pointed advice. The >Taxpayers Union is not necessarily concerned about political parties
    that are not a part of the Government.

    National are the opposition. Their promises are not a concern unless
    you believe they are certain to form or lead our next government. Are
    you criticising the Taxpayers Union for not critiquing the next
    government's policies?

    If they are really wanting less waste by government then yes of course
    they should question any proposals. After all, there is an election
    this year. Perhaps the NZ Taxpayer Union believe that the chance of
    National actually being in government to waster this sort of money is
    so low that it does not need to be questioned - but it would not make
    sense to think that the people running the Taxpayer Union are not
    supporters of two particular parties.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 28 04:20:34 2023
    On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 10:51:12 PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 21:13:15 +1200, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 16:35:35 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/26/ineffective-expensive-inequitable-expert-on-nats-crime-policy/

    Apparently the NZ Taxpayer Union does not object to a promise to waste >>money by National . . .

    Rich you don't get it despite repeated and very pointed advice. The >Taxpayers Union is not necessarily concerned about political parties
    that are not a part of the Government.

    National are the opposition. Their promises are not a concern unless
    you believe they are certain to form or lead our next government. Are
    you criticising the Taxpayers Union for not critiquing the next >government's policies?
    If they are really wanting less waste by government then yes of course
    they should question any proposals. After all, there is an election
    this year. Perhaps the NZ Taxpayer Union believe that the chance of
    National actually being in government to waster this sort of money is
    so low that it does not need to be questioned - but it would not make
    sense to think that the people running the Taxpayer Union are not
    supporters of two particular parties.
    Don't talk utter politicised bullshit! With all the weird stuff going on with Labour and it's determination to force 10 waters through till October they haven't got a snowballs chance in hell! And_you_know_it!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Wed Jun 28 20:04:37 2023
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 21:13:15 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 16:35:35 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
    https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/26/ineffective-expensive-inequitable-expert-on-nats-crime-policy/

    Apparently the NZ Taxpayer Union does not object to a promise to waste >>>money by National . . .

    Rich you don't get it despite repeated and very pointed advice. The >>Taxpayers Union is not necessarily concerned about political parties
    that are not a part of the Government.

    National are the opposition. Their promises are not a concern unless
    you believe they are certain to form or lead our next government. Are
    you criticising the Taxpayers Union for not critiquing the next >>government's policies?

    If they are really wanting less waste by government then yes of course
    they should question any proposals. After all, there is an election
    this year. Perhaps the NZ Taxpayer Union believe that the chance of
    National actually being in government to waster this sort of money is
    so low that it does not need to be questioned - but it would not make
    sense to think that the people running the Taxpayer Union are not
    supporters of two particular parties.
    Even a five year old is smarter than that comment. Of course it is reasonable to assume they will do what they always have, that is try to keep the incumbent government honest - whichever government that is at any time. That is their past history.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JohnO@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 28 13:41:51 2023
    On Wednesday, 28 June 2023 at 16:37:13 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/26/ineffective-expensive-inequitable-expert-on-nats-crime-policy/

    Apparently the NZ Taxpayer Union does not object to a promise to waste
    money by National . . .

    So says a left wing academic activist and diversity box ticker.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 29 18:14:50 2023
    On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 22:49:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 21:13:15 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 16:35:35 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
    https://www.1news.co.nz/2023/06/26/ineffective-expensive-inequitable-expert-on-nats-crime-policy/

    Apparently the NZ Taxpayer Union does not object to a promise to waste >>>money by National . . .

    Rich you don't get it despite repeated and very pointed advice. The >>Taxpayers Union is not necessarily concerned about political parties
    that are not a part of the Government.

    National are the opposition. Their promises are not a concern unless
    you believe they are certain to form or lead our next government. Are
    you criticising the Taxpayers Union for not critiquing the next >>government's policies?

    If they are really wanting less waste by government then yes of course
    they should question any proposals.

    You are illogical with this statement - you are suggesting that the
    Taxpayers Union not only critique the government of the day but also
    all the Opposition parties. What nonsense.

    After all, there is an election
    this year. Perhaps the NZ Taxpayer Union believe that the chance of
    National actually being in government to waster this sort of money is
    so low that it does not need to be questioned - but it would not make
    sense to think that the people running the Taxpayer Union are not
    supporters of two particular parties.

    Perhaps the Taxpayers Union should concentrate their meager resources
    on what they are currently doing - criticising the Government of the
    day for what they are actually doing. Far more rational and logical
    to your suggestion Rich.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)