Would be nice to have a test moderated group that functioned?
misc.test.moderated ...
doesn't seem to work
Would be nice to have a test moderated group that functioned?
misc.test.moderated ...
doesn't seem to work
Would be nice to have a test moderated group that functioned?
misc.test.moderated ...
doesn't seem to work
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:33:47 -0500, dale wrote:
Would be nice to have a test moderated group that functioned?
misc.test.moderated ...
doesn't seem to work
Hi Dale,
Moderation requires a moderator. Right now there's no one who is doing
that. That's the case for many dead moderated groups. We (B8MB) are open
to changing moderation on groups to a new moderator but first we need to
know that the person/group who wants to moderate is able to do so.
Russ Allbery has a great article: Pitfalls of Newsgroup Moderation
that is a great place to begin if someone is interested in taking over a >moderated group.
https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/mod-pitfalls.html
Would be nice to have a test moderated group that functioned?
misc.test.moderated ...
doesn't seem to work
it's worth. Just decide what you're going to do about it.
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
We've already had a much longer discussion about this group than
it's worth. Just decide what you're going to do about it.
But you're posting the wrong rant.
The group does work.
Would be nice to have a test moderated group that functioned?
misc.test.moderated ...
doesn't seem to work
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:33:47 -0500, dale wrote:
Would be nice to have a test moderated group that functioned?
misc.test.moderated ...
doesn't seem to work
Hi Dale,
Moderation requires a moderator. Right now there's no one who is doing
that. That's the case for many dead moderated groups. We (B8MB) are open
to changing moderation on groups to a new moderator but first we need to
know that the person/group who wants to moderate is able to do so.
Russ Allbery has a great article: Pitfalls of Newsgroup Moderation
that is a great place to begin if someone is interested in taking over a moderated group.
https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/mod-pitfalls.html
"Right now there's no one who is doing that," that there's a
moderator vacancy? He's the hierarchy administrator, not I. I
assumed he knew what he was talking about.
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Take it up with Jason Evans. Was I not to believe his statement,
"Right now there's no one who is doing that," that there's a
moderator vacancy? He's the hierarchy administrator, not I. I
assumed he knew what he was talking about.
Ha, well, you were the first person to reply, you know....
Many of your posts are on point, but you sure seemed eager to dismiss >something we can easily have working....
Now, when you say that
having good posters is the important part of creating a group,
there's a lot less I can do other than agree....
dale <dale@dalekelly.org> wrote:
Would be nice to have a test moderated group that functioned?
misc.test.moderated ...
doesn't seem to work
It allows a News administrator to test the configuration of his News
server, that proto articles posted to moderated newsgroups aren't
injected into Usenet but mailed to the moderated posting address.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 286 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 85:04:26 |
Calls: | 6,495 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 12,097 |
Messages: | 5,276,965 |