• Safety on our streets: an interestig survey response

    From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 4 11:58:42 2023
    https://tinyurl.com/bdfjvvtf

    Personally I believe that imprisonment is required to keep crims off
    the streets. I acknowledge that prison can be a place where crims can
    learn how to outsmart law enforcement and join criminal gangs, however
    the protection of society trumps these concerns.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Crash on Sun Jun 4 00:35:17 2023
    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    https://tinyurl.com/bdfjvvtf

    Personally I believe that imprisonment is required to keep crims off
    the streets. I acknowledge that prison can be a place where crims can
    learn how to outsmart law enforcement and join criminal gangs, however
    the protection of society trumps these concerns.


    --
    Crash McBash
    This government has deliberately reduced the number of inmates. No wonder gangs are increasing in size and no wonder crime is increasing.
    Prisons are a vital part of keeping people safe. By all means educate and attempt to rehabilitate them but those are secondary to protecting the community.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Sun Jun 4 20:10:18 2023
    On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 00:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    https://tinyurl.com/bdfjvvtf

    Personally I believe that imprisonment is required to keep crims off
    the streets. I acknowledge that prison can be a place where crims can >>learn how to outsmart law enforcement and join criminal gangs, however
    the protection of society trumps these concerns.


    --
    Crash McBash
    This government has deliberately reduced the number of inmates. No wonder gangs
    are increasing in size and no wonder crime is increasing.
    Prisons are a vital part of keeping people safe. By all means educate and >attempt to rehabilitate them but those are secondary to protecting the >community.

    I agree. Those that believe that prisons as rehab and/or educate are
    a failure forget why we have prisons, which is for the benefit of
    society in general and victims in particular (past, present and
    future). There is no alternative except what we are seeing today.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Jun 5 04:10:48 2023
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 00:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    https://tinyurl.com/bdfjvvtf

    Personally I believe that imprisonment is required to keep crims off
    the streets. I acknowledge that prison can be a place where crims can >>>learn how to outsmart law enforcement and join criminal gangs, however >>>the protection of society trumps these concerns.


    --
    Crash McBash
    This government has deliberately reduced the number of inmates. No wonder >>gangs
    are increasing in size and no wonder crime is increasing.
    Prisons are a vital part of keeping people safe. By all means educate and >>attempt to rehabilitate them but those are secondary to protecting the >>community.

    I am not aware of any changes to sentencing provisions or the
    procedures for approving bail. What are you talking about, Tony?
    I did not mention sentencing provisions or bail, what are you talking about?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Mon Jun 5 15:29:10 2023
    On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 00:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    https://tinyurl.com/bdfjvvtf

    Personally I believe that imprisonment is required to keep crims off
    the streets. I acknowledge that prison can be a place where crims can >>learn how to outsmart law enforcement and join criminal gangs, however
    the protection of society trumps these concerns.


    --
    Crash McBash
    This government has deliberately reduced the number of inmates. No wonder gangs
    are increasing in size and no wonder crime is increasing.
    Prisons are a vital part of keeping people safe. By all means educate and >attempt to rehabilitate them but those are secondary to protecting the >community.

    I am not aware of any changes to sentencing provisions or the
    procedures for approving bail. What are you talking about, Tony?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to Tony on Sun Jun 4 21:57:38 2023
    On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 4:10:50 PM UTC+12, Tony wrote:
    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 00:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    https://tinyurl.com/bdfjvvtf

    Personally I believe that imprisonment is required to keep crims off >>>the streets. I acknowledge that prison can be a place where crims can >>>learn how to outsmart law enforcement and join criminal gangs, however >>>the protection of society trumps these concerns.


    --
    Crash McBash
    This government has deliberately reduced the number of inmates. No wonder >>gangs
    are increasing in size and no wonder crime is increasing.
    Prisons are a vital part of keeping people safe. By all means educate and >>attempt to rehabilitate them but those are secondary to protecting the >>community.

