1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • Hipkin's couldn't say what a woman was!!!

    From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 3 00:49:13 2023
    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to bowesjohn02@gmail.com on Mon Apr 3 21:47:03 2023
    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    That New Zealand is open and tolerant, and values people as people
    rather than for labels says a lot positive about New Zealand, but it
    seems National want to drag us back to the divisive politics of the
    far right . . .

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/06/worlds-first-openly-transgender-mp-georgina-beyer-dies-in-new-zealand-aged-65
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgina_Beyer

    Note the use of she / her in those articles . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 3 03:23:00 2023
    On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 9:50:45 PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    That New Zealand is open and tolerant, and values people as people
    rather than for labels says a lot positive about New Zealand, but it
    seems National want to drag us back to the divisive politics of the
    far right . . .

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/06/worlds-first-openly-transgender-mp-georgina-beyer-dies-in-new-zealand-aged-65
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgina_Beyer

    Note the use of she / her in those articles . . .

    Why are you dragging Georgina into this? Don't have a problem with him. I doubt if he'd have anything to do with the trans mob. Georgina prefered transexual which the current feral trans don't like being called. Georgina was a great person unlike the
    free speech and women hating ferals like you Rich! Georgina is from a time when Labour wasn't controlled by feral gende rconfused people like Chris Hipkins and the current Labour party and it's supporters like you Rich....
    Who wrote the articles? Georgina or some woke left wing gender confused feral? But guess you're just trying to distract from our embarrassing PM. A person who watches where he walks because of his propensity to put his foot in his mouth up to his hips!
    It's not about pronouns it's about stupid political parties that take away the right of people to be identified by their sex at birth!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 4 04:48:25 2023
    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Apr 3 19:56:40 2023
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he >>can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    That New Zealand is open and tolerant, and values people as people
    rather than for labels says a lot positive about New Zealand, but it
    seems National want to drag us back to the divisive politics of the
    far right . . .

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/06/worlds-first-openly-transgender-mp-georgina-beyer-dies-in-new-zealand-aged-65
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgina_Beyer

    Note the use of she / her in those articles . . .
    Off topic irrelevance. The topic is what the PM thinks, not National. You are obsessed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JohnO@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 3 13:54:21 2023
    On Tuesday, 4 April 2023 at 04:48:27 UTC+12, BR wrote:
    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.
    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Dickbot thinks the naked person with a penis in the women's changing room at the swimming pool is a woman, as long as that person feels so...

    Because Dickbot is a severely mentally and emotionally challenged individual.


    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to JohnO on Mon Apr 3 14:18:09 2023
    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 8:54:23 AM UTC+12, JohnO wrote:
    On Tuesday, 4 April 2023 at 04:48:27 UTC+12, BR wrote:
    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.
    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?
    Dickbot thinks the naked person with a penis in the women's changing room at the swimming pool is a woman, as long as that person feels so...

    Because Dickbot is a severely mentally and emotionally challenged individual.

    Dickbot is typical of the feral slime from the Labour river of filth! None of them believe in freedom of speech or support women's rights. Hipkins response to the question is typical of the beliefs of those who blindly follow Labour and the feral trans
    who attacked PP. I see them as just sorry victims of Labours failed mental health initiative. That is so typical of Labours failure to govern!

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to John Bowes on Mon Apr 3 23:14:51 2023
    On 2023-04-03, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 9:50:45 PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522
    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    That New Zealand is open and tolerant, and values people as people
    rather than for labels says a lot positive about New Zealand, but it
    seems National want to drag us back to the divisive politics of the
    far right . . .

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/06/worlds-first-openly-transgender-mp-georgina-beyer-dies-in-new-zealand-aged-65
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgina_Beyer

    Note the use of she / her in those articles . . .

    Why are you dragging Georgina into this? Don't have a problem with him. I doubt if he'd have anything to do with the trans mob. Georgina prefered transexual which the current feral trans don't like being called. Georgina was a great person unlike the
    free speech and women hating ferals like you Rich! Georgina is from a time when Labour wasn't controlled by feral gende rconfused people like Chris Hipkins and the current Labour party and it's supporters like you Rich....
    Who wrote the articles? Georgina or some woke left wing gender confused feral?
    But guess you're just trying to distract from our embarrassing PM. A person who watches where he walks because of his propensity to put his foot in his mouth up to his hips!


