Both are not running an open resolver, and rather interesting, the IP
of paganini shown in the link doesn't return any problem when querying
the spamhaus website for it.
my server it's protected by zen of SpamHaus, but to use it with
openresolver (Google, Cloudflare, Quad9 etc) need a a key from
Spamhaus itself, but I don't know why today all query reply with
127.0.0.1 key invalid.
On 29.01.2024 um 22:27 Uhr Ivo Gandolfo wrote:
my server it's protected by zen of SpamHaus, but to use it with
openresolver (Google, Cloudflare, Quad9 etc) need a a key from
Spamhaus itself, but I don't know why today all query reply with
127.0.0.1 key invalid.
Why don't they respond with 127.255.255.254 like it is described in https://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/788/spamhaus-dnsbl-return-codes-technical-update
?
Because that's the code that responds when you use zen.spamhaus.org with
an openresolver. I used the host that was provided to me, and if the key
is invalid it responds with that code.
The keys are checked every 12 months, if you ignore S/H's emails, they
end your subscription and invalidate the key - as you found out.
-------- Original Message --------
From: noel <deletethis@invalid.lan>
Date: mar, gen 30 2024 12:47:55PM GMT+00:00 Subject: paganini MX rejects
all
I have added zen 6 month ago (and created the account on that date).
The keys are checked every 12 months, if you ignore S/H's emails, they
end your subscription and invalidate the key - as you found out.
That's not the case.
Sincerely
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 388 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 134:12:09 |
Calls: | 8,209 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 13,122 |
Messages: | 5,871,457 |