• This alone is enough to ensure Labour is destroyed in October

    From JohnO@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 25 11:50:45 2023
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to JohnO on Wed Jan 25 20:28:50 2023
    On 2023-01-25, JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.

    There is a saying that everything goes in cycles. There were people who
    offered the view that interest rates where too low and at some point they
    were going to rise. How/who was the cause of it is irrelevant, apart from needing a scapegoat.

    The idea that interest rates might rise to 10%, or at least 7% just were not considered.

    A small dose of common sense along with a small study in history would have
    had them buying a less expensive house.

    Finally, you give too much credit for the Government having caused this problem. Partly at best but not all of it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 25 12:37:52 2023
    On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 9:19:45 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:50:45 -0800 (PST), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>
    wrote: >https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.
    So what would National have done in the face of international increass
    in fuel prices, supply issues due to Covid, shortages of building
    workers, problems with low wages, transport problems?

    Labour has given us lower inflation than most countries, with lower government debt as a % of GDP than most countries. The have sorted the shortages in building workers, sorted many of the supply issues,
    increased the minumum wage, got our hospitals on the way to recovery, increased training and international revruitment of health workers, subsidised public transport, kept reductions in overall crime going;
    sorted the worst of the problem with ram raids (spening more than
    National who largely ignored it, but also fixing the problem with the fragmented agencies dealing with yourg people.

    So what? Labour has overseen the highest inflation in years and only ever talked about it Rich. Your wailing about our inflation being better than other country's is just crocodile tears worthy off the useless government you blindly and stupidly support!

    What Labour has not been able to do is fix excessive problems with far
    too high profits by banks and supermarkets - both examples of the lack
    of adequate competition - they have made a few small changes but fundamentally we are being ripped off for coporate profit.

    So what happened to the great leveler of bank profits that KiwiBank was supposed to be? What do you think Labour should have done about these supposed excessive coporate profits? Or are you just the sort of loser who doesn't and can't think things
    through? I'd tell you why they do but your to fucking stupid and comprehensionless lacking to understand and it isn't just because there isn't a lot of competition...


    The banks promised that they would do everything they could to avoid foreclosing - but it seems they have not spoken to this customer; but
    the bank should have known that they were lending too much - are we
    seeing predatory coporates again ripping off customers?

    The word is CORPORATES you semi literate loser!

    So what would you have the government do, JohnO?

    For me I'd have them stop fucking talking and actually DO something!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to Gordon on Wed Jan 25 12:43:23 2023
    On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 9:28:53 AM UTC+13, Gordon wrote:
    On 2023-01-25, JohnO <john...@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.
    There is a saying that everything goes in cycles. There were people who offered the view that interest rates where too low and at some point they were going to rise. How/who was the cause of it is irrelevant, apart from needing a scapegoat.

    We don't need scapegoats we need action. Something lacking from so much Labour has done although in some cases the action wasn't required...


    The idea that interest rates might rise to 10%, or at least 7% just were not considered.

    People (and that includes journo's and MPs) NEVER look at history. If they did we wouldn't have the buggers mess this government has made of the economy!

    A small dose of common sense along with a small study in history would have had them buying a less expensive house.

    It's called status Gordon. People have always tended to let this affect their house buying.

    Finally, you give too much credit for the Government having caused this problem. Partly at best but not all of it.

    There profligate spending must have had a big effect on it Gordon. But typical of this government and it's blind followers it's never this government's fault for anything!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 26 09:15:33 2023
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:50:45 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.
    So what would National have done in the face of international increass
    in fuel prices, supply issues due to Covid, shortages of building
    workers, problems with low wages, transport problems?

    Labour has given us lower inflation than most countries, with lower
    government debt as a % of GDP than most countries. The have sorted the shortages in building workers, sorted many of the supply issues,
    increased the minumum wage, got our hospitals on the way to recovery,
    increased training and international revruitment of health workers,
    subsidised public transport, kept reductions in overall crime going;
    sorted the worst of the problem with ram raids (spening more than
    National who largely ignored it, but also fixing the problem with the fragmented agencies dealing with yourg people.

    What Labour has not been able to do is fix excessive problems with far
    too high profits by banks and supermarkets - both examples of the lack
    of adequate competition - they have made a few small changes but
    fundamentally we are being ripped off for coporate profit.

    The banks promised that they would do everything they could to avoid foreclosing - but it seems they have not spoken to this customer; but
    the bank should have known that they were lending too much - are we
    seeing predatory coporates again ripping off customers?

