I am seeing lot's a spam using Google Forms, normally the 419
format but sent with Google Forms. These seem to use the Form
to confirm the target's e-mail, and the spam usually says
unnamed form.
Google should really clean up their act as they are
facilitating scammers.
Well, I've got multiple google forms spam daily so its getting annoying. Spamcop parses it as google forms and also all header information and
also spamload points to google. So what's amusing here ?
ismo
On 12/8/2020 10:18 AM, Ismo Salonen wrote:
Well, I've got multiple google forms spam daily so its getting annoying.
Spamcop parses it as google forms and also all header information and
also spamload points to google. So what's amusing here ?
ismo
I mainly get them on my Gmail account, three just now in my Gmail Spam >filter, all advance fee scams. Interesting Google aka Gmail
automagically flags them as spam.
I get several per day, but not in my primary e-mail account, that one my
spam filters work daily on the list.ru and inbox.ru spam flood.
--
*Darrell Larose ** >------------------------------------------------------------------------
web: http://DarrellLarose.ca
blog: http://darrelllarose.ca/www
Flickr: flickr.com/photos/10994343@N07 >------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
In article <MOMzH.6272$uau.592@uutiset.elisa.fi>,
Ismo Salonen <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
Well, I've got multiple google forms spam daily so its getting annoying.
Spamcop parses it as google forms and also all header information and
also spamload points to google. So what's amusing here ?
I suspect he is amused that you would think Google would ever actually
do something about spam. After all, they are the number one source of
Usenet spam, thye don't respond to email reports, and many of their
services like blogspot.com don't even have valid abuse addresses. Just
try some time to report an email spam that contains a youtube payload to youtube.
Google is not the solution, Google is the problem.
--scott
Well, I've got multiple google forms spam daily so its getting annoying. >Spamcop parses it as google forms and also all header information and
also spamload points to google. So what's amusing here ?
I will never use Gmail or Google groups!
On 12/8/2020 6:18 PM, The Doctor wrote:
I will never use Gmail or Google groups!
I have a real e-mail account, so Gmail is a backup. I agree Google is
the problem.
--
*Darrell Larose ** >------------------------------------------------------------------------
web: DarrellLarose.ca <http://DarrellLarose.ca>
blog: DarrellLarose.ca/www <http://darrelllarose.ca/www>
Flickr: flickr.com/photos/10994343@N07 >------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
On 2020-12-09 02:39, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article <MOMzH.6272$uau.592@uutiset.elisa.fi>,
Ismo Salonen <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
Well, I've got multiple google forms spam daily so its getting annoying. >>> Spamcop parses it as google forms and also all header information and
also spamload points to google. So what's amusing here ?
I suspect he is amused that you would think Google would ever actually
do something about spam. After all, they are the number one source of
Usenet spam, thye don't respond to email reports, and many of their
services like blogspot.com don't even have valid abuse addresses. Just
try some time to report an email spam that contains a youtube payload to
youtube.
Google is not the solution, Google is the problem.
--scott
My sarcasm detector was broken :-). I agree that Google is quite big
problem nowadays, getting as big as ovh.net spammer heaven. As I no
longer run any mailhosts I can not filter by ip or other relevant (
block lists etc) criteria. My ISP just has spamassasin with >keywords/heuristics based filtering, no editing by myself.
In article <MOMzH.6272$uau.592@uutiset.elisa.fi>,
Ismo Salonen <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
Well, I've got multiple google forms spam daily so its getting annoying.
Spamcop parses it as google forms and also all header information and
also spamload points to google. So what's amusing here ?
I suspect he is amused that you would think Google would ever actually
do something about spam. After all, they are the number one source of
Usenet spam, thye don't respond to email reports, and many of their
services like blogspot.com don't even have valid abuse addresses. Just
try some time to report an email spam that contains a youtube payload to youtube.
Google is not the solution, Google is the problem.
--scott
In article <MOMzH.6272$uau.592@uutiset.elisa.fi>,
Ismo Salonen <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
Well, I've got multiple google forms spam daily so its
getting annoying. Spamcop parses it as google forms and also
all header information and also spamload points to google. So
what's amusing here ?
I suspect he is amused that you would think Google would ever
actually do something about spam.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, 09 December 2020 23:32 -0000,
in article <rqrmpo$1sh2$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
Gmail spams!!
This is a misrepresentation of reality. While Google's Gmail may be a >conduit for a load of spam, Gmail is not a spammer. You, however,
are.
If you actually have a desire to be taken seriously within this
subhierarchy, now would be a good time to knock it off. As an equal >opportunity lartist, I am more than willing to attempt to shut your
newesfeed down. I would personally greatly prefer it, were you to act
as though you are a responsible member of the community and clean up
your act.
HTH. HAND.
- --
David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com>
"The Zen nature of a spammer resembles a cockroach,
except that the cockroach is higher up on the evolutionary chain."
- Peter Olson, Delphi Information Engineer; 27-AUG-1998
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iF0EARECAB0WIQSc0FU3XAVGYDjSGUhSvCmZGhLe6wUCX9GUlQAKCRBSvCmZGhLe >61DBAJ4/lCiO/5dOuxMmtUwIpjeRyPEGmACg7sM02/XXIonMfbgkyd7vS1vy1sY=
=H6TU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article <MOMzH.6272$uau.592@uutiset.elisa.fi>,
Ismo Salonen <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
Well, I've got multiple google forms spam daily so its
getting annoying. Spamcop parses it as google forms and also
all header information and also spamload points to google. So
what's amusing here ?
I suspect he is amused that you would think Google would ever
actually do something about spam.
Bingo!
