Or is it an independent attempt to remove our democracy. >https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
and >https://rumble.com/v1582jz-burying-democracy-under-the-guise-of-health-mep-anderson-reveals-the-motive.html
and
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/alternative-media
If this is correct, how can it not have been advised to the people of this >country by our government?
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 19:11:23 -0000 (UTC), TonyObscenity removed.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Or is it an independent attempt to remove our democracy. >>https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
and >>https://rumble.com/v1582jz-burying-democracy-under-the-guise-of-health-mep-anderson-reveals-the-motive.html
and
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/alternative-media
If this is correct, how can it not have been advised to the people of this >>country by our government?
If what is correct, Tony?
New Zealand has not goven executive authority to a non-elected body.
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
There have been no agreements to change the rules for the WHO - but it
is reasonable for all organisations to review thier purpose and
authorities from time to time.
What is it that actually concerns you in relation to New Zealand,
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 19:11:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Or is it an independent attempt to remove our democracy. >https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
and >https://rumble.com/v1582jz-burying-democracy-under-the-guise-of-health-mep-anderson-reveals-the-motive.html
and
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/alternative-media
If this is correct, how can it not have been advised to the people of this >country by our government?If what is correct, Tony?
New Zealand has not goven executive authority to a non-elected body.
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
There have been no agreements to change the rules for the WHO - but it
is reasonable for all organisations to review thier purpose and
authorities from time to time.
What is it that actually concerns you in relation to New Zealand,
Tony, or is this just another scare-mongering troll post?
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 9:23:47 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 19:11:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Or is it an independent attempt to remove our democracy.If what is correct, Tony?
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
and
https://rumble.com/v1582jz-burying-democracy-under-the-guise-of-health-mep-anderson-reveals-the-motive.html
and
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/alternative-media
If this is correct, how can it not have been advised to the people of this >> >country by our government?
New Zealand has not goven executive authority to a non-elected body.
So just what is five fucking waters then?!
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
Except Labour who have written all sorts of bullshit into it like co governance!
There have been no agreements to change the rules for the WHO - but it
is reasonable for all organisations to review thier purpose and
authorities from time to time.
So being the good little communist you obviously are your happy to go along with anything big government decrees without question.?
What is it that actually concerns you in relation to New Zealand,
Tony, or is this just another scare-mongering troll post?
What concerns Tony, me and a growing number of people as proved by the polls is we're being run by a totalitarian government happily removing rights such as free choice!
Regrettably Rich your habit of bullying others leads you to behave like the typical cockalorum and not bother to actually read the links!
On 2023-01-08, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Or is it an independent attempt to remove our democracy.
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
and
andhttps://rumble.com/v1582jz-burying-democracy-under-the-guise-of-health-mep-anderson-reveals-the-motive.html
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/alternative-media
If this is correct, how can it not have been advised to the people of this >> country by our government?
Short answer because they they signed up to it. They want to be on the >winning side. ( Okay that is a theory)
It made a global world but there are sure signs that a Gobal Government is >not going to work. Empires have failed to control the people and all empires >have failed.
Britext occurred as the folks of the UK got tired of being ruled from >Brussels, some far way place who did not understand the state of play in the >UK. We have the same situation here in that we grizzle about what
Wellington thinks and plns to do, as in it thinks there is no differences >within the country.
The same reference is applied in the US to Washington.
Once again we have some vaild ideals, but this is an im-perfect world. Tears >For Fears, Everyone wants to rule the world
Tears For Fears LyricsGood sentiments, so let us make sure that globalisation (as envisaged by the not-so-good professor Klaus Schwab) and co-governance fails too.
"Everybody Wants To Rule The World"
Welcome to your life
There's no turning back
Even while we sleep
We will find you
Acting on your best behaviour
Turn your back on mother nature
Everybody wants to rule the world
It's my own design
It's my own remorse
Help me to decide
Help me make the most
Of freedom and of pleasure
Nothing ever lasts forever
Everybody wants to rule the world
There's a room where the light won't find you
Holding hands while the walls come tumbling down
When they do I'll be right behind you
So glad we've almost made it
So sad they had to fade it
Everybody wants to rule the world
I can't stand this indecision
Married with a lack of vision
Everybody wants to rule the world
Say that you'll never never never never need it
One headline why believe it?
Everybody wants to rule the world
All for freedom and for pleasure
Nothing ever lasts forever
Everybody wants to rule the world
On 2023-01-08, John Bowes <bowesjohn02@gmail.com> wrote:Woke is broke!
On Monday, January 9, 2023 at 9:23:47 AM UTC+13, Rich80105 wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 19:11:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Or is it an independent attempt to remove our democracy.If what is correct, Tony?
