• David Ritz forges Archimedes Plutonium in sci.physics

    From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Archimedes Plutonium on Fri Jan 1 22:01:59 2021
    David Ritz
    Jan 1, 2021, 6:29:42 PM (6 hours ago)



    to
    On Friday, 01 January 2021 11:53 -0800, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

    Re: Happy New Year! AP's 1st book I AM A LUNATIC published in 1937

    Has the above forger hacked into my computer itself?????

    Above what, Archie Pu? Without so much as a pointer to the newsgroup
    where the forgery appeared, let alone a Message-ID, it is a bit
    difficult to determine what you're on about.

    Your computer may or may not be hacked, but the absence of evidence one
    way or the other will leave you guessing, as usual. It's your brain
    that's hacked (cracked).

    Recently Google sent me a email saying the PRIVACY of email is not
    really up to snuff

    Google sent the same message to all their users. While you may be
    (short bus) special, you are not receiving anything especially created
    and crafted for you, Archie.

    Did you follow Google's recommendations and review your privacy and
    security settings?

    So is the forgerer someone inside of Google?

    No, you dimwitted Usenet personality[*].

    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=160954490000
    Message-ID: <rsngd8$2dae$1...@neodome.net>

    Please note, the message headers include an abuse contact address.

    Injection-Info: neodome.net; mail-complaints-to="ab...@neodome.net"

    Recommendations:

    Get a real News-reader. As hard as it is to believe, G2 (Google
    Groups) is even more useless in its current iteration.

    Buy yourself a clue, as you'll never find one if left to your
    own devices.

    [*] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_personality

    --
    David Ritz <dr...@mindspring.com>
    "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
    different results." -- attrib. Albert Einstein



    This is the forged post in sci.physics

    Happy New Year! AP's 1st book I AM A LUNATIC published in 1937
    9 views
    Subscribe
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    9:51 AM (9 hours ago)



    to
    Through faith in god I have maintained the strength to endure.
    I need all of you to listen very carefully to me. I share a common bond
    with all of you and many of u knw me to the core. The revelation I'm
    about to share with all of you takes the utmost of courage and through
    this courage should demonstrate my utmost conviction despite my internal struggles to reconcile these factual and very real experiences. Those of
    you in Omaha - have you noticed a recent barrage of audible signals,
    amplified sounds, mufflers, trains, pattern-based bird calls all
    throughout the city at every hour of the night? Fo
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Michael Moroney on Sat Jan 2 07:11:29 2021
    Georgia Tech, M.G.Finn, Christoph J. Fahrni, Angus Wilkinson, question, do you have more forgers than students of science at Georgia Tech???
    David Ritz
    Re: Happy New Year! AP's 1st book I AM A LUNATIC published in 1937


    No wonder Georgia Tech like Dr. Thorp of SCIENCE magazine are bozo the clowns with Lewis 8 Structure, too stupid to realize it must be Lewis 6 Structure in order for CO and N3 having higher dissociation energy than does O2. Bozo the clowns of science
    lack logic, and so they run out and hire stalking nitwits like David Ritz to forge AP


    STEALING DR THORP SCIENCE magazine


    Kibo Parry Moroney shits in face Dr.Thorp, Dr.Chandler Davis as thieves of science from Internet and Newsgroups.

    On Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 3:40:13 PM UTC-6, Michael Moroney wrote: >struggling for relevance

    AP writes: do not be fooled by the several people posting under the name Michael Moroney as a "open hate spam line"



    AP writes: is that why Dr.Thorp and Dr. Chandler Davis steal from AP?

    Which steals better, MitchR, Dr.Thorp, or Dr. Chandler Davis. Some in the journal of science business have just not transitioned to our new world where you have to also include Internet and Newsgroups as reference.



    88th published book
    Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to prevent and combat stealing// Sociology series, book 10 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)


    3_H. Holden Thorp fails Chemistry, now tries to steal AP 2004 work on "Dog, first domesticated animal" Kindle book of AP's. Kibo Parry Moroney confirms theft-- see below.


    Ask Dr. Thorp when in the world he has no brains to do proper chemistry. Ask him why he believes in Lewis 8 Structure, when it has been known for decades that CO then N2 have the highest bonded dissociation energy. Thus, if you had at least one logical
    marble of a brain, you would understand that the highest dissociation energy tells you what the Lewis Structure must be. It cannot be Lewis 8 Structure but has to be Lewis 6 Arm Structure. If it were Lewis 8, then O2 would have the highest dissociation
    energy, not CO.

