On 2023-01-27, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
Just been looking at the updates on what is happening in Auckland. hope any who live in the region aren't being impacted to badly.
By the looks of it some sure are impacted. More to come with the insurance >battles to come.
24 hour word record 1,825mm Foc Foc, La Réunion 7-8 Jan 1966
Makes the 71mm in Auckland amount look rather small.
Wednesday. Install the new PM.
Friday night. State of emergency in Auckland for PM to attend to.
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:27:28 -0800 (PST), John Bowes
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 11:22:01 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On 27 Jan 2023 21:09:38 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Yet you supported Labours decision to let them build more houses in a flood prone area in Tauranga. an area they had refused building permission for about a tenth of the number in the past. Hypocrisy is surely your main attribute Rich!
On 2023-01-27, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Primary role is for the Mayor and Local Council. Not a good start, but
Just been looking at the updates on what is happening in Auckland. hope any who live in the region aren't being impacted to badly.
By the looks of it some sure are impacted. More to come with the insurance >>> >battles to come.
24 hour word record 1,825mm Foc Foc, La Réunion 7-8 Jan 1966
Makes the 71mm in Auckland amount look rather small.
Wednesday. Install the new PM.
Friday night. State of emergency in Auckland for PM to attend to.
they should have got processes going now. Clearly we have not
anticipated the extent of extreme weather that we are starting to get.
The flooding is in many places a clear example of the inadequacy of
our storm water systems. We cannot expect to avoid all problems from
extreme weather, but it did occur to me that yet again we are seeing
the results of poor decisions from the past in allowing building in
areas without adequate drainage.
So what happened with the current burst of rain in that area, John -
and what are the requirements on the developer for adequate drainage
in that area?
I did not support the criticism based on inadeqaute data, but equally
I did not have adequate information to support the decision. You were
unable to recognise the difference.
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:27:28 -0800 (PST), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 11:22:01 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:So what happened with the current burst of rain in that area, John -
On 27 Jan 2023 21:09:38 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Yet you supported Labours decision to let them build more houses in a flood prone area in Tauranga. an area they had refused building permission for about a tenth of the number in the past. Hypocrisy is surely your main attribute Rich!
On 2023-01-27, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Primary role is for the Mayor and Local Council. Not a good start, but
Just been looking at the updates on what is happening in Auckland. hope any who live in the region aren't being impacted to badly.
By the looks of it some sure are impacted. More to come with the insurance
battles to come.
24 hour word record 1,825mm Foc Foc, La Réunion 7-8 Jan 1966
Makes the 71mm in Auckland amount look rather small.
Wednesday. Install the new PM.
Friday night. State of emergency in Auckland for PM to attend to.
they should have got processes going now. Clearly we have not
anticipated the extent of extreme weather that we are starting to get.
The flooding is in many places a clear example of the inadequacy of
our storm water systems. We cannot expect to avoid all problems from
extreme weather, but it did occur to me that yet again we are seeing
the results of poor decisions from the past in allowing building in
areas without adequate drainage.
and what are the requirements on the developer for adequate drainage
in that area?
I did not support the criticism based on inadeqaute data, but equally
I did not have adequate information to support the decision. You were
unable to recognise the difference.
On 2023-01-27, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Because Rich is stupid and a compulsive liar. The events in Auckland was an exceptional event even for thge current weather patterns. Another inconvenient fact Rich hasn't the comprehension skills to comprehend...
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:27:28 -0800 (PST), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 11:22:01 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On 27 Jan 2023 21:09:38 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Yet you supported Labours decision to let them build more houses in a flood prone area in Tauranga. an area they had refused building permission for about a tenth of the number in the past. Hypocrisy is surely your main attribute Rich!
On 2023-01-27, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Primary role is for the Mayor and Local Council. Not a good start, but >>> they should have got processes going now. Clearly we have not
Just been looking at the updates on what is happening in Auckland. hope any who live in the region aren't being impacted to badly.
By the looks of it some sure are impacted. More to come with the insurance
battles to come.
24 hour word record 1,825mm Foc Foc, La Réunion 7-8 Jan 1966
Makes the 71mm in Auckland amount look rather small.
Wednesday. Install the new PM.
Friday night. State of emergency in Auckland for PM to attend to.
anticipated the extent of extreme weather that we are starting to get. >>> The flooding is in many places a clear example of the inadequacy of
our storm water systems. We cannot expect to avoid all problems from
extreme weather, but it did occur to me that yet again we are seeing
the results of poor decisions from the past in allowing building in
areas without adequate drainage.
