- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 2:08:23?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters.
https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
We thought our so called government was crazy and totalitarian...
Rich will be a strong supporter even though he'll never admit it :)
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 18:47:01 -0700 (PDT), John BowesAbsolutely Crash. However the WEF does seem to be getting more and more press and there are crazies who listen to them. Just worth keeping an eye on their so-called business.
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 2:08:23?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters.
https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
We thought our so called government was crazy and totalitarian...
Rich will be a strong supporter even though he'll never admit it :)
Relax folks - the WEF does not have to deal with US domestic politics
- this will never happen.
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), TonySo as usual you attack the publisher and you do not address the content.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have
pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive
to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have
pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive
to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a verySo as usual you attack the publisher and you do not address the content.
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have
pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive
to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
You are pathetic and desperate.
And your abuse is noted - you are always the first to abuse other posters as we
all know.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:53:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have
pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive
to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
Rich you were doing OK until the last sentence.
You have no comment on what the WEF said - which was the point of
Tony's post. You have instead passed judgment on what you believe the
WEF to be. It is a pity that you choose to post off-topic opinions
when nothing in your post is on-topic.
Your last sentence is the sort of rubbish you have resorted to in many >threads. I don't know about Tony but I read a wide variety of
political comment from a number of authors, some of which I disagree
with consistently but value their ability to challenge my thinking.
Cut out the crap such as your last sentence.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:40:31 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>You have still not addressed the content. .
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:53:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have >>>pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive
to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
Rich you were doing OK until the last sentence.
You have no comment on what the WEF said - which was the point of
Tony's post. You have instead passed judgment on what you believe the
WEF to be. It is a pity that you choose to post off-topic opinions
when nothing in your post is on-topic.
Your last sentence is the sort of rubbish you have resorted to in many >>threads. I don't know about Tony but I read a wide variety of
political comment from a number of authors, some of which I disagree
with consistently but value their ability to challenge my thinking.
Cut out the crap such as your last sentence.
OK, fair enough - it was not meant to denigrate Tony; I agree that the
WEF does seem to be an enemy of mankind, but the site the article
comes from appears nearly as bad - most people would not ever find it
without having been led there, but Tony does seem to find extremism
quite frequently, hence the reference to regular reading.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 5:10:39?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), TonySo as usual you attack the publisher and you do not address the content.
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters.
https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have
pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive
to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
You are pathetic and desperate.
And your abuse is noted - you are always the first to abuse other posters as we
all know.
It's just Rich trying to make out he doesn't agree with their extreme left wing totalitarian views which by his record in this ng are part of Rich's left wing belief...
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:40:31 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:53:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have >>>pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive
to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
Rich you were doing OK until the last sentence.
You have no comment on what the WEF said - which was the point of
Tony's post. You have instead passed judgment on what you believe the
WEF to be. It is a pity that you choose to post off-topic opinions
when nothing in your post is on-topic.
Your last sentence is the sort of rubbish you have resorted to in many >>threads. I don't know about Tony but I read a wide variety of
political comment from a number of authors, some of which I disagree
with consistently but value their ability to challenge my thinking.
Cut out the crap such as your last sentence.
OK, fair enough - it was not meant to denigrate Tony; I agree that the
WEF does seem to be an enemy of mankind, but the site the article
comes from appears nearly as bad - most people would not ever find it
without having been led there, but Tony does seem to find extremism
quite frequently, hence the reference to regular reading.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have
pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive
to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:40:31 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:You have still not addressed the content. .
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:53:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very >>>>large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets >>>>and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have >>>>pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef >>>>appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive >>>>to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
Rich you were doing OK until the last sentence.
You have no comment on what the WEF said - which was the point of
Tony's post. You have instead passed judgment on what you believe the >>>WEF to be. It is a pity that you choose to post off-topic opinions
when nothing in your post is on-topic.
Your last sentence is the sort of rubbish you have resorted to in many >>>threads. I don't know about Tony but I read a wide variety of
political comment from a number of authors, some of which I disagree
with consistently but value their ability to challenge my thinking.
Cut out the crap such as your last sentence.
