https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinatingWhat a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the dictatorial Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this but on reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician though a rather weak one.
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that
others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer
to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not
needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same
time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians
that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the
idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff
report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinatingWhat a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the dictatorial Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this but on reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician though a rather weak one.
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that
others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer
to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not
needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same
time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians
that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the
idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his
marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff
report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John BowesFunny how as Labour continues it downward spiral you are still stupid enough to think it's only because of an imagined move of voters from one right wing party to another. The trouble with nasty little communist trans like you Rich is your constant
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinatingWhat a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the dictatorial Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this but on reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician though a rather weak one.
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that
others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer
to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not
needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same
time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians
that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the
idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his
marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff
report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from
National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John BowesSeymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, not just National.
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
What a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the dictatorial >>Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this but on >>reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician though a >>rather weak one.https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that
others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer
to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not
needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same
time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians
that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the
idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his
marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff
report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is
likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from
National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Do you have any evidence to support that statement, Tony? I would not
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Seymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, not just >National.
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
What a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the dictatorial >>>Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this but onhttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that
others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer >>>> to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not
needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same >>>> time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians >>>> that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the
idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his
marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff
report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician though a
rather weak one.
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is
likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from
National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
On Sat, 13 May 2023 00:30:20 -0000 (UTC), TonyWhen you provide support for your statement -
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Do you have any evidence to support that statement, Tony? I would not
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Seymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, not just >>National.
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
What a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the >>>>dictatorialhttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that
others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer >>>>> to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not
needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same >>>>> time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians >>>>> that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the
idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his >>>>> marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff
report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this but >>>>on
reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician though >>>>a
rather weak one.
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is >>>likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from
National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
expect many to shift from either the Green Party or Te Pati Maori; but
the polls do not give sufficient information to completely assess
changes - that ACT has increased by roughly the same percentage as
National has declined may however indicate where most movement is
happening . . .
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:It only takes common sense to come to your conclusion Tony. Rich is so deeply enamoured of his highly politicized opinion to comprehend the truth of your claim!
On Sat, 13 May 2023 00:30:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
When you provide support for your statement -Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Do you have any evidence to support that statement, Tony? I would not >expect many to shift from either the Green Party or Te Pati Maori; but
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Seymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, not just
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
What a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the >>>>dictatorialhttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that >>>>> others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer >>>>> to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not >>>>> needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same >>>>> time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians >>>>> that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the >>>>> idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his >>>>> marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff >>>>> report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here: >>>>> >>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this but
on
reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician though
a
rather weak one.
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is >>>likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>>National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
National.
the polls do not give sufficient information to completely assess
changes - that ACT has increased by roughly the same percentage as >National has declined may however indicate where most movement is >happening . . .
"it is likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from National"
I will consider it.
Nobody with a scince degree of any kind would consider that a decline by National of a similar percentage to ACT means that the two are directly related. Science degrees include some statistics, some of them a great deal. The assumption made breaks all the rules.Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:It only takes common sense to come to your conclusion Tony. Rich is so deeply >enamoured of his highly politicized opinion to comprehend the truth of your >claim!
On Sat, 13 May 2023 00:30:20 -0000 (UTC), TonyWhen you provide support for your statement -
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that
others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer >> >>>>> to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not
needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same >> >>>>> time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians >> >>>>> that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the
idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his >> >>>>> marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff
report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here:
Do you have any evidence to support that statement, Tony? I would notSeymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, notWhat a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than thehttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
dictatorial
Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this >> >>>>but
on
reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician
though
a
rather weak one.
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is
likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from
National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
just
National.
expect many to shift from either the Green Party or Te Pati Maori; but
the polls do not give sufficient information to completely assess
changes - that ACT has increased by roughly the same percentage as
National has declined may however indicate where most movement is
happening . . .
"it is likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from
National"
I will consider it.
