https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/even-more-proof-masks-dont-work#poll-42262 No surprise here.But how do those criterion fit political scientists like Rich? My observation of many political scientists is that none of them meet any of your criterion Tony. For the simple reason political science is the mainstay of woke wankers like Rich :)
But as an aside for Rich80105 here is something that made me think of him -
"Real scientists never try to censor their opposition.
Real scientists are not attached to their beliefs.
Real scientists are not afraid of being challenged."
Food for thought, especially anybody who claims to have a degree of a scientific nature.
On 2023-01-13, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/even-more-proof-masks-dont-work#poll-42262
No surprise here.
But as an aside for Rich80105 here is something that made me think of him - >>
"Real scientists never try to censor their opposition.
Real scientists are not attached to their beliefs.
Real scientists are not afraid of being challenged."
Food for thought, especially anybody who claims to have a degree of a
scientific nature.
There are other words which could replace "Real Scientists", say
Governments, or In a democracy.
Science should not be political, espically in these woke fueled days.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/even-more-proof-masks-dont-work#poll-42262 No surprise here.
But as an aside for Rich80105 here is something that made me think of him -
"Real scientists never try to censor their opposition.
Real scientists are not attached to their beliefs.
Real scientists are not afraid of being challenged."
Food for thought, especially anybody who claims to have a degree of a scientific nature.
On 13 Jan 2023 22:51:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:No right turn and several others.
On 2023-01-13, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
No surprise here.https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/even-more-proof-masks-dont-work#poll-42262
But as an aside for Rich80105 here is something that made me think of him - >>>
"Real scientists never try to censor their opposition.
Real scientists are not attached to their beliefs.
Real scientists are not afraid of being challenged."
Food for thought, especially anybody who claims to have a degree of a
scientific nature.
There are other words which could replace "Real Scientists", say >>Governments, or In a democracy.
Science should not be political, espically in these woke fueled days.
Yet still non-science websites are often given as an authority -
Hatchard, the BFD etc . . .
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Typical of political scientists like Rich to attack sites that tell the truth about his political masters while attacking those who don't even know (or care) that Rich exists. Typical of woke fake news pushers like Rich :)
On 13 Jan 2023 22:51:13 GMT, Gordon <Gor...@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2023-01-13, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
No surprise here.https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/even-more-proof-masks-dont-work#poll-42262
But as an aside for Rich80105 here is something that made me think of him -
"Real scientists never try to censor their opposition.
Real scientists are not attached to their beliefs.
Real scientists are not afraid of being challenged."
Food for thought, especially anybody who claims to have a degree of a
scientific nature.
There are other words which could replace "Real Scientists", say >>Governments, or In a democracy.
Science should not be political, espically in these woke fueled days.
Yet still non-science websites are often given as an authority -No right turn and several others.
Hatchard, the BFD etc . . .
However I don't remember a post that used Hatchard as an authority or indeed the BFD. They are merely people with some skills and experience publishing articles. Good to see they are still able to despite the concerted attempts at
shutting them out.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 111:11:25 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Files: | 12,209 |
Messages: | 5,335,948 |