I=E2=80=99m replying to a post from 4 years ago, replying to a post from
5 = years ago, about a post from 12 years ago...
I've just Subscribed to this thread, to watch it continually unfold for the next 20+ years.
Please, continue.
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 10:06:03 PM UTC+3, Michael Kilts wrote:
I've just Subscribed to this thread, to watch it continually unfold for the next 20+ years.
Please, continue.I like how things are heating up here. Truly insane!
El jueves, 8 de julio de 2021 a las 15:51:22 UTC+2, Digital Ego
escribió:
On Sunday, September 20, 2020 at 10:06:03 PM UTC+3, Michael Kilts
wrote:
I've just Subscribed to this thread, to watch it continually unfoldI like how things are heating up here. Truly insane!
for the next 20+ years.
Please, continue.
Watch as I reply to your 1 year old post replying to a couple of posts
from 2 years ago replying to a post from 6 years ago, replying to a post
from 7 years ago, about a 14 year old post.
bump
bump
In article <dfbfde2b-5bba-475b...@googlegroups.com>, Davidhappy new year guys
Michael wrote...
bump
I can't make any sense of your question. Just be selective in what you delete?
What situation prompts that question?
Trying to unpack: I infer that you have data (constants?) in a cell which contains a formula. If so, try moving the constants to a dedicated worksheet, and name the ranges. Simple example: I have a spreadsheet which tracks my alcohol consumption units (medical necessity, sadly). I have a named range called "PINT", and I refer to it in a cell as '=PINT'. The named range PINT contains the value 568. There are other ranges called 'BOTTLE' and 'HALFBOTTLE'. If someone in the USA wanted to use my spreadsheet, they could edit PINT to 473.
Throughout IT, it's beneficial to keep raw data independent from operations which derive from that data, and similarly from formatting markup. The benefits of this increase with the scale of the project.
--
Phil, London
On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 3:28:44 PM UTC+5, Philip Herlihy wrote:No one has really answered the question either.
In article <dfbfde2b-5bba-475b...@googlegroups.com>, David
Michael wrote...
bump
I can't make any sense of your question. Just be selective in what you delete?
What situation prompts that question?
Trying to unpack: I infer that you have data (constants?) in a cell which contains a formula. If so, try moving the constants to a dedicated worksheet,
and name the ranges. Simple example: I have a spreadsheet which tracks my alcohol consumption units (medical necessity, sadly). I have a named range called "PINT", and I refer to it in a cell as '=PINT'. The named range PINT
contains the value 568. There are other ranges called 'BOTTLE' and 'HALFBOTTLE'. If someone in the USA wanted to use my spreadsheet, they could
edit PINT to 473.
Throughout IT, it's beneficial to keep raw data independent from operations
which derive from that data, and similarly from formatting markup. The benefits of this increase with the scale of the project.
--
Phil, Londonhappy new year guys
On Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 5:38:11 PM UTC-6, Amman Pasha wrote:
On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 3:28:44 PM UTC+5, Philip Herlihy wrote:
In article <dfbfde2b-5bba-475b...@googlegroups.com>, David
Michael wrote...
bump
I can't make any sense of your question. Just be selective in what you delete?
What situation prompts that question?
Trying to unpack: I infer that you have data (constants?) in a cell which
contains a formula. If so, try moving the constants to a dedicated worksheet,
and name the ranges. Simple example: I have a spreadsheet which tracks my
alcohol consumption units (medical necessity, sadly). I have a named range
called "PINT", and I refer to it in a cell as '=PINT'. The named range PINT
contains the value 568. There are other ranges called 'BOTTLE' and 'HALFBOTTLE'. If someone in the USA wanted to use my spreadsheet, they could
edit PINT to 473.
Throughout IT, it's beneficial to keep raw data independent from operations
which derive from that data, and similarly from formatting markup. The benefits of this increase with the scale of the project.
--
No one has really answered the question either.Phil, Londonhappy new year guys
I've just Subscribed to this thread, to watch it continually unfold for the next 20+ years.
Please, continue.
mattsteel101 wrote:
On Sunday, April 20, 2008 at 11:07:25 PM UTC+1, David Biddulph wrote:
A cell contains either formula or data. It can't contain both.
That is rubbish David
You're replying to a post from 7 years ago.
--
I look at my life and it just seems so depressing that I'm
not sure if I was born or if Morrissey sang me into existence.
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 1:59:57 AM UTC+9, Auric__ wrote:Feel like there needs to be separate cells for the data and formulas. Would =IF Functions would have worked? =IF(A3>4, sum(A2+A4+A5), 0). Happy to be hear. Look forward to the next 15 years.
mattsteel101 wrote:
On Sunday, April 20, 2008 at 11:07:25 PM UTC+1, David Biddulph wrote:
A cell contains either formula or data. It can't contain both.
That is rubbish David
You're replying to a post from 7 years ago.
--Doesn't make it any less true.
I look at my life and it just seems so depressing that I'm
not sure if I was born or if Morrissey sang me into existence.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 79:36:12 |
| Calls: | 6,658 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,203 |
| Messages: | 5,333,092 |
| Posted today: | 1 |