    Is this why Dr. Thorp was dismissed out of chemistry? He just does not have one logical marble? But it appears the no logical marble of Dr. Thorp is allowing SCIENCE magazine to steal, and steal away the AP theory of DOG, FIRST DOMESTICATED ANIMAL of
    year 2004, published in the book of that same title in Amazon's Kindle.

    But it appears that SCIENCE is trying very hard to steal AP's theory.

    And all I asked for was inclusion on a correction page of SCIENCE, but Dr. Thorp is headstrong in his stealing ways.

    Is SCIENCE magazine trying to steal away AP's theory-- Dog-First Domesticated Animal, or, will they do the proper etiquette of a Corrections page in a future edition?
    4 views
    Subscribe

    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
    Nov 17, 2020, 1:01:25 PM (4 days ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe


    Is SCIENCE magazine trying to steal away AP's theory-- Dog-First Domesticated Animal, or, will they do the proper etiquette of a Corrections page in a future edition?

    Nov 17, 2020, 12:53 PM
    to sci.physics, sci.math, plutonium-atom-universe
    In that 30OCT2020 issue of SCIENCE AAAS, on page 523 has a list of references and notes and the oldest date is this.

    8. G.H.Perry et al..Nat. Genet. 39. 1256 (2007).

    Well, AP's Dog-- First Domesticated Animal has a long long history of Usenet posts going back to 2004. So, no, AP is not going to have his theories, any one of them, stolen from him.

    I have asked SCIENCE to include my name in a future corrections page of Dog-First Domesticated Animal.

    Is SCIENCE magazine AAAS, trying to steal AP's theory-- Dog-- First Domesticated Animal// Looks like it in 30OCT2020 issue pages 522 & 557. I did not see the name Archimedes Plutonium in the references. There are four major offending words in ....
    6 views
    Subscribe

    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
    Nov 14, 2020, 7:08:20 PM (3 days ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe

    Is SCIENCE magazine AAAS, trying to steal AP's theory-- Dog-- First Domesticated Animal// Looks like it in 30OCT2020 issue pages 522 & 557.

    I did not see the name Archimedes Plutonium in the references. There are four major offending words in these two articles on pages 522 and 557 and contents page-- " dog, first domesticated animal".

    Unless SCIENCE can include the name Archimedes Plutonium in a future edition, saying-- forgot to cite AP in reference to dog domestication. Then AP is forced to include SCIENCE magazine in his book-- Theft and Stealing of Intellectual Property.



    22nd published book
    Biology: First Domesticated Animal: the Dog Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    Amazing that just watching TV of science shows, one can formulate a true theory of science. Now my theory needs research, but it basically says the dog was the first farm animal, the first domesticated animal of the wolf, that became food for early homo
    sapiens. We tend to think of herbivores being the first domesticated animals, but I tend to think the dog comes as first domesticated animal. Many good lines of research are suggested below in the text.

    Cover picture: are three dogs, the light brown one is Indy and her two daughters. Indy comes from the Waziristan mountains as a shephard dog.Indy is very smart.
    Length: 50 pages

    Product details
    File Size: 3076 KB
    Print Length: 50 pages
    Publication Date: March 17, 2019
    Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
    Language: English
    ASIN: B07PQ5CPKG
    Text-to-Speech: Enabled
    X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

    Word Wise: Enabled
    Lending: Enabled
    Screen Reader: Supported
    Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
    Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #429,006 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
    #93 in 90-Minute Science & Math Short Reads
    #469 in Evolution (Kindle Store)
    #648 in Biology (Kindle Store)

    Biology: First Domesticated Animal: the Dog// Anthropology series, book 2
    by Archimedes Plutonium

    Preface: Amazing that just watching TV of science shows, one can formulate a true theory of science. Now my theory needs research, but it basically says the dog was the first farm animal, the first domesticated animal of the wolf, that became food for
    early homo sapiens. We tend to think of herbivores being the first domesticated animals, but I tend to think the dog comes as first domesticated animal. Many good lines of research are suggested below in the text.

    Cover picture: are three dogs, the light brown one is Indy and her two daughters. Indy comes from the Waziristan mountains as a shepherd dog.Indy is very smart.


