https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
On 2023-04-15, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
From a link in that article.
https://www.jmadresearch.com/_files/ugd/a95e86_506c8b2b92ea45d9b13eba92fdcdb354.pdf
This has some interesting facts (and graphs in it). It appears at best that >approx 40% trust the News and 69% do not enagage with it from time to time, or >all the time.
In a democracy the Fourth Estate needs to be a moderator, an uninterested >party. Once the news is in bed with the Government the trust is lost and so >is the moderation. While the Government thinks "donating" to the Media is a >weapon to be used on the other side and thus "destroy" all it does is to >remove the moderation and allows the slide into total tribalism.
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this : https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-advice
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals support
partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the
right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards the
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago
Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this : >https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-adviceOff topic
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals support
partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the
right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards theI have no such admiration and I have never stated an opinion of the two papers you mention. SO you are making shit up again.collectively
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago
Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking >admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .I did not say they were biassed.
On 15 Apr 2023 04:13:48 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-04-15, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
From a link in that article.
Get your head out of your arse and go look for once in your useless and unproductive life Rich. The evidence is out there no matter what lies you tell!https://www.jmadresearch.com/_files/ugd/a95e86_506c8b2b92ea45d9b13eba92fdcdb354.pdf
This has some interesting facts (and graphs in it). It appears at best that >approx 40% trust the News and 69% do not enagage with it from time to time, or
all the time.
In a democracy the Fourth Estate needs to be a moderator, an uninterested >party. Once the news is in bed with the Government the trust is lost and so >is the moderation. While the Government thinks "donating" to the Media is a >weapon to be used on the other side and thus "destroy" all it does is to >remove the moderation and allows the slide into total tribalism.So what money has been donated to Stuff that produced any article
relating to NZ political parties? There is no mention of any such "donations" in the jmad article which indicates higher trust in RNZ
and TVNZ than many other news media - They may be government funded
but there are strong precautions against political influence by
government
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this : https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-adviceStuff reports what the government wants and pays for it to report Rich. Explain why a violent attack by feral tranny at Albert park was described but Stuff as a peaceful protest while many overseas newspapers where shocked that the NZ media hadn't
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals support
partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the
right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards the
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago
Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 4:44:33?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On 15 Apr 2023 04:13:48 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Get your head out of your arse and go look for once in your useless and unproductive life Rich. The evidence is out there no matter what lies you tell!
On 2023-04-15, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:So what money has been donated to Stuff that produced any article
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
From a link in that article.
https://www.jmadresearch.com/_files/ugd/a95e86_506c8b2b92ea45d9b13eba92fdcdb354.pdf
This has some interesting facts (and graphs in it). It appears at best that >> >approx 40% trust the News and 69% do not enagage with it from time to time, or
all the time.
In a democracy the Fourth Estate needs to be a moderator, an uninterested >> >party. Once the news is in bed with the Government the trust is lost and so >> >is the moderation. While the Government thinks "donating" to the Media is a >> >weapon to be used on the other side and thus "destroy" all it does is to
remove the moderation and allows the slide into total tribalism.
relating to NZ political parties? There is no mention of any such
"donations" in the jmad article which indicates higher trust in RNZ
and TVNZ than many other news media - They may be government funded
but there are strong precautions against political influence by
government
On 15 Apr 2023 04:49:50 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Gordon was correct - your bias is showing.
On 2023-04-15, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this :
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals supporthttps://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-advice
partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the
right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards the
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago
Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking
admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .
Your post above seems to go a good way to doing so.
No, it is quite balanced and independent reporting - the conclusion
that ACT is unbalanced is not a conclusion expressed by Stuff - that
is merely likely to be the view of many readers who find his policies
very unattractive . . .
On 2023-04-15, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this :
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-advice
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals support
partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the
right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards the
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago
Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking
admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .
Your post above seems to go a good way to doing so.
On 15 Apr 2023 04:49:50 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:BULLSHIT! It's only balanced if your an imbecilic Marxist like you Rich! Stuff is neck deep in the governments bribe named the Journalistic fund!
On 2023-04-15, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this :
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-advice
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals support
partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the
right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards the
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago
Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking
admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .
Your post above seems to go a good way to doing so.No, it is quite balanced and independent reporting - the conclusion
that ACT is unbalanced is not a conclusion expressed by Stuff - that
is merely likely to be the view of many readers who find his policies
very unattractive . . .