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
and
https://rumble.com/v1582jz-burying-democracy-under-the-guise-of-health-mep-anderson-reveals-the-motive.htmland
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/alternative-media
If this is correct, how can it not have been advised to the people of this >>> >country by our government?
New Zealand has not goven executive authority to a non-elected body.
So just what is five fucking waters then?!
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
Except Labour who have written all sorts of bullshit into it like co >>governance!
There have been no agreements to change the rules for the WHO - but it
is reasonable for all organisations to review thier purpose and
authorities from time to time.
So being the good little communist you obviously are your happy to go along >>with anything big government decrees without question.?
What is it that actually concerns you in relation to New Zealand,
Tony, or is this just another scare-mongering troll post?
What concerns Tony, me and a growing number of people as proved by the polls >>is we're being run by a totalitarian government happily removing rights such as
free choice!
You and Tony are far from the only ones. Beyond reasonable doubt, there is >the power grabbers, and the folks who want to tell you about it.
So, everyone, that includes Rich, stay alert. With the woke folks in control >things will go from bad to worse.
Regrettably Rich your habit of bullying others leads you to behave like the >>typical cockalorum and not bother to actually read the links!
Or is it an independent attempt to remove our democracy. https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
and https://rumble.com/v1582jz-burying-democracy-under-the-guise-of-health-mep-anderson-reveals-the-motive.html
and
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/alternative-media
If this is correct, how can it not have been advised to the people of this country by our government?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:<deleted line returned:>
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 19:11:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Or is it an independent attempt to remove our democracy. >>>https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
and >>>https://rumble.com/v1582jz-burying-democracy-under-the-guise-of-health-mep-anderson-reveals-the-motive.html
and
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/alternative-media
If this is correct, how can it not have been advised to the people of this >>>country by our government?
If what is correct, Tony?
New Zealand has not goven executive authority to a non-elected body.
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
There have been no agreements to change the rules for the WHO - but it
is reasonable for all organisations to review thier purpose and
authorities from time to time.
What is it that actually concerns you in relation to New Zealand,
Obscenity removed.I was not looking for any question you may have posed; I was asking
YHou have not read the links, if you had you would have understood the question.
You are a sham.
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 20:51:35 -0000 (UTC), TonyAddress the content or piss off.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:I was not looking for any question you may have posed; I was asking
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 19:11:23 -0000 (UTC), TonyYHou have not read the links, if you had you would have understood the >>question.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Or is it an independent attempt to remove our democracy. >>>>https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
and >>>>https://rumble.com/v1582jz-burying-democracy-under-the-guise-of-health-mep-anderson-reveals-the-motive.html
and
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/alternative-media
If this is correct, how can it not have been advised to the people of this >>>>country by our government?
If what is correct, Tony?
New Zealand has not goven executive authority to a non-elected body.
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
There have been no agreements to change the rules for the WHO - but it
is reasonable for all organisations to review thier purpose and >>>authorities from time to time.
What is it that actually concerns you in relation to New Zealand, >>Obscenity removed.
what concerns you - apparently you cannot follow a simple question:
What is it that actually concerns you in relation to New Zealand,
Tony?
You are a sham.
Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:Typical of the cretin Rich! He asks a question we're supposed to drop everything and answer it. We ask Rich a question and the fucking liar just avoids answering it. so typical of woke cockalorum like Rich...
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 20:51:35 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Address the content or piss off.Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> wrote:I was not looking for any question you may have posed; I was asking
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 19:11:23 -0000 (UTC), TonyYHou have not read the links, if you had you would have understood the >>question.
<lizan...@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Or is it an independent attempt to remove our democracy. >>>>https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
and >>>>https://rumble.com/v1582jz-burying-democracy-under-the-guise-of-health-mep-anderson-reveals-the-motive.html
and
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/alternative-media
If this is correct, how can it not have been advised to the people of this
country by our government?
If what is correct, Tony?
New Zealand has not goven executive authority to a non-elected body.
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
There have been no agreements to change the rules for the WHO - but it >>>is reasonable for all organisations to review thier purpose and >>>authorities from time to time.
What is it that actually concerns you in relation to New Zealand, >>Obscenity removed.
what concerns you - apparently you cannot follow a simple question:
What is it that actually concerns you in relation to New Zealand,
Tony?
You are a sham.
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:20:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
What's to support? The intent of the the treaty of Waitangi was to
establish equality under the law. We have that. The treaty has served
it's purpose. The end.
Bill.
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 21:28:57 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:20:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
What's to support? The intent of the the treaty of Waitangi was to >>establish equality under the law. We have that. The treaty has served
it's purpose. The end.
Bill.
Tino Rangatiratanga was granted . . .