    So what would you have the government do, JohnO?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to bowesjohn02@gmail.com on Thu Jan 26 10:54:00 2023
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:43:23 -0800 (PST), John Bowes
    <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 9:28:53 AM UTC+13, Gordon wrote:
    On 2023-01-25, JohnO <john...@gmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.
    There is a saying that everything goes in cycles. There were people who
    offered the view that interest rates where too low and at some point they
    were going to rise. How/who was the cause of it is irrelevant, apart from
    needing a scapegoat.

    We don't need scapegoats we need action. Something lacking from so much Labour has done although in some cases the action wasn't required...


    The idea that interest rates might rise to 10%, or at least 7% just were not >> considered.

    People (and that includes journo's and MPs) NEVER look at history. If they did we wouldn't have the buggers mess this government has made of the economy!

    A small dose of common sense along with a small study in history would have >> had them buying a less expensive house.

    It's called status Gordon. People have always tended to let this affect their house buying.

    Finally, you give too much credit for the Government having caused this
    problem. Partly at best but not all of it.

    There profligate spending must have had a big effect on it Gordon. But typical of this government and it's blind followers it's never this government's fault for anything!

    Actually the spending on wage subsidies meant we have fairly low
    business collapses compared with some other countries, with many
    businesses remaining profitable - coporate taxes were higher than
    expected, meaning the borrowing had a lower net cost to NZ than the
    original payments.

    Inflation is also lower than most other countries; but we could not
    avoid the inflationary effect of greater transport costs, shortages of
    some materials causing price rises, and the rise (and now return to
    lower levels) of oil-based fuels.

    The effect of higher interest rates on mortgage costs is the market
    working as it should - I would not expect the government to get
    involved in a family having problems due to a borrow only having a
    deposit of 17% for a $1.2 million purchase; I am surprised that the
    bank gave the loan, but I also suspect that with the large profits
    they have been making, they can afford to assist the family ride this
    out . . . Not a government problem - or if you disagree what do you
    think a National Government would be now doing for this householder,
    John?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 26 10:17:30 2023
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:50:45 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.

    While this is a tragic outcome for the family involved, the primary
    cause of their problem is that they borrowed so much at a time when
    interest rates were bound to rise substantially because of the Covid
    wage subsidies. Interest rates were at historic lows and there was
    plenty of informed commentary on the effect such subsidies would have
    on inflation and these folks should have been aware of this. The Bank
    is a secondary contributor - it is better to decline a loan than have
    the substantial costs involved with payment defaulters.

    Yes the Government contributed to inflation with subsidies and yes
    they had no plan to deal with the inflationary outcome, but these
    folks borrowed too much. If they had stayed out of the housing market
    it would also have helped bring down home prices.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JohnO@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 25 16:40:28 2023
    On Thursday, 26 January 2023 at 09:19:45 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:50:45 -0800 (PST), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>
    wrote: >https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.
    So what would National have done in the face of international increass

    Why ask me? I am not National you idiot. Ask them.

    in fuel prices, supply issues due to Covid, shortages of building
    workers, problems with low wages, transport problems?

    <Sigh> There are two components to inflation. Non tradable inflation is not imported. Domestic spending and artificially low interest rates are down to the government and the reserve bank. You can't use overseas effects as an excuse.


    Labour has given us lower inflation than most countries, with lower

    Other countries are not us so irrelevant diversion. Labour has given us sustained inflation. That's all you need to say.

    government debt as a % of GDP than most countries. The have sorted the shortages in building workers, sorted many of the supply issues,
    increased the minumum wage, got our hospitals on the way to recovery, increased training and international revruitment of health workers, subsidised public transport, kept reductions in overall crime going;
    sorted the worst of the problem with ram raids (spening more than
    National who largely ignored it, but also fixing the problem with the fragmented agencies dealing with yourg people.

    What Labour has not been able to do is fix excessive problems with far
    too high profits by banks and supermarkets - both examples of the lack
    of adequate competition - they have made a few small changes but fundamentally we are being ripped off for coporate profit.

    You are making that up. Banks and supermarkets are making as much profit or more than ever.


    The banks promised that they would do everything they could to avoid foreclosing - but it seems they have not spoken to this customer; but
    the bank should have known that they were lending too much - are we
    seeing predatory coporates again ripping off customers?

    So what would you have the government do, JohnO?

    I'm not a politician so why are you asking me, dimwit? Ask Chippie or Luxon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Thu Jan 26 01:52:54 2023
    On 2023-01-25, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:50:45 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.
    So what would National have done in the face of international increass
    in fuel prices, supply issues due to Covid, shortages of building
    workers, problems with low wages, transport problems?

