https://climatlas.com/tropical/?fbclid=IwAR18ZWK90fNLCB9CmlY0ueN9Y8TgXUHOzLbvQ-zqOkWD0bM0SJBwiXfbseANIWA is part of an international study as to what effect the Tongan volcano has had on our current weather. From an article I posted a link to several weeks ago they seem to think it had quite an effect...
I recently read several suggestions that cyclone activity has increased lately.
The data does not bear that out.
Maybe this was just our turn which will not and should not make those affected
feel better.
Using the recent and ongoing weather activity to shore up the "climate change
is man-made" idiots is phoney and should be ignored.
On Monday, February 27, 2023 at 8:41:54?AM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
https://climatlas.com/tropical/?fbclid=IwAR18ZWK90fNLCB9CmlY0ueN9Y8TgXUHOzLbvQ-zqOkWD0bM0SJBwiXfbseANIWA is part of an international study as to what effect the Tongan volcano has had on our current weather. From an article I posted a link to several weeks ago they seem to think it had quite an effect...
I recently read several suggestions that cyclone activity has increased lately.
The data does not bear that out.
Maybe this was just our turn which will not and should not make those affected
feel better.
Using the recent and ongoing weather activity to shore up the "climate change
is man-made" idiots is phoney and should be ignored.
There was a massive amount of water released - interesting science.NIWA is part of an international study as to what effect the Tongan volcano >has had on our current weather. From an article I posted a link to several >weeks ago they seem to think it had quite an effect...https://climatlas.com/tropical/?fbclid=IwAR18ZWK90fNLCB9CmlY0ueN9Y8TgXUHOzLbvQ-zqOkWD0bM0SJBwiXfbseA
I recently read several suggestions that cyclone activity has increased >>lately.
The data does not bear that out.
Maybe this was just our turn which will not and should not make those >>affected
feel better.
Using the recent and ongoing weather activity to shore up the "climate >>change
is man-made" idiots is phoney and should be ignored.
John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:A BILLION tonnes!
On Monday, February 27, 2023 at 8:41:54 AM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
There was a massive amount of water released - interesting science.NIWA is part of an international study as to what effect the Tongan volcano >has had on our current weather. From an article I posted a link to several >weeks ago they seem to think it had quite an effect...https://climatlas.com/tropical/?fbclid=IwAR18ZWK90fNLCB9CmlY0ueN9Y8TgXUHOzLbvQ-zqOkWD0bM0SJBwiXfbseA
I recently read several suggestions that cyclone activity has increased >>lately.
The data does not bear that out.
Maybe this was just our turn which will not and should not make those >>affected
feel better.
Using the recent and ongoing weather activity to shore up the "climate >>change
is man-made" idiots is phoney and should be ignored.
On 2023-02-26, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://climatlas.com/tropical/?fbclid=IwAR18ZWK90fNLCB9CmlY0ueN9Y8TgXUHOzLbvQ-zqOkWD0bM0SJBwiXfbseA
I recently read several suggestions that cyclone activity has increased lately.
The data does not bear that out.
Maybe this was just our turn which will not and should not make those affected
feel better.
Using the recent and ongoing weather activity to shore up the "climate change
is man-made" idiots is phoney and should be ignored.
Okay, climate changers, how many of those cyclones, hurricans and typhoons >can you name? Well they blew alot harder than your narrative.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/two-new-tropical-cyclones-could-form-this-week-metservice/I4AOIPBUABCOFIXXV2HMYY6RAU/
"Historically, late February and early March marked the height of our >November-to-April cyclone season.
In a given week around this peak period, chances of a cyclone being
present in the southwest Pacific was typically at least 50 per cent.
Each season, around nine cyclones formed up in the southwest Pacific,
of which least one travelled within 550km of our country.
But this season had come with an elevated risk, with Niwa warning at
its outset that one to two systems could head our way as had since
come to pass with Gabrielle and Hale."
