Google removed the newest post from its archive: >https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at: >https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
All posts are available at: >https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
Message-ID: <7e2a356c-8313-45c1-a12c-44bd4f0ba39cn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: <thai spam>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.security.virus
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:08:15 +0000
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive: >>https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at: >>https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
Removed? You DO realize that Google is no longer archiving Usenet or being connected to Usenet in any way now, right?
[…]
On Sat, 09 Mar 2024 18:43:53 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote: >>Google removed the newest post from its archive: >>https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at: >>https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
this may be unrelated to what you are describing, but this was posted
to many usenet server-related newsgroups and has remained uncontested:
using 40tude dialog > edit > find a message-id > from server (servers
added to settings > servers, identities, signatures... > newsservers), >preliminary results indicate that this article could be google's last:
Message-ID: <7e2a356c-8313-45c1-a12c-44bd4f0ba39cn@googlegroups.com> >>Subject: <thai spam>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.security.virus
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:08:15 +0000
22 february 2024 03:08:15 pm ut (000w00:00,00n00:00; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 10:08:15 am et (074w00:11,40n44:29; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 07:08:15 am pt (122w05:02,37n25:18; jd 2460363.13073)
pending further updates, it appears that google shut down their usenet >gateway shortly after 7 a.m. googleplex time thursday 22 february 2024
[end citation]
google groups is completely disconnected from usenet ... so why should
anyone reading in these usenet newsgroups browse a "ghost ship" server
whose legacy is that google became the worst spammer in global history?
Google removed the newest post from its archive: >https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at: >https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
--
A. Filip
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive: >>https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at: >>https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
Removed? You DO realize that Google is no longer archiving Usenet or being >connected to Usenet in any way now, right?
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
It's not a problem, it's a solution.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive: >>>https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at: >>>https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
Removed? You DO realize that Google is no longer archiving Usenet or being >> connected to Usenet in any way now, right?
[…]
It was post to Google Groups.
--
A. Filip
In article <anfi+u0cv8zgryf-o396@wp.eu>,
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive: >>>>https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at: >>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
Removed? You DO realize that Google is no longer archiving Usenet or being >>> connected to Usenet in any way now, right?
[…]
It was post to Google Groups.
And removed by google, yes?
In article <9060e37cebc329c87ebfe77d4b9fc47f@dizum.com>, D <J@M> wrote:
On Sat, 09 Mar 2024 18:43:53 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote: >>>Google removed the newest post from its archive: >>>https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at: >>>https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
this may be unrelated to what you are describing, but this was posted
to many usenet server-related newsgroups and has remained uncontested: >>using 40tude dialog > edit > find a message-id > from server (servers
added to settings > servers, identities, signatures... > newsservers), >>preliminary results indicate that this article could be google's last:
Message-ID: <7e2a356c-8313-45c1-a12c-44bd4f0ba39cn@googlegroups.com> >>>Subject: <thai spam>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.security.virus
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:08:15 +0000
22 february 2024 03:08:15 pm ut (000w00:00,00n00:00; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 10:08:15 am et (074w00:11,40n44:29; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 07:08:15 am pt (122w05:02,37n25:18; jd 2460363.13073)
pending further updates, it appears that google shut down their usenet >>gateway shortly after 7 a.m. googleplex time thursday 22 february 2024
[end citation]
google groups is completely disconnected from usenet ... so why should >>anyone reading in these usenet newsgroups browse a "ghost ship" server >>whose legacy is that google became the worst spammer in global history?
Gmail and GGroups!
D <J@M> wrote:
[...]
i've never used email any more than necessary but i've read that
gmail is notoriously spammy . . . couldn't be nearly as horrible
as google groups was . . . could it? is gmail really that putrid?
On the contrary, I find Gmail perfectly satisfactory, reliable and
99.9% spam free. I have several Gmail accounts in daily use.
--
^^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator
My pet rock Gordon just is.
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
In article <anfi+u0cv8zgryf-o396@wp.eu>,
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive: >>>>>https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at: >>>>>https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
Removed? You DO realize that Google is no longer archiving Usenet or being
connected to Usenet in any way now, right?
[…]
It was post to Google Groups.
And removed by google, yes?
<quote src="email">
We're letting you know that we've permanently removed the content at >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/spamcop-top200/_jUiGqsyFgU/07FwIxsgAAAJ
*Why did this happen?*
An external report flagged the content for illegal content or policy >violations. As a result, our legal content and policy standards team
removed the content for the following reason: *phishing*.