    Labour has given us lower inflation than most countries, with lower government debt as a % of GDP than most countries. The have sorted the shortages in building workers, sorted many of the supply issues,
    increased the minumum wage, got our hospitals on the way to recovery, increased training and international revruitment of health workers, subsidised public transport, kept reductions in overall crime going;
    sorted the worst of the problem with ram raids (spening more than
    National who largely ignored it, but also fixing the problem with the fragmented agencies dealing with yourg people.

    What Labour has not been able to do is fix excessive problems with far
    too high profits by banks and supermarkets - both examples of the lack
    of adequate competition - they have made a few small changes but fundamentally we are being ripped off for coporate profit.

    The banks promised that they would do everything they could to avoid foreclosing - but it seems they have not spoken to this customer; but
    the bank should have known that they were lending too much - are we
    seeing predatory coporates again ripping off customers?

    So what would you have the government do, JohnO?


    Done it again. From high mortgage rates hitting hard owing to inflation, to National, and fuel prices, and other stuff about National.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JohnO@21:1/5 to Gordon on Wed Jan 25 18:07:11 2023
    On Thursday, 26 January 2023 at 14:56:12 UTC+13, Gordon wrote:
    On 2023-01-25, John Bowes <bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 9:19:45 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:50:45 -0800 (PST), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.
    So what would National have done in the face of international increass
    in fuel prices, supply issues due to Covid, shortages of building
    workers, problems with low wages, transport problems?

    Labour has given us lower inflation than most countries, with lower
    government debt as a % of GDP than most countries. The have sorted the
    shortages in building workers, sorted many of the supply issues,
    increased the minumum wage, got our hospitals on the way to recovery,
    increased training and international revruitment of health workers,
    subsidised public transport, kept reductions in overall crime going;
    sorted the worst of the problem with ram raids (spening more than
    National who largely ignored it, but also fixing the problem with the
    fragmented agencies dealing with yourg people.

    So what? Labour has overseen the highest inflation in years and only ever talked about it Rich. Your wailing about our inflation being better than other country's is just crocodile tears worthy off the useless government you blindly and stupidly
    support!

    What Labour has not been able to do is fix excessive problems with far
    too high profits by banks and supermarkets - both examples of the lack
    of adequate competition - they have made a few small changes but
    fundamentally we are being ripped off for coporate profit.

    So what happened to the great leveler of bank profits that KiwiBank was supposed to be? What do you think Labour should have done about these supposed excessive coporate profits? Or are you just the sort of loser who doesn't and can't think things
    through? I'd tell you why they do but your to fucking stupid and comprehensionless lacking to understand and it isn't just because there isn't a lot of competition...


    The banks promised that they would do everything they could to avoid
    foreclosing - but it seems they have not spoken to this customer; but
    the bank should have known that they were lending too much - are we
    seeing predatory coporates again ripping off customers?

    The word is CORPORATES you semi literate loser!

    So what would you have the government do, JohnO?

    For me I'd have them stop fucking talking and actually DO something!
    To rephrase that, Foe me I'd have then stop doing great damage and actually start thinking.

    No wonder the government coalition is tanking in the polls: https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/9152-nz-national-voting-intention-december-2022
    Should take another nosedive now that St Jacinda jumped off the sinking ship.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to John Bowes on Thu Jan 26 01:56:09 2023
    On 2023-01-25, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 9:19:45 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:50:45 -0800 (PST), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.
    So what would National have done in the face of international increass
    in fuel prices, supply issues due to Covid, shortages of building
    workers, problems with low wages, transport problems?

    Labour has given us lower inflation than most countries, with lower
    government debt as a % of GDP than most countries. The have sorted the
    shortages in building workers, sorted many of the supply issues,
    increased the minumum wage, got our hospitals on the way to recovery,
    increased training and international revruitment of health workers,
    subsidised public transport, kept reductions in overall crime going;
    sorted the worst of the problem with ram raids (spening more than
    National who largely ignored it, but also fixing the problem with the
    fragmented agencies dealing with yourg people.

    So what? Labour has overseen the highest inflation in years and only ever talked about it Rich. Your wailing about our inflation being better than other country's is just crocodile tears worthy off the useless government you blindly and stupidly
    support!

    What Labour has not been able to do is fix excessive problems with far
    too high profits by banks and supermarkets - both examples of the lack
    of adequate competition - they have made a few small changes but
    fundamentally we are being ripped off for coporate profit.