So in the November to April period there is a 50% chance that there will be
a cyclone in the SW pacific.
At present two are deciding that they might form.
*****
"As they move away from the tropics and over colder waters, tropical
cyclones weaken and lose much of their characteristic structure.
In particular, the narrow ring of cumulonimbus clouds known as the >eye-wall, which produces heavy rain and is surrounded by the
relatively small area of maximum winds, breaks up and weakens.
For two tropical cyclones to form in the tropics close together in
space or time is not unusual. However, for two to take such similar
paths as Fergus and Drena when they leave the tropics is rare, although
not without precedent.
In the ten cyclone seasons The Weekly News told the tale of destruction
in 1936.
Before this one, the low centres of four decaying tropical cyclones
passed over New Zealand, while another five, such as Bola in 1988
came close enough to affect New Zealands weather. In addition, another
three contributed to record floods in parts of New Zealand because of
the warm moist tropical air their wind systems brought over the country,
even though their centres of lowest pressure stayed well away from the
land."
Above from https://www.nzgeo.com/stories/the-ghost-of-cyclones-past/
1936, a tale of destruction. Wow, ancient history eh? Maybe.
Keep in mind the path comment, two can follow the same path.
https://climatlas.com/tropical/?fbclid=IwAR18ZWK90fNLCB9CmlY0ueN9Y8TgXUHOzLbvQ-zqOkWD0bM0SJBwiXfbseA
I recently read several suggestions that cyclone activity has increased lately.
The data does not bear that out.
Maybe this was just our turn which will not and should not make those affected
feel better.
Using the recent and ongoing weather activity to shore up the "climate change is man-made" idiots is phoney and should be ignored.
On 2023-02-26, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes indeed. The data is clear, whilst we do not want anymore of these - they will probably follow. There is nothing in the data that indicates man-made cyclone activity. Just nature doing what it does and has done for millenia.
https://climatlas.com/tropical/?fbclid=IwAR18ZWK90fNLCB9CmlY0ueN9Y8TgXUHOzLbvQ-zqOkWD0bM0SJBwiXfbseA
I recently read several suggestions that cyclone activity has increased >>lately.
The data does not bear that out.
Maybe this was just our turn which will not and should not make those >>affected
feel better.
Using the recent and ongoing weather activity to shore up the "climate >>change
is man-made" idiots is phoney and should be ignored.
Okay, climate changers, how many of those cyclones, hurricans and typhoons >can you name? Well they blew alot harder than your narrative.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/two-new-tropical-cyclones-could-form-this-week-metservice/I4AOIPBUABCOFIXXV2HMYY6RAU/
"Historically, late February and early March marked the height of our >November-to-April cyclone season.
In a given week around this peak period, chances of a cyclone being
present in the southwest Pacific was typically at least 50 per cent.
Each season, around nine cyclones formed up in the southwest Pacific,
of which least one travelled within 550km of our country.
But this season had come with an elevated risk, with Niwa warning at
its outset that one to two systems could head our way – as had since
come to pass with Gabrielle and Hale."
So in the November to April period there is a 50% chance that there will be
a cyclone in the SW pacific.
At present two are deciding that they might form.
*****
"As they move away from the tropics and over colder waters, tropical
cyclones weaken and lose much of their characteristic structure.
In particular, the narrow ring of cumulonimbus clouds known as the >“eye-wall,” which produces heavy rain and is surrounded by the
relatively small area of maximum winds, breaks up and weakens.
For two tropical cyclones to form in the tropics close together in
space or time is not unusual. However, for two to take such similar
paths as Fergus and Drena when they leave the tropics is rare, although
not without precedent.
In the ten cyclone seasons The Weekly News told the tale of destruction
in 1936.
Before this one, the low centres of four decaying tropical cyclones
passed over New Zealand, while another five, such as Bola in 1988
came close enough to affect New Zealand’s weather. In addition, another >three contributed to record floods in parts of New Zealand because of
the warm moist tropical air their wind systems brought over the country,
even though their centres of lowest pressure stayed well away from the
land."