Learn more
You can learn more about our content policies and enforcement at our
help center.
What you can do next
You may have the option to pursue your claims in court. If you have
legal questions or wish to examine legal options that may be available
to you, you may want to consult with your own legal counsel.
</quote>
--
A. Filip
Google removed the newest post from its archive: https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at: https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
On 3/9/24 18:43, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive:
https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
Question is: bug or malice
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <1qq6i3a.fd0kwh3hifmdN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>,
Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> wrote:
D <J@M> wrote:
[...]
i've never used email any more than necessary but i've read that
gmail is notoriously spammy . . . couldn't be nearly as horrible
as google groups was . . . could it? is gmail really that putrid?
On the contrary, I find Gmail perfectly satisfactory, reliable and
99.9% spam free. I have several Gmail accounts in daily use.
<https://www.nk.ca/blog/index.php?/categories/14-Google-Spam>
I only report my own user experience; YMMV.
--
^^. Sn!pe, PA, FIBS - Professional Crastinator
My pet rock Gordon just is.
On 3/9/24 18:43, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive:
https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
Question is: bug or malice
tjoen <tjoen@dds.invalid> wrote:
On 3/9/24 18:43, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive:
https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
Question is: bug or malice
Can't it be "We don't care" attitude? I personally perceive it mostly
as incompetence and arrogance of "Too Big to Fall" class.
I find Google practices unfit for me quite frequently.
I merely means that I am not theirs target group
and I accept it *fully* .
--
A. Filip
In article <usjvk9$2t2rr$1@dont-email.me>, tjoen <tjoen@dds.nl> wrote:
On 3/9/24 18:43, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive:
https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
Question is: bug or malice
methinks malice!
On the contrary, I find Gmail perfectly satisfactory, reliable and
99.9% spam free. I have several Gmail accounts in daily use.
there are armies
On 3/9/24 18:43, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive: https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at: https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
Question is: bug or malice
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:29:52 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
In article <9060e37cebc329c87ebfe77d4b9fc47f@dizum.com>, D <J@M> wrote: >>On Sat, 09 Mar 2024 18:43:53 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive: >>>https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at: >>>https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
this may be unrelated to what you are describing, but this was posted
to many usenet server-related newsgroups and has remained uncontested: >>using 40tude dialog > edit > find a message-id > from server (servers >>added to settings > servers, identities, signatures... > newsservers), >>preliminary results indicate that this article could be google's last:
Message-ID: <7e2a356c-8313-45c1-a12c-44bd4f0ba39cn@googlegroups.com> >>>Subject: <thai spam>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.security.virus
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:08:15 +0000
22 february 2024 03:08:15 pm ut (000w00:00,00n00:00; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 10:08:15 am et (074w00:11,40n44:29; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 07:08:15 am pt (122w05:02,37n25:18; jd 2460363.13073)
pending further updates, it appears that google shut down their usenet >>gateway shortly after 7 a.m. googleplex time thursday 22 february 2024 >>[end citation]
google groups is completely disconnected from usenet ... so why should >>anyone reading in these usenet newsgroups browse a "ghost ship" server >>whose legacy is that google became the worst spammer in global history?
Gmail and GGroups!
i've never used email any more than necessary but i've read that
gmail is notoriously spammy . . . couldn't be nearly as horrible
as google groups was . . . could it? is gmail really that putrid?
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:17:18 +0100 (CET)
D <J@M> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:29:52 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The >Doctor) wrote:
In article <9060e37cebc329c87ebfe77d4b9fc47f@dizum.com>, D <J@M> wrote:
On Sat, 09 Mar 2024 18:43:53 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive:
https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
this may be unrelated to what you are describing, but this was posted
to many usenet server-related newsgroups and has remained uncontested:
using 40tude dialog > edit > find a message-id > from server (servers
added to settings > servers, identities, signatures... > newsservers),
preliminary results indicate that this article could be google's last:
Message-ID: <7e2a356c-8313-45c1-a12c-44bd4f0ba39cn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: <thai spam>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.security.virus
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:08:15 +0000
22 february 2024 03:08:15 pm ut (000w00:00,00n00:00; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 10:08:15 am et (074w00:11,40n44:29; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 07:08:15 am pt (122w05:02,37n25:18; jd 2460363.13073)
pending further updates, it appears that google shut down their usenet
gateway shortly after 7 a.m. googleplex time thursday 22 february 2024
[end citation]
google groups is completely disconnected from usenet ... so why should
anyone reading in these usenet newsgroups browse a "ghost ship" server
whose legacy is that google became the worst spammer in global history?
