https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/132194066/morgan-godfery-human-right-to-housing-obscured-by-back-and-forth-about-density
National appear to be captured by the people that own land on the edge
of residential areas, who want to see development on their land, and
don't care about the costs of infrastructure - that just gets passed
on to purchasers.
Most of New Zealand wants the areas that have been devastated by
flooding to be repaired - they do not want the workers that can fix
roads and clean water / storm water / sewage to be diverted onto new subdivisions that include market gardens that are vital to local towns
for food supply . . . it is cheaper to manage local town and city
systems to cope with greater intensification than to pay for new subdivisions. For roads, the priority is restoring those that were
washed away - the potholes arising from low maintenance pre-2017 (and
cheap builds in that time as well) will just have to wait their turn
in priorities, but all of them are more important than increasing
urban sprawl just to benefit a few landowners.
The u-turn by National shows how fragile they are - they are divided internally, and Luxon clearly feels he has to move closer to ACT
policies to slow down the drift to that party of many of their
supporters - the question they have not answered is whether they will continue to support the electorate seat for Seymour, and also whether
they will repeat that for another deal in the interests of keeping
their party vote percentage higher than it would be otherwise . . .
On 2023-06-01, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Labour wants create ghetto where they can recruit more voters to push their desire for control over the masses...
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/132194066/morgan-godfery-human-right-to-housing-obscured-by-back-and-forth-about-density
National appear to be captured by the people that own land on the edge
of residential areas, who want to see development on their land, and
don't care about the costs of infrastructure - that just gets passed
on to purchasers.
Most of New Zealand wants the areas that have been devastated by
flooding to be repaired - they do not want the workers that can fix
roads and clean water / storm water / sewage to be diverted onto new subdivisions that include market gardens that are vital to local towns
for food supply . . . it is cheaper to manage local town and city
systems to cope with greater intensification than to pay for new subdivisions. For roads, the priority is restoring those that were
washed away - the potholes arising from low maintenance pre-2017 (and cheap builds in that time as well) will just have to wait their turn
in priorities, but all of them are more important than increasing
urban sprawl just to benefit a few landowners.
The u-turn by National shows how fragile they are - they are divided internally, and Luxon clearly feels he has to move closer to ACTUrban sprawl was "demanded" after world war 2. You know women had on
policies to slow down the drift to that party of many of their
supporters - the question they have not answered is whether they will continue to support the electorate seat for Seymour, and also whether
they will repeat that for another deal in the interests of keeping
their party vote percentage higher than it would be otherwise . . .
average twice the number they do to-day and families stayed to-gether. Children played in the back yard and home vege gardens where in vogue.
Now it is a question of life style that is demanded, you know sunshine
in winter and not too many cars parking hither and beyond in place for
which there is no parking.
Rich, from what I have seen it is the Woke sct whom are weak apart from
the Posie bashing crowd.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/132194066/morgan-godfery-human-right-to-housing-obscured-by-back-and-forth-about-density
National appear to be captured by the people that own land on the edge
of residential areas, who want to see development on their land, and
don't care about the costs of infrastructure - that just gets passed
on to purchasers.
Most of New Zealand wants the areas that have been devastated by
flooding to be repaired - they do not want the workers that can fix
roads and clean water / storm water / sewage to be diverted onto new subdivisions that include market gardens that are vital to local towns
for food supply . . . it is cheaper to manage local town and city
systems to cope with greater intensification than to pay for new subdivisions. For roads, the priority is restoring those that were
washed away - the potholes arising from low maintenance pre-2017 (and
cheap builds in that time as well) will just have to wait their turn
in priorities, but all of them are more important than increasing
urban sprawl just to benefit a few landowners.
The u-turn by National shows how fragile they are - they are divided internally, and Luxon clearly feels he has to move closer to ACT
policies to slow down the drift to that party of many of their
supporters - the question they have not answered is whether they will continue to support the electorate seat for Seymour, and also whether
they will repeat that for another deal in the interests of keeping
their party vote percentage higher than it would be otherwise . . .
On Thursday, 1 June 2023 at 16:37:25 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Off topic, John - try a new thread . . .
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/132194066/morgan-godfery-human-right-to-housing-obscured-by-back-and-forth-about-density
National appear to be captured by the people that own land on the edge
of residential areas, who want to see development on their land, and
don't care about the costs of infrastructure - that just gets passed
on to purchasers.
Most of New Zealand wants the areas that have been devastated by
flooding to be repaired - they do not want the workers that can fix
roads and clean water / storm water / sewage to be diverted onto new
subdivisions that include market gardens that are vital to local towns
for food supply . . . it is cheaper to manage local town and city
systems to cope with greater intensification than to pay for new
subdivisions. For roads, the priority is restoring those that were
washed away - the potholes arising from low maintenance pre-2017 (and
cheap builds in that time as well) will just have to wait their turn
in priorities, but all of them are more important than increasing
urban sprawl just to benefit a few landowners.
The u-turn by National shows how fragile they are - they are divided
internally, and Luxon clearly feels he has to move closer to ACT
policies to slow down the drift to that party of many of their
supporters - the question they have not answered is whether they will
continue to support the electorate seat for Seymour, and also whether
they will repeat that for another deal in the interests of keeping
their party vote percentage higher than it would be otherwise . . .