    From: a_plu...@hotmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
    Newsgroups: sci.bio.misc,sci.anthropology,sci.anthropology.paleo
    Subject: how dogs evolved from wolves; TV NOVA show; 1st domesticated farm animal theory
    Date: 5 Feb 2004 15:07:00 -0800
    Lines: 76


    A few days ago I watched a NOVA program on the variety of dogs with
    talk of their evolution from that of wolves. Quite an interesting
    program. However there are very many gaps of logic in the discussion
    of how dogs came from wolves.

    There was proffered the usual old theory that wolf babies make nice
    pets and hominids would have come upon wolf babies and raised them in
    their living camps.

    Then there was a scientist who proffered a different theory suggesting
    that dumpsites of early humans was a place to pick up easy food for
    those wolves tolerant of human nearby presence.

    I am going to offer a third theory which sort of incorporates the
    above two. Let me call the above by their main mechanism. The first is
    that of "Baby Pet" theory
    and the second would be called the "Dumpsite" theory.

    My theory would be called the "First Domesticated Farm Animal" theory.

    The logical gap in theories one and two is that they confer little to
    no advantage to the hominids or early humans involved, unless you want
    to say that having a pet confers advantage over disadvantage of the
    time spent on the pet, or as in the dumpsite theory that of the
    spectacle of semi-wolves near camp is some sort of advantage.

    My theory of "First Domesticated Animal" as the mechanism of how dogs
    evolved from wolves makes the most sense because it confers the most
    advantage to hominids or early humans. Here is how it works. Hominids
    or Early Humans found wolf babies and would take them back to their
    camp. They are too little and young to eat now, but as they grow older
    fed from the snacks around the campsite (the dump) then they would be
    large enough for food to eat.

    Here I would have to research as to how easy or hard it would be to
    have sheep or cattle hang around close to the campsite so that when
    they got large enough they would be dinner. You see, I have the
    suspicion that wild wolf babies are the animal that has the greatest
    tendency to hang around the campsite than any other wild animal baby.
    And thus, wolves would have been the first domesticated animal which
    is rather surprising because they are carnivores and most of us would
    guess that the first domesticated animal would have been a herbivore.
    But I doubt that any baby herbivore would have stayed around the human campsite as steadfast as a pet baby wolf until it grows to enough size
    to eat.

    Remember we are talking of primitive and savage hominids and early
    humans who when looking at pets see them more as future food.

    Which brings up very many good questions. Was the Dog the first
    domesticated animal? I think it was. I say this because the wild wolf
    baby imprints on a human better than a wild-any-other-animal. And
    because of this imprinting the baby wolf would have stayed nearby the
    humans until it grew of a size wherein one of the hungry hominids or
    early humans ate the pet for dinner.

    The Dump theory is okay in that the baby wolf would have wandered no
    further away than the dump. And when the wolf was of a eatable size
    would have been enticed by some scrap food bones and then killed and
    eaten. Sounds gory and awful but that is probably the true sequence of
    events that lead from wolves to the evolution of dog. And as this
    relationship continued, the semi-wild wolf or dog had ears that drooped
    and had a disposition to not run away.

    We can measure the drooping ears of cattle or other domesticated
    animals compared to their wild counterparts. As early man ate more and
    more dogs for their dinners they wanted dogs that would hang around
    the dumps and had droopy ears and not prone to run away.

    And after hominids or early humans domesticated the wolf by becoming
    the dog, they then got the idea that other animals such as cattle or
    sheep can be domesticated for future dinners as well as the dog.

    AP

    From: a_plu...@hotmail.com (Archimedes Plutonium)
    Newsgroups: sci.anthropology,sci.anthropology.paleo,soc.history
    Subject: dog farming formed the first Human or Hominid farm
    Date: 8 Feb 2004 12:12:05 -0800
    Lines: 27

    Based on a NOVA TV show recently watched. And my theory that dogs
    evolved from wolves because they are an easy steady and stable food
    supply.

    Query: if we pose a query or question as to what would the first, yes
    the very first Farm in the entire history of the Human or perhaps
    Hominid history, then I think most of us would conjure up the images
    of say early humans planting corn seeds or something like that.
    Perhaps some would not conjure up some plant seeds but would instead
    think of confining buffalo or some sort of animal resembling sheep or
    cattle.