    I am not aware of any changes to sentencing provisions or the
    procedures for approving bail. What are you talking about, Tony?
    I did not mention sentencing provisions or bail, what are you talking about?
    Trying to distract because we know the police have been told to ease up on the charging because the Prison service is undermanned because of Labours incompetence!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Jun 5 04:33:24 2023
    On 2023-06-05, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 00:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    https://tinyurl.com/bdfjvvtf

    Personally I believe that imprisonment is required to keep crims off
    the streets. I acknowledge that prison can be a place where crims can >>>learn how to outsmart law enforcement and join criminal gangs, however >>>the protection of society trumps these concerns.


    --
    Crash McBash
    This government has deliberately reduced the number of inmates. No wonder gangs
    are increasing in size and no wonder crime is increasing.
    Prisons are a vital part of keeping people safe. By all means educate and >>attempt to rehabilitate them but those are secondary to protecting the >>community.

    I am not aware of any changes to sentencing provisions or the
    procedures for approving bail. What are you talking about, Tony?

    Right, a quick check finds

    https://www.corrections.govt.nz/resources/statistics/quarterly_prison_statistics/prison_stats_march_2023

    along with alot of other pages of data.

    There is a chart Total Prison Population.

    March 2023 8376 inmates
    Feb 2020 10250
    March - July 2022 7750
    March 2018 10645

    So the number has come down, but it has gone up in recent times. To ne this suggests that the crime rate has gone up since August 2022. This would tie
    in with the perception that the crime rate is now way up on what it has been.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Mon Jun 5 22:27:41 2023
    On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 04:10:48 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 00:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    https://tinyurl.com/bdfjvvtf

    Personally I believe that imprisonment is required to keep crims off >>>>the streets. I acknowledge that prison can be a place where crims can >>>>learn how to outsmart law enforcement and join criminal gangs, however >>>>the protection of society trumps these concerns.


    --
    Crash McBash
    This government has deliberately reduced the number of inmates. No wonder >>>gangs
    are increasing in size and no wonder crime is increasing.
    Prisons are a vital part of keeping people safe. By all means educate and >>>attempt to rehabilitate them but those are secondary to protecting the >>>community.

    I am not aware of any changes to sentencing provisions or the
    procedures for approving bail. What are you talking about, Tony?
    I did not mention sentencing provisions or bail, what are you talking about?

    So you accept that, once convicted, sentences have not changed - so
    there must be other reasons for the small decline in prison
    population. One of course that there is less crime - that is
    consistent with Labour increasing the number of police as planned -
    about the only area of crime that really gets in the news are those
    with youth involved in ram raids - and currently they are not usually
    facing prison (although adults are). Do you object to there being more
    police? We do not know of course whether an ACT / Nat government would
    continue to fund those higher levels of police.

    You claim there has been a deliberate reduction in the number of
    inmates, and implied that this was by action of the government.
    Perhaps you could explain just what actions government have taken that
    may have contributed to fewer prisoners other than increasing the
    number of police.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Jun 5 20:00:28 2023
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 04:10:48 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 00:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    https://tinyurl.com/bdfjvvtf

    Personally I believe that imprisonment is required to keep crims off >>>>>the streets. I acknowledge that prison can be a place where crims can >>>>>learn how to outsmart law enforcement and join criminal gangs, however >>>>>the protection of society trumps these concerns.


    --
    Crash McBash
    This government has deliberately reduced the number of inmates. No wonder >>>>gangs
    are increasing in size and no wonder crime is increasing.
    Prisons are a vital part of keeping people safe. By all means educate and >>>>attempt to rehabilitate them but those are secondary to protecting the >>>>community.

    I am not aware of any changes to sentencing provisions or the
    procedures for approving bail. What are you talking about, Tony?
    I did not mention sentencing provisions or bail, what are you talking about?

    So you accept that, once convicted, sentences have not changed - so
    there must be other reasons for the small decline in prison
    population. One of course that there is less crime - that is
    consistent with Labour increasing the number of police as planned -
    about the only area of crime that really gets in the news are those
    with youth involved in ram raids - and currently they are not usually
    facing prison (although adults are). Do you object to there being more >police? We do not know of course whether an ACT / Nat government would >continue to fund those higher levels of police.
    Nothing to do with National or ACT. Keep on topic.
    I accept nothing that you have written.

    You claim there has been a deliberate reduction in the number of
    inmates, and implied that this was by action of the government.
    Perhaps you could explain just what actions government have taken that
    may have contributed to fewer prisoners other than increasing the
    number of police.

