Hi.

Remote peer will be unable connect to my peer as I have no
external IP address. For some reason I won't use mail as channel
feed. Any idea how to peer under such conditions?
--
Miner

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Miner <john@doe.invalid> writes:

Remote peer will be unable connect to my peer as I have no external IP address. For some reason I won't use mail as channel feed. Any idea how
to peer under such conditions?

UUCP would be my recommendation, if the peer is willing to do it. The advantage of UUCP is that you can plug in whatever transport mechanism you
can make work to get the batches from one host to another.

--
Russ Allbery (eagle@eyrie.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Please post questions rather than mailing me directly.
<https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 3/26/22 10:37 AM, Miner wrote:

Hi.

Hi Miner,

Remote peer will be unable connect to my peer as I have no external
IP address. For some reason I won't use mail as channel feed. Any
idea how to peer under such conditions?

As Russ suggested, UUCP would be an option.

Though I'm not sure what the best method would be to get UUCP bag files attached to email and off to you. I suppose there's some room for
automation to attach the UUCP bag files and send them.

Do you /need/ to use email (SMTP) as the transport? Or can you connect
out from -- I presume -- behind NAT to a server and pull data?

There's also something like a Tor hidden service to allow peers that
support Tor to connect to you. Or other similar VPNs.

I'm curious and like the thought experiment about how to make this work.

I'd be happy to peer with you, be it UUCP bag files, UUCP pull initiated
from your end, or something else yet to be determined. -- Please send
me an email directly so we can discuss details.



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Miner <john@doe.invalid> writes:

Remote peer will be unable connect to my peer as I have no
external IP address. For some reason I won't use mail as channel
feed. Any idea how to peer under such conditions?

Rent a VPS for a few dollars a month and peer from that instead.

--
https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Grant Taylor wrote:

On 3/26/22 10:37 AM, Miner wrote:

Hi.

Hi Miner,

Remote peer will be unable connect to my peer as I have no
external IP address. For some reason I won't use mail as
channel feed. Any idea how to peer under such conditions?

As Russ suggested, UUCP would be an option.

Though I'm not sure what the best method would be to get UUCP
bag files attached to email and off to you. I suppose there's
some room for automation to attach the UUCP bag files and send
them.

Do you /need/ to use email (SMTP) as the transport? Or can you
connect out from -- I presume -- behind NAT to a server and
pull data?

I would like to avoid using email at all for this purpose. Most
email services tend to impose unacceptable conditions and
restrictions. It seems to me that Tox is more preferred as a
channel feed solution than email. Look on FIFO based Tox client
"ratox" https://github.com/pranomostro/ratox

Yes, I can connect to remote server.

There's also something like a Tor hidden service to allow peers
that support Tor to connect to you. Or other similar VPNs.

Good solution. Thanks to my friend you may read my message. We
peer over I2P network.

I'm curious and like the thought experiment about how to make
this work.

I'd be happy to peer with you, be it UUCP bag files, UUCP pull
initiated from your end, or something else yet to be
determined. -- Please send me an email directly so we can
discuss details.

Ok. Do you have valid GnuPG key? 9864F8EC1A79AAA0 expired since
2018-01-01.

--
Miner

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In article <t1ouom$rm1$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>,
Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> wrote:

On 3/26/22 10:37 AM, Miner wrote:

Hi.

Hi Miner,

Remote peer will be unable connect to my peer as I have no external
IP address. For some reason I won't use mail as channel feed. Any
idea how to peer under such conditions?

As Russ suggested, UUCP would be an option.

Though I'm not sure what the best method would be to get UUCP bag files >attached to email and off to you. I suppose there's some room for
automation to attach the UUCP bag files and send them.

Do you /need/ to use email (SMTP) as the transport? Or can you connect
out from -- I presume -- behind NAT to a server and pull data?

There's also something like a Tor hidden service to allow peers that
support Tor to connect to you. Or other similar VPNs.

I'm curious and like the thought experiment about how to make this work.

I'd be happy to peer with you, be it UUCP bag files, UUCP pull initiated
from your end, or something else yet to be determined. -- Please send
me an email directly so we can discuss details.

UUCP over TCp should also work.

--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b No technology will cancel out wishful thinking. -unknown Beware https://mindspring.com

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Richard Kettlewell wrote:

Miner <john@doe.invalid> writes:

Remote peer will be unable connect to my peer as I have no
external IP address. For some reason I won't use mail as channel
feed. Any idea how to peer under such conditions?

Rent a VPS for a few dollars a month and peer from that instead.

Sounds like membership fee.

--
Miner

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 3/27/22 5:14 AM, Miner wrote:

I would like to avoid using email at all for this purpose. Most
email services tend to impose unacceptable conditions and
restrictions.

I seem to have mis-read your previous post to be that you wanted to use
email as the transport. I now re-read and see that's not the case.

It seems to me that Tox is more preferred as a channel feed
solution than email. Look on FIFO based Tox client "ratox" https://github.com/pranomostro/ratox

I'm not familiar with (ra)Tox. I'll do some reading.

Yes, I can connect to remote server.

In that case, I believe my preference would be to use UUCP over SSH.

Good solution. Thanks to my friend you may read my message. We peer
over I2P network.

I don't currently support I2P. I've looked at it in the past and am disinclined to use it.

Ok. Do you have valid GnuPG key? 9864F8EC1A79AAA0 expired since
2018-01-01.

No. I prefer S/MIME over GPG when possible.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Grant Taylor wrote:

I'd be happy to peer with you, be it UUCP bag files, UUCP pull
initiated from your end, or something else yet to be
determined. -- Please send me an email directly so we can
discuss details.

Tox is a best communication tool.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net
host tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net [2600:3c00:e000:1e9::8849]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>:
550 5.7.1 <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>... Fix reverse DNS for IPv6:2a02:180:2:92:3:4:5:6

--
Miner

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 3/31/22 5:05 AM, Miner wrote:

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net
host tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net [2600:3c00:e000:1e9::8849]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>:
550 5.7.1 <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net>... Fix reverse DNS for IPv6:2a02:180:2:92:3:4:5:6

The last five words of the message tell you what you need to do.

Fix reverse DNS for IPv6:2a02:180:2:92:3:4:5:6



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Grant Taylor wrote:

On 3/31/22 5:05 AM, Miner wrote:

host tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net
[2600:3c00:e000:1e9::8849]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT

The last five words of the message tell you what you need to do.
Fix reverse DNS for IPv6:2a02:180:2:92:3:4:5:6

I already wrote to admin. No reaction from remote side.

--
Miner

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)