<snip>
I am seeing lot's a spam using Google Forms, normally the 419 format but
sent with Google Forms. These seem to use the Form to confirm the
target's e-mail, and the spam usually says unnamed form.
Google should really clean up their act as they are facilitating scammers.
I suspect he is amused that you would think Google would ever actually
do something about spam.
After all, they are the number one source of Usenet spam, thye don't
respond to email reports, and many of their services like blogspot.com
don't even have valid abuse addresses.
Just try some time to report an email spam that contains a youtube
payload to youtube.
Google is not the solution, Google is the problem.
On 2020-12-06 10:44 a.m., Darrell A. Larose wrote:
I am seeing lot's a spam using Google Forms, normally the 419 format but
sent with Google Forms. These seem to use the Form to confirm the
target's e-mail, and the spam usually says unnamed form.
Google should really clean up their act as they are facilitating scammers. >>
New load of spam this morning coming from IP 209.85.220.69 (Google.com)
https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-209-85-128-0-1/pft?s=209.85.220.69
https://pastebin.com/fzfACb4m
On 12/8/20 5:39 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
I suspect he is amused that you would think Google would ever actually
do something about spam.
Oh, they do. I've seen Google shut down a number of prolific spammers.
After all, they are the number one source of Usenet spam, thye don't
respond to email reports, and many of their services like blogspot.com
don't even have valid abuse addresses.
IMHO the main problem with Google regarding spam is their size and
number of users / accounts. So even a tiny fraction of a percentage of
their user base leaking spam means that hundreds of thousands if not
millions of messages get out.
Just try some time to report an email spam that contains a youtube
payload to youtube.
I've successfully reported spam a few times to Google. They were
ongoing spam campaigns from the same group or using the same method.
Google did respond, but it took weeks ~> months for them to fix the flaw
that was being exploited.
Google is not the solution, Google is the problem.
Google's size is the problem. Google's diligence (as in percentage of
total messages sent) is quite good. -- One billionth of the distance
from the Earth to the Earth's sun is still a really, Really, REALLY long
way. The same applies to the number of messages entering and leaving
Google every day.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
Gmail spams!!
Phone number to google needed.
I wonder if they have internal alarms!
Need a better vicious dog.
WEll, can the legal system in USA go after Google just like they are
doing with Facebook?
On 12/10/20 7:25 PM, The Doctor wrote:
Phone number to google needed.
EXTREMELY unlikely to happen. It's probably between 0 and 1 percent likely.
I wonder if they have internal alarms!
Yes. They do. But by the time that they go off SO MANY MESSAGES have
been sent.
How many stars are one percent of the stars in the clear night sky.
Need a better vicious dog.
For what?
WEll, can the legal system in USA go after Google just like they are
doing with Facebook?
Maybe. Why? When someone does bring an issue to their attention they
do work it. It's just a matter of scale and fighting the bigger fires
first.
In some ways spammers aren't a big enough problem to take attention from >bigger problems.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
That is what you get when you are understaffed and overtaxed.
Spammers destroy credibility!
In article <rqtjmd$ulp$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>,
Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
On 12/8/20 5:39 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
I suspect he is amused that you would think Google would ever actually
do something about spam.
Oh, they do. I've seen Google shut down a number of prolific spammers.
Phone number to google needed.
On 12/11/20 7:18 AM, The Doctor wrote:
That is what you get when you are understaffed and overtaxed.
It's not a staffing issue.
It's what a insurance video called law of large numbers problem. Even
if only one in one million message is spam, when you send one trillion >messages a day, that's one million spam messages.
Spammers destroy credibility!
I don't know about that.
On 2020-12-10 7:25 p.m., The Doctor wrote:
In article <rqtjmd$ulp$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>,
Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
On 12/8/20 5:39 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
I suspect he is amused that you would think Google would ever actually >>>> do something about spam.
Oh, they do. I've seen Google shut down a number of prolific spammers.
Phone number to google needed.
<SNIP>
Here you go phone numbers to Google.
https://www.elliott.org/company-contacts/google/
Main: (650) 253-0000
Customer Service: (650) 623-4000
Toll Free: (866) 246-6453
Head Office Fax #: 650-253-0001
1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy
Mountain View, CA 94043
https://www.google.com/
https://about.google/intl/en/contact-google/
On 12/11/20 7:18 AM, The Doctor wrote:
That is what you get when you are understaffed and overtaxed.
It's not a staffing issue.
It's what a insurance video called law of large numbers problem. Even
if only one in one million message is spam, when you send one trillion >messages a day, that's one million spam messages.
Spammers destroy credibility!
I don't know about that.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 12/11/20 7:18 AM, The Doctor wrote:
That is what you get when you are understaffed and overtaxed.
It's not a staffing issue.
It's what a insurance video called law of large numbers problem. Even
if only one in one million message is spam, when you send one trillion >>messages a day, that's one million spam messages.
Spammers destroy credibility!
I don't know about that.
Grant, seriously: It's far less painful to bash your own skull against a >masonry wall than it is to reason with yads. For the last several
months, he's been posting followups to every unwanted article he finds
back into the very same newsgroup he's reading, including this one. He's >quoting the headers. We don't get the unwanted article just once. Thanks
to yadification, we get it twice.
He's trolling you and he's got you hooked. Spit it out.
I am seeing lot's a spam using Google Forms, normally the 419 format but
sent with Google Forms. These seem to use the Form to confirm the
target's e-mail, and the spam usually says unnamed form.
Google should really clean up their act as they are facilitating scammers.
I am seeing lot's a spam using Google Forms, normally the 419 format butApostrophe's and they're use's you blithering fuckwit.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 293 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 233:45:00 |
| Calls: | 6,624 |
| Files: | 12,172 |
| Messages: | 5,319,635 |