Got Nigerian style spam yesterday with the email address ><mailto:pyramidloansector@gmail.com>. Almost. Should probably use
"Pyramid scheme" next time. *g*
--
Andreas
In article <87k07eg9tr.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
Got Nigerian style spam yesterday with the email address >><mailto:pyramidloansector@gmail.com>. Almost. Should probably use
"Pyramid scheme" next time. *g*
What headers do you see?
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 18:08:57 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
In article <87k07eg9tr.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
Got Nigerian style spam yesterday with the email address >>><mailto:pyramidloansector@gmail.com>. Almost. Should probably use >>>"Pyramid scheme" next time. *g*
What headers do you see?
Typical 419 scam via Gmail. I think it was in the Reply-To:, while the
From: had another Gmail address. Both are most likely valid, although the >spammer might not check the From: address.
--
Andreas
In article <874jyifn70.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 18:08:57 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
In article <87k07eg9tr.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
Got Nigerian style spam yesterday with the email address >>>><mailto:pyramidloansector@gmail.com>. Almost. Should probably use >>>>"Pyramid scheme" next time. *g*
What headers do you see?
Typical 419 scam via Gmail. I think it was in the Reply-To:, while the >>From: had another Gmail address. Both are most likely valid, although the >>spammer might not check the From: address.
Will Gmail axe this abuser?
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:35:37 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
In article <874jyifn70.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 18:08:57 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
In article <87k07eg9tr.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
Got Nigerian style spam yesterday with the email address >>>>><mailto:pyramidloansector@gmail.com>. Almost. Should probably use >>>>>"Pyramid scheme" next time. *g*
What headers do you see?
Typical 419 scam via Gmail. I think it was in the Reply-To:, while the >>>From: had another Gmail address. Both are most likely valid, although the >>>spammer might not check the From: address.
Will Gmail axe this abuser?
No. Google stopped caring to remove their own spammers two or three years ago.
--
Andreas
In article <1pwlqu2.grlnwwt0hfzeN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>,
Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <87k07ddzee.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:35:37 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
In article <874jyifn70.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 18:08:57 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
In article <87k07eg9tr.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
Got Nigerian style spam yesterday with the email address
<mailto:pyramidloansector@gmail.com>. Almost. Should probably use
"Pyramid scheme" next time. *g*
What headers do you see?
Typical 419 scam via Gmail. I think it was in the Reply-To:, while
the From: had another Gmail address. Both are most likely valid,
although the spammer might not check the From: address.
Will Gmail axe this abuser?
No. Google stopped caring to remove their own spammers
two or three years ago.
More reason why gamil should be bit-bucketed.
*@gmail is a perfectly acceptable email address. You should k/f on >'User-Agent: G2/1.0' instead; that's the Google Groups posting agent.
We are takling e-mail not newsgroups.
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <87k07ddzee.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:35:37 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
In article <874jyifn70.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 18:08:57 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
In article <87k07eg9tr.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
Got Nigerian style spam yesterday with the email address
<mailto:pyramidloansector@gmail.com>. Almost. Should probably use
"Pyramid scheme" next time. *g*
What headers do you see?
Typical 419 scam via Gmail. I think it was in the Reply-To:, while the
From: had another Gmail address. Both are most likely valid, although the >> >>>spammer might not check the From: address.
Will Gmail axe this abuser?
No. Google stopped caring to remove their own spammers
two or three years ago.
More reason why gamil should be bit-bucketed.
*@gmail is a perfectly acceptable email address. You should k/f on >'User-Agent: G2/1.0' instead; that's the Google Groups posting agent.
--
^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
~ Slava Ukraini ~
In article <87k07ddzee.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:35:37 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
In article <874jyifn70.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 18:08:57 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
In article <87k07eg9tr.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
Got Nigerian style spam yesterday with the email address >>>>><mailto:pyramidloansector@gmail.com>. Almost. Should probably use >>>>>"Pyramid scheme" next time. *g*
What headers do you see?
Typical 419 scam via Gmail. I think it was in the Reply-To:, while the >>>From: had another Gmail address. Both are most likely valid, although the >>>spammer might not check the From: address.
Will Gmail axe this abuser?
No. Google stopped caring to remove their own spammers
two or three years ago.
More reason why gamil should be bit-bucketed.
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <1pwlqu2.grlnwwt0hfzeN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>,
Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> wrote:
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
In article <87k07ddzee.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 00:35:37 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
In article <874jyifn70.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 18:08:57 -0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
In article <87k07eg9tr.fsf@usenet.ankman.de>,
Andreas Kohlbach <ank@spamfence.net> wrote:
Got Nigerian style spam yesterday with the email address
<mailto:pyramidloansector@gmail.com>. Almost. Should probably use
"Pyramid scheme" next time. *g*
What headers do you see?
Typical 419 scam via Gmail. I think it was in the Reply-To:, while
the From: had another Gmail address. Both are most likely valid,
although the spammer might not check the From: address.
Will Gmail axe this abuser?
No. Google stopped caring to remove their own spammers
two or three years ago.
More reason why gamil should be bit-bucketed.
*@gmail is a perfectly acceptable email address. You should k/f on
'User-Agent: G2/1.0' instead; that's the Google Groups posting agent.
We are takling e-mail not newsgroups.
Apologies, I'd forgotten that. However, plonking in email is a local >decision that doesn't affect other sites. Not that it matters to me,
I'll just assume that you don't want email from me.
--
^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
~ Slava Ukraini ~
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 463 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 141:59:04 |
Calls: | 9,381 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,558 |
Messages: | 6,094,751 |