https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:41:44 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >>>over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK
Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in
the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime >>Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >>deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right
wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our >>National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
So Rich you have no actual comment on the article other than to
question its provenance? How unusual of you.
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:41:44 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >>over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK
Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in
the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime >Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now rightSo Rich you have no actual comment on the article other than to
wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our >National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
question its provenance? How unusual of you.
--
Crash McBash
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >>over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK
Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in
the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime
Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right
wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our >National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:48:06 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid>Funny how you who prefer to remain anonymous are questioning someone else practicing what you practice Rich. Actually I find it fucking hilarious how you preach against someone else doing what you do on a daily basis :)
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:41:44 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >>>over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK >>Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in >>the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime >>Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >>deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right >>wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our >>National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
So Rich you have no actual comment on the article other than toDo you think it is relevant that it appears to be deliberately
question its provenance? How unusual of you.
anonymous? I did suggest the author may not have been familiar with
WOW - I think John Key appeared at one of those shows a long time ago
. . .
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), TonyFunny how any site that tells the truth about Labour earns your accolade of it's 'fake news'. In reality the major purveyor of 'fake news' is your very incompetent Labour party and it's commissars like you Rich :)
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in
the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime
Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right
wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 10:12:02 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:48:06 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid>Funny how you who prefer to remain anonymous are questioning someone else practicing what you practice Rich. Actually I find it fucking hilarious how you preach against someone else doing what you do on a daily basis :)
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:41:44 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>Do you think it is relevant that it appears to be deliberately
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little
over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK
Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in
the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime
Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly
deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right
wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our
National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
So Rich you have no actual comment on the article other than to
question its provenance? How unusual of you.
anonymous? I did suggest the author may not have been familiar with
WOW - I think John Key appeared at one of those shows a long time ago
. . .
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:40:01 -0800 (PST), John BowesAnd it is not your own - we know that so how is that different to any others here who do not use their own names. I do by the way but do not expect others to do so.
<bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 10:12:02 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:48:06 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid>Funny how you who prefer to remain anonymous are questioning someone else >>practicing what you practice Rich. Actually I find it fucking hilarious how you
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:41:44 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>Do you think it is relevant that it appears to be deliberately
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little
over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK
Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in >>> >>the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime
Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >>> >>deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right >>> >>wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our
National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
So Rich you have no actual comment on the article other than to
question its provenance? How unusual of you.
anonymous? I did suggest the author may not have been familiar with
WOW - I think John Key appeared at one of those shows a long time ago
. . .
preach against someone else doing what you do on a daily basis :)
I suspect "Flat White" is not a real name, but I only have your word
that "John Bowes" is your real name. Pseudonyms are far more common on
Usenet than in other forums; I have been using the same posting name
for many years.
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:48:06 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:41:44 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >>>over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK >>Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in >>the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime >>Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >>deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right >>wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our >>National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
So Rich you have no actual comment on the article other than toDo you think it is relevant that it appears to be deliberately
question its provenance? How unusual of you.
anonymous? I did suggest the author may not have been familiar with
WOW - I think John Key appeared at one of those shows a long time ago
. . .
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:48:06 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:41:44 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >>>>over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK >>>Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in >>>the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime >>>Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >>>deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right >>>wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our >>>National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
So Rich you have no actual comment on the article other than to
question its provenance? How unusual of you.
Do you think it is relevant that it appears to be deliberately
anonymous?
I did suggest the author may not have been familiar with
WOW - I think John Key appeared at one of those shows a long time ago
. . .