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:34:33 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 4:44:33?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:It certainly appears that you cannot find any such evidence. Why do
On 15 Apr 2023 04:13:48 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Get your head out of your arse and go look for once in your useless and unproductive life Rich. The evidence is out there no matter what lies you tell!
On 2023-04-15, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:So what money has been donated to Stuff that produced any article
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
From a link in that article.
https://www.jmadresearch.com/_files/ugd/a95e86_506c8b2b92ea45d9b13eba92fdcdb354.pdf
This has some interesting facts (and graphs in it). It appears at best that
approx 40% trust the News and 69% do not enagage with it from time to time, or
all the time.
In a democracy the Fourth Estate needs to be a moderator, an uninterested
party. Once the news is in bed with the Government the trust is lost and so
is the moderation. While the Government thinks "donating" to the Media is a
weapon to be used on the other side and thus "destroy" all it does is to >> >remove the moderation and allows the slide into total tribalism.
relating to NZ political parties? There is no mention of any such
"donations" in the jmad article which indicates higher trust in RNZ
and TVNZ than many other news media - They may be government funded
but there are strong precautions against political influence by
government
you so obviously lie, John?
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:29:50 -0700 (PDT), John Bowesreported that fact!
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 4:11:13?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), TonyStuff reports what the government wants and pays for it to report Rich. Explain why a violent attack by feral tranny at Albert park was described but Stuff as a peaceful protest while many overseas newspapers where shocked that the NZ media hadn't
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this :
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-advice
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals support
partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the
right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards the
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago
Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking
admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .
Your constant support for a government that is steadily dropping below National polling only makes me wonder how much YOU get from the Journalism bribe!
Provide evidence for any such payments, John Bowes. This is not your
first lie relating to this issue; lack of evidence will confirm that
you are a serial liar . . .
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:reported that fact!
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:29:50 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 4:11:13?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), TonyStuff reports what the government wants and pays for it to report Rich. Explain why a violent attack by feral tranny at Albert park was described but Stuff as a peaceful protest while many overseas newspapers where shocked that the NZ media hadn't
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this :
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-advice
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals support
partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the
right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards the
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago >>> Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking >>> admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .
The Labour payoff to the media go back to 2018. Oh and it was at least $55 million. Though the NZ media at present aren't worth $55 ;)Your constant support for a government that is steadily dropping below National polling only makes me wonder how much YOU get from the Journalism bribe!
Provide evidence for any such payments, John Bowes. This is not yourRich. Everyone knows that the news media in this country was paid off
first lie relating to this issue; lack of evidence will confirm that
you are a serial liar . . .
with the $55 covid fund and are still being paid off to promote the government line. The news media in NZ is just a New Zealand version
of Pravda. Want to find out what's really going on here you have to
look at overseas media.
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:34:33 -0700 (PDT), John BowesEnjoy your dead rats Rich! https://twitter.com/OpinionistNZ/status/1647342554957086720/photo/1
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 4:44:33?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:It certainly appears that you cannot find any such evidence. Why do
On 15 Apr 2023 04:13:48 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Get your head out of your arse and go look for once in your useless and unproductive life Rich. The evidence is out there no matter what lies you tell!
On 2023-04-15, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:So what money has been donated to Stuff that produced any article
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
From a link in that article.
https://www.jmadresearch.com/_files/ugd/a95e86_506c8b2b92ea45d9b13eba92fdcdb354.pdf
This has some interesting facts (and graphs in it). It appears at best that
approx 40% trust the News and 69% do not enagage with it from time to time, or
all the time.
In a democracy the Fourth Estate needs to be a moderator, an uninterested
party. Once the news is in bed with the Government the trust is lost and so
is the moderation. While the Government thinks "donating" to the Media is a
weapon to be used on the other side and thus "destroy" all it does is to >> >remove the moderation and allows the slide into total tribalism.
relating to NZ political parties? There is no mention of any such
"donations" in the jmad article which indicates higher trust in RNZ
and TVNZ than many other news media - They may be government funded
but there are strong precautions against political influence by
government
you so obviously lie, John?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:reported that fact!
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:29:50 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 4:11:13?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), TonyStuff reports what the government wants and pays for it to report Rich. Explain why a violent attack by feral tranny at Albert park was described but Stuff as a peaceful protest while many overseas newspapers where shocked that the NZ media hadn't
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this :
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-advice
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals support
partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the
right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards the
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago
Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking >>>> admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .
Your constant support for a government that is steadily dropping below National polling only makes me wonder how much YOU get from the Journalism bribe!