OK, fair enough - it was not meant to denigrate Tony; I agree that the
WEF does seem to be an enemy of mankind, but the site the article
comes from appears nearly as bad - most people would not ever find it >>without having been led there, but Tony does seem to find extremism
quite frequently, hence the reference to regular reading.
You think I might follow extremist views - well you are wrong - I watch them and call them out just like I call out your extremism.
If we do not watch extremism we will fall foul of it. The practices of our current government are an example of that..
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 21:22:23 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 5:10:39?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), TonySo as usual you attack the publisher and you do not address the content. >>> You are pathetic and desperate.
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters.
https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have
pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive
to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
And your abuse is noted - you are always the first to abuse other posters as we
all know.
It's just Rich trying to make out he doesn't agree with their extreme left wing totalitarian views which by his record in this ng are part of Rich's left wing belief...
This does not sound left-wing: "The Forum suggests that a globalised
world is best managed by a self-selected coalition of multinational corporations, governments and civil society organizations
(CSOs),[5][6] which it expresses through initiatives like the "Great Reset"[7] and the "Global Redesign".[8][9]"
From environmental neglect, financial bullying, bribery, attempts to
cause distrust in government; Tony is correct that the far-right WEF
and their promoters may well be mankind's biggest enemy.
On 2023-03-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:40:31 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>wrote:You have still not addressed the content. .
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:53:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>>>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very >>>>>large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets >>>>>and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have >>>>>pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef >>>>>appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive >>>>>to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
Rich you were doing OK until the last sentence.
You have no comment on what the WEF said - which was the point of >>>>Tony's post. You have instead passed judgment on what you believe the >>>>WEF to be. It is a pity that you choose to post off-topic opinions >>>>when nothing in your post is on-topic.
Your last sentence is the sort of rubbish you have resorted to in many >>>>threads. I don't know about Tony but I read a wide variety of >>>>political comment from a number of authors, some of which I disagree >>>>with consistently but value their ability to challenge my thinking.
Cut out the crap such as your last sentence.
OK, fair enough - it was not meant to denigrate Tony; I agree that the >>>WEF does seem to be an enemy of mankind, but the site the article
comes from appears nearly as bad - most people would not ever find it >>>without having been led there, but Tony does seem to find extremism
quite frequently, hence the reference to regular reading.
You think I might follow extremist views - well you are wrong - I watch them >> and call them out just like I call out your extremism.
If we do not watch extremism we will fall foul of it. The practices of our >> current government are an example of that..
Indeed, it is somewhat concecerning that the WEF gets any attention at all.
On 2023-03-14, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 21:22:23 -0700 (PDT), John Bowes >><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 5:10:39?PM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), TonySo as usual you attack the publisher and you do not address the content. >>>> You are pathetic and desperate.
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters.
https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have
pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive >>>> >to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
And your abuse is noted - you are always the first to abuse other posters as we
all know.
It's just Rich trying to make out he doesn't agree with their extreme left wing totalitarian views which by his record in this ng are part of Rich's left wing belief...
This does not sound left-wing: "The Forum suggests that a globalised
world is best managed by a self-selected coalition of multinational
corporations, governments and civil society organizations
(CSOs),[5][6] which it expresses through initiatives like the "Great
Reset"[7] and the "Global Redesign".[8][9]"
From environmental neglect, financial bullying, bribery, attempts to
cause distrust in government; Tony is correct that the far-right WEF
and their promoters may well be mankind's biggest enemy.
Why does it take so long to not have any throw away lines?
Anyhow Rich, the idea of left and right, or rather what they do/think is >changing some what. Liberal Fassicsm is the term where the Liberals/left get >out the policies and then go all Nazi like in their enforcement.
This takes some heavy thinking. Look at how the Labour Party/Government was >kind in polices and then divived the country in how they applied them. On >with the jack boots and ensure that the public are doing as instructed. RubbishIt was called "National Socialist", but never came close to having any
Hitler came to power under a Socialist party.
The WEF, want it all, all the worlds power, wealth, and money as far as I
can see. Too much is never enough. Some of the ideas have some small merit, >but power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
On 2023-03-14, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yes he does - it is monomania. Something that children learn to stop doing at about the age of 12.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have
pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive
to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
You just have to do it, do not you Rich.
On 14 Mar 2023 07:15:55 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:It was mine first you fool but you had to criticise me and then take the credit - typical of your sort.