    See https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/sector/long-term-insights-briefing/user_uploads/long-term-insights-briefing-consulation-document-1.pdf
    It is all there.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JohnO@21:1/5 to Crash on Mon Jun 5 13:55:15 2023
    On Tuesday, 6 June 2023 at 08:24:05 UTC+12, Crash wrote:
    On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 22:27:41 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:
    On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 04:10:48 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 00:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid> wrote: >>>>>https://tinyurl.com/bdfjvvtf

    Personally I believe that imprisonment is required to keep crims off >>>>>the streets. I acknowledge that prison can be a place where crims can >>>>>learn how to outsmart law enforcement and join criminal gangs, however >>>>>the protection of society trumps these concerns.


    --
    Crash McBash
    This government has deliberately reduced the number of inmates. No wonder >>>>gangs
    are increasing in size and no wonder crime is increasing.
    Prisons are a vital part of keeping people safe. By all means educate and >>>>attempt to rehabilitate them but those are secondary to protecting the >>>>community.

    I am not aware of any changes to sentencing provisions or the >>>procedures for approving bail. What are you talking about, Tony?
    I did not mention sentencing provisions or bail, what are you talking about?

    So you accept that, once convicted, sentences have not changed - so
    there must be other reasons for the small decline in prison
    population.
    Rich this is an example of how you irrationally twist an attribution
    of a viewpoint from another poster. You don't respond to Tony's
    assertion that he has made no comment (in this thread) about
    sentencing provisions or bail. Having not addressed that you cannot reasonably draw any conclusion about what Tony does or does not
    accept.
    One of course that there is less crime - that is
    consistent with Labour increasing the number of police as planned -
    about the only area of crime that really gets in the news are those
    with youth involved in ram raids - and currently they are not usually >facing prison (although adults are). Do you object to there being more >police? We do not know of course whether an ACT / Nat government would >continue to fund those higher levels of police.

    You claim there has been a deliberate reduction in the number of
    inmates, and implied that this was by action of the government.
    Perhaps you could explain just what actions government have taken that
    may have contributed to fewer prisoners other than increasing the
    number of police.
    --
    Crash McBash

    It has been Special K's mission to empty out the prisons from Day One, Dickbot.

    https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1711/S00027/lower-prison-muster-a-priority-in-corrections.htm

    Of course you know this, but you are so dishonest you always attempt to twist and deflect and flat out lie to grease your way out of it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 6 08:24:05 2023
    On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 22:27:41 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 04:10:48 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 00:35:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> wrote:
    https://tinyurl.com/bdfjvvtf

    Personally I believe that imprisonment is required to keep crims off >>>>>the streets. I acknowledge that prison can be a place where crims can >>>>>learn how to outsmart law enforcement and join criminal gangs, however >>>>>the protection of society trumps these concerns.


    --
    Crash McBash
    This government has deliberately reduced the number of inmates. No wonder >>>>gangs
    are increasing in size and no wonder crime is increasing.
    Prisons are a vital part of keeping people safe. By all means educate and >>>>attempt to rehabilitate them but those are secondary to protecting the >>>>community.

    I am not aware of any changes to sentencing provisions or the
    procedures for approving bail. What are you talking about, Tony?
    I did not mention sentencing provisions or bail, what are you talking about?

    So you accept that, once convicted, sentences have not changed - so
    there must be other reasons for the small decline in prison
    population.

    Rich this is an example of how you irrationally twist an attribution
    of a viewpoint from another poster. You don't respond to Tony's
    assertion that he has made no comment (in this thread) about
    sentencing provisions or bail. Having not addressed that you cannot
    reasonably draw any conclusion about what Tony does or does not
    accept.

    One of course that there is less crime - that is
    consistent with Labour increasing the number of police as planned -
    about the only area of crime that really gets in the news are those
    with youth involved in ram raids - and currently they are not usually
    facing prison (although adults are). Do you object to there being more >police? We do not know of course whether an ACT / Nat government would >continue to fund those higher levels of police.

    You claim there has been a deliberate reduction in the number of
    inmates, and implied that this was by action of the government.
    Perhaps you could explain just what actions government have taken that
    may have contributed to fewer prisoners other than increasing the
    number of police.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)