    But I believe that the first ever farm by the earliest humans was a
    dog farm. Where they rounded up baby wolves and brought them into the
    campsite and fed them until a large enough size to eat. And they would
    not roam far from the campsite because they were imprinted forming a
    natural fence as to their roaming away from the humans. It could have
    been cats since cats are also easily imprinted.

    I do believe the dog would be the first ever Human farm. And then
    other animals brought into the campsite area and then later, much
    later would be to plant crops where these dogs and cats and other
    animals were confined.

    AP

    20 July 2019 Note: reading the above, got me to thinking that not only was the dog, dog food for early humans, and the dog being the first farm animal, but the advantage of a dog around the campsite, barking at say wild animals approaching such as big
    cats, or worse yet, rival early human clans, would have been a huge advantage that the early humans gained, in addition to food by eating the dog. Dog barking is a huge advantage to owners when you want a alarm system. And the barking dog certainly is
    the best animal I know of as a alarm system.

    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
    Nov 14, 2020, 7:35:25 PM (3 days ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    I am forwarding a copy of the below post to Editor in Chief, H. Holden Thorp, sciencemag.org.

    Of the thousands upon thousands of new ideas in science that AP has committed, I am not willing to give up a single one of them, to any ransacking marauding thiefs. Unless the name Archimedes Plutonium appears in a future correction page of references to
    this article on dogs-- first domesticated animal, then I shall enter the offending person/s in AP's book of Theft and Stealing.
    Reply all
    Reply to author
    Forward

    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium....@gmail.com>
    Nov 17, 2020, 5:40:41 PM (4 days ago)



    to Plutonium Atom Universe


    Comparing the stealing of Porat versus MitchR versus Chandler Davis of Math. Intelligencer magazine

    Well it is easy to compare their stealing ways.

    Porat would read a "good nice new idea", and really really like it. And so his reaction was to pop up in the author's thread and accuse that author of stealing the new idea from Porat. Such stealing behavior gets old very very fast for the original
    author.

    MitchR stealing ways is less offensive, less in-your-face stealing than Porat, but none-the-less as aggravating. What MitchR does is scout around in sci.math and sci.physics for new ideas. Once he spots one, he rewords the new idea and posts his
    rewording in a new thread pretending he is the discoverer of a brand new idea of science. Actually, AP has met people like this in real life, where they listen to someone talk about a new idea and reword it so that they feel they have no need of
    footnoting or citing original source. For there are thousands of people who think that rewording a new idea gives them the right to call it "their new idea".

    Chandler Davis when he was editor of Mathematical Intelligencer in Toronto Canada in the 1990s early 2000 printed a article on the mistakes in the Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof, not Chandler but two other authors. Trouble was, the article was almost
    a pure lifting, a stealing of AP's posts in sci.math over Euclid Infinitude of Primes. And I emailed Chandler asking for a correction page inclusion of my work in a future issue of the magazine. Turns out that Chandler was "stupid old school of thought"
    thinking that Usenet and Internet are just "for free to steal all you want". So, what AP ended up doing is publishing Chandler Davis's brash stealing of AP's work in AP's book. All that Chandler had to do was simply include a two line cite of Archimedes
    Plutonium in his magazine, but no, for I guess a thief is always a thief, and looking for a excuse.

    So, what turned out in the case of Chandler Davis refusal to publish priority rights of intellectual property, that now, Chandler Davis is published in AP's book of stealing on the Internet. Fair sailing Chandler...

    88th published book

    Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to prevent and combat stealing// Sociology series, book 10 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    New True Ideas in Science are very difficult to come by.

    And many communities and countries ignore or deny the practice of footnoting, citing reference source, or quoting, but are societies who live up to that of mass stealing.

    At minimum, every school education should and must teach how we "do not steal" by teaching footnote, reference cite, quoting. I learned it in High School, but across the world, most never learned this.

    I learned footnoting, citing sources reference, and quoting in High School English classrooms, thank you Wyoming High School, near Cincinnati Ohio, one of my most valuable lessons, because it teaches us not only honesty, but prepares us for becoming
    scientists and grappling with the truth of the world, without stealing it.