On Sat, 13 May 2023 00:30:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Do you have any evidence to support that statement, Tony? I would not
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Seymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, not just >>National.
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
What a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the dictatorialhttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that
others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer >>>>> to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not
needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same >>>>> time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians >>>>> that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the
idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his >>>>> marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff
report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this but on
reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician though a
rather weak one.
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is >>>likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from
National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
expect many to shift from either the Green Party or Te Pati Maori;
but
the polls do not give sufficient information to completely assess
changes - that ACT has increased by roughly the same percentage as
National has declined may however indicate where most movement is
happening . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2023 00:30:20 -0000 (UTC), TonyWhen you provide support for your statement -
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Do you have any evidence to support that statement, Tony? I would not >>expect many to shift from either the Green Party or Te Pati Maori; but
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Seymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, not just >>>National.
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
What a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the >>>>>dictatorialhttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that
others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer >>>>>> to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not >>>>>> needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same >>>>>> time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians >>>>>> that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the >>>>>> idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his >>>>>> marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff
report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here: >>>>>> >>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this but >>>>>on
reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician though
a
rather weak one.
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is >>>>likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>>>National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
the polls do not give sufficient information to completely assess
changes - that ACT has increased by roughly the same percentage as
National has declined may however indicate where most movement is
happening . . .
"it is likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >National"
I will consider it.
On Sat, 13 May 2023 21:49:26 -0000 (UTC), TonyLogic is not a strength of yours, your statement does not depend on mine, an absurd bit of reasoning. Your statement is not true. Period. You claim a degree, you may have one but it not a science degree. Anybody with a science degree would never have made that claim.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2023 00:30:20 -0000 (UTC), TonyWhen you provide support for your statement -
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Do you have any evidence to support that statement, Tony? I would not >>>expect many to shift from either the Green Party or Te Pati Maori; but >>>the polls do not give sufficient information to completely assess
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Seymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, not just >>>>National.
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
What a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the >>>>>>dictatorialhttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that >>>>>>> others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer >>>>>>> to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not >>>>>>> needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same >>>>>>> time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians >>>>>>> that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the >>>>>>> idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his >>>>>>> marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff >>>>>>> report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this >>>>>>but
on
reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician >>>>>>though
a
rather weak one.
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is >>>>>likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>>>>National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
changes - that ACT has increased by roughly the same percentage as >>>National has declined may however indicate where most movement is >>>happening . . .
"it is likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>National"
I will consider it.
If your statement is true, then mine is also true as being a small
part of your claim. It just indicates that your "reckons" are more
wild than those of others . . .
On Sat, 13 May 2023 21:49:26 -0000 (UTC), TonyRich. YOU are the best deliverer of wild reckons! You need to do some work on your comprehension skills or cut back on the politicised bullshit you keep pushing...
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:If your statement is true, then mine is also true as being a small
On Sat, 13 May 2023 00:30:20 -0000 (UTC), TonyWhen you provide support for your statement -
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Do you have any evidence to support that statement, Tony? I would not >>expect many to shift from either the Green Party or Te Pati Maori; but >>the polls do not give sufficient information to completely assess >>changes - that ACT has increased by roughly the same percentage as >>National has declined may however indicate where most movement is >>happening . . .
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Seymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, not just
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
What a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the >>>>>dictatorialhttps://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that >>>>>> others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer
to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not >>>>>> needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same
time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians
that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the >>>>>> idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his >>>>>> marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff >>>>>> report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here: >>>>>> >>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this but
on
reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician though
a
rather weak one.
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is >>>>likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>>>National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
National.
"it is likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >National"
I will consider it.
part of your claim. It just indicates that your "reckons" are more
wild than those of others . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2023 21:49:26 -0000 (UTC), TonyLogic is not a strength of yours, your statement does not depend on mine, an >absurd bit of reasoning. Your statement is not true. Period. You claim a >degree, you may have one but it not a science degree. Anybody with a science >degree would never have made that claim.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2023 00:30:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:When you provide support for your statement -
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Do you have any evidence to support that statement, Tony? I would not >>>>expect many to shift from either the Green Party or Te Pati Maori; but >>>>the polls do not give sufficient information to completely assess >>>>changes - that ACT has increased by roughly the same percentage as >>>>National has declined may however indicate where most movement is >>>>happening . . .
