i'd want newer threads on top ---
Can i make this the default in TB ? (Ascending, Descending) ?
in other words, Can i specify (Sort-by) Descending for all the Groups?
Does TB support X-Face?
HenHanna wrote:
Does TB support X-Face?
In Thunderbird, you can add an X-Face header to your messages, but
you won't be able to display X-Faces.
DV wrote:
HenHanna wrote:
Does TB support X-Face?
In Thunderbird, you can add an X-Face header to your messages, but
you won't be able to display X-Faces.
You'd think if TB was going to allow the option to add an x-face to
headers they'd at least have an option to display them!
You'd think if TB was going to allow the option to add an x-face to
headers they'd at least have an option to display them!
(does Gmail support Xface?)
Is there a NG (Group) or Web-gallery where we can see Fancy or Cute
X-Face collections?
HenHanna wrote:
(does Gmail support Xface?)
Is there a NG (Group) or Web-gallery where we can see Fancy or Cute X-Face collections?
I knew a few X-Faces web galleries, but unfortunately they no longer exist.
DV wrote:
HenHanna wrote:
(does Gmail support Xface?)
> I don't know: I've never used Gmail.
Is there a NG (Group) or Web-gallery where we can see Fancy or Cute X-Face collections?
I knew a few X-Faces web galleries, but unfortunately they no longer exist.
Thanks! i'll keep looking. (esp. for those with Puzzle or Joke aspect)
There are 2 (?) sample Xface files here, and DV (God Willing) i'll see the images soon.
https://faces.sourceforge.net/Documents/faces.txt
Here is a typical .face file:
X-Face: *7O.<19S{MCsaxxe=iCc*y5!i:>e,K40m^btp"<`~gNx5>o?eJMzUng=j]%KybY
/VaZ/3a4pD%#rGu7D<M$.TDpaDN8#8eJC&^^&Mr]@~}Pa,*F-ePrMg5.}e,,bu
qROdT{Vzn{!ouXy.&*#V#Q&Zf7a8lX2Kb}"$UT^VhnsJ?){wFU5r+,duO>4@L
posting again , because... a Msg (of mine) with attached file didn't get propagated (apparently).
DV wrote:
HenHanna wrote:
Does TB support X-Face?
In Thunderbird, you can add an X-Face header to your messages, but
you won't be able to display X-Faces.
You'd think if TB was going to allow the option to add an x-face to
headers they'd at least have an option to display them!
Blueshirt wrote:
DV wrote:
HenHanna wrote:
Does TB support X-Face?
In Thunderbird, you can add an X-Face header to your messages, but
you won't be able to display X-Faces.
You'd think if TB was going to allow the option to add an x-face to
headers they'd at least have an option to display them!
thanks... maybe i'll try that later (adding Xface header and posting from TB)
is anyone doing that (and posting from TB) ?
Does TB support X-Face? (does Gmail support Xface?)
HenHanna wrote:
Does TB support X-Face? (does Gmail support Xface?)
please don't post binary here. BTW, that's not an x-face. Gmail has its
own profile images internal protocol.
TB doesn't support natively Faces/X-Faces, but I can remember people
getting and decoding header's content with Autoit, then visualizing it
with an always on top, transparent viewer app. maybe some scripting guy
is reading here, and willing to help.
adding an X-Face header is easy on any given NR i believe.
issdr wrote:
HenHanna wrote:
Does TB support X-Face? (does Gmail support Xface?)
please don't post binary here. BTW, that's not an x-face. Gmail has its
own profile images internal protocol.
TB doesn't support natively Faces/X-Faces, but I can remember people
getting and decoding header's content with Autoit, then visualizing it
with an always on top, transparent viewer app. maybe some scripting guy
is reading here, and willing to help.
adding an X-Face header is easy on any given NR i believe.
Exactly. The header is easy, decoding and displaying is what takes work.