    It's not about pronouns it's about stupid political parties that take away the right of people to be identified by their sex at birth!

    Really? I see is as Transalfa folks and others are pushing for the
    diversity of sex/gender idendity. In much the same way that a person has the right to be called whatever they like.

    However it the world of total tribalism we are really in the swamp. Having a discussion is not going to happen. Not good for an outcome.

    There is a difference between male and female brains, which you have defines you sex/gender idenity. Then of course we have the gay brain which is a sub section of the male brain.

    The fact that so much buzz is going on now about sex/gender of a human shows that it is pushing peoples buttons. People see it as unsettling and are
    fearful of where this is going to go. After all we have had covid and
    climate change is nothing less than the oceans about to boil.

    In short defining a woman or a man comes from our past, when things were simpiler and binary, although gays were in underground.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Mon Apr 3 22:53:55 2023
    On 2023-04-03, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.


    Which version would you like Bill? The pre 1970 model, the 80's model of the real woke model, or some of the many others.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 3 17:32:52 2023
    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 12:23:05 PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.
    Yes - can you?
    LIAR!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Tue Apr 4 12:19:29 2023
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to bowesjohn02@gmail.com on Tue Apr 4 14:00:11 2023
    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:32:52 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 12:23:05?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.
    Yes - can you?
    LIAR!
    We knew you couldn't, John . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 3 20:10:35 2023
    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 2:03:50 PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:32:52 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 12:23:05?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.
    Yes - can you?
    LIAR!
    We knew you couldn't, John . . .
    Lying feral slime. Please tell us then if you know different from your biology failing feral PM!
    Here's a clue: Two sex known to humankind, child bearing and ball bearing. Something that confuses the shit out of feral woke twats like you and Hipkins!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Apr 4 04:05:17 2023
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think >>>>he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to Tony on Mon Apr 3 21:31:25 2023
    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 4:05:19 PM UTC+12, Tony wrote:
    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Rich will give us an even crazier explanation than his nutcase of a leader. Both suffer from Labours failed mental health initiative and are desperately in need of help...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to bowesjohn02@gmail.com on Tue Apr 4 17:07:11 2023
    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 20:10:35 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 2:03:50?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:32:52 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 12:23:05?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.
    Yes - can you?
    LIAR!
    We knew you couldn't, John . . .
    Lying feral slime. Please tell us then if you know different from your biology failing feral PM!
    Here's a clue: Two sex known to humankind, child bearing and ball bearing. Something that confuses the shit out of feral woke twats like you and Hipkins!

    Nive try, but no, that is not a definition, John. Seems even with all
    the time you have been given, you still can't define what a woman is .
    . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Tue Apr 4 17:14:50 2023
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think >>>>>he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.

    Why, Tony? Do you not know?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 3 22:39:23 2023
    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:10:53 PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 20:10:35 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 2:03:50?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:32:52 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 12:23:05?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >> >> >wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.
    Yes - can you?
    LIAR!
    We knew you couldn't, John . . .
    Lying feral slime. Please tell us then if you know different from your biology failing feral PM!
    Here's a clue: Two sex known to humankind, child bearing and ball bearing. Something that confuses the shit out of feral woke twats like you and Hipkins!
    Nive try, but no, that is not a definition, John. Seems even with all
    the time you have been given, you still can't define what a woman is .
    . .
    An even niver try from you Rich :)
    Guess just another fail from an arrogant and very feral extreme left hater of women, free speech and honesty...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 3 22:40:18 2023
    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26 PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Why, Tony? Do you not know?
    Wrong as usual Rich. We just want you to prove for once in your feral life that you can answer your own question.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Apr 4 05:28:52 2023
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think >>>>>>he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.

    Why, Tony? Do you not know?
    I have never said that I do or do not. But you have said that you do, so do tell us. Or be the coward you normally are and spin and twist your way into some sort of silly abusive post - again!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 4 17:28:04 2023
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:19:29 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?