Provide evidence for any such payments, John Bowes. This is not your
first lie relating to this issue; lack of evidence will confirm that
you are a serial liar . . .
Rich. Everyone knows that the news media in this country was paid off
with the $55 covid fund and are still being paid off to promote the >government line. The news media in NZ is just a New Zealand version
of Pravda. Want to find out what's really going on here you have to
look at overseas media.
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 6:20:19?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:NZ On Air is not the Labour Party . . . .
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:34:33 -0700 (PDT), John BowesEnjoy your dead rats Rich! https://twitter.com/OpinionistNZ/status/1647342554957086720/photo/1
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 4:44:33?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:It certainly appears that you cannot find any such evidence. Why do
On 15 Apr 2023 04:13:48 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Get your head out of your arse and go look for once in your useless and unproductive life Rich. The evidence is out there no matter what lies you tell!
On 2023-04-15, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:So what money has been donated to Stuff that produced any article
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/
From a link in that article.
https://www.jmadresearch.com/_files/ugd/a95e86_506c8b2b92ea45d9b13eba92fdcdb354.pdf
This has some interesting facts (and graphs in it). It appears at best that
approx 40% trust the News and 69% do not enagage with it from time to time, or
all the time.
In a democracy the Fourth Estate needs to be a moderator, an uninterested
party. Once the news is in bed with the Government the trust is lost and so
is the moderation. While the Government thinks "donating" to the Media is a
weapon to be used on the other side and thus "destroy" all it does is to >> >> >remove the moderation and allows the slide into total tribalism.
relating to NZ political parties? There is no mention of any such
"donations" in the jmad article which indicates higher trust in RNZ
and TVNZ than many other news media - They may be government funded
but there are strong precautions against political influence by
government
you so obviously lie, John?
On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 07:56:37 +1200, Mutley <mutle...@hotmail.com>reported that fact!
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:29:50 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 4:11:13?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), TonyStuff reports what the government wants and pays for it to report Rich. Explain why a violent attack by feral tranny at Albert park was described but Stuff as a peaceful protest while many overseas newspapers where shocked that the NZ media hadn't
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/ >>>>
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this :
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-advice
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals support
partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the
right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards the
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago >>>> Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking >>>> admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .
you've been asked plenty of times to provide proof and never have so try practicing what you preach tranny lover!Your constant support for a government that is steadily dropping below National polling only makes me wonder how much YOU get from the Journalism bribe!
Provide evidence for any such payments, John Bowes. This is not your >>first lie relating to this issue; lack of evidence will confirm that
you are a serial liar . . .
Rich. Everyone knows that the news media in this country was paid offYou were asked to provide proof - an effort to do so would demonstrate
with the $55 covid fund and are still being paid off to promote the >government line. The news media in NZ is just a New Zealand version
of Pravda. Want to find out what's really going on here you have to
look at overseas media.
to you that you are wrong . . .
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 15:32:08 -0700 (PDT), John BowesProve they're obeying their own claims if you can Rich and I'm still waiting for about twenty appologies from you so get stuffed!
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 6:20:19?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:NZ On Air is not the Labour Party . . . .
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:34:33 -0700 (PDT), John BowesEnjoy your dead rats Rich! https://twitter.com/OpinionistNZ/status/1647342554957086720/photo/1
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 4:44:33?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:It certainly appears that you cannot find any such evidence. Why do
On 15 Apr 2023 04:13:48 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Get your head out of your arse and go look for once in your useless and unproductive life Rich. The evidence is out there no matter what lies you tell!
On 2023-04-15, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:So what money has been donated to Stuff that produced any article
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/ >> >> >From a link in that article.
https://www.jmadresearch.com/_files/ugd/a95e86_506c8b2b92ea45d9b13eba92fdcdb354.pdf
This has some interesting facts (and graphs in it). It appears at best that
approx 40% trust the News and 69% do not enagage with it from time to time, or
all the time.
In a democracy the Fourth Estate needs to be a moderator, an uninterested
party. Once the news is in bed with the Government the trust is lost and so
is the moderation. While the Government thinks "donating" to the Media is a
weapon to be used on the other side and thus "destroy" all it does is to
remove the moderation and allows the slide into total tribalism.
relating to NZ political parties? There is no mention of any such
"donations" in the jmad article which indicates higher trust in RNZ
and TVNZ than many other news media - They may be government funded
but there are strong precautions against political influence by
government
you so obviously lie, John?
NZ on Air funding must be used in a specific way - have a look and you
can then apologise
On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 07:56:37 +1200, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>reported that fact!
