I know you can't help yourself defending the undefendable but claiming an event wasn't violent when it was just makes you look like an unscientific feral prat!
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/fear-and-loathing-in-new-zealand/
On 2023-03-31, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
I know you can't help yourself defending the undefendable but claiming an event wasn't violent when it was just makes you look like an unscientific feral prat!
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/fear-and-loathing-in-new-zealand/
That article is worth while reading as it is written by Posie, the woman in >the centre of this day of shame. Adds some balance to the story and confirms >the events as reported in the Stuff.
Day of Shame sums it up.
On 31 Mar 2023 06:50:01 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Bullshit! It provides more balance than we've ever seen from you Rich in all your years posting political bullshit here! JohnO provided another link so it's not unbalanced and if your head wasn't so far up your rectum you might actually have a clue of
On 2023-03-31, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
I know you can't help yourself defending the undefendable but claiming an event wasn't violent when it was just makes you look like an unscientific feral prat!
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/fear-and-loathing-in-new-zealand/
That article is worth while reading as it is written by Posie, the woman in >the centre of this day of shame. Adds some balance to the story and confirms
the events as reported in the Stuff.
Day of Shame sums it up.It is a one-sided opinion, and nothing that would not be expected - it provides no balance at all as those views were already well advertised through the disinformation far right dissemination systems.
On 2023-03-31, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
I know you can't help yourself defending the undefendable but claiming an event wasn't violent when it was just makes you look like an unscientific feral prat!
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/fear-and-loathing-in-new-zealand/That article is worth while reading as it is written by Posie, the woman in the centre of this day of shame. Adds some balance to the story and confirms the events as reported in the Stuff.
Day of Shame sums it up.
On 31 Mar 2023 06:50:01 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Your posts on the subject are also one-sided and contain no balance. But apparently that is OK and Posie is not permitted that privilege.
On 2023-03-31, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
I know you can't help yourself defending the undefendable but claiming an >>>event wasn't violent when it was just makes you look like an unscientific feral
prat!
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/fear-and-loathing-in-new-zealand/
That article is worth while reading as it is written by Posie, the woman in >>the centre of this day of shame. Adds some balance to the story and confirms >>the events as reported in the Stuff.
Day of Shame sums it up.
It is a one-sided opinion, and nothing that would not be expected - it >provides no balance at all as those views were already well advertised >through the disinformation far right dissemination systems.
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Laughing at Rich's stupidity. He's bitching about lack of cites as usual. however the one cite he posted in his attempt to refute the truth was from a government propaganda site. Rather sad that the imbecile after all this time and all the evidence still
On 31 Mar 2023 06:50:01 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-03-31, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
I know you can't help yourself defending the undefendable but claiming an
event wasn't violent when it was just makes you look like an unscientific feral
prat!
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/fear-and-loathing-in-new-zealand/
That article is worth while reading as it is written by Posie, the woman in
the centre of this day of shame. Adds some balance to the story and confirms
the events as reported in the Stuff.
Day of Shame sums it up.
It is a one-sided opinion, and nothing that would not be expected - it >provides no balance at all as those views were already well advertised >through the disinformation far right dissemination systems.Your posts on the subject are also one-sided and contain no balance. But apparently that is OK and Posie is not permitted that privilege.
There is no such thing as "disinformation far right dissemination systems" it
is also appalling English.
On 31 Mar 2023 06:50:01 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-03-31, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
I know you can't help yourself defending the undefendable but claiming an event wasn't violent when it was just makes you look like an unscientific feral prat!
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/fear-and-loathing-in-new-zealand/
That article is worth while reading as it is written by Posie, the woman in >>the centre of this day of shame. Adds some balance to the story and confirms >>the events as reported in the Stuff.
Day of Shame sums it up.
It is a one-sided opinion, and nothing that would not be expected - it >provides no balance at all as those views were already well advertised >through the disinformation far right dissemination systems.
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:02:12 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>Not at all. I share concerns that the police could have done more to
wrote:
On 31 Mar 2023 06:50:01 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-03-31, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
I know you can't help yourself defending the undefendable but claiming an event wasn't violent when it was just makes you look like an unscientific feral prat!
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/fear-and-loathing-in-new-zealand/
That article is worth while reading as it is written by Posie, the woman in >>>the centre of this day of shame. Adds some balance to the story and confirms >>>the events as reported in the Stuff.
Day of Shame sums it up.
It is a one-sided opinion, and nothing that would not be expected - it >>provides no balance at all as those views were already well advertised >>through the disinformation far right dissemination systems.
Rich I am a little surprised that you support the violent suppression
of a viewpoint from Posie Parker. She was invited to speak at a
protest meeting in Auckland and the Police failed to act to uphold the
law. Apparently if you have a certain view the Police have no
obligation to maintain law and order, and it is OK for death threats
to be carried out.
PM Hipkins had the good sense to stay out of any decision to deny
entry to NZ for Posie Parker. He has also had the good sense to order
an inquiry into OIA response issues and he should also have the good
sense to ask the IPCA to investigate Police actions at the Posie
Parker protest.
On Sat, 01 Apr 2023 10:25:16 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:02:12 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On 31 Mar 2023 06:50:01 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-03-31, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
I know you can't help yourself defending the undefendable but claiming an event wasn't violent when it was just makes you look like an unscientific feral prat!That article is worth while reading as it is written by Posie, the woman in
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/fear-and-loathing-in-new-zealand/ >>>
the centre of this day of shame. Adds some balance to the story and confirms
the events as reported in the Stuff.
Day of Shame sums it up.
It is a one-sided opinion, and nothing that would not be expected - it >>provides no balance at all as those views were already well advertised >>through the disinformation far right dissemination systems.
Rich I am a little surprised that you support the violent suppressionNot at all. I share concerns that the police could have done more to
of a viewpoint from Posie Parker. She was invited to speak at a
protest meeting in Auckland and the Police failed to act to uphold the >law. Apparently if you have a certain view the Police have no
obligation to maintain law and order, and it is OK for death threats
to be carried out.
prevent violence directed towards K-J KM or her supporters, or towards others by "supporters" of K-J KM. Unfortunately there were clashes in
both directions, with instigators not always able to be identified as
to support. Davidson for example is blamed for being on a pedetrian
crossing when she was hit; apparently by the handlbar of one of
Tamaki's bikie gang - they were riding in convoy and were otherwise reasonably disciplined as they travelled to the site of multiple
protests; most believe this should have been avoinded by the biker.
K-J KM is however just as entitled to voice her views as others should
be free to voice theirs. It is not clear that she was "invited" by
anyone; my impression is that her "organisation" arranged and
publicised it, just as a ''counter-protest'' was arranged and
publicised by others. The police did well to allow events to unfold,
but I believe they should have become involved when physical violence started - it would have been good to have had a few people arrested to further remind people of the limits of free expression. It is
noticeable that the "Free Speech Coalition" have largely been silent
on this event - they recognise that there are generally accepted
community limits of ''free speech'', but are not prepared to admit any limitations at all, as "Free Speech" is not their ultimate aim - it is
a cover organisation for political propoganda led by Farrar and
Williams, pushing extreme libertarian views.
PM Hipkins had the good sense to stay out of any decision to deny
entry to NZ for Posie Parker. He has also had the good sense to order
an inquiry into OIA response issues and he should also have the good
sense to ask the IPCA to investigate Police actions at the Posie
Parker protest.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (1 / 15) |
| Uptime: | 125:28:50 |
| Calls: | 6,663 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,854 |