    Let's be having it then.

    What is your definition of a woman?

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 4 23:53:04 2023
    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26 PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Why, Tony? Do you not know?
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to bowesjohn02@gmail.com on Wed Apr 5 21:19:37 2023
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Why, Tony? Do you not know? >https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995

    You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need
    to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to
    contribute . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 5 03:52:28 2023
    On Wednesday, April 5, 2023 at 9:23:15 PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Why, Tony? Do you not know? >https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995
    You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need
    to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to contribute . . .
    Rich it is YOU who are confused. I know damn well what a woman is. It's a human female capable of having baby's something the men wearing skirts will NEVER do! btw it was only irrelevant to gender confused ferals like you!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Wed Apr 5 19:58:46 2023
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think >>>>>>he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.

    Why, Tony? Do you not know?
    Anybody who posts a listing from a dictionary as an attempt to define women is illiterate.
    Dictionaries define words very well, they define complex things not at all.
    J K Rowling has quite accurately asked whether to gain some balance maybe women should define Chris Hipkins. Good idea, he is much easier to define than women.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Thu Apr 6 08:24:02 2023
    On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 19:58:46 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>>themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.

    Why, Tony? Do you not know?
    Anybody who posts a listing from a dictionary as an attempt to define women is >illiterate.
    Dictionaries define words very well, they define complex things not at all.
    J K Rowling has quite accurately asked whether to gain some balance maybe women
    should define Chris Hipkins. Good idea, he is much easier to define than women.

    I was asked to provide a definition, just as our Prime Minister was
    asked. Frankly I do not care that you and John Bowes do not agree with
    the definition I gave - provided you comply with our laws, and respect
    the different opinions of others, why should I care? I sus[pect
    however that respect for opinions contrary to your own is a big ask
    from you and John. I note that you tried to distract from the issue of
    defining a woman with an irrelevncy - yet again when you realise you
    do not understand you attempt to go off topic . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 5 14:08:49 2023
    On Thursday, April 6, 2023 at 8:27:40 AM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 19:58:46 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!! >>>>>>>
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>>themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.

    Why, Tony? Do you not know?
    Anybody who posts a listing from a dictionary as an attempt to define women is
    illiterate.
    Dictionaries define words very well, they define complex things not at all. >J K Rowling has quite accurately asked whether to gain some balance maybe women
    should define Chris Hipkins. Good idea, he is much easier to define than women.
    I was asked to provide a definition, just as our Prime Minister was
    asked. Frankly I do not care that you and John Bowes do not agree with
    the definition I gave - provided you comply with our laws, and respect
    the different opinions of others, why should I care? I sus[pect
    however that respect for opinions contrary to your own is a big ask
    from you and John. I note that you tried to distract from the issue of defining a woman with an irrelevncy - yet again when you realise you
    do not understand you attempt to go off topic . . .
    We respect sensible opinions Rich. This is the reason we have nothing but contempt for your over politicised ramblings. You know you were wrong in your protest and ignoring of common sense and are now desperately failing to try and achieve some
    credibility Rich. Regrettably as usual you've failed which isn't a surprise from the total failure that you are.

    Oh btw. The irrelevacancy was your stupid dictionary definition which only highlighted your antipathy to women's rights and hatred of freedom of speech. Please keep making your amusing but stupid opinions Rich. They do brighten the day as you sink deeper
    into ignorance...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Thu Apr 6 01:26:13 2023
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 19:58:46 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to >>>>>>>>think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>>>themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.

    Why, Tony? Do you not know?
    Anybody who posts a listing from a dictionary as an attempt to define women >>is
    illiterate.
    Dictionaries define words very well, they define complex things not at all. >>J K Rowling has quite accurately asked whether to gain some balance maybe >>women
    should define Chris Hipkins. Good idea, he is much easier to define than >>women.

