On Friday, 05 November 2021 16:43 -0000,
in article <anfi+cz1l1xus8f-lb55@wp.eu>,
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
In article <anfi+2021-11-05-34fa28d665dd8a0729ed7c39@wp.eu>, A. Filip wrote:
Spamcop.net Top200 source: https://www.spamcop.net/hoshame.shtml
IPv4 reports for the week ending 2021-11-05T10:51:08+00:00
#### Top entries with reports count
#### [Top-IP: Top 10 IPv4&IPv6 + DNSWL listed]
#No. Reports Age AS IP_Address
72. 72:IPv4 18_665 11 hours US AS15169 209.85.220.41
https://dnswl.org/s/?s=209.85.220.41 Trust=none google.com
116. 116:IPv4 12_417 7 hours US AS15169 209.85.220.65
https://dnswl.org/s/?s=209.85.220.65 Trust=none google.com
200. 200:IPv4 7_720 - - -
#### Entries and reports count by AS
#### [Top-AS: Top 10 ASes + listed in Top-IP]
#No. Reports AS_name_and_country
6. AS15169 3 108_785 GOOGLE, US
[Top-IP:72(dnswl-none),116(dnswl-none)] >>>>103. - 1 7_861 -
Google spams you say?
/me offers Dave Yadallee some cheese and crackers, to go with his
perpetual whine.
Big email system for external customers and free riders means some
outgoing spam is unavoidable IMHO. Based on my personal mailboxes I
am surprised that Google is not represented in spamcop top-200
*permanently*.
By big, I assume you mean individual servers, in huge server farms,
which may average more than 5k messages per second, for years on end.
These servers may emit over 10k messages per second, in short bursts.
As such, 18_665 messages in 11 hours amounts to a relative trickle.
It still sucks.
[…]
David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> wrote:
On Friday, 05 November 2021 16:43 -0000,
in article <anfi+cz1l1xus8f-lb55@wp.eu>,
Andrzej Adam Filip <anfi@onet.eu> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
In article <anfi+2021-11-05-34fa28d665dd8a0729ed7c39@wp.eu>, A. Filip wrote:
Spamcop.net Top200 source: https://www.spamcop.net/hoshame.shtml
IPv4 reports for the week ending 2021-11-05T10:51:08+00:00
#### Top entries with reports count
#### [Top-IP: Top 10 IPv4&IPv6 + DNSWL listed]
#No. Reports Age AS IP_Address
72. 72:IPv4 18_665 11 hours US AS15169 209.85.220.41
https://dnswl.org/s/?s=209.85.220.41 Trust=none google.com >>>>>116. 116:IPv4 12_417 7 hours US AS15169 209.85.220.65
https://dnswl.org/s/?s=209.85.220.65 Trust=none google.com >>>>>200. 200:IPv4 7_720 - - -
#### Entries and reports count by AS
#### [Top-AS: Top 10 ASes + listed in Top-IP]
#No. Reports AS_name_and_country
6. AS15169 3 108_785 GOOGLE, US
[Top-IP:72(dnswl-none),116(dnswl-none)] >>>>>103. - 1 7_861 -
Google spams you say?
/me offers Dave Yadallee some cheese and crackers, to go with his
perpetual whine.
Big email system for external customers and free riders means some
outgoing spam is unavoidable IMHO. Based on my personal mailboxes I
am surprised that Google is not represented in spamcop top-200
*permanently*.
By big, I assume you mean individual servers, in huge server farms,
which may average more than 5k messages per second, for years on end.
These servers may emit over 10k messages per second, in short bursts.
As such, 18_665 messages in 11 hours amounts to a relative trickle.
It still sucks.
[…]
I *suspect* that google avoids listings in spamcop top-200 mainly due to >_very wide_ distribution of email sending. I hope to be wrong.
It is not a strong hope.
--
A. Filip
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 462 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 141:12:01 |
Calls: | 9,380 |
Files: | 13,558 |
Messages: | 6,094,670 |