    It was August of 1993 that I first arrived on the Internet in the sci.math, sci.physics and many other Newsgroups of Usenet. I had already copyrighted my Atom Totality theory and was protected in that manner of copyrights. But I wanted more protection so
    I published in the Dartmouth College newspaper many of my discovered ideas of 1990 through August 1993. So I had a double wall of protection of Library of Congress copyright but also, Dartmouth College newspaper. But then with the arrival onto Usenet
    newsgroups, sci.physics, sci.math, sci.chem, sci.bio.misc, sci.physics.electromag, sci.astro, and many more newsgroups. I saw that as a third layer of protection of my newly discovered ideas.

    However, starting August 1993, it was plainly clear to me that this Internet posting of my ideas, that it is easy to steal those ideas.

    Length: 147 pages

    Product details
    File Size: 783 KB
    Print Length: 147 pages
    Publication Date: February 13, 2020

    Sold by: Amazon.com Services LLC
    Language: English
    ASIN: B084T87JGY

    Text-to-Speech: Enabled
    X-Ray: 
Not Enabled 

    Word Wise: Not Enabled
    Lending: Enabled
    Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled
    Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #250,786 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
    #4742 in Counseling & Psychology
    #2013 in Medical General Psychology
    #7248 in Science & Math (Kindle Store)

    AP is hoping that he does not have to include the recent steal by SCIENCE magazine 30OCT2020, page 523 with a missing reference and note citation.

    15. Archimedes Plutonium, Biology: First Domesticated Animal: the Dog Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author), 2004, published 2019.

    I am hoping this does not end up being another Chandler Davis of Mathematical Intelligencer type of steal, where the editors of SCIENCE AAAS look upon everything on Usenet and Internet and Amazon's Kindle as just fertile grounds and fertile fields of
    stealing.

    I ask for the above (15) inclusion on a correction page of SCIENCE magazine. New true ideas in Science are terribly difficult to come by, and keeping that in mind, I am not willing to lose a single new idea I ever discovered.








    #1-3, 74th published book

    HISTORY OF THE PROTON MASS and the 945 MeV //Atom Totality series, book 3 Kindle Edition
    by Archimedes Plutonium (Author)

    In 2016-2017, AP discovered that the real proton has a mass of 840 MeV, not 938. The real electron was actually the muon and the muon stays inside the proton that forms a proton torus of 8 rings and with the muon as bar magnet is a Faraday Law producing
    magnetic monopoles. So this book is all about why researchers of physics and engineers keep getting the number 938MeV when they should be getting the number 840 MeV + 105 MeV = 945 MeV.

    Cover Picture is a proton torus of 8 rings with a muon of 1 ring inside the proton torus, doing the Faraday Law and producing magnetic monopoles.
    Length: 17 pages

    Product details
    • Publication Date : December 18, 2019
    • Word Wise : Enabled
    • Print Length : 17 pages
    • File Size : 698 KB
    • ASIN : B082WYGVNG
    • Language: : English
    • Text-to-Speech : Not enabled
    • Enhanced Typesetting : Enabled
    • Screen Reader : Supported
    • X-Ray : Not Enabled
    • Lending : Enabled

    Dr. Chandler Davis when editor of Mathematical Intelligencer, steals the work of AP's Euclid Infinitude of Primes proof, work I had done in early 1990s and there Davis publishes my work under names of different authors in 2009. Davis and Thorp just have
    not accepted the idea that Internet is "not free stealing grounds".

    Quoting from my book-- Theft & Stealing ideas of science in the era of the internet// Ways to prevent and combat stealing// Sociology series, book 10
    by Archimedes Plutonium




    Newsgroups: sci.physics, soc.history, sci.math
    From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
    Local: Fri, Sep 9 2011 1:22 pm
    Subject: Scardigli and arXiv, and QM of Titius-Bode rule priority? new book: #9 Usenet sci.newsgroups theft-without-proper-attribute

    On Sep 9, 1:17 am, Archimedes Plutonium

    <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:

    (snipped in large part)

