I am looking for an additional peers.
I have no external statical IP address. So, we can peer over
Yggdrasil network only.
I have no external statical IP address. So, we can peer over
Yggdrasil network only.
--
Miner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <tabeo0$auh$1@txtcon.i2p>, Miner <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
I am looking for an additional peers.
I have no external statical IP address. So, we can peer over
Yggdrasil network only.
Why invalid?
Because I won't share my email with everyone.
--
Miner
In article <tabeo0$auh$1@txtcon.i2p>, Miner <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: >I am looking for an additional peers.
I have no external statical IP address. So, we can peer over
Yggdrasil network only.
Why invalid?
In article <tabeto$b65$1@txtcon.i2p>, Miner <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Miner wrote:
I am looking for an additional peers.
I have no external statical IP address. So, we can peer over
Yggdrasil network only.
Over I2P network too.
Care to give us your details here?
In article <tac3s7$o5r$1@txtcon.i2p>, Miner <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:Really?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <tabeo0$auh$1@txtcon.i2p>, Miner <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
I am looking for an additional peers.
I have no external statical IP address. So, we can peer over
Yggdrasil network only.
Why invalid?
Because I won't share my email with everyone.
Looks like something suspicious is happening.
Do you have a news server name we can refer to?
On 7/9/22 10:10 AM, Miner wrote:
Really?
I don't know if it's /suspicious/ or not.
My opinion is that someone asking to peer while also refraining from
sharing a valid email address and using a single component name is
definitely /questionable/ behavior.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
Really?
You too smell a rat.
On 7/9/22 3:14 PM, The Doctor wrote:
You too smell a rat.
I /want/ to give Miner the benefit of the doubt.
But they aren't helping their case.
I'd be happy to peer with you, be it UUCP bag files, UUCP pull
initiated from your end, or something else yet to be
determined. -- Please send me an email directly so we can
discuss details.
I am looking for an additional peers.
I have no external statical IP address. So, we can peer over
Yggdrasil network only.
Fix reverse DNS for IPv6:2a02:180:2:92:3:4:5:6
On 7/10/22 2:41 AM, Miner wrote:
Fix reverse DNS for IPv6:2a02:180:2:92:3:4:5:6
I already wrote to admin. No reaction from remote side.
On 7/10/22 11:46 AM, Miner wrote:
I already wrote to admin. No reaction from remote side.
Please clarify who "remote side" represents.
As I see it, there are potentially three parties involved, you,
the admin that you wrote, and the original intended recipient.
I have offered you a solution that immediately removes the barriers to interaction. Please tell us what did you do to overcome the obstacle
for your "benefit"?
On 7/9/22 3:14 PM, The Doctor wrote:
You too smell a rat.
I /want/ to give Miner the benefit of the doubt.
But they aren't helping their case.
In article <tac3s7$o5r$1@txtcon.i2p>, Miner
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <tabeo0$auh$1@txtcon.i2p>, Miner
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
I am looking for an additional peers.
I have no external statical IP address. So, we can peer over
Yggdrasil network only.
Why invalid?
Because I won't share my email with everyone.
Looks like something suspicious is happening.
Do you have a news server name we can refer to?
Grant Taylor wrote:
On 7/11/22 4:46 AM, Miner wrote:
I have offered you a solution that immediately removes the
barriers to interaction. Please tell us what did you do to
overcome the obstacle for your "benefit"?
That is not an answer to the question that I asked.
Please clarify who "remote side" represents.
As I see it, there are potentially three parties involved, you,
the admin that you wrote, and the original intended recipient.
The solution I proposed does not require extraordinary abilities
for its use, even a child can do it. You did nothing. Absolutely
nothing.
An ephemeral benefit of a hypocritical person...
On 7/11/22 4:46 AM, Miner wrote:
I have offered you a solution that immediately removes the
barriers to interaction. Please tell us what did you do to
overcome the obstacle for your "benefit"?
That is not an answer to the question that I asked.
Please clarify who "remote side" represents.
As I see it, there are potentially three parties involved, you,
the admin that you wrote, and the original intended recipient.
On 7/9/22 21:04, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 7/9/22 3:14 PM, The Doctor wrote:
You too smell a rat.
I /want/ to give Miner the benefit of the doubt.
But they aren't helping their case.
Why is Miner attempting to get multiple NNTP admins to join him in a Tox
chat when the newsgroups are just fine for this use case?