Retro Guy <retroguy@novabbs.com> wrote at 23:27 this Tuesday (GMT):
issdr wrote:
HenHanna wrote:
Does TB support X-Face? (does Gmail support Xface?)
please don't post binary here. BTW, that's not an x-face. Gmail has its
own profile images internal protocol.
TB doesn't support natively Faces/X-Faces, but I can remember people
getting and decoding header's content with Autoit, then visualizing it
with an always on top, transparent viewer app. maybe some scripting guy
is reading here, and willing to help.
adding an X-Face header is easy on any given NR i believe.
Exactly. The header is easy, decoding and displaying is what takes work.
uncompface -X helps a lot
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:10:08 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
Retro Guy <retroguy@novabbs.com> wrote at 23:27 this Tuesday (GMT):
issdr wrote:
HenHanna wrote:
Does TB support X-Face? (does Gmail support Xface?)
please don't post binary here. BTW, that's not an x-face. Gmail has its >>>> own profile images internal protocol.
TB doesn't support natively Faces/X-Faces, but I can remember people
getting and decoding header's content with Autoit, then visualizing it >>>> with an always on top, transparent viewer app. maybe some scripting guy >>>> is reading here, and willing to help.
adding an X-Face header is easy on any given NR i believe.
Exactly. The header is easy, decoding and displaying is what takes work.
uncompface -X helps a lot
Yes, it does. That's how I do it in my web interface software. I just mean that the code is easy to write to allow a user to populate a new header
with a string, but it takes more work (in the code) to decode the string
and display the x-face.
Retro Guy <retroguy@novabbs.org> wrote at 03:24 this Wednesday (GMT):
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:10:08 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
Retro Guy <retroguy@novabbs.com> wrote at 23:27 this Tuesday (GMT):
issdr wrote:uncompface -X helps a lot
HenHanna wrote:
Does TB support X-Face? (does Gmail support Xface?)
please don't post binary here. BTW, that's not an x-face. Gmail has its >>>>> own profile images internal protocol.
TB doesn't support natively Faces/X-Faces, but I can remember people >>>>> getting and decoding header's content with Autoit, then visualizing it >>>>> with an always on top, transparent viewer app. maybe some scripting guy >>>>> is reading here, and willing to help.
adding an X-Face header is easy on any given NR i believe.
Exactly. The header is easy, decoding and displaying is what takes work. >>>
Yes, it does. That's how I do it in my web interface software. I just mean >> that the code is easy to write to allow a user to populate a new header
with a string, but it takes more work (in the code) to decode the string
and display the x-face.
Yeah.
I will say tho, this xface was a pain to set up because I had to
escape a ton of % and \ chars to get it to send properly.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 06:20:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
Retro Guy <retroguy@novabbs.org> wrote at 03:24 this Wednesday (GMT):
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:10:08 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
Retro Guy <retroguy@novabbs.com> wrote at 23:27 this Tuesday (GMT):
issdr wrote:uncompface -X helps a lot
HenHanna wrote:
Does TB support X-Face? (does Gmail support Xface?) >>>>>please don't post binary here. BTW, that's not an x-face. Gmail has its >>>>>> own profile images internal protocol.
TB doesn't support natively Faces/X-Faces, but I can remember people >>>>>> getting and decoding header's content with Autoit, then visualizing it >>>>>> with an always on top, transparent viewer app. maybe some scripting guy >>>>>> is reading here, and willing to help.
adding an X-Face header is easy on any given NR i believe.
Exactly. The header is easy, decoding and displaying is what takes work. >>>>
Yes, it does. That's how I do it in my web interface software. I just mean >>> that the code is easy to write to allow a user to populate a new header
with a string, but it takes more work (in the code) to decode the string >>> and display the x-face.
Yeah.
I will say tho, this xface was a pain to set up because I had to
escape a ton of % and \ chars to get it to send properly.
Interesting. Apparently it (whatever software) is or is willing to exectute things from this string. Hopefully it's just something you needed to do
once and done :)
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 109:14:25 |
| Calls: | 6,701 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,348,487 |