On 2023-03-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:40:31 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>wrote:You have still not addressed the content. .
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:53:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>>>>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very >>>>>>large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets >>>>>>and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have >>>>>>pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef >>>>>>appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive >>>>>>to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
Rich you were doing OK until the last sentence.
You have no comment on what the WEF said - which was the point of >>>>>Tony's post. You have instead passed judgment on what you believe the >>>>>WEF to be. It is a pity that you choose to post off-topic opinions >>>>>when nothing in your post is on-topic.
Your last sentence is the sort of rubbish you have resorted to in many >>>>>threads. I don't know about Tony but I read a wide variety of >>>>>political comment from a number of authors, some of which I disagree >>>>>with consistently but value their ability to challenge my thinking.
Cut out the crap such as your last sentence.
OK, fair enough - it was not meant to denigrate Tony; I agree that the >>>>WEF does seem to be an enemy of mankind, but the site the article
comes from appears nearly as bad - most people would not ever find it >>>>without having been led there, but Tony does seem to find extremism >>>>quite frequently, hence the reference to regular reading.
You think I might follow extremist views - well you are wrong - I watch >>>them
and call them out just like I call out your extremism.
If we do not watch extremism we will fall foul of it. The practices of our >>> current government are an example of that..
Indeed, it is somewhat concecerning that the WEF gets any attention at all.
Exactly my point.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 14 Mar 2023 07:15:55 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:It was mine first you fool but you had to criticise me and then take the credit
On 2023-03-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Exactly my point.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:40:31 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>>wrote:You have still not addressed the content. .
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:53:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>>wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>>>>>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very >>>>>>>large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets >>>>>>>and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have >>>>>>>pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef >>>>>>>appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive >>>>>>>to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
Rich you were doing OK until the last sentence.
You have no comment on what the WEF said - which was the point of >>>>>>Tony's post. You have instead passed judgment on what you believe the >>>>>>WEF to be. It is a pity that you choose to post off-topic opinions >>>>>>when nothing in your post is on-topic.
Your last sentence is the sort of rubbish you have resorted to in many >>>>>>threads. I don't know about Tony but I read a wide variety of >>>>>>political comment from a number of authors, some of which I disagree >>>>>>with consistently but value their ability to challenge my thinking. >>>>>>
Cut out the crap such as your last sentence.
OK, fair enough - it was not meant to denigrate Tony; I agree that the >>>>>WEF does seem to be an enemy of mankind, but the site the article >>>>>comes from appears nearly as bad - most people would not ever find it >>>>>without having been led there, but Tony does seem to find extremism >>>>>quite frequently, hence the reference to regular reading.
You think I might follow extremist views - well you are wrong - I watch >>>>them
and call them out just like I call out your extremism.
If we do not watch extremism we will fall foul of it. The practices of our >>>> current government are an example of that..
Indeed, it is somewhat concecerning that the WEF gets any attention at all. >>
- typical of your sort.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-03-14, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yes he does - it is monomania. Something that children learn to stop doing at >about the age of 12.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have
pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive
to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
You just have to do it, do not you Rich.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 19:25:24 -0000 (UTC), TonyThose people have nothing to do with you or me, but your response is the epitomy of childishness - thanks for the proof.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-03-14, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yes he does - it is monomania. Something that children learn to stop doing at >>about the age of 12.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have
pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive
to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
You just have to do it, do not you Rich.
There you go again, Tony - the old Cam Slater Judith Collins "Hit back >Double" - Right?
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 19:27:12 -0000 (UTC), TonyOnly to you, my motives are clear and clean - you are the one that supports a government that wants exactly what you wrote "power to the few" That is He Puapua. co-governance, 5 waters et al in a neat little package - nicely put Rich 80105!
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 14 Mar 2023 07:15:55 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:It was mine first you fool but you had to criticise me and then take the >>credit
On 2023-03-14, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Exactly my point.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:40:31 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>>>wrote:You have still not addressed the content. .
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:53:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>>>wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>>>>>>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very >>>>>>>>large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets >>>>>>>>and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have >>>>>>>>pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef >>>>>>>>appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive >>>>>>>>to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
Rich you were doing OK until the last sentence.
