• David Ritz shits in face Angus Wilkinson, Angel Cabrera, Georgia Tech,

    From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 3 09:01:23 2021
    David Ritz shits in face Angus Wilkinson, Angel Cabrera, Georgia Tech, M.G.Finn, Christoph J. Fahrni question, do you have more forgers than students of science at Georgia Tech???
    David Ritz
    Re: Happy New Year! AP's 1st book I AM A LUNATIC published in 1937


    Tim Skirvin shits in face Murray Gell-Mann, Anthony Leggett, Jessie Shelton, Anne Sickles, Timothy Stelzer, Michael Stone, Dale van Harlingen, James Wiss, encouraging forgeries of AP


    David Ritz and Tim Skirvin forgery machinery. AP does not appreciate forgeries of him


    Douglas Beck, Bryan Clark, Lance Cooper, Univ Illinois, why is Skirvin allowing the dumping of trash books/tests in sci.math//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's Magnetic Monopole

    Charles Gammie, Russell Giannetta, Nigel Goldenfeld, Univ Illinois, why is Skirvin allowing the dumping of drug ads in sci.physics//never realizing the Real Electron = muon, proton=840MeV, .5MeV = Dirac's Magnetic Monopole

    Proofs that the Real Electron=muon, Real Proton=840MeV, and that the .5MeV particle was the magnetic monopole, afterall

    12 PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon
    by Archimedes Plutonium

    Proofs that the Real Electron=muon and that the .5MeV particle was the magnetic monopole, afterall

    PROOFS that Real-Electron = muon

    1st proof is chemical bonding cannot exist with momentum of 938 versus .5MeV Chemical Bonds are covalent, ionic, metallic. You simply cannot get atoms to bond if the electron is thought of as the .5MeV particle, only with a muon at 105 MeV and the proton at 840 MeV with neutron at 945 MeV do you have the physics of angular
    momentum that allows bonding in Chemistry. The .5MeV particle was, all along a magnetic monopole of a photon with .5 MeV charge energy, not rest mass energy.


    2nd proof with the direct observance some years back in Poland of a 840 Mev particle along with 105 MeV particle of the hydrogen atom.

    Hello, well i found the below on the internet. I need a 840MeV particle that is the Real Proton. I have asked to look for it in the production of Muons. Is the below a production of muons along with 840 MeV particles?

    Quoting

    Indication For A Broad J(pc) = 2++ Meson At 840-mev Produced In The Reaction Pi- P ---> Pi+ Pi- N At High |t|
    K. Rybicki, I. Sakrejda (Cracow, INP)
    1985 - 10 pages

    Z.Phys. C28 (1985) 65-74
    DOI: 10.1007/BF01550250
    Abstract (Springer)
    The reaction π−p→π+π−n has been studied at 17.2 GeV/c and 63 GeV/c. A partial wave analysis shows a fairly broad (∼250 MeV) resonance at about 840 MeV. This object, already visible in moments of the angular distribution, is produced in theD
    wave with helicitym=2 via unnatural exchange. The cross section for the reaction π−p→D2U(840)n is only by an order of magnitude lower than that of ϱ(770) and falls likepLAB−2.1±0.3. We have not been able to explain this object by systematic
    experimental effects like acceptance and/orN* reflections; neither is the nature of the resonance (if real) clear to us.
    --- end quote ---


    3rd proof-- pull plug out of electrical socket and notice light flash. That flash of light was the magnetic monopoles as photons with charge energy of .5MeV, for the monopoles compose all electric currents.

    4th proof is that the radius of the hydrogen proton shrinks too much when a muon is injected and that contradicts Standard Model. The reason is obvious-- the proton is 840 MeV electron is muon and then you add a second muon.

    --- Quoting from www, Ars Technica, Researchers orbit a muon around an atom, confirm physics is broken ---

    So, the proton radius puzzle remains a puzzle. The team behind this new work point to a number of measurements that could potentially help clarify it. Some of them involve better measurements with normal electrons; others involve scattering muons off
    protons themselves to see if there's an unknown force at work. The latter would tell us whether anything beyond the Standard Model will be needed to explain this puzzle.

    --- end Quote ---

    5