• Archive of initial RFD's {or similar content}

    From Richard Owlett@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 9 14:35:28 2017
    I had asked in several groups for suggestions of USENET groups where
    discussion about home PC monitoring of blood pressure. Eventually I was refereed to news.groups.proposals with the suggestion I initiate the
    creation of such a group.

    I found http://www.big-8.org/articles/b/i/g/Big-8_Usenet.html and
    followed possibly relevant links in order to know whether such a group
    existed and/or had been proposed. The only link I found was http://www.big-8.org/articles/a/r/c/Archived_Announcements.html which
    appears to be incomplete and has had no additions for ~4 years.

    Is there perhaps a site other than www.big-8.org which would have
    similar content?

    Thank you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kathy Morgan@21:1/5 to Richard Owlett on Sat Sep 9 17:20:55 2017
    Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> wrote:

    I had asked in several groups for suggestions of USENET groups where discussion about home PC monitoring of blood pressure. Eventually I was refereed to news.groups.proposals with the suggestion I initiate the
    creation of such a group.

    I can't imagine that there would be sufficient interest in such a group
    to create a viable amount of traffic if the group were created.

    I found http://www.big-8.org/articles/b/i/g/Big-8_Usenet.html and
    followed possibly relevant links in order to know whether such a group existed and/or had been proposed. The only link I found was http://www.big-8.org/articles/a/r/c/Archived_Announcements.html which
    appears to be incomplete and has had no additions for ~4 years.

    You are correct--that page is no longer being maintained. I don't
    personally recall that or a similar group having ever been proposed in
    the Big 8. You might check your full list of groups for something
    possibly in alt.*

    Is there perhaps a site other than www.big-8.org which would have
    similar content?

    I think you would probably be more likely to find what you want using a
    Web search. Also, check for newsgroups where fitness trackers and smart watches are discussed.

    --
    Kathy - speaking only for myself

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David E. Ross@21:1/5 to Richard Owlett on Sat Sep 9 23:19:36 2017
    On 9/9/2017 1:35 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
    I had asked in several groups for suggestions of USENET groups where discussion about home PC monitoring of blood pressure. Eventually I was refereed to news.groups.proposals with the suggestion I initiate the
    creation of such a group.

    I found http://www.big-8.org/articles/b/i/g/Big-8_Usenet.html and
    followed possibly relevant links in order to know whether such a group existed and/or had been proposed. The only link I found was http://www.big-8.org/articles/a/r/c/Archived_Announcements.html which
    appears to be incomplete and has had no additions for ~4 years.

    Is there perhaps a site other than www.big-8.org which would have
    similar content?

    Thank you.

    Try <ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/>, which is
    actually viewable via any Web browser. You do not need to access it via
    FTP.

    --
    David E. Ross
    <http://www.rossde.com/>

    Yes, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and other
    "founding fathers" owned slaves. However, they created
    a nation. Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, Thomas
    "Stonewall" Jackson and other "heroes" of the
    Confederacy tried to tear the nation apart. Statues
    and other monuments to those "heroes" of the
    Confederacy actually celebrate traitors and treason.

    See my <http://www.rossde.com/editorials/edtl_conf_flag.html>.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Owlett@21:1/5 to David E. Ross on Sun Sep 10 16:08:31 2017
    On 09/10/2017 12:19 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
    On 9/9/2017 1:35 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
    I had asked in several groups for suggestions of USENET groups where
    discussion about home PC monitoring of blood pressure. Eventually I was
    refereed to news.groups.proposals with the suggestion I initiate the
    creation of such a group.

    I found http://www.big-8.org/articles/b/i/g/Big-8_Usenet.html and
    followed possibly relevant links in order to know whether such a group
    existed and/or had been proposed. The only link I found was
    http://www.big-8.org/articles/a/r/c/Archived_Announcements.html which
    appears to be incomplete and has had no additions for ~4 years.

    Is there perhaps a site other than www.big-8.org which would have
    similar content?

    Thank you.

    Try <ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/>, which is actually viewable via any Web browser. You do not need to access it via
    FTP.


    I just took a second look at that URL.
    There is more content there than I thought.
    Will have to think about a semi-automated search for the information I'm looking for. It may not be where *I* expect.

    Thank you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Owlett@21:1/5 to Kathy Morgan on Sun Sep 10 16:08:03 2017
    On 09/09/2017 06:20 PM, Kathy Morgan wrote:
    Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> wrote:

    I had asked in several groups for suggestions of USENET groups where
    discussion about home PC monitoring of blood pressure. Eventually
    I was refereed to news.groups.proposals with the suggestion I
    initiate the creation of such a group.

    I can't imagine that there would be sufficient interest in such
    a group to create a viable amount of traffic if the group were
    created.


    If the group covered only what I described, I would agree. However I was looking for a group where my topic would be within the group's charter
    rather than in a sense being it's charter.

    Further browsing after my initial post suggested possible group titles
    of sci.med.home-health or comp.home.health .


    I found http://www.big-8.org/articles/b/i/g/Big-8_Usenet.html and
    followed possibly relevant links in order to know whether such a group
    existed and/or had been proposed. The only link I found was
    http://www.big-8.org/articles/a/r/c/Archived_Announcements.html which
    appears to be incomplete and has had no additions for ~4 years.