    I was asked to provide a definition, just as our Prime Minister was
    asked. Frankly I do not care that you and John Bowes do not agree with
    the definition I gave - provided you comply with our laws, and respect
    the different opinions of others, why should I care? I sus[pect
    however that respect for opinions contrary to your own is a big ask
    from you and John. I note that you tried to distract from the issue of >defining a woman with an irrelevncy - yet again when you realise you
    do not understand you attempt to go off topic . . .
    You went off topic and I responded to you.
    I don't give a fig about what you care about. However a dictionary definition of the words women or woman (or men or man) does not describe women, not in a million years. You are a fool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 6 19:30:30 2023
    On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995

    You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need
    to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to
    contribute . . .

    So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a
    woman is.

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Fri Apr 7 00:08:33 2023
    On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>> >>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995

    You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need
    to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>contribute . . .

    So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a
    woman is.

    Bill.

    I have given a definition as equested - I not that no other
    definitions have been given. Ask someone else . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 7 06:24:06 2023
    On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:08:33 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>> >>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995

    You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need
    to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>>contribute . . .

    So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a
    woman is.

    Bill.

    I have given a definition as equested -

    You've done nothing of the sort.

    I not that no other definitions have been given.

    Here, let me help you out.

    A woman is an adult human female.

    An adult human female can be further defined as a person who's anatomy
    is comprised of cells that contain only XX chromosomes.

    Agree or disagree?

    Ask someone else . . .

    Why? It's a simple enough question.

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 6 14:05:33 2023
    On Friday, April 7, 2023 at 6:24:07 AM UTC+12, BR wrote:
    On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:08:33 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>> >>
    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>> >>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!! >>>>> >>>>>
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995

    You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need >>>to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>>contribute . . .

    So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a >>woman is.

    Bill.

    I have given a definition as equested -
    You've done nothing of the sort.
    I not that no other definitions have been given.
    Here, let me help you out.

    A woman is an adult human female.

    An adult human female can be further defined as a person who's anatomy
    is comprised of cells that contain only XX chromosomes.

    Agree or disagree?
    Ask someone else . . .
    Why? It's a simple enough question.
    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com
    Being a good little communist blindly following feral Labour Rich believes you are what you think you are and the mere thought entitles you to invade womens spaces and cheat as women's sport. He's typical of the sheep that blindly follow Labour! Roll on
    October!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Fri Apr 7 13:45:45 2023
    On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 06:24:06 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:08:33 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>>> >>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!! >>>>>> >>>>>
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question
    themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995

    You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need
    to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>>>contribute . . .

    So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a >>>woman is.

    Bill.

    I have given a definition as equested -

    You've done nothing of the sort.

    I not that no other definitions have been given.

    Here, let me help you out.

    A woman is an adult human female.

    An adult human female can be further defined as a person who's anatomy
    is comprised of cells that contain only XX chromosomes.

    Agree or disagree?

    Ask someone else . . .

    Why? It's a simple enough question.

    Bill.
    Indeed it was, and you have now given a different definition. Thank
    you. You will by now realise that words have meaning that can be
    different between different people, and that may change over time. I
    have not said which definition I believe, or which I prefer - what
    concerns me more is that when I do express view I do not expect
    everyone to necessarily agree, or to not have alternative views - you
    are entitled to express a different view than anyone else, and we
    should respect and at times even celebrate our differences.

    https://novonordiskfonden.dk/en/news/more-women-than-expected-are-genetically-men/
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/q-a-mixed-sex-biology/

    Sometimes a simple definition does not cover all all of reality -
    greater scientific knowledge can result in changes, and at times
    unwanted complexity, but at the end of the day, the labels man or
    woman are not immutable or in some cases sufficiently clear. We do
    however need to be sensitive to those that do not fit simple labels;
    all people have rights, and nobody deserves the wild misinformed
    criticism and effectively identity attacks that some rabid nutters
    would encourage through their own ignorance and prejudice against
    those that are different.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 6 20:26:11 2023
    On Friday, April 7, 2023 at 1:49:24 PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 06:24:06 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:08:33 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>> >>
    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!! >>>>>> >>>>>
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>> >>>>themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995

    You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need >>>>to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>>>contribute . . .

    So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a >>>woman is.

    Bill.