    So what happened to the great leveler of bank profits that KiwiBank was supposed to be? What do you think Labour should have done about these supposed excessive coporate profits? Or are you just the sort of loser who doesn't and can't think things
    through? I'd tell you why they do but your to fucking stupid and comprehensionless lacking to understand and it isn't just because there isn't a lot of competition...


    The banks promised that they would do everything they could to avoid
    foreclosing - but it seems they have not spoken to this customer; but
    the bank should have known that they were lending too much - are we
    seeing predatory coporates again ripping off customers?

    The word is CORPORATES you semi literate loser!

    So what would you have the government do, JohnO?

    For me I'd have them stop fucking talking and actually DO something!


    To rephrase that, Foe me I'd have then stop doing great damage and actually start thinking.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to JohnO on Wed Jan 25 17:19:35 2023
    On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 1:40:30 PM UTC+13, JohnO wrote:
    On Thursday, 26 January 2023 at 09:19:45 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:50:45 -0800 (PST), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>
    wrote: >https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.
    So what would National have done in the face of international increass
    Why ask me? I am not National you idiot. Ask them.
    in fuel prices, supply issues due to Covid, shortages of building
    workers, problems with low wages, transport problems?
    <Sigh> There are two components to inflation. Non tradable inflation is not imported. Domestic spending and artificially low interest rates are down to the government and the reserve bank. You can't use overseas effects as an excuse.

    Labour has given us lower inflation than most countries, with lower
    Other countries are not us so irrelevant diversion. Labour has given us sustained inflation. That's all you need to say.

    Funny that Rich is happy that government debt has soared and is way above what it was when he was whining about John Key borrowing to cover the shortfall from Helen Clark's time as PM...
    government debt as a % of GDP than most countries. The have sorted the shortages in building workers, sorted many of the supply issues,
    increased the minumum wage, got our hospitals on the way to recovery, increased training and international revruitment of health workers,

    Still a typical Labour stuff up Rich!
    subsidised public transport, kept reductions in overall crime going;
    sorted the worst of the problem with ram raids (spening more than
    National who largely ignored it, but also fixing the problem with the fragmented agencies dealing with yourg people.

    What Labour has not been able to do is fix excessive problems with far
    too high profits by banks and supermarkets - both examples of the lack
    of adequate competition - they have made a few small changes but fundamentally we are being ripped off for coporate profit.
    You are making that up. Banks and supermarkets are making as much profit or more than ever.

    The banks promised that they would do everything they could to avoid foreclosing - but it seems they have not spoken to this customer; but
    the bank should have known that they were lending too much - are we
    seeing predatory coporates again ripping off customers?

    So what would you have the government do, JohnO?
    I'm not a politician so why are you asking me, dimwit? Ask Chippie or Luxon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 26 15:48:57 2023
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:40:28 -0800 (PST), JohnO <johno1234@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 26 January 2023 at 09:19:45 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:50:45 -0800 (PST), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.
    So what would National have done in the face of international increass

    Why ask me? I am not National you idiot. Ask them.
    Of course you are not; I was merely asking you what you think they
    would have done had they been in government. Alternatively, what do
    you think should have been done?


    in fuel prices, supply issues due to Covid, shortages of building
    workers, problems with low wages, transport problems?

    <Sigh> There are two components to inflation. Non tradable inflation is not imported. Domestic spending and artificially low interest rates are down to the government and the reserve bank. You can't use overseas effects as an excuse.
    I can however expect that tradeable international inflation will be
    imported.


    Labour has given us lower inflation than most countries, with lower

    Other countries are not us so irrelevant diversion. Labour has given us sustained inflation. That's all you need to say.
    Other countries have also been affected by increases to international
    prices. Part of New Zealand has of course benefitted from those higher
    prices . . .


    government debt as a % of GDP than most countries. The have sorted the
    shortages in building workers, sorted many of the supply issues,
    increased the minumum wage, got our hospitals on the way to recovery,
    increased training and international revruitment of health workers,
    subsidised public transport, kept reductions in overall crime going;
    sorted the worst of the problem with ram raids (spening more than
    National who largely ignored it, but also fixing the problem with the
    fragmented agencies dealing with yourg people.

    What Labour has not been able to do is fix excessive problems with far
    too high profits by banks and supermarkets - both examples of the lack
    of adequate competition - they have made a few small changes but
    fundamentally we are being ripped off for coporate profit.

