https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one?Interesting you don't include you and Labour in the list of those attacking politicians Rich. That's the funniest part of this sad little post of yours :)
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like
Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above
could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes
a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is
no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon;
does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an impact?
https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one?
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like
Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above
could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes
a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is
no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon;
does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >impact?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one?
The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like
Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above
could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes
a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is
no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon;
does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >>impact?
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people likeThe taxpayers union is not anti left, but you salivated when you saw this bit of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above
could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes
a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is
no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon;
does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >impact?
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one?
The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like
Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above >>>could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes
a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon;
does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >>>impact?
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had
a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>Well that went whoosh over your head eh?
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one?
The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like >>>>Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above >>>>could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes
a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >>>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon; >>>>does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >>>>impact?
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had
a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Most stuff does that with Rich :)
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid> >wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one? >>>>
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like >>>>Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above >>>>could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes >>>>a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >>>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon; >>>>does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >>>>impact?The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had
a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,Well that went whoosh over your head eh?
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 21:02:52 -0000 (UTC), TonyUtter bullshit from the master of lies...
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:I pointed out that the Taxpayer Union has now taken to personal
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:Well that went whoosh over your head eh?
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one? >>>>>
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like >>>>>Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above >>>>>could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes >>>>>a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >>>>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon; >>>>>does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >>>>>impact?The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had
a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
attacks rather than just espusing extremist policies.
Still at least they have some policies, even though they would be unacceptable to most New Zealanders.
So is the following satire or just a joke, Tony?: https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/113icr6/time_to_address_climate_change/
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 10:29:24 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 21:02:52 -0000 (UTC), TonyUtter bullshit from the master of lies...
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:I pointed out that the Taxpayer Union has now taken to personal
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid>Well that went whoosh over your head eh?
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one? >> >>>>>The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like
Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above >> >>>>>could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes >> >>>>>a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is
no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon;
does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >> >>>>>impact?
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had
a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
attacks rather than just espusing extremist policies.
Still at least they have some policies, even though they would be
unacceptable to most New Zealanders.
So is the following satire or just a joke, Tony?:
https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/113icr6/time_to_address_climate_change/
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:I pointed out that the Taxpayer Union has now taken to personal
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:Well that went whoosh over your head eh?
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one? >>>>>
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like >>>>>Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above >>>>>could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes >>>>>a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >>>>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon; >>>>>does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >>>>>impact?The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had
a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:46:18 -0800 (PST), John BowesNo he hasn't, post a cite or be damned.
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 10:29:24 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 21:02:52 -0000 (UTC), TonyUtter bullshit from the master of lies...
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:I pointed out that the Taxpayer Union has now taken to personal
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid>Well that went whoosh over your head eh?
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one? >>> >>>>>The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like
Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above >>> >>>>>could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes >>> >>>>>a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >>> >>>>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon; >>> >>>>>does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >>> >>>>>impact?
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had
a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
attacks rather than just espusing extremist policies.
Still at least they have some policies, even though they would be
unacceptable to most New Zealanders.
So is the following satire or just a joke, Tony?:
https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/113icr6/time_to_address_climate_change/
It is a bit early for that, John Bowes - Sure Luxon has been a climate
change denier
and has resisted all those good initiatives by Labour,
but Luxon now says that Climate Change is real and that we should be
doing things to limit the impact. Quite a U-Turn, but don't hold your
breath when it coes to actually supporting any real action by the
government. Calling Luxon ''the master of lies'' is exactly the sort
of over the top gratuitous nonsense that we have come to expect from
you, John Bowes - perhaps you have been reading too much from the BFD
and the Taxpayer Union.
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 21:02:52 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou are wrong on both counts, and what Crash posted whoosehed over your head.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:I pointed out that the Taxpayer Union has now taken to personal
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>wrote:Well that went whoosh over your head eh?
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one? >>>>>>
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like >>>>>>Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above >>>>>>could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes >>>>>>a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >>>>>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon; >>>>>>does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >>>>>>impact?The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had
a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
attacks rather than just espusing extremist policies.
Still at least they have some policies, even though they would be >unacceptable to most New Zealanders.What policies?I cvan't be bothered with your off topic divesrions.
So is the following satire or just a joke, Tony?: >https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/113icr6/time_to_address_climate_change/
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Of course he hasn't Tony and Rich won't post a cite because as so often he's telling an outright lie! The only thing he ever does in his efforts to make the useless look like a viable political party!
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:46:18 -0800 (PST), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 10:29:24 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 21:02:52 -0000 (UTC), TonyUtter bullshit from the master of lies...
