• Free news-server for discussion?

    From Lucas S. A. Castro@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 2 06:25:01 2016
    Hello, folk of Usenet.

    I have ever dreamed of joining this magnific network. After downloading Pan, however, and trying some free "Usenet" servers, I am pretty frustrated: I have not found a server which fully implements the RFCs for free, for most proposals are about
    downloading binaries (which are not the objective of this system). XSUsenet, for example, does not respect cancel and rmvgroup messages, nor it accepts posting.

    What I am looking for is to use the true Usenet, for discussions and knowledge, according to the specifications and authorities of the Big 8 (alt.* is not truly necessary); I have no problem if the message retention is only one month, provided I am able
    to enjoy all the functionality. Then, I ask you, here from these goddamned Google Groups: by which means (even if extremely complex) may I access properly at least the last month of the Usenet and answer it, just like paying members do?

    As I do not know how to crosspost from Google Groups, I may have to post it some more times.

    Respectfully,
    Lucas S. A. Castro, from Brazil.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Whiskers@21:1/5 to Lucas S. A. Castro on Thu Jun 2 23:25:01 2016
    On 2016-06-02, Lucas S. A. Castro <lucassebastiao2010@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hello, folk of Usenet.

    I have ever dreamed of joining this magnific network. After
    downloading Pan, however, and trying some free "Usenet" servers, I am
    pretty frustrated: I have not found a server which fully implements
    the RFCs for free, for most proposals are about downloading binaries
    (which are not the objective of this system). XSUsenet, for example,
    does not respect cancel and rmvgroup messages, nor it accepts posting.

    What I am looking for is to use the true Usenet, for discussions and knowledge, according to the specifications and authorities of the Big
    8 (alt.* is not truly necessary); I have no problem if the message
    retention is only one month, provided I am able to enjoy all the functionality. Then, I ask you, here from these goddamned Google
    Groups: by which means (even if extremely complex) may I access
    properly at least the last month of the Usenet and answer it, just
    like paying members do?

    As I do not know how to crosspost from Google Groups, I may have to
    post it some more times.

    Respectfully, Lucas S. A. Castro, from Brazil.

    Welcome to usenet :))

    The newsgroup for discussing free news-servers is alt.free.newsservers
    but sadly the signal to noise ratio there is very poor these days.

    'Eternal-September' is widely used and is free, and seems to work very
    well. See <http://www.eternal-september.org/>.

    'Albasani' is also free and has a good reputation; see
    <http://albasani.net/>.

    'Datemas' costs 5 Euros a year <http://news.datemas.de/> and works very
    well.

    'Individual' costs 10 Euros a year <http://individual.net/> and is
    probably the best of the text-only news servers.

    Some ISPs still include a news-server as part of their normal service.

    --
    -- ^^^^^^^^^^
    -- Whiskers
    -- ~~~~~~~~~~

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kathy Morgan@21:1/5 to Kathy Morgan on Mon Jun 6 04:25:02 2016
    Kathy Morgan <kmorgan@spamcop.net> wrote:

    Lucas S. A. Castro <lucassebastiao2010@gmail.com> wrote:

    What I am looking for is to use the true Usenet, for discussions and knowledge, according to the specifications and authorities of the Big 8 (alt.* is not truly necessary); I have no problem if the message
    retention is only one month, provided I am able to enjoy all the functionality.

    Your message has extremely long lines. (snip)

    I should have waited to comment; your post with Pan looks very nice.

    --
    Kathy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Whiskers@21:1/5 to Kathy Morgan on Mon Jun 6 23:00:02 2016
    On 2016-06-06, Kathy Morgan <kmorgan@spamcop.net> wrote:
    Kathy Morgan <kmorgan@spamcop.net> wrote:

    Lucas S. A. Castro <lucassebastiao2010@gmail.com> wrote:

    What I am looking for is to use the true Usenet, for discussions
    and knowledge, according to the specifications and authorities of
    the Big 8 (alt.* is not truly necessary); I have no problem if the
    message retention is only one month, provided I am able to enjoy
    all the functionality.