    You are making that up. Banks and supermarkets are making as much profit or more than ever.
    Which is why I am saying that the government has not reduced those
    profits to the level made by those industries in other countries. We
    have structural lack of competition in banking, supermarkets,
    electricity, and some commercial products. The electricity market is particularly bad because privatisation has resulted in companies that
    have no incentive to keep prices low. They will only commission
    additional generation sufficient to meet immediate demands (allowing
    for the lead needed for new generation), and effectively act as a
    cartel - they carefully ensure there is no legal collusion while
    making comparisons of price difficult, and taking turns having the
    lowest prices so that thee canbe a pretence of competition. Then
    recently one company had so much money they wanted to distribute to shareholders more then the profits they had earned!

    Every time you have to pay an electricity bill, remember that some of
    it is payoff for political donations to National . . .

    As far as the construction industry is concerned, National had run
    down capacity so when the Christchurch earthquake happened, they were
    in real difficulty. They first slowed everything down by making the
    insurance industry take the blame - the problems of that industry were
    shown by EQC having to be propped up by money from government, the
    collapse of one major ensurer (which the Government had to take over),
    plus also the demise of the Local Authority Insurance company which
    also did not have enough money (or reinsurance arrangements). The
    government tried to reduce claims as much as they could; subsequently
    it was determined in court that they had ripped a lot of people off by
    forcing policyholders to accept low estimates (often determined by
    relatively unqualified people who were under pressure to keep
    estimates low) as full and final value.

    Then National decided to put the whole rebuild under the control of
    Fletchers - not only a guaranteed huge pfoit for one company by
    government decree, but also it enabled Fletchers to spin out
    constructin by timing work to allow for shortage of workers, but also
    for when they were able to produce construction materials.

    The scandal was a fairly open secret - it resulted in Brownlee losing
    in Ilam in 2020, but still getting into Parliament on the List.

    Contrast that with the new Government in 2017 - they very quickly
    encouraged trade training for apprenticeships, particularly for the
    building industry. They also worked on ways of ensuring we had a more
    efficient building industry - they gave contracts to a wide number of
    firms, and when Fletchers had problems meeting demand for Gib Board,
    they enabled the use of alternatives from overseas and assisted
    importation. Active management has resulted in the largest number of
    dwellings built in the time that they have so far been given - and the
    results are now being seen in artificially high prices for dwellings
    coming back to more realistic levels. For all the sob stories about
    people that bought at the peak and borrowed too much, there will be
    more people who can now afford a first home. There is still a way to
    go however - high immigration under National to keep wages down fed
    that crisis in accomodation; care is needed to put New Zealanders
    first, and to remind employers that sometimes if they need more staff,
    they need to pay them enogh so that they can afford to live, have a
    family etc.




    The banks promised that they would do everything they could to avoid
    foreclosing - but it seems they have not spoken to this customer; but
    the bank should have known that they were lending too much - are we
    seeing predatory coporates again ripping off customers?

    So what would you have the government do, JohnO?

    I'm not a politician so why are you asking me, dimwit? Ask Chippie or Luxon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Bowes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 25 20:03:58 2023
    On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 3:53:09 PM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:40:28 -0800 (PST), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday, 26 January 2023 at 09:19:45 UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
    On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:50:45 -0800 (PST), JohnO <john...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/brings-tears-to-my-eyes-family-consider-selling-after-2500-monthly-interest-rate-rise/LGT6FRARRZAELKHDWVHJJYDIHE/

    Robbo and his ventriloquist's dummy Orr have created this problem.

    There are lots of other disasters courtesy of Labour but this is one of the most egregious.
    So what would National have done in the face of international increass

    Why ask me? I am not National you idiot. Ask them.
    Of course you are not; I was merely asking you what you think they
    would have done had they been in government. Alternatively, what do
    you think should have been done?

    More to the point do you think Labour has done everything they could to decrease inflation? Don't bother answering Rich. Because it's Labour you think they've done everything they possibly could despite the evidence to the contrary...


    in fuel prices, supply issues due to Covid, shortages of building
    workers, problems with low wages, transport problems?

    <Sigh> There are two components to inflation. Non tradable inflation is not imported. Domestic spending and artificially low interest rates are down to the government and the reserve bank. You can't use overseas effects as an excuse.
    I can however expect that tradeable international inflation will be
    imported.


    Labour has given us lower inflation than most countries, with lower

    Other countries are not us so irrelevant diversion. Labour has given us sustained inflation. That's all you need to say.
    Other countries have also been affected by increases to international
    prices. Part of New Zealand has of course benefitted from those higher
    prices . . .

