• New weekend trains Plovdiv [BG] <-> Edirne [TR]

    From Ulf.Kutzner@web.de@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 26 03:39:19 2019
    Hello,

    see https://railturkey.org/2019/05/25/plovdiv-edirne-train-to-start/

    Regards, ULF

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Recliner@21:1/5 to hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk on Mon May 27 22:00:31 2019
    hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk <hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    On 26/05/2019 11:39, Ulf.Kutzner@web.de wrote:
    Hello,

    see https://railturkey.org/2019/05/25/plovdiv-edirne-train-to-start/

    Regards, ULF


    I also saw that Baku-Tbilisi-Kars is due to start carrying passengers in August.

    It makes me wonder why the Baltic States and EU are investing very large
    sums into the construction of Rail Baltica. Would it not be easier and
    more economical, to rebuild and expand existing infrastructure and allow
    for variable-gauge axles, rather than build an entirely separate network?

    I thought the problem with the Baltic states' railways was that their
    networks radiated from St Petersburg, rather than having north-south links
    to Poland?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk@21:1/5 to Ulf.Kutzner@web.de on Mon May 27 22:55:06 2019
    On 26/05/2019 11:39, Ulf.Kutzner@web.de wrote:
    Hello,

    see https://railturkey.org/2019/05/25/plovdiv-edirne-train-to-start/

    Regards, ULF


    I also saw that Baku-Tbilisi-Kars is due to start carrying passengers in August.

    It makes me wonder why the Baltic States and EU are investing very large
    sums into the construction of Rail Baltica. Would it not be easier and
    more economical, to rebuild and expand existing infrastructure and allow
    for variable-gauge axles, rather than build an entirely separate network?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk@21:1/5 to Recliner on Tue May 28 00:44:49 2019
    On 27/05/2019 23:00, Recliner wrote:
    hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk <hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    On 26/05/2019 11:39, Ulf.Kutzner@web.de wrote:
    Hello,

    see https://railturkey.org/2019/05/25/plovdiv-edirne-train-to-start/

    Regards, ULF


    I also saw that Baku-Tbilisi-Kars is due to start carrying passengers in
    August.

    It makes me wonder why the Baltic States and EU are investing very large
    sums into the construction of Rail Baltica. Would it not be easier and
    more economical, to rebuild and expand existing infrastructure and allow
    for variable-gauge axles, rather than build an entirely separate network?

    I thought the problem with the Baltic states' railways was that their networks radiated from St Petersburg, rather than having north-south links
    to Poland?



    They do, but they also have a north-south connection.

    There used to be the Baltic Express, which ran from Tallinn to Warsaw
    with a change at Šeštokai.

    AIUI, there was a second connection between Poland and Lithuania, which required the use of a variable-gauge axle. I don't know if the now-standard-gauge line on the Lithuanian side was that.

    AIAUI, each of the lines into Lithuania are single-track, and that is
    where real work needs to occurr.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ulf.Kutzner@web.de@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 28 01:28:05 2019
    Am Montag, 27. Mai 2019 23:55:14 UTC+2 schrieb houn...@yahoo.co.uk:

    It makes me wonder why the Baltic States and EU are investing very large
    sums into the construction of Rail Baltica. Would it not be easier and
    more economical, to rebuild and expand existing infrastructure and allow
    for variable-gauge axles,

    For all passenger and freight trains? Those cars cannot freely circulate
    in Europe, by the way.

    rather than build an entirely separate network?

    IIRC, Kazlu Ruda - Sestokai was just rebuilt and regauged.

    Regards, ULF

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ulf.Kutzner@web.de@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 28 01:38:07 2019
    Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2019 01:44:58 UTC+2 schrieb houn...@yahoo.co.uk:
    On 27/05/2019 23:00, Recliner wrote:

    I thought the problem with the Baltic states' railways was that their networks radiated from St Petersburg, rather than having north-south links to Poland?



    They do, but they also have a north-south connection.

    Which was not used for public passenger service during Siviet times.

    There used to be the Baltic Express,

    That was Balti. https://www.russianrail.com/train-tallinn-st-petersburg-moscow.html

    which ran from Tallinn to Warsaw
    with a change at Šeštokai.

    Not to be confounded with the Baltic Express. https://www.russianrail.com/train-tallinn-st-petersburg-moscow.html

    There was a through service via Kuźnica Białostocka and Grodno
    about 1990/92 but Transit visa were needed for most of
    the passengers.

    AIUI, there was a second connection between Poland and Lithuania, which required the use of a variable-gauge axle. I don't know if the now-standard-gauge line on the Lithuanian side was that.

    AIAUI, each of the lines into Lithuania are single-track,

    Don't think so. Gudogay to Chernyahovsk is shown as
    double track on https://www.parovoz.com/maps/supermap/supermap-small.png
    (a bit outdated).

    and that is
    where real work needs to occurr.