Above from https://www.nzgeo.com/stories/the-ghost-of-cyclones-past/
1936, a tale of destruction. Wow, ancient history eh? Maybe.
Keep in mind the path comment, two can follow the same path.
Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Yet another inconvenient fact Rich is to stupid to take on board. Guess imbeciles like him are only capable of one incoherent thought at a time. In his case it's either how great Labour/Green are, or anyone who doesn't toe the climate change line is a
On 2023-02-26, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://climatlas.com/tropical/?fbclid=IwAR18ZWK90fNLCB9CmlY0ueN9Y8TgXUHOzLbvQ-zqOkWD0bM0SJBwiXfbseA
I recently read several suggestions that cyclone activity has increased >>lately.
The data does not bear that out.
Maybe this was just our turn which will not and should not make those >>affected
feel better.
Using the recent and ongoing weather activity to shore up the "climate >>change
is man-made" idiots is phoney and should be ignored.
Okay, climate changers, how many of those cyclones, hurricans and typhoons >can you name? Well they blew alot harder than your narrative.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/two-new-tropical-cyclones-could-form-this-week-metservice/I4AOIPBUABCOFIXXV2HMYY6RAU/
"Historically, late February and early March marked the height of our >November-to-April cyclone season.
In a given week around this peak period, chances of a cyclone being >present in the southwest Pacific was typically at least 50 per cent.
Each season, around nine cyclones formed up in the southwest Pacific,
of which least one travelled within 550km of our country.
But this season had come with an elevated risk, with Niwa warning at
its outset that one to two systems could head our way – as had since >come to pass with Gabrielle and Hale."
So in the November to April period there is a 50% chance that there will be >a cyclone in the SW pacific.
At present two are deciding that they might form.
*****
"As they move away from the tropics and over colder waters, tropical >cyclones weaken and lose much of their characteristic structure.
In particular, the narrow ring of cumulonimbus clouds known as the >“eye-wall,” which produces heavy rain and is surrounded by the >relatively small area of maximum winds, breaks up and weakens.
For two tropical cyclones to form in the tropics close together in
space or time is not unusual. However, for two to take such similar
paths as Fergus and Drena when they leave the tropics is rare, although >not without precedent.
In the ten cyclone seasons The Weekly News told the tale of destruction
in 1936.
Before this one, the low centres of four decaying tropical cyclones
passed over New Zealand, while another five, such as Bola in 1988
came close enough to affect New Zealand’s weather. In addition, another >three contributed to record floods in parts of New Zealand because of
the warm moist tropical air their wind systems brought over the country, >even though their centres of lowest pressure stayed well away from the >land."
Above from https://www.nzgeo.com/stories/the-ghost-of-cyclones-past/
1936, a tale of destruction. Wow, ancient history eh? Maybe.
Keep in mind the path comment, two can follow the same path.Yes indeed. The data is clear, whilst we do not want anymore of these - they will probably follow. There is nothing in the data that indicates man-made cyclone activity. Just nature doing what it does and has done for millenia.
On Monday, February 27, 2023 at 10:01:52 AM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:A BILLION tonnes!
On Monday, February 27, 2023 at 8:41:54 AM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
There was a massive amount of water released - interesting science.NIWA is part of an international study as to what effect the Tongan volcano >> >has had on our current weather. From an article I posted a link to several >> >weeks ago they seem to think it had quite an effect...
https://climatlas.com/tropical/?fbclid=IwAR18ZWK90fNLCB9CmlY0ueN9Y8TgXUHOzLbvQ-zqOkWD0bM0SJBwiXfbseA
I recently read several suggestions that cyclone activity has increased >> >>lately.
The data does not bear that out.
Maybe this was just our turn which will not and should not make those
affected
feel better.
Using the recent and ongoing weather activity to shore up the "climate
change
is man-made" idiots is phoney and should be ignored.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 115:48:07 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,175 |