https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/Whereas your inglorious Labour party just takes our property and gives it to the iwi elite! Try some other distraction Rich. We all know the economy is going down the gurgler thanks to Labour who think the law and rules don't apply to them!
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game
for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for
property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 4:00:28?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/Whereas your inglorious Labour party just takes our property and gives it to the iwi elite! Try some other distraction Rich. We all know the economy is going down the gurgler thanks to Labour who think the law and rules don't apply to them!
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game
for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for
property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:08:39 -0700 (PDT), John BowesWhy haven't you replied to my post Rich? Because you know you're just pushing pure political bullshit in an effort to distract from yet another failure of your inglorious and ever more useless Labour party!?
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 4:00:28?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Are you pretending that because of a small technical recession
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/Whereas your inglorious Labour party just takes our property and gives it to the iwi elite! Try some other distraction Rich. We all know the economy is going down the gurgler thanks to Labour who think the law and rules don't apply to them!
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game
for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for
property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
National has not been able to seek permission and pay copyright for
their advertising? This is not the first or even second time they have
been caught this way - what is wrong with them that they have such
contempt for the property of others?
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:08:39 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 4:00:28?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/Whereas your inglorious Labour party just takes our property and gives it to the iwi elite! Try some other distraction Rich. We all know the economy is going down the gurgler thanks to Labour who think the law and rules don't apply to them!
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game
for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for
property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
Are you pretending that because of a small technical recession
National has not been able to seek permission and pay copyright for
their advertising? This is not the first or even second time they have
been caught this way - what is wrong with them that they have such
contempt for the property of others?
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:08:39 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 4:00:28?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/Whereas your inglorious Labour party just takes our property and gives it to the iwi elite! Try some other distraction Rich. We all know the economy is going down the gurgler thanks to Labour who think the law and rules don't apply to them!
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game
for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for
property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
Are you pretending that because of a small technical recession
National has not been able to seek permission and pay copyright for
their advertising? This is not the first or even second time they have
been caught this way - what is wrong with them that they have such
contempt for the property of others?
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:06:47 +1200, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:22:22 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:08:39 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 4:00:28?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/Whereas your inglorious Labour party just takes our property and gives it to the iwi elite! Try some other distraction Rich. We all know the economy is going down the gurgler thanks to Labour who think the law and rules don't apply to them!
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game >>>> for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for >>>> property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
Are you pretending that because of a small technical recession
National has not been able to seek permission and pay copyright for >>their advertising? This is not the first or even second time they have >>been caught this way - what is wrong with them that they have such >>contempt for the property of others?
You exaggerate as usual Rich. While it is indeed regrettable thatNational have a record of serial stealing of music under copyright -
National has had to take down content adjudged to infringe copyright,
at least they have done so.
they appear to believe that unless it is real property, that it is
fair game for them to steal - and if found out, apologise and move on.
They give a very poor image for New Zealand, and need to be sued more
often - but then they just rock past fines and raise a bit more by
selling tax cuts to the very wealthy . . .
If you are going to raise these sort of issues, how about you address >Hipkins as COVID19 minister refusing to apologise for lying about some >women crossing the lockdown border from Auckland to Northland?Off topic.
Once every fifteen years isn't serial offending Rich. Unlike your daily lies to support your inglorious and useless Labour government. Hell you tell more lies than Labour does...This is far more significant and your attempt to distract with triviaStealing copyright material is not trivial, except to those who put themselves above the law.
is evidence of your desperation in your anti-National rhetoric.
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:22:22 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>National have a record of serial stealing of music under copyright -
wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:08:39 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 4:00:28?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/Whereas your inglorious Labour party just takes our property and gives it to the iwi elite! Try some other distraction Rich. We all know the economy is going down the gurgler thanks to Labour who think the law and rules don't apply to them!
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game
for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for
property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
Are you pretending that because of a small technical recession
National has not been able to seek permission and pay copyright for
their advertising? This is not the first or even second time they have
been caught this way - what is wrong with them that they have such
contempt for the property of others?
You exaggerate as usual Rich. While it is indeed regrettable that
National has had to take down content adjudged to infringe copyright,
at least they have done so.
If you are going to raise these sort of issues, how about you addressOff topic.
Hipkins as COVID19 minister refusing to apologise for lying about some
women crossing the lockdown border from Auckland to Northland?
This is far more significant and your attempt to distract with triviaStealing copyright material is not trivial, except to those who put
is evidence of your desperation in your anti-National rhetoric.
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:06:47 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>Oh you hate balance don't you?
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:22:22 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:National have a record of serial stealing of music under copyright -
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:08:39 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 4:00:28?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
Whereas your inglorious Labour party just takes our property and gives it >>>>to the iwi elite! Try some other distraction Rich. We all know the economy ishttps://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game >>>>> for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for
property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
going down the gurgler thanks to Labour who think the law and rules don't apply
to them!
Are you pretending that because of a small technical recession
National has not been able to seek permission and pay copyright for
their advertising? This is not the first or even second time they have >>>been caught this way - what is wrong with them that they have such >>>contempt for the property of others?