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:29:50 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 4:11:13?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), TonyStuff reports what the government wants and pays for it to report Rich. Explain why a violent attack by feral tranny at Albert park was described but Stuff as a peaceful protest while many overseas newspapers where shocked that the NZ media hadn't
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/ >>>>>
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this :
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-advice
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals support
partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the
right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards the
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago >>>>> Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking >>>>> admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .
Your constant support for a government that is steadily dropping below National polling only makes me wonder how much YOU get from the Journalism bribe!
Provide evidence for any such payments, John Bowes. This is not your >>>first lie relating to this issue; lack of evidence will confirm that
you are a serial liar . . .
Rich. Everyone knows that the news media in this country was paid off
with the $55 covid fund and are still being paid off to promote the >>government line. The news media in NZ is just a New Zealand version
of Pravda. Want to find out what's really going on here you have to
look at overseas media.
You were asked to provide proof - an effort to do so would demonstrate
to you that you are wrong . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Seeing and acknowledging are unrelated for Rich.
On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 07:56:37 +1200, Mutley <mutley2000@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:29:50 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 4:11:13?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), TonyStuff reports what the government wants and pays for it to report Rich. >>>>>Explain why a violent attack by feral tranny at Albert park was described but
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/ >>>>>>
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this : >>>>>> >>>>>>https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-advice
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals support
partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the
right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards the
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago >>>>>> Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking >>>>>> admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .
Stuff as a peaceful protest while many overseas newspapers where shocked that
the NZ media hadn't reported that fact!
Your constant support for a government that is steadily dropping below >>>>>National polling only makes me wonder how much YOU get from the Journalism >>>>>bribe!
Provide evidence for any such payments, John Bowes. This is not your >>>>first lie relating to this issue; lack of evidence will confirm that >>>>you are a serial liar . . .
Rich. Everyone knows that the news media in this country was paid off >>>with the $55 covid fund and are still being paid off to promote the >>>government line. The news media in NZ is just a New Zealand version
of Pravda. Want to find out what's really going on here you have to
look at overseas media.
You were asked to provide proof - an effort to do so would demonstrate
to you that you are wrong . . .
The proof is reading the likes of Stuff and NZ Herald . All government >promoting stories. Anything to counter that is suppressed and you
any see it in the likes of Twitter and this group . Even the most
blind Liebor supporter like you can see that.
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:reported that fact!
On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 07:56:37 +1200, Mutley <mutle...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 22:29:50 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 15, 2023 at 4:11:13?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 02:14:21 -0000 (UTC), TonyStuff reports what the government wants and pays for it to report Rich. Explain why a violent attack by feral tranny at Albert park was described but Stuff as a peaceful protest while many overseas newspapers where shocked that the NZ media hadn't
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://thebfd.co.nz/2023/04/14/the-height-of-hypocrisy-from-stuff/ >>>>>
Clearly Stuff is biassed against National to have published this : >>>>> https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/131777857/david-seymour-covid-isolation-rules-reflect-bad-decisions-based-on-bad-advice
It really is unfair to point out how unbalanced Nationals support >>>>> partner is - but on the other hand Seymour is seen by many on the >>>>> right as a better leader than Luxon . . .
But your assertion that Stuff is in any way biassed towards the
government is as untrue as claiming that The Herald / DomPost / Otago >>>>> Times etc are biassed - just because they do not share your unthinking >>>>> admiration for NatAct . . .
If you really think there is a bias, provide evidence . . .
You just have to see Luxon going to Australian media so his message gets out their. NO NZ media give him a chance to announce some excellent ideas!Your constant support for a government that is steadily dropping below National polling only makes me wonder how much YOU get from the Journalism bribe!
Provide evidence for any such payments, John Bowes. This is not your >>>first lie relating to this issue; lack of evidence will confirm that >>>you are a serial liar . . .
Rich. Everyone knows that the news media in this country was paid off >>with the $55 covid fund and are still being paid off to promote the >>government line. The news media in NZ is just a New Zealand version
of Pravda. Want to find out what's really going on here you have to
look at overseas media.
You were asked to provide proof - an effort to do so would demonstrateThe proof is reading the likes of Stuff and NZ Herald . All government promoting stories. Anything to counter that is suppressed and you
to you that you are wrong . . .
any see it in the likes of Twitter and this group . Even the most
blind Liebor supporter like you can see that.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 126:26:38 |
| Calls: | 6,663 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,956 |