Here is a much better example of a political party that cannot be trusted... because they keep getting caught lying:
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/05/prime-minister-s-staff-knew-education-minister-jan-tinetti-s-office-was-holding-up-attendance-data.html
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:56:48 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>Wow the newsgroup's most off topic poster now gets pissed off because people don't do as he wants, that's you Rich.
wrote:
On Thursday, 1 June 2023 at 16:37:25 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Off topic, John - try a new thread . . .
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/132194066/morgan-godfery-human-right-to-housing-obscured-by-back-and-forth-about-density
National appear to be captured by the people that own land on the edge
of residential areas, who want to see development on their land, and
don't care about the costs of infrastructure - that just gets passed
on to purchasers.
Most of New Zealand wants the areas that have been devastated by
flooding to be repaired - they do not want the workers that can fix
roads and clean water / storm water / sewage to be diverted onto new
subdivisions that include market gardens that are vital to local towns
for food supply . . . it is cheaper to manage local town and city
systems to cope with greater intensification than to pay for new
subdivisions. For roads, the priority is restoring those that were
washed away - the potholes arising from low maintenance pre-2017 (and
cheap builds in that time as well) will just have to wait their turn
in priorities, but all of them are more important than increasing
urban sprawl just to benefit a few landowners.
The u-turn by National shows how fragile they are - they are divided
internally, and Luxon clearly feels he has to move closer to ACT
policies to slow down the drift to that party of many of their
supporters - the question they have not answered is whether they will
continue to support the electorate seat for Seymour, and also whether
they will repeat that for another deal in the interests of keeping
their party vote percentage higher than it would be otherwise . . .
Here is a much better example of a political party that cannot be trusted... >>because they keep getting caught lying: >>https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/05/prime-minister-s-staff-knew-education-minister-jan-tinetti-s-office-was-holding-up-attendance-data.html
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Typical supporter of a draconian and tyrannical party throwing a fit because someone points out just how untrustworthy his inglorious Labour party is. Hell Labour could give National lessons on dirty politics and authoritarian practice and Rich knows it!
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:56:48 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Wow the newsgroup's most off topic poster now gets pissed off because people don't do as he wants, that's you Rich.On Thursday, 1 June 2023 at 16:37:25 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:Off topic, John - try a new thread . . .
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/132194066/morgan-godfery-human-right-to-housing-obscured-by-back-and-forth-about-density
National appear to be captured by the people that own land on the edge >>> of residential areas, who want to see development on their land, and
don't care about the costs of infrastructure - that just gets passed
on to purchasers.
Most of New Zealand wants the areas that have been devastated by
flooding to be repaired - they do not want the workers that can fix
roads and clean water / storm water / sewage to be diverted onto new
subdivisions that include market gardens that are vital to local towns >>> for food supply . . . it is cheaper to manage local town and city
systems to cope with greater intensification than to pay for new
subdivisions. For roads, the priority is restoring those that were
washed away - the potholes arising from low maintenance pre-2017 (and >>> cheap builds in that time as well) will just have to wait their turn
in priorities, but all of them are more important than increasing
urban sprawl just to benefit a few landowners.
The u-turn by National shows how fragile they are - they are divided
internally, and Luxon clearly feels he has to move closer to ACT
policies to slow down the drift to that party of many of their
supporters - the question they have not answered is whether they will >>> continue to support the electorate seat for Seymour, and also whether >>> they will repeat that for another deal in the interests of keeping
their party vote percentage higher than it would be otherwise . . .
Here is a much better example of a political party that cannot be trusted...
because they keep getting caught lying: >>https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/05/prime-minister-s-staff-knew-education-minister-jan-tinetti-s-office-was-holding-up-attendance-data.html
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:56:48 -0700 (PDT), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>Not by a long shot Rich! The topic is trust in political parties! My post is about the most untrustworthy political party in NZ history and_you_know_it! So it's right on topic no matter what you might try and deny!
wrote:
On Thursday, 1 June 2023 at 16:37:25 UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/132194066/morgan-godfery-human-right-to-housing-obscured-by-back-and-forth-about-density
National appear to be captured by the people that own land on the edge
of residential areas, who want to see development on their land, and
don't care about the costs of infrastructure - that just gets passed
on to purchasers.
Most of New Zealand wants the areas that have been devastated by
flooding to be repaired - they do not want the workers that can fix
roads and clean water / storm water / sewage to be diverted onto new
subdivisions that include market gardens that are vital to local towns
for food supply . . . it is cheaper to manage local town and city
systems to cope with greater intensification than to pay for new
subdivisions. For roads, the priority is restoring those that were
washed away - the potholes arising from low maintenance pre-2017 (and
cheap builds in that time as well) will just have to wait their turn
in priorities, but all of them are more important than increasing
urban sprawl just to benefit a few landowners.
The u-turn by National shows how fragile they are - they are divided
internally, and Luxon clearly feels he has to move closer to ACT
policies to slow down the drift to that party of many of their
supporters - the question they have not answered is whether they will
continue to support the electorate seat for Seymour, and also whether
they will repeat that for another deal in the interests of keeping
their party vote percentage higher than it would be otherwise . . .
Here is a much better example of a political party that cannot be trusted... because they keep getting caught lying:Off topic, John - try a new thread . . .
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2023/05/prime-minister-s-staff-knew-education-minister-jan-tinetti-s-office-was-holding-up-attendance-data.html
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 123:18:20 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,700 |