• Naming Guidelines For uk.*

    From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 31 19:39:19 2021
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 1 11:32:24 2021
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 1 19:33:02 2022
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 1 11:20:50 2022
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 1 11:00:35 2022
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 28 10:43:16 2022
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 28 03:15:05 2022
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 26 23:15:45 2022
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 27 09:49:57 2022
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 27 03:15:07 2022
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 26 03:15:07 2022
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 25 23:18:25 2022
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 25 00:17:58 2022
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 25 00:19:48 2022
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 25 00:18:44 2023
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Simon Gray@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 22 03:16:37 2023
    XPost: uk.net.news.announce, uk.net.news.config, uk.answers

    Archive-name: uk/naming
    Posting-frequency: monthly
    Last-modified: Sun Jul 12 17:06:39 BST 2015


    Guidelines on uk.* Newsgroup Names



    This document is intended to be a primer for use by those wishing to
    create new NetNews (Usenet) newsgroups in uk.*, the specific hierarchy
    for the UK which is managed by committee@usenet.org.uk, & for which uk.net.news.config is the appropriate place to discuss new newsgroups.
    It has been adapted from the document "Guidelines on Usenet Newsgroup
    Names" originally written by David.W.Wright@bnr.co.uk.

    Netnews news group names are structured, hierarchical, taxonomic but not definitive. They are intended to help users find what they want and news administrators manage their systems, to the benefit of their users. By understanding each of these concepts, you can understand how to select
    suitable names for new news groups.

    Structured

    Newsgroup names are structured into parts separated by dots, for example "uk.rec.sheds". Each part should consist only of *lower case* letters,
    digits, "+" and "-", with at least one letter; in the past there was a
    14 character limit imposed for each naming component, which is now 20 characters due to improvements in newsgroup server software;
    however, it is still *recommended* that if possible you keep to the old
    limit to ensure good propagation of your group on older servers.

    Hierarchical

    Names fall into clear hierarchies - for example all computer-related
    groups are in uk.comp.*; each may be sub-divided into second, third, and
    lower level hierarchies, such as uk.comp.os.linux, by adding more parts
    to the basic name. The first part is the most general (comp), the second
    more specific, and so on. The last part completes the actual group name.
    As each part implies a further level, words at the same level are
    included into one part using a hyphen - e.g. uk.education.schools-it
    rather than uk.education.schools.it, which would imply that it was a
    type of school. A hyphen should also be used where multiple words would
    in normal english be seperated by a space - this is clearer than
    concatenating words together, as in 'science-fiction' rather than 'sciencefiction'.

    Understand that the hierarchical system of newsgroup naming does *not*
    reflect the 'importance' of a newsgroup, nor does it say anything about
    how many groups are now or in the future 'underneath' that top level
    hierarchy. It is purely about organisation of newsgroups into similar
    related subjects - more of which below.

    There are (in comparison to the so - called 'Big 8') quite a broad range
    of top level hierarchies in uk.*, & the current definitive list of these
    (along with their hierarchy charters) is regularly posted to the newsgroup uk.net.news.announce, which is a low traffic group that it is recommended
    that all readers of uk.* newsgroups subscribe to. It may also be inspected
    at <http://www.usenet.org.uk/hierarchy.html>.

    Taxonomic

    Taxonomy is the science of classifying things - for example species in
    biology, or books in a library. Group names classify subjects into areas
    and hierarchies. Getting these right is not easy, for you have to fit in
    with those already there, and also allow for likely future growth. This
    second point is especially important; of course, nobody can truly
    predict the future, but be guided by those who have long & not so long experience on uk.net.news.config, who have seen the growth of uk.* over
    the years & thus have a 'feel' for what other possible groups your group
    might inspire.

    It must be remembered that there is often no single 'correct' taxonomy
    for a new newsgroup - for instance, many people regard radio as part of
    the 'media' whereas others regard what's on the radio as an example of
    'art'. Where should a radio newsgroup be - uk.media.radio or uk.culture.arts.radio? If its going to be a completely new newsgroup,
    then let your gut feelings (plus of course the advice of
    uk.net.news.config regulars) be your guide. See below for what to do if
    there are already newsgroups on similar topics.

    Please also note that Big 8 guidelines compelling 'miscification' of
    newsgroups are *not* being enforced in uk.* at this present time,
    although usually it is a good idea to do so anyway.

    Not definitive

    Newsgroup names are inclusive rather than definitive. That is to say, a
    group name defines an area in which a message may be posted if there is
    no other group with a better name fit. The name does not define exact
    limits to the group, eliminating subjects which do not exactly match the
    name, rather, it gives the user a guide as to the nature of the intended content of the group.