Gmail and GGroups!
i've never used email any more than necessary but i've read that
gmail is notoriously spammy . . . couldn't be nearly as horrible
as google groups was . . . could it? is gmail really that putrid?
GMail users who aren't accustomed to checking the
junk folder for legitimate eMail sometimes complain
to senders that they never received the eMail that
was sent to them. It's a strategy that many free
webmail providers use to claim a spam-free inbox,
but it comes at the cost of junking legitimate
messages from senders who haven't been whitelisted
(which may also serve as an example of how a pure
technology-based anti-spam solution can't solve a
human problem, at least not entirely).
GMail also has many users who send spam, and on a
daily basis some of them also try to sell (whatever
it is they claim to be selling) to our spamtraps as
well as our users. The volume of spam received
also varies from one user to the next (ditto for
spamtraps). Google has a vast user base, so it's
certainly a significant challenge.
--
Randolf Richardson 張文道, CNA - noc@inter-corporate.com
Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc.
Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
https://www.inter-corporate.com/
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:47:53 +0100
tjoen <tjoen@dds.invalid> wrote:
On 3/9/24 18:43, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive:
https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
Question is: bug or malice
I recall reading that Google won't be archiving new
postings after pulling out from Usenet. I suspect
they see Usenet as a dying technology that's being
abused by a lot of spammers.
I like the Usenet technology. Sure, it would be
great to have some additional features to prevent
forgeries and deal with abusive posters, but
overall I think Google is ultimately sacrificing
long-term name brand recognition by pulling out of
Usenet, and I suspect their Google Groups platform
could suffer too since it's pretty basic compared
to the offerings of many web-based forums.
--
Randolf Richardson 張文道, CNA - noc@inter-corporate.com
Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc.
Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
https://www.inter-corporate.com/
In article <20240310172630.4759695c26c37928f33202a6@inter-corporate.com>, Randolf Richardson 張_ _ <noc@inter-corporate.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:17:18 +0100 (CET)
D <J@M> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:29:52 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The >Doctor) wrote:
In article <9060e37cebc329c87ebfe77d4b9fc47f@dizum.com>, D <J@M> wrote: >> >>On Sat, 09 Mar 2024 18:43:53 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
Gmail and GGroups!
Google removed the newest post from its archive:
https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
this may be unrelated to what you are describing, but this was posted
to many usenet server-related newsgroups and has remained uncontested: >> >>using 40tude dialog > edit > find a message-id > from server (servers
added to settings > servers, identities, signatures... > newsservers), >> >>preliminary results indicate that this article could be google's last: >> >>
Message-ID: <7e2a356c-8313-45c1-a12c-44bd4f0ba39cn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: <thai spam>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.security.virus
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:08:15 +0000
22 february 2024 03:08:15 pm ut (000w00:00,00n00:00; jd 2460363.13073) >> >>22 february 2024 10:08:15 am et (074w00:11,40n44:29; jd 2460363.13073) >> >>22 february 2024 07:08:15 am pt (122w05:02,37n25:18; jd 2460363.13073) >> >>
pending further updates, it appears that google shut down their usenet >> >>gateway shortly after 7 a.m. googleplex time thursday 22 february 2024 >> >>[end citation]
google groups is completely disconnected from usenet ... so why should >> >>anyone reading in these usenet newsgroups browse a "ghost ship" server >> >>whose legacy is that google became the worst spammer in global history? >> >
i've never used email any more than necessary but i've read that
gmail is notoriously spammy . . . couldn't be nearly as horrible
as google groups was . . . could it? is gmail really that putrid?
GMail users who aren't accustomed to checking the
junk folder for legitimate eMail sometimes complain
to senders that they never received the eMail that
was sent to them. It's a strategy that many free
webmail providers use to claim a spam-free inbox,
but it comes at the cost of junking legitimate
messages from senders who haven't been whitelisted
(which may also serve as an example of how a pure
technology-based anti-spam solution can't solve a
human problem, at least not entirely).
GMail also has many users who send spam, and on a
daily basis some of them also try to sell (whatever
it is they claim to be selling) to our spamtraps as
well as our users. The volume of spam received
also varies from one user to the next (ditto for
spamtraps). Google has a vast user base, so it's
certainly a significant challenge.