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:40:01 -0800 (PST), John BowesI know you've been hiding behind a nym for many years Rich! I just find it typically hypocritical of you attacking another nym user just because they've told the truth about New Zealand and shown your beloved PM is nothing but a Marxist muppet playing at
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 10:12:02 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:I suspect "Flat White" is not a real name, but I only have your word
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:48:06 +1300, Crash <nog...@dontbother.invalid>Funny how you who prefer to remain anonymous are questioning someone else practicing what you practice Rich. Actually I find it fucking hilarious how you preach against someone else doing what you do on a daily basis :)
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:41:44 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>Do you think it is relevant that it appears to be deliberately
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little
over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK
Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old, >> >>but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in >> >>the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime
Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >> >>deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right >> >>wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our >> >>National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
So Rich you have no actual comment on the article other than to
question its provenance? How unusual of you.
anonymous? I did suggest the author may not have been familiar with
WOW - I think John Key appeared at one of those shows a long time ago
. . .
that "John Bowes" is your real name. Pseudonyms are far more common on Usenet than in other forums; I have been using the same posting name
for many years.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), TonyEntirely delusional response as anticipated.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >>>over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK
Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in
the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime >>Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >>deliberately misleading article.
Adds nothing positive to the thread and I already said it was published in November - did you read that bit?
As usual, Rich completely fails to address the content - What a loser.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right
wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our >>National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:48:06 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>Still refusing to address the content - you really are a loser.
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:41:44 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >>>>over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK >>>Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in >>>the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime >>>Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >>>deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right >>>wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our >>>National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
So Rich you have no actual comment on the article other than to
question its provenance? How unusual of you.
Do you think it is relevant that it appears to be deliberately
anonymous? I did suggest the author may not have been familiar with
WOW - I think John Key appeared at one of those shows a long time ago
. . .
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:48:06 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:41:44 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >>>>over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK >>>Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in >>>the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime >>>Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >>>deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right >>>wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our >>>National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
So Rich you have no actual comment on the article other than to
question its provenance? How unusual of you.
Do you think it is relevant that it appears to be deliberately
anonymous?
I did suggest the author may not have been familiar with
WOW - I think John Key appeared at one of those shows a long time ago
. . .
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), TonyEntirely delusional response as anticipated.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >>over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK
Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in
the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime
Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now rightAs usual, Rich completely fails to address the content - What a loser.
wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our >National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
On Thursday, 12 January 2023 at 09:48:08 UTC+13, Crash wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:41:44 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), TonySo Rich you have no actual comment on the article other than to
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little
over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK
Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in
the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime
Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly
deliberately misleading article.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right
wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our
National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
question its provenance? How unusual of you.
--
Crash McBash
I thought the comments section made good reading too.
On 2023-01-11, Tony <lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:A safe bet each day.
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:03:59 -0000 (UTC), TonyEntirely delusional response as anticipated.
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little >>>over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
Not many Australians - despite the name, this is not like the UK >>Spectator - it is a right wing disinformation site; and the article
you refer to was probably written by someone from New Zealand;
possibly from thebfd or similar site here. I note it is 2 months old,
but has attracted few comments. One calls into question the costume in >>the photograph - we know that this was taken at a "World of Wearable
Art" show last year - lending support to a show that assists New
Zealand exports and reputation for innovation - I think other Prime >>Ministers have appeared in the past. That indicates it as a typicallly >>deliberately misleading article.
Adds nothing positive to the thread and I already said it was published in November - did you read that bit?It is 2 months old, not a great deal of time.
If it is of importance then one needs to point out how things have changed, what is the additional evidence/facts/situation which needs to be taken into consideration.
Taking the " vaccines are safe and effective" stance. Might have passed with a push at the start. Now, now not so much.
As usual, Rich completely fails to address the content - What a loser.
Amusing that the right in Australia are having a stab at the now right >>wing opposition; as here, nothing matters expcet power to many of our >>National'' their Liberal party supporters; they can get a bit feral
about party leaders that lose . . .
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
You've chosen another extreme right publication to bolster your prejudiced views, Tony. Surely you are aware that the the trotSpace has zero credbility. It's on a par with the gouty rambling of poor old Karl Du Fenser.But far more truthful than your periodic mutters Breen...
On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 8:04:02 AM UTC+13, Tony wrote:
https://spectator.com.au/2022/11/jacinda-just-go/
Yes this is from last November and in some respects may be a little over-the-top but more and more it appears to be on the button.
Worth reposting I think.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 103:53:27 |
| Calls: | 6,660 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,335,167 |