Why is he trying to create a sense of urgency?
On 7/13/22 07:16, Miner wrote:
Grant Taylor wrote:
On 7/11/22 4:46 AM, Miner wrote:
I have offered you a solution that immediately removes the
barriers to interaction. Please tell us what did you do to
overcome the obstacle for your "benefit"?
That is not an answer to the question that I asked.
Please clarify who "remote side" represents.
As I see it, there are potentially three parties involved, you,
the admin that you wrote, and the original intended recipient.
The solution I proposed does not require extraordinary abilities
for its use, even a child can do it. You did nothing. Absolutely
nothing.
An ephemeral benefit of a hypocritical person...
The same could be said about your inability to use a reliable email
service. Your request is extraordinary, and unreasonable. You are
exuding crank.
I could sense your hostility when I first read your exchange with
RetroGuy on Rocksolid. Even RetroGuy explained to you that he was
unfamiliar with Tox, and hopefully he was wise enough to not bother >installing it. NNTP administration is done via email and control
messages. It is not done via Tox messenger. You are demanding something
out of the ordinary, then acting petulant when you can't have your way.
Three people smelled a rat. But they're hypocrites, amirite? You are >demanding people use a unknown, untrusted protocol to communicate with
you, when NNTP admins must have a public email in the first place.
Both the Tox protocol and all the available software for it is an
obscure, amateurish and insecure hodge-podge of parts. I know the
character of some of the people who worked on the Tox project and I
wouldn't trust them with a pet rock. Some unknown person demanding
strangers to install and use unorganized and un-vetted software that can >access the audio, video, and other hardware and drivers of the target
machine just to chat, smells like a bouquet of Roden Tendrons.
a
--
Ishmel Rowe Dent
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 05:56:39 -0500, Rod Ent wrote:
On 7/9/22 21:04, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 7/9/22 3:14 PM, The Doctor wrote:
You too smell a rat.
I /want/ to give Miner the benefit of the doubt.
But they aren't helping their case.
[ snip ]
Why is Miner attempting to get multiple NNTP admins to join him in a Tox
chat when the newsgroups are just fine for this use case?
Why is he trying to create a sense of urgency?
I think it's pretty clear from the beginning that they have been acting
in bad faith and that a reasonable news server administrator should
avoid peering with them.
--
"The avalanche has started, it is too late for the pebbles to vote."
--Kosh
The solution I proposed does not require extraordinary abilities for
its use, even a child can do it.
8--
You did nothing. Absolutely nothing.
An ephemeral benefit of a hypocritical person...
I think it's pretty clear from the beginning that they have been
acting in bad faith and that a reasonable news server administrator
should avoid peering with them.
On 7/13/22 07:16, Miner wrote:
Grant Taylor wrote:
On 7/11/22 4:46 AM, Miner wrote:
I have offered you a solution that immediately removes
the barriers to interaction. Please tell us what did you
do to overcome the obstacle for your "benefit"?
That is not an answer to the question that I asked.
Please clarify who "remote side" represents.
As I see it, there are potentially three parties involved,
you, the admin that you wrote, and the original intended
recipient.
The solution I proposed does not require extraordinary
abilities for its use, even a child can do it. You did
nothing. Absolutely nothing.
An ephemeral benefit of a hypocritical person...
The same could be said about your inability to use a reliable
email service. Your request is extraordinary, and unreasonable.
You are exuding crank.
I could sense your hostility when I first read your exchange
with RetroGuy on Rocksolid. Even RetroGuy explained to you that
he was unfamiliar with Tox, and hopefully he was wise enough to
not bother installing it. NNTP administration is done via email
and control messages. It is not done via Tox messenger. You are
demanding something out of the ordinary, then acting petulant
when you can't have your way.
Three people smelled a rat. But they're hypocrites, amirite?
You are demanding people use a unknown, untrusted protocol to
communicate with you, when NNTP admins must have a public email
in the first place.
Both the Tox protocol and all the available software for it is
an obscure, amateurish and insecure hodge-podge of parts. I
know the character of some of the people who worked on the Tox
project and I wouldn't trust them with a pet rock. Some unknown
person demanding strangers to install and use unorganized and
un-vetted software that can access the audio, video, and other
hardware and drivers of the target machine just to chat, smells
like a bouquet of Roden Tendrons.
Grant Taylor wrote:
I'm confident in my reputation on the Internet as someone who
goes out of their way to make things work and collaborate with
people.