You can track Gmail spam at
https://www.nk.ca/blog/index.php?/categories/14-Google-Spam
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 02:58:17 -0000 (UTC)
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
In article <20240310172630.4759695c26c37928f33202a6@inter-corporate.com>,<anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
Randolf Richardson 張_ _ <noc@inter-corporate.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:17:18 +0100 (CET)
D <J@M> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:29:52 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (TheDoctor) wrote:
In article <9060e37cebc329c87ebfe77d4b9fc47f@dizum.com>, D <J@M> wrote: >> >> >>On Sat, 09 Mar 2024 18:43:53 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip
Gmail and GGroups!
Google removed the newest post from its archive:
https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
this may be unrelated to what you are describing, but this was posted >> >> >>to many usenet server-related newsgroups and has remained uncontested: >> >> >>using 40tude dialog > edit > find a message-id > from server (servers >> >> >>added to settings > servers, identities, signatures... > newsservers), >> >> >>preliminary results indicate that this article could be google's last: >> >> >>
Message-ID: <7e2a356c-8313-45c1-a12c-44bd4f0ba39cn@googlegroups.com> >> >> >>>Subject: <thai spam>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.security.virus
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:08:15 +0000
22 february 2024 03:08:15 pm ut (000w00:00,00n00:00; jd 2460363.13073) >> >> >>22 february 2024 10:08:15 am et (074w00:11,40n44:29; jd 2460363.13073) >> >> >>22 february 2024 07:08:15 am pt (122w05:02,37n25:18; jd 2460363.13073) >> >> >>
pending further updates, it appears that google shut down their usenet >> >> >>gateway shortly after 7 a.m. googleplex time thursday 22 february 2024 >> >> >>[end citation]
google groups is completely disconnected from usenet ... so why should >> >> >>anyone reading in these usenet newsgroups browse a "ghost ship" server >> >> >>whose legacy is that google became the worst spammer in global history? >> >> >
i've never used email any more than necessary but i've read that
gmail is notoriously spammy . . . couldn't be nearly as horrible
as google groups was . . . could it? is gmail really that putrid?
GMail users who aren't accustomed to checking the
junk folder for legitimate eMail sometimes complain
to senders that they never received the eMail that
was sent to them. It's a strategy that many free
webmail providers use to claim a spam-free inbox,
but it comes at the cost of junking legitimate
messages from senders who haven't been whitelisted
(which may also serve as an example of how a pure
technology-based anti-spam solution can't solve a
human problem, at least not entirely).
GMail also has many users who send spam, and on a
daily basis some of them also try to sell (whatever
it is they claim to be selling) to our spamtraps as
well as our users. The volume of spam received
also varies from one user to the next (ditto for
spamtraps). Google has a vast user base, so it's
certainly a significant challenge.
You can track Gmail spam at
https://www.nk.ca/blog/index.php?/categories/14-Google-Spam
That looks similar to what we've been seeing.
The page is confusing to look at because
the headers is double-spaced, although it is
still readable.
Is that data published in a database format
of some sort, such as CSV or BIND DNS zone?
--
Randolf Richardson 張文道, CNA - noc@inter-corporate.com
Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc.
Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
https://www.inter-corporate.com/
In article <20240310213551.33760496211cf8b34bdc04fe@inter-corporate.com>, Randolf Richardson 張_ _ <noc@inter-corporate.com> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 02:58:17 -0000 (UTC)
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
In article <20240310172630.4759695c26c37928f33202a6@inter-corporate.com>, >> Randolf Richardson 張_ _ <noc@inter-corporate.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:17:18 +0100 (CET)
D <J@M> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:29:52 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The >> >Doctor) wrote:
In article <9060e37cebc329c87ebfe77d4b9fc47f@dizum.com>, D <J@M> wrote:
On Sat, 09 Mar 2024 18:43:53 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip ><anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
Google removed the newest post from its archive:
https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
this may be unrelated to what you are describing, but this was posted >> >> >>to many usenet server-related newsgroups and has remained uncontested:
using 40tude dialog > edit > find a message-id > from server (servers >> >> >>added to settings > servers, identities, signatures... > newsservers),
preliminary results indicate that this article could be google's last:
Message-ID: <7e2a356c-8313-45c1-a12c-44bd4f0ba39cn@googlegroups.com> >> >> >>>Subject: <thai spam>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.security.virus
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:08:15 +0000
22 february 2024 03:08:15 pm ut (000w00:00,00n00:00; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 10:08:15 am et (074w00:11,40n44:29; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 07:08:15 am pt (122w05:02,37n25:18; jd 2460363.13073)
pending further updates, it appears that google shut down their usenet
gateway shortly after 7 a.m. googleplex time thursday 22 february 2024
[end citation]
google groups is completely disconnected from usenet ... so why should
anyone reading in these usenet newsgroups browse a "ghost ship" server
whose legacy is that google became the worst spammer in global history?
