• Re: Rail shutdown would be disastrous for consumers

    From Arlo@21:1/5 to David Hartung on Wed Sep 14 11:25:01 2022
    XPost: alt.society.labor-unions, alt.politics.republicans, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    In article <t06abr$28p97$73@news.freedyn.de>
    David Hartung <kicking.rudys.ass@Hotmail.com> wrote:

    Railroaders for Trump!

    Before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, consumers hardly, if
    ever, gave thought to “supply chains.” For most people, it
    sounded like a corporate buzzword, similar to “synergy” or “deep
    dive.” However, two years later, consumers are painfully aware
    of how important supply chains are to the availability and cost
    of common products.

    Continued backlogs in producing and transporting goods are one
    of the main drivers of inflation that reached a four-decade high
    earlier this summer. This is not going unnoticed by consumers.
    Polls continue to show that inflation remains one of the most
    important issues to Americans.

    As both supply chain problems and inflation are starting to show
    some signs of easing, the last thing consumers need is a work
    stoppage that shuts down freight and passenger rail lines. That
    is why last month’s recommendation from the Presidential
    Emergency Board (PEB) of neutral arbitrators appointed by
    President Joe Biden is so crucial.

    Biden issued an Executive Order in July to create the
    arbitration board after several rounds of negotiating between
    freight railroads and several labor unions that represent
    various rail workers failed to achieve an agreement.

    The recommendations issued by the PEB are not binding, but they
    do represent a framework for a potential deal. There is a lot to
    like for labor and the railroads, as well as many things that
    will be tough to swallow for both sides.

    Most important, for rail workers, wages would increase by 24%
    during the five-year period from 2020-24, with a 14.1% wage
    increase becoming effective immediately. The key aspect of this
    is that because it is retroactive to 2020, it would result in
    more than $11,000 in immediate payouts to employees on average.

    For the railroads, the deal would help them maintain the kind of
    flexibility that will allow them to quickly respond to their
    customers’ needs. This is crucial for the industry to remain
    competitive with other forms of transportation, such as trucking.

    To be clear, this is not a perfect agreement for either side. If
    you gave both industry and labor the chance to write their
    preferred Collective Bargaining Agreement, neither side would
    have written the framework recommended by the PEB. That should
    be taken as a sign that the administration’s experts succeeded
    in coming up with a recommendation that is fair and requires
    compromises and concessions from both sides of the bargaining
    table. This tracks with many of the recent policy wins in
    Washington, all predicated on compromise.

    The PEB’s recommendation triggered a 30-day cooling off period,
    which gives the two sides a chance to reach an agreement. If the
    two sides fail to agree to a new deal by Sept. 16, there could
    be a work stoppage that would shut down our nation’s freight
    rails, which move about 40 percent of the nation’s freight in
    terms of tonnage.

    This would be absolutely devastating for consumers. Freight rail
    moves many of the goods we consume daily, including many
    consumer products found on store shelves. Disrupting the
    movement of that volume of goods would cripple supply chain and
    drive inflation even higher, at a time when Americans simply
    can’t afford more price increases.

    Both railroads and labor unions want the best possible
    deal—workers want deserved pay increases and a better quality of
    life; railroads want to remain competitive with other modes of
    transportation. And, they both will have to live with whatever
    the final deal is.

    But, one thing is clear: If they can’t come to an agreement that
    avoids a work stoppage, it will be a bad deal for our economy,
    and millions of Americans will be forced to live with the
    consequences of broken supply chains and higher prices.

    Ken McEldowney is executive director of Consumer Action,
    national consumer advocacy and education membership organization
    based in San Francisco.

    https://www.chicagobusiness.com/opinion/rail-strike-shutdown- would-be-disastrous-consumers

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)