The undeniable fact is that your "benefit" was ephemeral.
I'm confident in my reputation on the Internet as someone who
goes out of their way to make things work and collaborate with
people.
Though a bystander on this topic, I have to say I've observed Grant
on Usenet for decades and have found him to be the epitome of open
mindedness and good faith wilingness to be helpful. He bolsters my
faith in humanity.
On 7/13/22 11:55 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
Though a bystander on this topic, I have to say I've observed Grant
on Usenet for decades and have found him to be the epitome of open
mindedness and good faith wilingness to be helpful. He bolsters my
faith in humanity.
Hi Ted,
Thank you. You brought a smile to my face. I'm glad that someone >appreciates my efforts.
Have a good day.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 7/13/22 6:16 AM, Miner wrote:
The solution I proposed does not require extraordinary abilities for
its use, even a child can do it.
Yet again you fail or refuse -- I don't think the difference matters --
to answer my question. (Question copied below for your convenience.)
--8<--
Please clarify who "remote side" represents.
As I see it, there are potentially three parties involved, you, the
admin that you wrote, and the original intended recipient.
8--
You did nothing. Absolutely nothing.
Let's agree to disagree.
An ephemeral benefit of a hypocritical person...
I'm confident in my reputation on the Internet as someone who goes out
of their way to make things work and collaborate with people.
If you won't meet me part way by answering a question, then as far as
I'm concerned, that's on you.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 7/13/22 11:55 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
Though a bystander on this topic, I have to say I've observed Grant
on Usenet for decades and have found him to be the epitome of open
mindedness and good faith wilingness to be helpful. He bolsters my
faith in humanity.
Hi Ted,
Thank you. You brought a smile to my face. I'm glad that someone appreciates my efforts.
Have a good day.
Subject: 6.14. Find external feeds and set up peering
Miner wrote:
I am looking for an additional peers.
I have no external statical IP address. So, we can peer over
Yggdrasil network only.
No one was willing to peer with me for the past 24 hours. I find
it pointless to waste time and computing resources on running a
news server while I have only one newsfeed. I decided to shutting
down my news server for a few next days.
Grant, you are welcome to assist Ishmel's.
The same could be said about your inability to use a reliable
email service. Your request is extraordinary, and unreasonable.
You are exuding crank.
Le 13/07/2022 à 20:32, Grant Taylor a écrit :
he not alone. Keep going, Grant!
Hi
I think in all chapter with social interactions a Refence to
https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/442332/the-modern-gentlemans-handbook-by-tyrwhitt-charles/9781529108842
would be suffice.
On 7/14/22 12:49 AM, jdd wrote:
Le 13/07/2022 ? 20:32, Grant Taylor a ?crit?:
he not alone. Keep going, Grant!
Thank you jdd. You too brought a smile to my face.
I've added both of your complements to my save file.
Ishmel Rowe Dent wrote:
The same could be said about your inability to use a reliable
email service. Your request is extraordinary, and unreasonable.
You are exuding crank.
Ishmel Rowe Dent, where did you disappear to? Now it's your turn
on the stage. Did you read this <87a69bg3bs.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>?
Please, define the term "reliable email service". Give me a list
of "reliable email service". Tell me how to use them without
caring about commercial interests of a third party?
Grant, you are welcome to assist Ishmel's.
Please, define the term "reliable email service". Give me a list
of "reliable email service". Tell me how to use them without
caring about commercial interests of a third party?
I don't understand what the "commercial interests of a third party"
means in the context of having a reliable email address.
On 7/14/22 10:28 AM, Miner wrote:This is irrelevant, not in dispute.
Grant, you are welcome to assist Ishmel's.
I'll add this:
On 7/14/22 11:28, Miner wrote:
Ishmel Rowe Dent wrote:
The same could be said about your inability to use a reliable
email service. Your request is extraordinary, and unreasonable.
You are exuding crank.
Please, define the term "reliable email service". Give me a list
of "reliable email service". Tell me how to use them without
caring about commercial interests of a third party?
Grant, you are welcome to assist Ishmel's.
A list of "reliable email service" --> (1) Your own MTA server,
which presumably is already installed alongside your INN
server.
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 16:28:39 -0000 (UTC), Miner wrote:
[ snip ]
Please, define the term "reliable email service". Give me a
list of "reliable email service". Tell me how to use them
without caring about commercial interests of a third party?