Gmail and GGroups!
i've never used email any more than necessary but i've read that
gmail is notoriously spammy . . . couldn't be nearly as horrible
as google groups was . . . could it? is gmail really that putrid?
GMail users who aren't accustomed to checking the
junk folder for legitimate eMail sometimes complain
to senders that they never received the eMail that
was sent to them. It's a strategy that many free
webmail providers use to claim a spam-free inbox,
but it comes at the cost of junking legitimate
messages from senders who haven't been whitelisted
(which may also serve as an example of how a pure
technology-based anti-spam solution can't solve a
human problem, at least not entirely).
GMail also has many users who send spam, and on a
daily basis some of them also try to sell (whatever
it is they claim to be selling) to our spamtraps as
well as our users. The volume of spam received
also varies from one user to the next (ditto for
spamtraps). Google has a vast user base, so it's
certainly a significant challenge.
You can track Gmail spam at
https://www.nk.ca/blog/index.php?/categories/14-Google-Spam
That looks similar to what we've been seeing.
The page is confusing to look at because
the headers is double-spaced, although it is
still readable.
Is that data published in a database format
of some sort, such as CSV or BIND DNS zone?
Just raw text cut and paste.
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 05:34:48 -0000 (UTC)
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
In article <20240310213551.33760496211cf8b34bdc04fe@inter-corporate.com>,<J@M> wrote:
Randolf Richardson 張_ _ <noc@inter-corporate.com> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 02:58:17 -0000 (UTC)
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
In article <20240310172630.4759695c26c37928f33202a6@inter-corporate.com>, >> >> Randolf Richardson 張_ _ <noc@inter-corporate.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:17:18 +0100 (CET)
D <J@M> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:29:52 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The >> >> >Doctor) wrote:
In article <9060e37cebc329c87ebfe77d4b9fc47f@dizum.com>, D
<anfi@onet.eu> wrote:On Sat, 09 Mar 2024 18:43:53 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip
Google removed the newest post from its archive:
https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
this may be unrelated to what you are describing, but this was posted
to many usenet server-related newsgroups and has remained uncontested:
using 40tude dialog > edit > find a message-id > from server (servers
added to settings > servers, identities, signatures... > newsservers),
preliminary results indicate that this article could be google's last:
Message-ID: <7e2a356c-8313-45c1-a12c-44bd4f0ba39cn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: <thai spam>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.security.virus
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:08:15 +0000
22 february 2024 03:08:15 pm ut (000w00:00,00n00:00; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 10:08:15 am et (074w00:11,40n44:29; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 07:08:15 am pt (122w05:02,37n25:18; jd 2460363.13073)
pending further updates, it appears that google shut down their usenet
gateway shortly after 7 a.m. googleplex time thursday 22 february 2024
[end citation]
google groups is completely disconnected from usenet ... so why should
anyone reading in these usenet newsgroups browse a "ghost ship" server
whose legacy is that google became the worst spammer in global >history?
Gmail and GGroups!
i've never used email any more than necessary but i've read that
gmail is notoriously spammy . . . couldn't be nearly as horrible
as google groups was . . . could it? is gmail really that putrid?
GMail users who aren't accustomed to checking the
junk folder for legitimate eMail sometimes complain
to senders that they never received the eMail that
was sent to them. It's a strategy that many free
webmail providers use to claim a spam-free inbox,
but it comes at the cost of junking legitimate
messages from senders who haven't been whitelisted
(which may also serve as an example of how a pure
technology-based anti-spam solution can't solve a
human problem, at least not entirely).
GMail also has many users who send spam, and on a
daily basis some of them also try to sell (whatever
it is they claim to be selling) to our spamtraps as
well as our users. The volume of spam received
also varies from one user to the next (ditto for
spamtraps). Google has a vast user base, so it's
certainly a significant challenge.
You can track Gmail spam at
https://www.nk.ca/blog/index.php?/categories/14-Google-Spam
That looks similar to what we've been seeing.
The page is confusing to look at because
the headers is double-spaced, although it is
still readable.