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Seymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, not just
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
What a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the >>>>>>>dictatorial
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that >>>>>>>> others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be closer >>>>>>>> to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not >>>>>>>> needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this
interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the same >>>>>>>> time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be politicians >>>>>>>> that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the >>>>>>>> idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his >>>>>>>> marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff >>>>>>>> report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this >>>>>>>but
on
reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician >>>>>>>though
a
rather weak one.
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is >>>>>>likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>>>>>National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
National.
"it is likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>>National"
I will consider it.
If your statement is true, then mine is also true as being a small
part of your claim. It just indicates that your "reckons" are more
wild than those of others . . .
On Sun, 14 May 2023 03:20:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou can prevaricate as much as you want but when you suggested that ACTs gain was Nationals loss you made a significant logical and mathematical blunder - unlikely from a science graduate.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2023 21:49:26 -0000 (UTC), TonyLogic is not a strength of yours, your statement does not depend on mine, an >>absurd bit of reasoning. Your statement is not true. Period. You claim a >>degree, you may have one but it not a science degree. Anybody with a science >>degree would never have made that claim.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2023 00:30:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:When you provide support for your statement -
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Do you have any evidence to support that statement, Tony? I would not >>>>>expect many to shift from either the Green Party or Te Pati Maori; but >>>>>the polls do not give sufficient information to completely assess >>>>>changes - that ACT has increased by roughly the same percentage as >>>>>National has declined may however indicate where most movement is >>>>>happening . . .
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Seymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, not >>>>>>just
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
What a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the >>>>>>>>dictatorial
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that >>>>>>>>> others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be >>>>>>>>>closer
to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not >>>>>>>>> needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this >>>>>>>>> interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the >>>>>>>>>same
time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be >>>>>>>>>politicians
that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the >>>>>>>>> idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his >>>>>>>>> marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff >>>>>>>>> report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this >>>>>>>>but
on
reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician >>>>>>>>though
a
rather weak one.
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is >>>>>>>likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>>>>>>National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
National.
"it is likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>>>National"
I will consider it.
If your statement is true, then mine is also true as being a small
part of your claim. It just indicates that your "reckons" are more
wild than those of others . . .
So you are saying that ACT is gaining support from all across the
political spectrum, but that the article will not bring them any
support from National voters . . . . Logic not your strong point;
"Right", Tony?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Oh dear, you do get yourself very muddled, Tony. Never mind, you can
On Sun, 14 May 2023 03:20:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou can prevaricate as much as you want but when you suggested that ACTs gain >was Nationals loss you made a significant logical and mathematical blunder - >unlikely from a science graduate.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2023 21:49:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Logic is not a strength of yours, your statement does not depend on mine, an >>>absurd bit of reasoning. Your statement is not true. Period. You claim a >>>degree, you may have one but it not a science degree. Anybody with a science >>>degree would never have made that claim.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2023 00:30:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:When you provide support for your statement -
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Do you have any evidence to support that statement, Tony? I would not >>>>>>expect many to shift from either the Green Party or Te Pati Maori; but >>>>>>the polls do not give sufficient information to completely assess >>>>>>changes - that ACT has increased by roughly the same percentage as >>>>>>National has declined may however indicate where most movement is >>>>>>happening . . .
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Seymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, not >>>>>>>just
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
What a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the >>>>>>>>>dictatorial
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that >>>>>>>>>> others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be >>>>>>>>>>closer
to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not >>>>>>>>>> needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this >>>>>>>>>> interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the >>>>>>>>>>same
time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be >>>>>>>>>>politicians
that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the >>>>>>>>>> idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share his >>>>>>>>>> marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff >>>>>>>>>> report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on this >>>>>>>>>but
on
reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician >>>>>>>>>though
a
rather weak one.