    Yes the government! Due to the increased tax they make take from businesses and from GST on the increased prices. As usual Rich like most left wing losers you don't look at the big picture!

    government debt as a % of GDP than most countries. The have sorted the
    shortages in building workers, sorted many of the supply issues,
    increased the minumum wage, got our hospitals on the way to recovery,
    increased training and international revruitment of health workers,
    subsidised public transport, kept reductions in overall crime going;
    sorted the worst of the problem with ram raids (spening more than
    National who largely ignored it, but also fixing the problem with the
    fragmented agencies dealing with yourg people.

    What Labour has not been able to do is fix excessive problems with far
    too high profits by banks and supermarkets - both examples of the lack
    of adequate competition - they have made a few small changes but
    fundamentally we are being ripped off for coporate profit.

    You are making that up. Banks and supermarkets are making as much profit or more than ever.
    Which is why I am saying that the government has not reduced those
    profits to the level made by those industries in other countries. We
    have structural lack of competition in banking, supermarkets,
    electricity, and some commercial products. The electricity market is particularly bad because privatisation has resulted in companies that
    have no incentive to keep prices low. They will only commission
    additional generation sufficient to meet immediate demands (allowing
    for the lead needed for new generation), and effectively act as a
    cartel - they carefully ensure there is no legal collusion while
    making comparisons of price difficult, and taking turns having the
    lowest prices so that thee canbe a pretence of competition. Then
    recently one company had so much money they wanted to distribute to shareholders more then the profits they had earned!

    Every time you have to pay an electricity bill, remember that some of
    it is payoff for political donations to National . . .

    Bullshit! 52% goes directly to the government as well as the tax on their profits. An inconvenient fact you ignore because it doesn't fit your little Marxist agenda!

    As far as the construction industry is concerned, National had run
    down capacity so when the Christchurch earthquake happened, they were
    in real difficulty. They first slowed everything down by making the
    insurance industry take the blame - the problems of that industry were
    shown by EQC having to be propped up by money from government, the
    collapse of one major ensurer (which the Government had to take over),
    plus also the demise of the Local Authority Insurance company which
    also did not have enough money (or reinsurance arrangements). The
    government tried to reduce claims as much as they could; subsequently
    it was determined in court that they had ripped a lot of people off by forcing policyholders to accept low estimates (often determined by
    relatively unqualified people who were under pressure to keep
    estimates low) as full and final value.

    Gee Rich! You keep asking us for cites but you don't worry about giving cites to back up your left wing bias!


    Then National decided to put the whole rebuild under the control of
    Fletchers - not only a guaranteed huge pfoit for one company by
    government decree, but also it enabled Fletchers to spin out
    constructin by timing work to allow for shortage of workers, but also
    for when they were able to produce construction materials.

    cite please. considering Fletchers was the biggest company in the building industry who would you expect to get the contract? Ministry of Works? Oh that's right they're no longer around because they tended to never complete projects under budget!


    The scandal was a fairly open secret - it resulted in Brownlee losing
    in Ilam in 2020, but still getting into Parliament on the List.

    Like so many Labour MP's but guess as usual with you Labour good, National bad. The mantra of born losers like you Rich :)

    Contrast that with the new Government in 2017 - they very quickly
    encouraged trade training for apprenticeships, particularly for the
    building industry. They also worked on ways of ensuring we had a more efficient building industry - they gave contracts to a wide number of
    firms, and when Fletchers had problems meeting demand for Gib Board,
    they enabled the use of alternatives from overseas and assisted
    importation. Active management has resulted in the largest number of dwellings built in the time that they have so far been given - and the results are now being seen in artificially high prices for dwellings
    coming back to more realistic levels. For all the sob stories about
    people that bought at the peak and borrowed too much, there will be
    more people who can now afford a first home. There is still a way to
    go however - high immigration under National to keep wages down fed
    that crisis in accomodation; care is needed to put New Zealanders
    first, and to remind employers that sometimes if they need more staff,
    they need to pay them enogh so that they can afford to live, have a
    family etc.

    So why did Labour wait till 2017? Clark had nine wasted years to correct the shortage of tradesmen that were biting even back then!


    The banks promised that they would do everything they could to avoid
    foreclosing - but it seems they have not spoken to this customer; but
    the bank should have known that they were lending too much - are we
    seeing predatory coporates again ripping off customers?

    So what would you have the government do, JohnO?

    I'm not a politician so why are you asking me, dimwit? Ask Chippie or Luxon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)