You exaggerate as usual Rich. While it is indeed regrettable that
National has had to take down content adjudged to infringe copyright,
at least they have done so.
they appear to believe that unless it is real property, that it is
fair game for them to steal - and if found out, apologise and move on.
They give a very poor image for New Zealand, and need to be sued more
often - but then they just rock past fines and raise a bit more by
selling tax cuts to the very wealthy . . .
If you are going to raise these sort of issues, how about you address >>Hipkins as COVID19 minister refusing to apologise for lying about some >>women crossing the lockdown border from Auckland to Northland?Off topic.
This is far more significant and your attempt to distract with triviaStealing copyright material is not trivial, except to those who put >themselves above the law.
is evidence of your desperation in your anti-National rhetoric.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game
for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for
property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:06:47 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 16:22:22 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:National have a record of serial stealing of music under copyright -
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 21:08:39 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 4:00:28?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/Whereas your inglorious Labour party just takes our property and gives it to the iwi elite! Try some other distraction Rich. We all know the economy is going down the gurgler thanks to Labour who think the law and rules don't apply to them!
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game >>>>> for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for
property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
Are you pretending that because of a small technical recession
National has not been able to seek permission and pay copyright for
their advertising? This is not the first or even second time they have >>>been caught this way - what is wrong with them that they have such >>>contempt for the property of others?
You exaggerate as usual Rich. While it is indeed regrettable that
National has had to take down content adjudged to infringe copyright,
at least they have done so.
they appear to believe that unless it is real property, that it is
fair game for them to steal - and if found out, apologise and move on.
They give a very poor image for New Zealand, and need to be sued more
often - but then they just rock past fines and raise a bit more by
selling tax cuts to the very wealthy . . .
If you are going to raise these sort of issues, how about you address >>Hipkins as COVID19 minister refusing to apologise for lying about some >>women crossing the lockdown border from Auckland to Northland?Off topic.
This is far more significant and your attempt to distract with triviaStealing copyright material is not trivial, except to those who put >themselves above the law.
is evidence of your desperation in your anti-National rhetoric.
On Thursday, 15 June 2023 at 16:00:28 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:education , disastrous race relations, and so on, all under Labour.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game
for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for
property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
Dickbot: "Look! A squirrel!"
You can see how desperate Dickbot and his ilk are when they are nitpicking with such minutiae as NZ struggles with disastrous inflation, disastrous cost of living, disastrous balance of accounts, disastrous law and order, disastrous health, disastrous
Yet as Labour burns NZ to the ground here is our village idiot wailing at National's minor copyright issues. What a tosser.
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:58:08 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>education , disastrous race relations, and so on, all under Labour.
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 June 2023 at 16:00:28 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game
for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for
property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
Dickbot: "Look! A squirrel!"
You can see how desperate Dickbot and his ilk are when they are nitpicking with such minutiae as NZ struggles with disastrous inflation, disastrous cost of living, disastrous balance of accounts, disastrous law and order, disastrous health, disastrous
Yet as Labour burns NZ to the ground here is our village idiot wailing at National's minor copyright issues. What a tosser.
You are fair to call Rich's obsession with anti-National trivia
rhetoric as you have.
I expect Rich to respond with 'off topic'.......;-)
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 09:14:40 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>education , disastrous race relations, and so on, all under Labour.
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:58:08 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> >>wrote:
On Thursday, 15 June 2023 at 16:00:28 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/
National shows they regard property belonging to others as fair game
for them to use without asking permission. Just watch now as some
National supporting twerp tries to justify National''s contempt for
property rights, or honesty - will they try the ""pretty legal""
excuse again?
Dickbot: "Look! A squirrel!"
You can see how desperate Dickbot and his ilk are when they are nitpicking with such minutiae as NZ struggles with disastrous inflation, disastrous cost of living, disastrous balance of accounts, disastrous law and order, disastrous health, disastrous
Yet as Labour burns NZ to the ground here is our village idiot wailing at National's minor copyright issues. What a tosser.
You are fair to call Rich's obsession with anti-National trivia
rhetoric as you have.
I expect Rich to respond with 'off topic'.......;-)
Crash, you are entitled to regard $600,000 (reduced on appeal to
$225,000) as trivial, but they would have also had legal costs to pay
- but others may not see it that way: >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight_Mile_Style_v_New_Zealand_National_Party
I do not know if they will be asked to pay for later examples, which
include: >https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/news/politics/national-party-instagram-post-pulled-over-apparent-katy-perry-copyright-issue/
and >https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/national-party-removes-tiktok-videos-after-inquiry-with-film-studios/YRCFRYPFEREOVK3FMFPXI42FYY/
Also surprising is that it appears that the current leader of the
party was not told of these problems immediately, and also that he did
not see any problems arising from them - perhaps laws are only
supposed to apply to other people . . .
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 118:03:40 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,210 |
| Messages: | 5,334,298 |