    I have given a definition as equested -

    You've done nothing of the sort.

    I not that no other definitions have been given.

    Here, let me help you out.

    A woman is an adult human female.

    An adult human female can be further defined as a person who's anatomy
    is comprised of cells that contain only XX chromosomes.

    Agree or disagree?

    Ask someone else . . .

    Why? It's a simple enough question.

    Bill.
    Indeed it was, and you have now given a different definition. Thank
    you. You will by now realise that words have meaning that can be
    different between different people, and that may change over time. I
    have not said which definition I believe, or which I prefer - what
    concerns me more is that when I do express view I do not expect
    everyone to necessarily agree, or to not have alternative views - you
    are entitled to express a different view than anyone else, and we
    should respect and at times even celebrate our differences.

    https://novonordiskfonden.dk/en/news/more-women-than-expected-are-genetically-men/
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/q-a-mixed-sex-biology/

    Sometimes a simple definition does not cover all all of reality -
    greater scientific knowledge can result in changes, and at times
    unwanted complexity, but at the end of the day, the labels man or
    woman are not immutable or in some cases sufficiently clear. We do
    however need to be sensitive to those that do not fit simple labels;
    all people have rights, and nobody deserves the wild misinformed
    criticism and effectively identity attacks that some rabid nutters
    would encourage through their own ignorance and prejudice against
    those that are different.
    More garbage from the ever duplicitous Rich! Guess he's just a NZGreen cry baby weeping it's sad little way through what passes for it's hypocritical life...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to Gordon on Thu Apr 6 21:51:47 2023
    On Friday, April 7, 2023 at 4:40:58 PM UTC+12, Gordon wrote:
    On 2023-04-07, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 06:24:06 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:08:33 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:

    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>> >>
    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>>> >>>>themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>>>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995

    You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need >>>>>to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>>>>contribute . . .

    So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a >>>>woman is.

    Bill.

    I have given a definition as equested -

    You've done nothing of the sort.

    I not that no other definitions have been given.

    Here, let me help you out.

    A woman is an adult human female.

    An adult human female can be further defined as a person who's anatomy >>is comprised of cells that contain only XX chromosomes.
    Not in all cases

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/141105165209.htm along with the other links Rich has given below.

    Agree or disagree?

    Ask someone else . . .

    Why? It's a simple enough question.

    Bill.
    Indeed it was, and you have now given a different definition. Thank
    you. You will by now realise that words have meaning that can be
    different between different people, and that may change over time. I
    have not said which definition I believe, or which I prefer - what concerns me more is that when I do express view I do not expect
    everyone to necessarily agree, or to not have alternative views - you
    are entitled to express a different view than anyone else, and we
    should respect and at times even celebrate our differences.

    https://novonordiskfonden.dk/en/news/more-women-than-expected-are-genetically-men/
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/q-a-mixed-sex-biology/

    Sometimes a simple definition does not cover all all of reality -
    greater scientific knowledge can result in changes, and at times
    unwanted complexity, but at the end of the day, the labels man or
    woman are not immutable or in some cases sufficiently clear. We do
    however need to be sensitive to those that do not fit simple labels;
    all people have rights, and nobody deserves the wild misinformed
    criticism and effectively identity attacks that some rabid nutters
    would encourage through their own ignorance and prejudice against
    those that are different.
    To-days suprise. Rich has switched into sensible mode.

    Rich NEVER switches into sensible mode. He's incapable of it. He's just trying to cver his sorry arse because he's just realised what an utter imbecile he looks like...

    Which organs alone you have does not one male or female, you need to check what type of brain the person has.

    The brain is the most important sex organ.

    Why back when I was a student a university, I read an article on the matter of which way to go for the inter-sex baby. The arguement went, female is easier so as it is a baby we can bring it up as a girl. Some chap in the neuro world, asked the question about Which brain did the baby have? No one really stopped and thought about this until the "girl" we a teenanger.

    Sorry old chap but I am a man in a women's body. That can not be as girl had been rasied as a girl. Nature vs nurature.

    Nowdays the thinking is do no harm, do nothing and let the child grow up. At some point it will know whether its a man or a woman.