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:I pointed out that the Taxpayer Union has now taken to personal
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid> >>> >>wrote:Well that went whoosh over your head eh?
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one?The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like >>> >>>>>Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above
could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes
a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >>> >>>>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon; >>> >>>>>does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an
impact?
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had >>> >>>a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
attacks rather than just espusing extremist policies.
Still at least they have some policies, even though they would be
unacceptable to most New Zealanders.
So is the following satire or just a joke, Tony?:
https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/113icr6/time_to_address_climate_change/
It is a bit early for that, John Bowes - Sure Luxon has been a climate >change denierNo he hasn't, post a cite or be damned.
and has resisted all those good initiatives by Labour,
but Luxon now says that Climate Change is real and that we should be
doing things to limit the impact. Quite a U-Turn, but don't hold your >breath when it coes to actually supporting any real action by the >government. Calling Luxon ''the master of lies'' is exactly the sort
of over the top gratuitous nonsense that we have come to expect from
you, John Bowes - perhaps you have been reading too much from the BFD
and the Taxpayer Union.
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:46:18 -0800 (PST), John BowesSo you post more bullshit to support your senseless attack on Luxon. Bloody typical of fucking imbecilic hypocrites like you Rich! I get more truth from the BFD and Taxpayer Union than I've ever got from you, Labour, thestranded and norightturn! All of
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 10:29:24 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:It is a bit early for that, John Bowes - Sure Luxon has been a climate change denier and has resisted all those good initiatives by Labour,
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 21:02:52 -0000 (UTC), TonyUtter bullshit from the master of lies...
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:I pointed out that the Taxpayer Union has now taken to personal
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid> >> >>wrote:Well that went whoosh over your head eh?
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one?The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like
Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above
could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes
a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >> >>>>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon; >> >>>>>does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an
impact?
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had >> >>>a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
attacks rather than just espusing extremist policies.
Still at least they have some policies, even though they would be
unacceptable to most New Zealanders.
So is the following satire or just a joke, Tony?:
https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/113icr6/time_to_address_climate_change/
but Luxon now says that Climate Change is real and that we should be
doing things to limit the impact. Quite a U-Turn, but don't hold your
breath when it coes to actually supporting any real action by the government. Calling Luxon ''the master of lies'' is exactly the sort
of over the top gratuitous nonsense that we have come to expect from
you, John Bowes - perhaps you have been reading too much from the BFD
and the Taxpayer Union.
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one?
The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like >>>>Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above >>>>could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes
a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >>>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon; >>>>does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >>>>impact?
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had
a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:42:53 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one? >>>>>
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like >>>>>Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above >>>>>could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes >>>>>a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >>>>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon; >>>>>does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >>>>>impact?The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had
a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
Yet you do not cite an example. I cited an example to support my view
- so should you.
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:07:15 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:42:53 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one? >>>>>>
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like >>>>>>Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above >>>>>>could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes >>>>>>a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >>>>>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon; >>>>>>does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >>>>>>impact?The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had
a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
Yet you do not cite an example. I cited an example to support my view
- so should you.
Here is an example then of an article where in my view that was in my
view some unwarranted unkindness relating to one politician at least. >https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one?
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 13:07:15 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid>You're a joke Rich. You practice unwarranted unkindness in a vain effort to be funny yet you now claim (falsely) that somebody else is wrong in doing what you do. All to admit you're just a sad joke! :)
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:42:53 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:50:49 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:41:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one? >>>>>
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like >>>>>Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above >>>>>could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes >>>>>a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is >>>>>no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon; >>>>>does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >>>>>impact?The taxpayers union is not anti left,
Correct. This is a Taxpayer Union publication from 2015 (hint we had
a National-led Government then)
https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/new_kids
No less hard-hitting with the picture of a pig, than now.
but you salivated when you saw this bit
of silliness and could not wait to post it.
Nasty attacks are what you do.
The article you post espoused a particular political point of view,
but did not make a personal attack on the politicians of the day.
Yet you do not cite an example. I cited an example to support my viewHere is an example then of an article where in my view that was in my
- so should you.
view some unwarranted unkindness relating to one politician at least. https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one?
https://nickrockel.substack.com/p/rolling-christopher-luxon-part-one?
Generally nasty attacks on politicians are from nasty people like
Slater and the Taxpayer Union, attacking the left, but hte link above
could be seen as a similar style against Chris Luxon. I think it goes
a bit far, but what do others think. From what I have seen there is
no-one better to lead National in parliament at present than Luxon;
does this sort of article indicate that he is starting to be making an >impact?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 115:41:49 |
| Calls: | 6,662 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,132 |