So what happened with the current burst of rain in that area, John -Up until now it was up to the local body to decide on the level of service, 1 in x years storm. Just like earthquakes you can not design for the largest storm/earthquake or rouge wave even.
and what are the requirements on the developer for adequate drainage
in that area?
We have to accept the big/huge ones will be out of our control.
I did not support the criticism based on inadeqaute data, but equallyWhy do you insist Rich in slapping these last sentences as that above?
I did not have adequate information to support the decision. You were unable to recognise the difference.
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 11:22:01 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On 27 Jan 2023 21:09:38 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Yet you supported Labours decision to let them build more houses in a flood prone area in Tauranga. an area they had refused building permission for about a tenth of the number in the past. Hypocrisy is surely your main attribute Rich!
On 2023-01-27, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Primary role is for the Mayor and Local Council. Not a good start, but
Just been looking at the updates on what is happening in Auckland. hope any who live in the region aren't being impacted to badly.
By the looks of it some sure are impacted. More to come with the insurance >> >battles to come.
24 hour word record 1,825mm Foc Foc, La Réunion 7-8 Jan 1966
Makes the 71mm in Auckland amount look rather small.
Wednesday. Install the new PM.
Friday night. State of emergency in Auckland for PM to attend to.
they should have got processes going now. Clearly we have not
anticipated the extent of extreme weather that we are starting to get.
The flooding is in many places a clear example of the inadequacy of
our storm water systems. We cannot expect to avoid all problems from
extreme weather, but it did occur to me that yet again we are seeing
the results of poor decisions from the past in allowing building in
areas without adequate drainage.
On 27 Jan 2023 21:09:38 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Yet you supported Labours decision to let them build more houses in a flood prone area in Tauranga. an area they had refused building permission for about a tenth of the number in the past. Hypocrisy is surely your main attribute Rich!
On 2023-01-27, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
Just been looking at the updates on what is happening in Auckland. hope any who live in the region aren't being impacted to badly.
By the looks of it some sure are impacted. More to come with the insurance >battles to come.
24 hour word record 1,825mm Foc Foc, La Réunion 7-8 Jan 1966
Makes the 71mm in Auckland amount look rather small.
Wednesday. Install the new PM.Primary role is for the Mayor and Local Council. Not a good start, but
Friday night. State of emergency in Auckland for PM to attend to.
they should have got processes going now. Clearly we have not
anticipated the extent of extreme weather that we are starting to get.
The flooding is in many places a clear example of the inadequacy of
our storm water systems. We cannot expect to avoid all problems from
extreme weather, but it did occur to me that yet again we are seeing
the results of poor decisions from the past in allowing building in
areas without adequate drainage.
Just been looking at the updates on what is happening in Auckland. hope any who live in the region aren't being impacted to badly.
Just been looking at the updates on what is happening in Auckland. hope
any who live in the region aren't being impacted to badly.
On 2023-01-27, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:27:28 -0800 (PST), John Bowes >><bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 11:22:01 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On 27 Jan 2023 21:09:38 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Yet you supported Labours decision to let them build more houses in a flood prone area in Tauranga. an area they had refused building permission for about a tenth of the number in the past. Hypocrisy is surely your main attribute Rich!
On 2023-01-27, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Primary role is for the Mayor and Local Council. Not a good start, but >>>> they should have got processes going now. Clearly we have not
Just been looking at the updates on what is happening in Auckland. hope any who live in the region aren't being impacted to badly.
By the looks of it some sure are impacted. More to come with the insurance
battles to come.
24 hour word record 1,825mm Foc Foc, La Réunion 7-8 Jan 1966
Makes the 71mm in Auckland amount look rather small.
Wednesday. Install the new PM.
Friday night. State of emergency in Auckland for PM to attend to.
anticipated the extent of extreme weather that we are starting to get. >>>> The flooding is in many places a clear example of the inadequacy of
our storm water systems. We cannot expect to avoid all problems from
extreme weather, but it did occur to me that yet again we are seeing
the results of poor decisions from the past in allowing building in
areas without adequate drainage.
So what happened with the current burst of rain in that area, John -
and what are the requirements on the developer for adequate drainage
in that area?
Up until now it was up to the local body to decide on the level of service,
1 in x years storm. Just like earthquakes you can not design for the largest >storm/earthquake or rouge wave even.
