• Re: new york to convert to mileage based exit numbering

    From mkeen@21:1/5 to Jeff Morrison on Wed Dec 28 17:27:14 2022
    On Sunday, September 13, 2009 at 2:14:27 PM UTC-4, Jeff Morrison wrote:
    On Sep 10, 1:30 pm, "rshe...@gmail.com" <rshe...@gmail.com> wrote:
    The Thruway should be two separate numbering systems, one for I-90 and
    the other for I-87, and the Berkshire Section can carry the I-90
    numbering.

    But like I say, I will believe it when I see contracts let
    Nah, too logical. :-P Of course, this would be the perfect time to do
    such a conversion.
    Would there be any chance of the Berkshire spur getting an odd x87 or
    x90 designation, since that's the only part of the Thruway that
    doesn't have any interstate number? (see: I-335, Kansas Turnpike)

    I realize this is 14 years later, but the Berkshire spur is not the only part of the Thruway without any interstate number. You're forgetting the Garden State Parkway extension.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)