    Now I need to shorten the title of this book and so far I have adopted
    this as the title:
    "Usenet sci.newsgroups theft-without-proper-attribute"
    Maybe I can improve that even more, along the way
    As mentioned often in this book, of the newness of the Internet and 
Usenet and that newness 
will create problems with the old media way of publishing science 
ideas. There were 
numerous problems in old media coverage of science, but when
    Usenet 
came around circa 1990, 
the proper attribute for new ideas had to be re-examined. And it left 
decades open of 
misappropriation of new ideas.
    Now Mr Scardigli mentions above that he inserted a "errors corrected 
and more references cited" 
as a second edition to his first edition. I still do not see where he 
references Archimedes Plutonium 
Usenet posts to sci.physics on the Titius
    Bode Rule as quantum 
mechanics.
    But what Mr. Scardigli has done by using a correction page to update, 
offers us a solution to 
the problem of "theft-without-proper-attribute." And this is what I 
tried to get Chandler Davis 
editor of Mathematical Intelligencer to do with his
    published article 
of "Prime Simplicity" of 2009 
was to include in a future correction page of Mathematical 
Intelligencer the name of Archimedes Plutonium 
with the referencing of my thousand or so Usenet posts on the subject 
for which I had
    priority.
    So whereas the Usenet science newsgroups offers superior date-time- 
group for new ideas. The Usenet can be 
corrected of theft-by-improper-attribute by the insertion of the 
reference in a "Correction Page".
    So that if Mr. Scardigli were to include Archimedes Plutonium, posts 
to sci.physics in a future correction page, then this episode is over 
with and ended. And if Chandler Davis with Mathematical Intelligencer 
in a future correction page of that
    magazine cites Archimedes 
Plutonium: posts to sci.math on Euclid Infinitude of Primes corrected, 
then that issue is over with.
    So we begin to see the problem and it is a huge problem, and we begin 
to see a clearcut solution by authors, that they can correct priority 
rights through a Correction page citing those earlier sources.
    Now I want to talk briefly about the opposite and rather insidious 
phenomenon that is occurring on Usenet as a publishing medium, that 
was there also in old media publishing but not so obnoxious and not so 
widespread. It is what can be
    considered the inverse of not including 
a reference to that of over-including a reference to the detriment of 
the source. What I am talking about is what has been dubbed as 
"bombing, Google bombing or 
search engine bombing." So that when you
    are reading a article about 
coal, you have reference to old articles written by Archimedes 
Plutonium to the planet Mars and whether Mars has coal.
    Science before the Internet was worried about citing original sources. 
With the Internet a new problem arises 
where search engines are hyper-sensitive and will list references to 
authors for which the only element in common was a few words.
    So in science, we still have the problem of proper citation to 
scientists with original ideas, but we also have a new problem on our 
hands of drowning authors of science with the pollution of search 
engine bombing 
on those authors. In a sense,
    this happened in old media science where 
a tabloid press would talk about a 
famous scientist, for which that scientist would rather that the 
tabloid never discussed him or his work, 
at all.

    Newsgroups: sci.anthropology, sci.anthropology.paleo, sci.math
    From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
    Local: Wed, Sep 14 2011 12:18 am
    Subject: Richard W. Young and stonethrowing theory priorities new book: #10 Usenet sci.newsgroups theft-without-proper-attribute

    In the mid 2000s a search for the stonethrowing theory in Google
    delivered not Archimedes Plutonium first but delivers Richard W 
Young
    with his tiny blurb on the 
Stonethrowing theory in a Journal of
    Anatomy of 2003.
    This example of taking ideas from the Usenet science newsgroups 
without proper attribute is seen clearly by Dr. Young, and this case 
will show and exemplify the new era of publishing of science is more 
important about having a date time group
    stamp than where the article 
is published. This case of Dr. Young shows us the superiority of 
publishing first to Usenet and then going back and having the slow old 
way of publishing take its course.
    What Dr. Young teaches us about science publishing, is to post the 
abstract to the Usenet first since its speed is superior and then have 
the article published in the slow process of 
peer review journal.
    We have a historical case to recall in biology itself where Wallace 
had the ideas of evolution before or simultaneous to that of Darwin.
    So let me go through my archive of posts to fetch out what happened on 
the issue of Dr. 
Young, stonethrowing theory and Archimedes Plutonium. And from this 
case study, I think 
everyone will be convinced that speed of recorded date time group
    is 
more important than 
where it is published, and the superiority of Usenet for the date time 
group stamp.


    Newsgroups: sci.anthropology, sci.anthropology.paleo, sci.math
    From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
    Local: Wed, Sep 14 2011 12:50 am
    Subject: Re: Richard W. Young and stonethrowing theory priorities new book: #11 Usenet sci.newsgroups theft-without-proper-attribute

    I am going to repost an older post of mine of 2007 where I lay out the particular's of the Dr. Young
    case and priority rights and where the new medium of Usenet publishing
    is trampled on by the old medium.
    --- quoting old post of mine ---

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)