You have no comment on what the WEF said - which was the point of >>>>>>>Tony's post. You have instead passed judgment on what you believe the >>>>>>>WEF to be. It is a pity that you choose to post off-topic opinions >>>>>>>when nothing in your post is on-topic.
Your last sentence is the sort of rubbish you have resorted to in many >>>>>>>threads. I don't know about Tony but I read a wide variety of >>>>>>>political comment from a number of authors, some of which I disagree >>>>>>>with consistently but value their ability to challenge my thinking. >>>>>>>
Cut out the crap such as your last sentence.
OK, fair enough - it was not meant to denigrate Tony; I agree that the >>>>>>WEF does seem to be an enemy of mankind, but the site the article >>>>>>comes from appears nearly as bad - most people would not ever find it >>>>>>without having been led there, but Tony does seem to find extremism >>>>>>quite frequently, hence the reference to regular reading.
You think I might follow extremist views - well you are wrong - I watch >>>>>them
and call them out just like I call out your extremism.
If we do not watch extremism we will fall foul of it. The practices of >>>>>our
current government are an example of that..
Indeed, it is somewhat concecerning that the WEF gets any attention at all. >>>
- typical of your sort.
Then why publicise it? The attitudes of profit before people, power to
the few and small government all seem to be what you support . . .
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 19:27:12 -0000 (UTC), TonyWhereas YOU support a useless totalitarian bunch of Marxist/Communist wankers! who don't believe in small government, freedom or peoples right to disagree with them! A typical Marxist/Communist stooge and spin doctor!
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Then why publicise it? The attitudes of profit before people, power to
On 14 Mar 2023 07:15:55 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:It was mine first you fool but you had to criticise me and then take the credit
On 2023-03-14, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:40:31 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid> >>>>>wrote:You have still not addressed the content. .
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 16:53:27 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>>>>>wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>>>>>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very >>>>>>>large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets >>>>>>>and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have >>>>>>>pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef >>>>>>>appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive >>>>>>>to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
Rich you were doing OK until the last sentence.
You have no comment on what the WEF said - which was the point of >>>>>>Tony's post. You have instead passed judgment on what you believe the >>>>>>WEF to be. It is a pity that you choose to post off-topic opinions >>>>>>when nothing in your post is on-topic.
Your last sentence is the sort of rubbish you have resorted to in many >>>>>>threads. I don't know about Tony but I read a wide variety of >>>>>>political comment from a number of authors, some of which I disagree >>>>>>with consistently but value their ability to challenge my thinking. >>>>>>
Cut out the crap such as your last sentence.
OK, fair enough - it was not meant to denigrate Tony; I agree that the >>>>>WEF does seem to be an enemy of mankind, but the site the article >>>>>comes from appears nearly as bad - most people would not ever find it >>>>>without having been led there, but Tony does seem to find extremism >>>>>quite frequently, hence the reference to regular reading.
You think I might follow extremist views - well you are wrong - I watch >>>>them
and call them out just like I call out your extremism.
If we do not watch extremism we will fall foul of it. The practices of our
current government are an example of that..
Indeed, it is somewhat concecerning that the WEF gets any attention at all.
Exactly my point.
- typical of your sort.
the few and small government all seem to be what you support . . .
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 19:25:24 -0000 (UTC), TonySounds more like the bullshit you constantly post Rich! Instead of just repeating left wing lies try actually addressing the freedom lovers that scare you so much and provide some evidence to support your political bias!
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:There you go again, Tony - the old Cam Slater Judith Collins "Hit back Double" - Right?
On 2023-03-14, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Yes he does - it is monomania. Something that children learn to stop doing at
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:08:21 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>><lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
- mankind's biggest enemy is the WEF and their promoters. >>>>https://newspunch.com/wef-says-us-must-implement-one-child-policy-for-white-families/
Look here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum
It is quite a ong Wiki article, but the WEF comes across as a very
large organisation for big international companies, offering junkets
and pretence of world influence. It appears unlikely that they have
pushed the views attributed to them by the website, which itslef
appears to be a far-right disinformation vehicle; probably attractive >>> to nutters. Part of your regular reading, is it Tony?
You just have to do it, do not you Rich.
about the age of 12.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 124:26:01 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,334,763 |