    The default sex is female. To get a male you need a Y chromosone to "throw a few switches". At fertilisation, at approx 6 months and the start of pubity.

    If it does not do this we end with some unusal versions.

    Gay men know that they are gay, and trying them to be anything else is a waste of time and effort, not to mention being sexist. We have just about cleared this predijuce.

    At the end of the day there will a great deal more understanding about how binary is best for numbers, not people.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Fri Apr 7 04:40:56 2023
    On 2023-04-07, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 06:24:06 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 00:08:33 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Thu, 06 Apr 2023 19:30:30 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:19:37 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:

    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 23:53:04 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >>>>><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 5:18:26?PM UTC+12, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 04:05:17 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 04:48:25 +1200, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>> >>
    On Mon, 03 Apr 2023 21:47:03 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>>>> >>>wrote:

    On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:49:13 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
    <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:

    To think this useless, ill informed Marxist muppets has the gall to think
    he can win an election! No wonder Labour is such a shambles!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1642748914209259522

    It seems the critics on the right are avoiding that question >>>>>>> >>>>themselves.

    Can you define what a woman is Rich80105?

    Bill.

    Yes - can you?
    Ok then tell us.
    Why, Tony? Do you not know? >>>>>>https://twitter.com/i/status/1643450523235028995

    You have already confirmed that you do not know, John Bowes. No need >>>>>to post further irrelevancies to emphasis that you have nothing to >>>>>contribute . . .

    So come on Rich80105. Tell the readers here what your definition of a >>>>woman is.

    Bill.

    I have given a definition as equested -

    You've done nothing of the sort.

    I not that no other definitions have been given.

    Here, let me help you out.

    A woman is an adult human female.

    An adult human female can be further defined as a person who's anatomy
    is comprised of cells that contain only XX chromosomes.

    Not in all cases

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/141105165209.htm along with
    the other links Rich has given below.


    Agree or disagree?

    Ask someone else . . .

    Why? It's a simple enough question.

    Bill.
    Indeed it was, and you have now given a different definition. Thank
    you. You will by now realise that words have meaning that can be
    different between different people, and that may change over time. I
    have not said which definition I believe, or which I prefer - what
    concerns me more is that when I do express view I do not expect
    everyone to necessarily agree, or to not have alternative views - you
    are entitled to express a different view than anyone else, and we
    should respect and at times even celebrate our differences.

    https://novonordiskfonden.dk/en/news/more-women-than-expected-are-genetically-men/
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/q-a-mixed-sex-biology/

    Sometimes a simple definition does not cover all all of reality -
    greater scientific knowledge can result in changes, and at times
    unwanted complexity, but at the end of the day, the labels man or
    woman are not immutable or in some cases sufficiently clear. We do
    however need to be sensitive to those that do not fit simple labels;
    all people have rights, and nobody deserves the wild misinformed
    criticism and effectively identity attacks that some rabid nutters
    would encourage through their own ignorance and prejudice against
    those that are different.

    To-days suprise. Rich has switched into sensible mode.

    Which organs alone you have does not one male or female, you need to check
    what type of brain the person has.

    The brain is the most important sex organ.

    Why back when I was a student a university, I read an article on the matter
    of which way to go for the inter-sex baby. The arguement went, female is
    easier so as it is a baby we can bring it up as a girl. Some chap in the
    neuro world, asked the question about Which brain did the baby have? No one really stopped and thought about this until the "girl" we a teenanger.

    Sorry old chap but I am a man in a women's body. That can not be as girl had been rasied as a girl. Nature vs nurature.

    Nowdays the thinking is do no harm, do nothing and let the child grow up. At some point it will know whether its a man or a woman.

    The default sex is female. To get a male you need a Y chromosone to "throw a few switches". At fertilisation, at approx 6 months and the start of pubity.

    If it does not do this we end with some unusal versions.

    Gay men know that they are gay, and trying them to be anything else is a
    waste of time and effort, not to mention being sexist. We have just about cleared this predijuce.

    At the end of the day there will a great deal more understanding about how binary is best for numbers, not people.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)