    Your message has extremely long lines. (snip)

    I should have waited to comment; your post with Pan looks very nice.

    Perhaps Pan automatically wraps long lines to fit your 'window' whereas
    MacSoup doesn't?

    Slrn can wrap long lines to the window, but has to be given a manual
    command to do it. Slrn has no text editor of its own but the one I use
    with it (Vim) can wrap long lines and automatically add the necessary email/usenet > quotes at the start of lines of quoted text if necessary,
    so that when I remember I can format my replies neatly regardless of the
    line length in the article I'm replying to.

    Google Groups does produce annoyingly unformatted paragraphs unless the
    user deliberately inserts a 'return' manually at sane points. Their
    user interface seems to hide this defect.

    --
    -- ^^^^^^^^^^
    -- Whiskers
    -- ~~~~~~~~~~

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kathy Morgan@21:1/5 to Whiskers on Tue Jun 7 04:10:02 2016
    Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> wrote:

    On 2016-06-06, Kathy Morgan <kmorgan@spamcop.net> wrote:
    Kathy Morgan <kmorgan@spamcop.net> wrote:

    Your message has extremely long lines. (snip)

    I should have waited to comment; your post with Pan looks very nice.

    Perhaps Pan automatically wraps long lines to fit your 'window' whereas MacSoup doesn't?

    MacSoup wraps the messages in the window, but when doing a followup, it
    leaves the line long--but then refuses to post the followup until the
    quoted long line is fixed. There's a manual command to do that, but it
    doesn't properly fix the quote level, so I need to manually insert "> "
    at the beginning of each rewrapped line.

    Slrn can wrap long lines to the window, but has to be given a manual
    command to do it. Slrn has no text editor of its own but the one I use
    with it (Vim) can wrap long lines and automatically add the necessary email/usenet > quotes at the start of lines of quoted text if necessary,
    so that when I remember I can format my replies neatly regardless of the
    line length in the article I'm replying to.

    Google Groups does produce annoyingly unformatted paragraphs unless the
    user deliberately inserts a 'return' manually at sane points. Their
    user interface seems to hide this defect.

    Heh! Google Groups' user interface hides many defects, so this one does
    not surprise me.

    --
    Kathy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kathy Morgan@21:1/5 to Lucas S. A. Castro on Fri Jun 3 22:10:02 2016
    Lucas S. A. Castro <lucassebastiao2010@gmail.com> wrote:

    What I am looking for is to use the true Usenet, for discussions and knowledge, according to the specifications and authorities of the Big 8 (alt.* is not truly necessary); I have no problem if the message
    retention is only one month, provided I am able to enjoy all the functionality.

    Your message has extremely long lines. If your news client
    (GoogleGropes?) does not automatically break them into shorter lines,
    you should do it manually yourself. Put carriage return/line feeds
    after about every 72 characters. I had to rewrap your paragraph above
    and add quote marks to the new lines.

    Whiskers has posted some excellent suggestions. I have accounts on both Albasani and Individual.net, and my experience is that Albasani's
    retention is much longer than Individual's.

    You mentioned wanting to be able to issue cancel messages and rmgroup
    messages; because of massive abuse of those types of message, most
    servers will not accept them.

    --
    Kathy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lucas S. A. Castro@21:1/5 to Whiskers on Fri Jun 3 22:10:02 2016
    On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 23:25:01 +0000, Whiskers wrote:
    Welcome to usenet :))

    The newsgroup for discussing free news-servers is alt.free.newsservers
    but sadly the signal to noise ratio there is very poor these days.

    'Eternal-September' is widely used and is free, and seems to work very
    well. See <http://www.eternal-september.org/>.

    'Albasani' is also free and has a good reputation; see <http://albasani.net/>.

    'Datemas' costs 5 Euros a year <http://news.datemas.de/> and works very
    well.

    'Individual' costs 10 Euros a year <http://individual.net/> and is
    probably the best of the text-only news servers.

    Some ISPs still include a news-server as part of their normal service.

    Thank you very much: eternal-september.org works wonderfully well. I can consider myself part of the Usenet here-to-fore.

    Lucas S. A. Castro

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)