We have to accept the big/huge ones will be out of our control.
I did not support the criticism based on inadeqaute data, but equally
I did not have adequate information to support the decision. You were
unable to recognise the difference.
Why do you insist Rich in slapping these last sentences as that above?
On 27 Jan 2023 23:41:22 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-01-27, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:27:28 -0800 (PST), John Bowes >><bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 11:22:01 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >>>> On 27 Jan 2023 21:09:38 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
Yet you supported Labours decision to let them build more houses in a flood prone area in Tauranga. an area they had refused building permission for about a tenth of the number in the past. Hypocrisy is surely your main attribute Rich!
On 2023-01-27, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Primary role is for the Mayor and Local Council. Not a good start, but >>>> they should have got processes going now. Clearly we have not
Just been looking at the updates on what is happening in Auckland. hope any who live in the region aren't being impacted to badly.
By the looks of it some sure are impacted. More to come with the insurance
battles to come.
24 hour word record 1,825mm Foc Foc, La Réunion 7-8 Jan 1966
Makes the 71mm in Auckland amount look rather small.
Wednesday. Install the new PM.
Friday night. State of emergency in Auckland for PM to attend to.
anticipated the extent of extreme weather that we are starting to get. >>>> The flooding is in many places a clear example of the inadequacy of >>>> our storm water systems. We cannot expect to avoid all problems from >>>> extreme weather, but it did occur to me that yet again we are seeing >>>> the results of poor decisions from the past in allowing building in >>>> areas without adequate drainage.
So what happened with the current burst of rain in that area, John -
and what are the requirements on the developer for adequate drainage
in that area?
Up until now it was up to the local body to decide on the level of service, >1 in x years storm. Just like earthquakes you can not design for the largest
storm/earthquake or rouge wave even.
We have to accept the big/huge ones will be out of our control.
I did not support the criticism based on inadeqaute data, but equally
I did not have adequate information to support the decision. You were
unable to recognise the difference.
Why do you insist Rich in slapping these last sentences as that above? Because John had criticised a decision by the government withoutadequate information or consideration as to why why a change may have legitimately been made. I also made the point that I had not supported either the earlier or later decisions made by the government, but gave possible reasons why such a change to a previous decision may have
been made.
Some such as John will always criticise the government, mostly without giving any reason for his criticism. '
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/114832273/jim-hubbard-cartoons
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 3:43:09 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:won't change that unless you're fucking imbecile blindly supporting the most useless government in New Zealands history!
On 27 Jan 2023 23:41:22 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-01-27, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Because John had criticised a decision by the government without
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:27:28 -0800 (PST), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 11:22:01 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On 27 Jan 2023 21:09:38 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Yet you supported Labours decision to let them build more houses in a flood prone area in Tauranga. an area they had refused building permission for about a tenth of the number in the past. Hypocrisy is surely your main attribute Rich!
On 2023-01-27, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:Primary role is for the Mayor and Local Council. Not a good start, but >> >>>> they should have got processes going now. Clearly we have not
Just been looking at the updates on what is happening in Auckland. hope any who live in the region aren't being impacted to badly.
By the looks of it some sure are impacted. More to come with the insurance
battles to come.
24 hour word record 1,825mm Foc Foc, La Réunion 7-8 Jan 1966
Makes the 71mm in Auckland amount look rather small.
Wednesday. Install the new PM.
Friday night. State of emergency in Auckland for PM to attend to.
anticipated the extent of extreme weather that we are starting to get. >> >>>> The flooding is in many places a clear example of the inadequacy of
our storm water systems. We cannot expect to avoid all problems from
extreme weather, but it did occur to me that yet again we are seeing
the results of poor decisions from the past in allowing building in
areas without adequate drainage.
So what happened with the current burst of rain in that area, John -
and what are the requirements on the developer for adequate drainage
in that area?
Up until now it was up to the local body to decide on the level of service, >> >1 in x years storm. Just like earthquakes you can not design for the largest
storm/earthquake or rouge wave even.
We have to accept the big/huge ones will be out of our control.
I did not support the criticism based on inadeqaute data, but equally
I did not have adequate information to support the decision. You were
unable to recognise the difference.
Why do you insist Rich in slapping these last sentences as that above?
adequate information or consideration as to why why a change may have
legitimately been made. I also made the point that I had not supported
either the earlier or later decisions made by the government, but gave
possible reasons why such a change to a previous decision may have
been made.