I won't assume to speak for others as to defining a reliable
email service but I don't understand what the "commercial
interests of a third party" means in the context of having a
reliable email address.
Matthew Ernisse wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 16:28:39 -0000 (UTC), Miner wrote:
[ snip ]
Please, define the term "reliable email service". Give me a
list of "reliable email service". Tell me how to use them
without caring about commercial interests of a third party?
I won't assume to speak for others as to defining a reliable
email service but I don't understand what the "commercial
interests of a third party" means in the context of having a
reliable email address.
Try to get competent advice in the relevant group. alt.privacy
will be helpful, I hope.
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 19:21:20 -0000 (UTC), Miner wrote:
Matthew Ernisse wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 16:28:39 -0000 (UTC), Miner wrote:
[ snip ]
Please, define the term "reliable email service". Give me a
list of "reliable email service". Tell me how to use them
without caring about commercial interests of a third party?
I won't assume to speak for others as to defining a reliable
email service but I don't understand what the "commercial
interests of a third party" means in the context of having a
reliable email address.
Try to get competent advice in the relevant group. alt.privacy
will be helpful, I hope.
They speak for you in articulating your meaning?
Do I need to register a domain?
Do I need to register a domain?
Do I need to register a domain?
Several countries still offer free domain registrations:
https://freenom.com
Le 14/07/2022 23:56, Ishmel Rowe Dent a crit :
Several countries still offer free domain registrations:
I wanted to try freenom.com, but do not find a way to register
there. any random domain I test is marked "not available" as
Matthew Ernisse wrote:
I don't understand what the "commercial interests of a third party"
means in the context of having a reliable email address.
My take on that is that you shouldn't depeer with someone who was not profiting from their Usenet service just because they started charging
for access thereto / profiting therefrom. E.g. a small office that
has a few modems and a Usenet server that allowed employees to dial in
from home now decides to start selling dial up access to
non-employees.
Either you exchange articles or you don't. Your decision shouldn't be
based on if the perspective peer is commercially benefiting from the
peering or not.
I wouldn’t reject a commerical peer but in my opinion people are
free to peer with whoever they want, using their preferred criteria.
Peers I would reject:
* A peer I can’t contact if there is a problem.
* A peer who can’t/won’t stop sending binaries.
* A peer who can’t/won’t stop sending material illegal in a
jurisdiction I care about.
* Weird connectivity arrangements.
Ishmel Rowe Dent wrote:
On 7/14/22 11:28, Miner wrote:
Ishmel Rowe Dent wrote:
The same could be said about your inability to use a reliable
email service. Your request is extraordinary, and unreasonable.
You are exuding crank.
Please, define the term "reliable email service". Give me a list
of "reliable email service". Tell me how to use them without
caring about commercial interests of a third party?
Grant, you are welcome to assist Ishmel's.
A list of "reliable email service" --> (1) Your own MTA server,
which presumably is already installed alongside your INN
server.
Do I need to register a domain?
Ishmel Rowe Dent wrote:
The same could be said about your inability to use a reliable
email service. Your request is extraordinary, and unreasonable.
You are exuding crank.
Ishmel Rowe Dent, where did you disappear to? Now it's your turn
on the stage. Did you read this <87a69bg3bs.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>?
Please, define the term "reliable email service". Give me a list
of "reliable email service". Tell me how to use them without
caring about commercial interests of a third party?
Grant, you are welcome to assist Ishmel's.
Ishmel Rowe Dent wrote:
The same could be said about your inability to use a reliable
email service. Your request is extraordinary, and unreasonable.
You are exuding crank.
Ishmel Rowe Dent, where did you disappear to? Now it's your turn
on the stage. Did you read this <87a69bg3bs.fsf@hope.eyrie.org>?
Please, define the term "reliable email service". Give me a list
of "reliable email service". Tell me how to use them without
caring about commercial interests of a third party?
Grant, you are welcome to assist Ishmel's.
Do I need to register a domain?Of course. You need a FDQN for the MX records, DKIM keys, etc. Do you
have some kind of objection to obtaining a domain? If you do, give up
now. The Internet and its siblings are not for you in that case.
I am looking for an additional peers.
I have no external statical IP address. So, we can peer over
Yggdrasil network only.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 325 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 84:09:36 |
| Calls: | 7,164 |
| Files: | 12,543 |
| Messages: | 5,534,328 |