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is >>>>>>>>likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>>>>>>>National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
National.
"it is likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>>>>National"
I will consider it.
If your statement is true, then mine is also true as being a small
part of your claim. It just indicates that your "reckons" are more
wild than those of others . . .
So you are saying that ACT is gaining support from all across the
political spectrum, but that the article will not bring them any
support from National voters . . . . Logic not your strong point;
"Right", Tony?
My logic eclipses yours
On Sun, 14 May 2023 21:22:46 -0000 (UTC), TonySo you deny your mathematical and scientific incompetence. So you should, because it is very amusing.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Oh dear, you do get yourself very muddled, Tony. Never mind, you can
On Sun, 14 May 2023 03:20:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou can prevaricate as much as you want but when you suggested that ACTs gain >>was Nationals loss you made a significant logical and mathematical blunder - >>unlikely from a science graduate.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2023 21:49:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Logic is not a strength of yours, your statement does not depend on mine, >>>>an
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2023 00:30:20 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:When you provide support for your statement -
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Do you have any evidence to support that statement, Tony? I would not >>>>>>>expect many to shift from either the Green Party or Te Pati Maori; but >>>>>>>the polls do not give sufficient information to completely assess >>>>>>>changes - that ACT has increased by roughly the same percentage as >>>>>>>National has declined may however indicate where most movement is >>>>>>>happening . . .
On Fri, 12 May 2023 15:39:15 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Seymour has gained support from all across the political spectrum, not >>>>>>>>just
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 9:49:33?AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300876220/david-seymours-interview-on-voice-for-freedom-radio-station-is-fascinating
What a load of twaddle! Seymour is as far more tolerant than the >>>>>>>>>>dictatorial
This interview allowed Seymour to demonstrate his acceptance that >>>>>>>>>>> others may have views he does not share, showing that he can be >>>>>>>>>>>closer
to Green Party or Labour tolerance levels than National, while not >>>>>>>>>>> needing to defend his less attractive economic views. In this >>>>>>>>>>> interview Seymour shows the benefit of his experience, but at the >>>>>>>>>>>same
time provides a contrast to the has-been and never-will-be >>>>>>>>>>>politicians
that are Peters and Luxon. Seymour also knows that a vote from the >>>>>>>>>>> idiot fringe has just as much value as one from those that share >>>>>>>>>>>his
marginal views on other issues.
The interview could almost have been planned to result in a Stuff >>>>>>>>>>> report from Charlie Mitchell - see an earlier article by him here: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/300841258/rip-woke-media-an-examination-of-voices-for-freedoms-web-radio-channel
Labour and Greens! It's a surprise to many that Stuff reported on >>>>>>>>>>this
but
on
reading it it's just another Stuff attack on a right wing politician >>>>>>>>>>though
a
rather weak one.
I suspect Seymour and ACT will be very happy with the article; it is >>>>>>>>>likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>>>>>>>>National . . . I did not see any attack on Seymour.
National.
"it is likely to encourage at least a few National voters to shift from >>>>>>National"
I will consider it.
If your statement is true, then mine is also true as being a small >>>>>part of your claim. It just indicates that your "reckons" are more >>>>>wild than those of others . . .
absurd bit of reasoning. Your statement is not true. Period. You claim a >>>>degree, you may have one but it not a science degree. Anybody with a >>>>science
degree would never have made that claim.
So you are saying that ACT is gaining support from all across the >>>political spectrum, but that the article will not bring them any
support from National voters . . . . Logic not your strong point; >>>"Right", Tony?
My logic eclipses yours
comfort yourself that Luxon is now ahead of Ardern in the preferred
leader poll . . .
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 100:37:22 |
| Calls: | 6,659 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,208 |
| Messages: | 5,334,754 |