Is that data published in a database format
of some sort, such as CSV or BIND DNS zone?
Just raw text cut and paste.
Okay. Thanks!
--
Randolf Richardson 張文道, CNA - noc@inter-corporate.com
Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc.
Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
https://www.inter-corporate.com/
In article <20240310213551.33760496211cf8b34bdc04fe@inter-corporate.com>, Randolf Richardson 張?? ?? <noc@inter-corporate.com> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 02:58:17 -0000 (UTC)
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
In article <20240310172630.4759695c26c37928f33202a6@inter-corporate.com>, >>> Randolf Richardson 張_ _ <noc@inter-corporate.com> wrote:
You can track Gmail spam at
https://www.nk.ca/blog/index.php?/categories/14-Google-Spam
That looks similar to what we've been seeing.
The page is confusing to look at because the headers is
double-spaced, although it is still readable.
Is that data published in a database format of some sort, such as
CSV or BIND DNS zone?
Just raw text cut and paste.
In article <20240410134850.fd0fe5662c942e9dbddfe9b6@inter-corporate.com>, Randolf Richardson 張_ _ <noc@inter-corporate.com> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 05:34:48 -0000 (UTC)
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
In article <20240310213551.33760496211cf8b34bdc04fe@inter-corporate.com>, >> Randolf Richardson 張_ _ <noc@inter-corporate.com> wrote:<J@M> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 02:58:17 -0000 (UTC)
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
In article <20240310172630.4759695c26c37928f33202a6@inter-corporate.com>,
Randolf Richardson 張_ _ <noc@inter-corporate.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:17:18 +0100 (CET)
D <J@M> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 23:29:52 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (TheDoctor) wrote:
In article <9060e37cebc329c87ebfe77d4b9fc47f@dizum.com>, D
<anfi@onet.eu> wrote:On Sat, 09 Mar 2024 18:43:53 +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip
Google removed the newest post from its archive:
https://groups.google.com/g/spamcop-top200
All posts are available at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/spamcop-top200@googlegroups.com/
I refuse to see Google actions as *my* problem.
this may be unrelated to what you are describing, but this was posted
to many usenet server-related newsgroups and has remained uncontested:
using 40tude dialog > edit > find a message-id > from server (servers
added to settings > servers, identities, signatures... > newsservers),
preliminary results indicate that this article could be google's last:
Message-ID: <7e2a356c-8313-45c1-a12c-44bd4f0ba39cn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: <thai spam>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.security.virus
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:08:15 +0000
22 february 2024 03:08:15 pm ut (000w00:00,00n00:00; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 10:08:15 am et (074w00:11,40n44:29; jd 2460363.13073)
22 february 2024 07:08:15 am pt (122w05:02,37n25:18; jd 2460363.13073)
pending further updates, it appears that google shut down their usenet
gateway shortly after 7 a.m. googleplex time thursday 22 february 2024
[end citation]
google groups is completely disconnected from usenet ... so why should
anyone reading in these usenet newsgroups browse a "ghost ship" server
whose legacy is that google became the worst spammer in global >history?
Gmail and GGroups!
i've never used email any more than necessary but i've read that
gmail is notoriously spammy . . . couldn't be nearly as horrible
as google groups was . . . could it? is gmail really that putrid?
GMail users who aren't accustomed to checking the
junk folder for legitimate eMail sometimes complain
to senders that they never received the eMail that
was sent to them. It's a strategy that many free
webmail providers use to claim a spam-free inbox,
but it comes at the cost of junking legitimate
messages from senders who haven't been whitelisted
(which may also serve as an example of how a pure
technology-based anti-spam solution can't solve a
human problem, at least not entirely).
GMail also has many users who send spam, and on a
daily basis some of them also try to sell (whatever
it is they claim to be selling) to our spamtraps as
well as our users. The volume of spam received
also varies from one user to the next (ditto for
spamtraps). Google has a vast user base, so it's
certainly a significant challenge.
You can track Gmail spam at
https://www.nk.ca/blog/index.php?/categories/14-Google-Spam
That looks similar to what we've been seeing.
The page is confusing to look at because
the headers is double-spaced, although it is
still readable.
Is that data published in a database format
of some sort, such as CSV or BIND DNS zone?
Just raw text cut and paste.
Okay. Thanks!
And more coming in daily.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 465 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 69:42:33 |
| Calls: | 9,412 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 13,575 |
| Messages: | 6,101,243 |