• Does howardknight.net have direct peering to Google Groups?

    From Marco Moock@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 21 12:07:24 2023
    Hello!

    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=170056470900

    Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

    There is no other server involved in the Path: header.
    Is my guess right that they have a direct peering?

    --
    kind regards
    Marco

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ray Banana@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 21 12:27:09 2023
    Thus spake Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de>

    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=170056470900
    Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
    There is no other server involved in the Path: header.

    The path header is shortened on the left [...].

    --
    Пу́тін — хуйло́
    http://www.eternal-september.org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Marco Moock on Tue Nov 21 14:44:59 2023
    On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 12:07:24 +0100, Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
    Hello!
    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=170056470900

    Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

    There is no other server involved in the Path: header.
    Is my guess right that they have a direct peering?

    "..." (ellipsis) omits irrelevant destination servers in path header...
    at this writing, <rec.arts.sf.written> four thousand six hundred (4630) articles containing "googlegroups.com" message-id and reference headers,
    not much compared to other newsgroups which have been heavily bombarded
    by the googlespam administration

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jakob Bohm@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 24 13:09:56 2023
    On 2023-11-21 14:44, D wrote:
    On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 12:07:24 +0100, Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
    Hello!
    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=170056470900

    Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

    There is no other server involved in the Path: header.
    Is my guess right that they have a direct peering?

    "..." (ellipsis) omits irrelevant destination servers in path header...
    at this writing, <rec.arts.sf.written> four thousand six hundred (4630) articles containing "googlegroups.com" message-id and reference headers,
    not much compared to other newsgroups which have been heavily bombarded
    by the googlespam administration


    Once again, I have to remind you to use the Path and Injection headers
    to determine Google relation, not the MsgId or Reference IDs!

    Enjoy

    Jakob
    --
    Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. https://www.wisemo.com
    Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. Direct +45 31 13 16 10
    This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
    WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Jakob Bohm on Fri Nov 24 17:19:11 2023
    On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:09:56 +0100, Jakob Bohm <jb-usenet@wisemo.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 2023-11-21 14:44, D wrote:
    On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 12:07:24 +0100, Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
    Hello!
    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=170056470900
    Path: ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
    There is no other server involved in the Path: header.
    Is my guess right that they have a direct peering?

    "..." (ellipsis) omits irrelevant destination servers in path header...
    at this writing, <rec.arts.sf.written> four thousand six hundred (4630)
    articles containing "googlegroups.com" message-id and reference headers,
    not much compared to other newsgroups which have been heavily bombarded
    by the googlespam administration

    Once again, I have to remind you to use the Path and Injection headers
    to determine Google relation, not the MsgId or Reference IDs!
    Enjoy
    Jakob

    it seems that as Grant Taylor recently explained to yours truly in this
    reply <message id ujolt3$9sj$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> "I get
    the impression that you don't understand how news servers operate"--and
    that is a true fact; one common feature for all gg posts and/or replies:

    Path: ...googlegroups.com
    Message-ID: ...googlegroups.com
    References: ...googlegroups.com

    beyond that, how news servers actually work is a learning curve pour moi

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From noel@21:1/5 to Jakob Bohm on Sun Nov 26 14:06:56 2023
    On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:09:56 +0100, Jakob Bohm wrote:

    On 2023-11-21 14:44, D wrote:
    On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 12:07:24 +0100, Marco Moock
    <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
    Hello!
    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=170056470900

    Path:
    ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google- groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

    There is no other server involved in the Path: header.
    Is my guess right that they have a direct peering?

    "..." (ellipsis) omits irrelevant destination servers in path header...
    at this writing, <rec.arts.sf.written> four thousand six hundred (4630)
    articles containing "googlegroups.com" message-id and reference
    headers,
    not much compared to other newsgroups which have been heavily bombarded
    by the googlespam administration


    Once again, I have to remind you to use the Path and Injection headers
    to determine Google relation, not the MsgId or Reference IDs!

    Enjoy

    Jakob

    injection header as most know it, don't exist in some software - dnews
    for one.

    with privacy settings enabled every post you see has not only the path
    but MID and X-Posting-Host headers as the news servers hostname, no
    hashes tring to match to a user for the script kiddies (we have internal
    method of matching a MID to senders real posting host to deal with any problematic posters) the advantage to this is its very easy for remote
    admins to filter on us if they ever have the need to, in fact, since some services have been known to strip out prior Path entries, its pretty fool
    proof filtering, for others, yes, Path filtering works in 98% of cases.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jakob Bohm@21:1/5 to noel on Wed Nov 29 10:49:01 2023
    On 2023-11-26 05:06, noel wrote:
    On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:09:56 +0100, Jakob Bohm wrote:

    On 2023-11-21 14:44, D wrote:
    On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 12:07:24 +0100, Marco Moock
    <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
    Hello!
    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=170056470900

    Path:
    ...!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-
    groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

    There is no other server involved in the Path: header.
    Is my guess right that they have a direct peering?

    "..." (ellipsis) omits irrelevant destination servers in path header...
    at this writing, <rec.arts.sf.written> four thousand six hundred (4630)
    articles containing "googlegroups.com" message-id and reference
    headers,
    not much compared to other newsgroups which have been heavily bombarded
    by the googlespam administration


    Once again, I have to remind you to use the Path and Injection headers
    to determine Google relation, not the MsgId or Reference IDs!

    Enjoy

    Jakob

    injection header as most know it, don't exist in some software - dnews
    for one.

    with privacy settings enabled every post you see has not only the path
    but MID and X-Posting-Host headers as the news servers hostname, no
    hashes tring to match to a user for the script kiddies (we have internal method of matching a MID to senders real posting host to deal with any problematic posters) the advantage to this is its very easy for remote
    admins to filter on us if they ever have the need to, in fact, since some services have been known to strip out prior Path entries, its pretty fool proof filtering, for others, yes, Path filtering works in 98% of cases.




    Point of my comment was that D keeps promoting the flawed idea of
    determining GG malfunction by doing statistics on headers that do not
    reliably indicate if a post passed through GG servers at all.

    Backtracking GG spam to Google User's is of little interest to the rest
    of us, although Google's failure to detect and stop the Spam makes it interesting for 3rd party spam filters to check if posts entered the GG
    servers from a known spam source IP.

    Enjoy

    Jakob
    --
    Jakob Bohm, CIO, Partner, WiseMo A/S. https://www.wisemo.com
    Transformervej 29, 2860 Søborg, Denmark. Direct +45 31 13 16 10
    This public discussion message is non-binding and may contain errors.
    WiseMo - Remote Service Management for PCs, Phones and Embedded

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)