    Helping users

    The group name is often the only clue the user has about the group
    without reading a selection of articles from the group. There are
    currently over 350 newsgroups in uk.*, with more being created every
    month. It isn't possible for users to read every group to find out which
    are of interest to them. Similarly, even a very popular group will only
    be read by 1% of all netnews users, so the name has to make sense to the
    99% who are not reading the group. It should be clear enough to avoid
    users posting "what is this?" articles, and to ensure that those who
    *would* like to know more about the subject do recognise the group's
    purpose and start to read it and join in.

    Also, bear in mind that uk.* is propagated globally, & not everybody
    will know (for example) that a TVR is a type of classic British
    sportscar. An early example of a badly named newsgroup in uk.* was
    uk.lifts, which frequently had people posting about vertical personal transportation devices, when in actuality the purpose of the group was
    for people to organise getting lifts off each other - after the First
    Great uk.* Renaming of 1995 the newsgroup was renamed to uk.transport.ride-sharing.

    All this leads to some strong guidelines about choosing names:

    - Group similar subjects together, in the same hierarchy if
    possible, so that people looking for a related subject will have a
    good idea where to find it. It is often better to put a new group
    with others in an approximately right "place" than to insist on
    getting the name precise at the expense of putting the group in a
    different area that many potential users will not look at.
    Although nowadays many people search for newsgroups to read by
    keyword, it is still often easier to find a newsgroup by browsing
    the hierarchy - & of course, good hierarchy placement does not
    adversely affect keyword searching.

    - Remember that newsgroup names are not 'judgemental' - placing
    uk.media.books.sf under uk.media.* rather than uk.culture.arts.*
    is in no way trying to say that science fiction books are not art,
    rather it is accepting that placing a group to talk about such
    science fiction books near to a group to talk about science
    fiction television makes both groups easier to find with reference
    to each other.

    - Another reason for this hierarchic naming structure is it helps to
    provide 'free' information; you may be interested in finding a
    group to talk about the television programme Babylon 5, & using
    the keyword search facility of your newsreader, you find that the
    uk.* newsgroup to do this in is uk.media.tv.sf.babylon5; now as it
    happens, you also like the X Files, but it didn't occur to you
    that there might have been a uk.* group to talk about this
    programme. But guess what - since most newsreaders show the list
    of newsgroups alphabetically, you can see right in front of you
    that just a little way down the list there is
    uk.media.tv.sf.x-files - you've just got some information totally
    free !

    - Usually, create general groups before creating very specific
    ones - but sometimes it may be that you have a potential group on
    a specific topic which would indeed be better created before a
    general group; be guided by the collective experience of
    uk.net.news.config.

    - Dnt Abrv8. Do not abbreviate or use obscure names. Your
    abbreviation may well be recognised by someone else as meaning
    something entirely different, especially if English is a second
    language to them. Netnews transport limitations no longer restrict
    the length of any component to 14 characters as they once did
    (though in uk.* the accepted limit is 20 characters), so there
    will rarely be a need for you to abbreviate.


    Helping news administrators

    No site now has the disk space to carry 50,000+ news groups and keep all
    their articles for weeks. So news administrators have to be selective in
    which groups they carry and how long they keep the articles of each
    group (expiry times). Yet with so many groups, they cannot manage each
    one separately. So they make use of the hierarchic property, and control
    news in hierarchies. For example, one may keep comp articles longer than
    rec, another may decide not to take any comp.sys.ibm.* groups as none of
    their users reads them. This is the other reason hierarchies are so
    important, and why a new group should always be fitted into an existing hierarchy if at all possible (& in uk.*, the creation of a new top level hierarchy, whilst still possible, is a purposely more involved process
    than creating a new group). Some new group proposers think it does not
    matter if their group does not fit in to this scheme, assuming that news administrators who don't want it can select it out individually: this is
    a mistaken view. Every group that a site gets that its users do not
    read, makes less disk space and so shorter expiry times for the groups
    they *do* want.

    In addition, much news server software stores the articles for the
    newsgroups in directories corresponding to the hierarchy components -
    for example, article 218 of uk.music.folk is often stored in the
    directory tree as ~/uk/music/folk/218 (which incidently is why you
    cannot have numbers-only as newsgroup name components), which makes for
    a nice tidy hard drive - can you imagine how difficult it would be to
    find files on your computer if there were no directories, & everything
    was in c:\ ?!!


    What's next?

    Think about these guidelines before naming your new newsgroup; remember
    that naming mistakes made in the past when netnews was much smaller, or
    now in uncontrolled parts of the net like alt.* or free.uk.*, are no
    reason to make more mistakes now in uk.* (as one uk.net.news.config
    mantra states, "the practices of other hierarchies are not our concern")
    - - so do not use these mistakes as excuses to make other mistakes.

    And if you still need advice, ask committee@usenet.org.uk,
    or control@usenet.org.uk.

    Comments

    This page is brought to you by Simon Gray. Comments and suggestions for
    future editions to simon@star-one.org.uk please.

    Email and Hosting Facilities
    kindly provided by Mythic Beasts

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)