All I did was point out yet ANOTHER stupid flip flop from the government Rich. The criticism was more than justified. A flood prone area doesn't change just because Megan Wood want's it to. It's more dangerous for 300 odd homes tan for 36. Your wailing
The particular cartoon that shows when you open the url is a graphic
Some such as John will always criticise the government, mostly without
giving any reason for his criticism. '
I certainly did give justification for the criticism. It's your total lack of comprehension that as so often made you look like the loser you are Rich!
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/114832273/jim-hubbard-cartoons
Why this cartoon Rich? Luxon had nothing to do with Megan Woods stupid decission!
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 20:07:22 -0800 (PST), John Boweswailing won't change that unless you're fucking imbecile blindly supporting the most useless government in New Zealands history!
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 3:43:09 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On 27 Jan 2023 23:41:22 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-01-27, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:adequate information or consideration as to why why a change may have
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:27:28 -0800 (PST), John Bowes
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 11:22:01 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote: >> >>>> On 27 Jan 2023 21:09:38 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
Yet you supported Labours decision to let them build more houses in a flood prone area in Tauranga. an area they had refused building permission for about a tenth of the number in the past. Hypocrisy is surely your main attribute Rich!
On 2023-01-27, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:they should have got processes going now. Clearly we have not
Just been looking at the updates on what is happening in Auckland. hope any who live in the region aren't being impacted to badly.
By the looks of it some sure are impacted. More to come with the insurance
battles to come.
24 hour word record 1,825mm Foc Foc, La Réunion 7-8 Jan 1966
Makes the 71mm in Auckland amount look rather small.
Wednesday. Install the new PM.
Friday night. State of emergency in Auckland for PM to attend to. >> >>>> Primary role is for the Mayor and Local Council. Not a good start, but
anticipated the extent of extreme weather that we are starting to get.
The flooding is in many places a clear example of the inadequacy of >> >>>> our storm water systems. We cannot expect to avoid all problems from >> >>>> extreme weather, but it did occur to me that yet again we are seeing >> >>>> the results of poor decisions from the past in allowing building in >> >>>> areas without adequate drainage.
So what happened with the current burst of rain in that area, John - >> >> and what are the requirements on the developer for adequate drainage >> >> in that area?
Up until now it was up to the local body to decide on the level of service,
1 in x years storm. Just like earthquakes you can not design for the largest
storm/earthquake or rouge wave even.
We have to accept the big/huge ones will be out of our control.
I did not support the criticism based on inadeqaute data, but equally >> >> I did not have adequate information to support the decision. You were >> >> unable to recognise the difference.
Why do you insist Rich in slapping these last sentences as that above? >> Because John had criticised a decision by the government without
legitimately been made. I also made the point that I had not supported
either the earlier or later decisions made by the government, but gave
possible reasons why such a change to a previous decision may have
been made.
All I did was point out yet ANOTHER stupid flip flop from the government Rich. The criticism was more than justified. A flood prone area doesn't change just because Megan Wood want's it to. It's more dangerous for 300 odd homes tan for 36. Your
It was not a flip flop - the situation had changed significantly - the requirements for a project to erect 300 homes will have had to have
sorted out water problems; a poject for 36 may well have not needed
the same oversight. Recent rain and its effect in Auckland may well concenntrate everyones mond on flood prone areas - if there are
problems relating to flooding they are likely to be much more
important to ordinary New Zealanders than previously . In short you
had no idea what problems there were with a previous proposal; they
may have been fixed in a second and much larger proposal, but in any
case commercial viability relies on the develope being fairly certain
there is a market.
You jumped to a conclusion without any knowledge of the factors that influenced either decision. When the situation changes, a change ofUtter bullshit! If the government actually achieved any of their election promises I wouldn't have anything to criticise Rich!
mind may not be a flip flop - it may be a recognition of changed circumstances.
Some such as John will always criticise the government, mostly without
giving any reason for his criticism. '
I certainly did give justification for the criticism. It's your total lack of comprehension that as so often made you look like the loser you are Rich!
https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/114832273/jim-hubbard-cartoons
Why this cartoon Rich? Luxon had nothing to do with Megan Woods stupid decission!The particular cartoon that shows when you open the url is a graphic protrayal of your knee-jerk reaction to almost anything that is done
in the name of the current government. Try clicking the arrow to the
right of the latest cartoon - Jim Hubbard has some quite clever takes
on issues that have been in news.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 100:49:49 |
| Calls: | 6,659 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,854 |