Tell us, BR, how do you feel about that?
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 08:05:38 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 21:28:57 +1300, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:20:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
What's to support? The intent of the the treaty of Waitangi was to >>establish equality under the law. We have that. The treaty has served >>it's purpose. The end.
Bill.
Tino Rangatiratanga was granted . . .
Tell us, BR, how do you feel about that?I don't know about BR but I do not speak or understand Maori and have
no interest in doing so. What is this 'Tino Rangatiratanga' that you
speak of?
--A made up word by the English man who wrote the Maori version of the Treaty because the consept didn't exist in Maori...
Crash McBash
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 08:05:38 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>Try
wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 21:28:57 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:20:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
What's to support? The intent of the the treaty of Waitangi was to >>>establish equality under the law. We have that. The treaty has served >>>it's purpose. The end.
Bill.
Tino Rangatiratanga was granted . . .
Tell us, BR, how do you feel about that?
I don't know about BR but I do not speak or understand Maori and have
no interest in doing so. What is this 'Tino Rangatiratanga' that you
speak of?
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:14:32 AM UTC+13, Crash wrote:The New Zealand Courts have determined otherwise. It was teh version
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 08:05:38 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>A made up word by the English man who wrote the Maori version of the Treaty because the consept didn't exist in Maori...
wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 21:28:57 +1300, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:I don't know about BR but I do not speak or understand Maori and have
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:20:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
What's to support? The intent of the the treaty of Waitangi was to
establish equality under the law. We have that. The treaty has served
it's purpose. The end.
Bill.
Tino Rangatiratanga was granted . . .
Tell us, BR, how do you feel about that?
no interest in doing so. What is this 'Tino Rangatiratanga' that you
speak of?
--
Crash McBash
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:14:31 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>No model that includes co-governance can ever be a good model.
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 08:05:38 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:Try
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 21:28:57 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:20:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
What's to support? The intent of the the treaty of Waitangi was to >>>>establish equality under the law. We have that. The treaty has served >>>>it's purpose. The end.
Bill.
Tino Rangatiratanga was granted . . .
Tell us, BR, how do you feel about that?
I don't know about BR but I do not speak or understand Maori and have
no interest in doing so. What is this 'Tino Rangatiratanga' that you
speak of?
https://www.google.com/search?q=tino+rangatiratanga+meaning
International Law indicates that such a Treaty is written in two
languages, it is the manguage of the indigenous people that is
binding, and that is accepted in Nw Zealand law. The last Natonal-led >Government under John Key made several settlements under the Treaty,
using co-governance as a key method of delivery of Tino
Rangatiratanga. It has proved to be a good model.
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 14:05:43 -0800 (PST), John BowesProve it Rich! Your propensity to lie in support of a stupid government and your insistence that the rest of us do it requires this from you unless you think being called a liar is an accolade! Without any support it is quite simply a lie and a simple
<bowes...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 10:14:32 AM UTC+13, Crash wrote:The New Zealand Courts have determined otherwise. It was teh version
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 08:05:38 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>A made up word by the English man who wrote the Maori version of the Treaty because the consept didn't exist in Maori...
wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 21:28:57 +1300, BR <bl...@blah.blah> wrote:I don't know about BR but I do not speak or understand Maori and have
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:20:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
What's to support? The intent of the the treaty of Waitangi was to
establish equality under the law. We have that. The treaty has served >> >>it's purpose. The end.
Bill.
Tino Rangatiratanga was granted . . .
Tell us, BR, how do you feel about that?
no interest in doing so. What is this 'Tino Rangatiratanga' that you
speak of?
--
Crash McBash
of the Treaty signed by the Maori chiefs, many of whom were proficient
in English as well as Maori.
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:14:31 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 08:05:38 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:Try
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 21:28:57 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:20:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:
All major parties in New Zealand support the Treaty of Waitangi.
What's to support? The intent of the the treaty of Waitangi was to >>>>establish equality under the law. We have that. The treaty has served >>>>it's purpose. The end.
Bill.
Tino Rangatiratanga was granted . . .
Tell us, BR, how do you feel about that?
I don't know about BR but I do not speak or understand Maori and have
no interest in doing so. What is this 'Tino Rangatiratanga' that you
speak of?
https://www.google.com/search?q=tino+rangatiratanga+meaning
International Law
indicates that such a Treaty is written in two
languages, it is the manguage of the indigenous people that is
binding
, and that is accepted in Nw Zealand law. The last Natonal-led
Government under John Key made several settlements under the Treaty,
using co-governance as a key method of delivery of Tino
Rangatiratanga.
It has proved to be a good model.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 102:10:51 |
| Calls: | 6,660 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,209 |
| Messages: | 5,334,982 |