    You are correct--that page is no longer being maintained. I don't
    personally recall that or a similar group having ever been proposed in
    the Big 8. You might check your full list of groups for something
    possibly in alt.*

    Is there perhaps a site other than www.big-8.org which would have
    similar content?

    I think you would probably be more likely to find what you want using
    a Web search.

    That's where I started ;/

    Also, check for newsgroups where fitness trackers and smart
    watches are discussed.


    I don't see how to search for either.

    Thank you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ivan Shmakov@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 29 18:21:22 2017
    David E Ross <nobody@nowhere.invalid> writes:
    On 9/9/2017 1:35 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:

    [...]

    I found http://www.big-8.org/articles/b/i/g/Big-8_Usenet.html and
    followed possibly relevant links in order to know whether such a
    group existed and/or had been proposed. The only link I found was
    http://www.big-8.org/articles/a/r/c/Archived_Announcements.html
    which appears to be incomplete and has had no additions for ~4
    years.

    Is there perhaps a site other than www.big-8.org which would have
    similar content?

    Try <ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/>, which is actually viewable via any Web browser. You do not need to access it
    via FTP.

    Except to access it /not/ via FTP (the protocol, not program),
    you'd use http://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/
    as the URI.

    Depending on the browser, and more importantly, how said browser
    reaches the Internet at large, it may not be possible to access
    FTP (ftp:) resources at all. For instance, the Polipo HTTP proxy
    (which may get handy alongside Tor) does not support FTP at all.

    Similarly, having a NAT box that's not configured to properly
    "intercept" transit FTP connections may prevent one from talking
    to outside FTP servers.

    --
    FSF associate member #7257 http://am-1.org/~ivan/ 7D17 4A59 6A21 3D97 6DDB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Kramer@21:1/5 to ivan@siamics.net on Tue Oct 3 18:36:58 2017
    In article <87shf6yfg8.fsf@violet.siamics.net>,
    Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> wrote:
    Except to access it /not/ via FTP (the protocol, not program),
    you'd use http://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/
    as the URI.

    Only if there is a web server running on that host that is using the
    same pathing. That isn't a given, you know.

    Similarly, having a NAT box that's not configured to properly
    "intercept" transit FTP connections may prevent one from talking
    to outside FTP servers.

    Intercepting connections shouldn't be necessary. FTP can work through
    NAT. Any web browser that does FTP protocol should be using PASV mode.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ivan Shmakov@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 4 15:26:56 2017
    Mark Kramer <c28f62@TheWorld.com> writes:
    In article <87shf6yfg8.fsf@violet.siamics.net>, Ivan Shmakov wrote:

    Except to access it /not/ via FTP (the protocol, not program), you'd
    use http://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/ as the URI.

    Only if there is a web server running on that host that is using the
    same pathing.

    I didn't suggest otherwise.

    That isn't a given, you know.

    I've checked that it applies to ftp.isc.org specifically before
    posting the URI.

    Similarly, having a NAT box that's not configured to properly
    "intercept" transit FTP connections may prevent one from talking to
    outside FTP servers.

    Intercepting connections shouldn't be necessary. FTP can work
    through NAT. Any web browser that does FTP protocol should be using
    PASV mode.

    Three different transfer modes are one of the issues with FTP.
    I recall stumbling upon a server that supported EPSV, but
    silently failed PASV (or vice versa.)

    I don't see any value in both FTP in general and ftp: URIs in
    particular these days. HTTP(S), Rsync, and either Rsync/SSH or
    SFTP, seem to cover all the use cases, and are just plain better.

    --
    FSF associate member #7257 http://am-1.org/~ivan/ 7D17 4A59 6A21 3D97 6DDB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David E. Ross@21:1/5 to Ivan Shmakov on Wed Oct 4 15:26:19 2017
    On 9/29/2017 5:21 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
    David E Ross <nobody@nowhere.invalid> writes:
    On 9/9/2017 1:35 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:

    [...]

    I found http://www.big-8.org/articles/b/i/g/Big-8_Usenet.html and
    followed possibly relevant links in order to know whether such a
    group existed and/or had been proposed. The only link I found was
    http://www.big-8.org/articles/a/r/c/Archived_Announcements.html
    which appears to be incomplete and has had no additions for ~4
    years.

    Is there perhaps a site other than www.big-8.org which would have
    similar content?

    Try <ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/>, which is actually viewable via any Web browser. You do not need to access it
    via FTP.

    Except to access it /not/ via FTP (the protocol, not program),
    you'd use http://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/
    as the URI.

    Depending on the browser, and more importantly, how said browser
    reaches the Internet at large, it may not be possible to access
    FTP (ftp:) resources at all. For instance, the Polipo HTTP proxy
    (which may get handy alongside Tor) does not support FTP at all.

    Similarly, having a NAT box that's not configured to properly
    "intercept" transit FTP connections may prevent one from talking
    to outside FTP servers.


    I use my Web browser to view <ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/>. I do not need
    to change the "ftp://" to "http://". My browser is SeaMonkey, which has
    the same internal "guts" as Firefox. Thus, Firefox could also view that without changing the "ftp://" to "http://".

    --
    David E. Ross
    <http://www.rossde.com/>

    Anything I post in this newsgroup is my personal
    opinion and does not reflect the official position
    of the Big8-Usenet Board.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)