    Regards, ULF

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arthur Figgis@21:1/5 to hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk on Tue May 28 18:39:25 2019
    On 27/05/2019 22:55, hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

    It makes me wonder why the Baltic States and EU are investing very large
    sums into the construction of Rail Baltica. Would it not be easier and
    more economical, to rebuild and expand existing infrastructure and allow
    for variable-gauge axles, rather than build an entirely separate network?

    That requires a captive fleet of trains, which is do-able for passenger services, but awkward for freight. And perhaps if you are going to build
    a new line for modern standards and speeds, and the point is to
    re-orient transport and political geography towards Warsaw, Berlin and
    Brussels rather than St Petersburg or Moscow, and Hard-Working
    [British/German] Families(tm) are paying, why not build standard gauge?

    Does Rail Baltica actually make much sense as a transport project,
    rather than a geopolitical one? If I lived there I'd probably want to
    know that flat wagons carrying heavy loads from NATO depots could arrive quickly rather than get stuck at a break of gauge, but is there much
    passenger and freight demand for normal services?

    --
    Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk@21:1/5 to Ulf.Kutzner@web.de on Wed May 29 01:10:07 2019
    On 28/05/2019 09:38, Ulf.Kutzner@web.de wrote:
    Am Dienstag, 28. Mai 2019 01:44:58 UTC+2 schrieb houn...@yahoo.co.uk:
    On 27/05/2019 23:00, Recliner wrote:

    I thought the problem with the Baltic states' railways was that their
    networks radiated from St Petersburg, rather than having north-south links >>> to Poland?



    They do, but they also have a north-south connection.

    Which was not used for public passenger service during Siviet times.

    So, during the Soviet occupation, there was no direct rail service
    between Tallinn and Riga as well as between Riga and Vilnius?

    There used to be the Baltic Express,

    That was Balti. https://www.russianrail.com/train-tallinn-st-petersburg-moscow.html

    Are you referring EVR's GO train, which runs between Tallinn and St. Petersburg/Moscow?

    There was also a Baltic Express train, which ran from Tallinn to Warsaw
    in about 1993, requiring a transfer to a standard-gauge, PKP train at Šeštokai.

    AIUI, there was a second connection between Poland and Lithuania, which
    required the use of a variable-gauge axle. I don't know if the
    now-standard-gauge line on the Lithuanian side was that.

    AIAUI, each of the lines into Lithuania are single-track,

    Don't think so. Gudogay to Chernyahovsk is shown as
    double track on https://www.parovoz.com/maps/supermap/supermap-small.png
    (a bit outdated).

    I was talking about current rail connections between Poland and Lithuania.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk@21:1/5 to Recliner on Wed May 29 10:42:25 2019
    On 27/05/2019 23:00, Recliner wrote:
    hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk <hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
    On 26/05/2019 11:39, Ulf.Kutzner@web.de wrote:
    Hello,

    see https://railturkey.org/2019/05/25/plovdiv-edirne-train-to-start/

    Regards, ULF


    I also saw that Baku-Tbilisi-Kars is due to start carrying passengers in
    August.

    It makes me wonder why the Baltic States and EU are investing very large
    sums into the construction of Rail Baltica. Would it not be easier and
    more economical, to rebuild and expand existing infrastructure and allow
    for variable-gauge axles, rather than build an entirely separate network?

    I thought the problem with the Baltic states' railways was that their networks radiated from St Petersburg, rather than having north-south links
    to Poland?



    Tallinn's radiates from St. Petersburg, I would say, whereas Riga is
    likely to have a more direct connection with Moscow.

    Lithuania shares no border with mainland Russia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arthur Figgis@21:1/5 to hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk on Wed May 29 19:26:37 2019
    On 29/05/2019 10:42, hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

    Lithuania shares no border with mainland Russia.

    But it does have a border with Russia, which has swapped sides of the
    frontier line from when the same border was the Russia-Germany border: http://pillandia.blogspot.com/2012/10/de-ru-1906.html

    --
    Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ulf.Kutzner@web.de@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 30 06:14:13 2019
    Am Mittwoch, 29. Mai 2019 02:10:15 UTC+2 schrieb houn...@yahoo.co.uk:

    I thought the problem with the Baltic states' railways was that their
    networks radiated from St Petersburg, rather than having north-south links
    to Poland?



    They do, but they also have a north-south connection.

    Which was not used for public passenger service during Siviet times.

    So, during the Soviet occupation, there was no direct rail service
    between Tallinn and Riga as well as between Riga and Vilnius?

    Which of them used "north-south links to Poland"?

    Well, the Tallin - Riga - Vilnius - Grodno - Warsaw service
    used a north-south link to Poland but the one one the
    Piter - Daugavpils - Warsaw line.

    There used to be the Baltic Express,

    That was Balti. https://www.russianrail.com/train-tallinn-st-petersburg-moscow.html

    Are you referring EVR's GO train, which runs between Tallinn and St. Petersburg/Moscow?

    There was also a Baltic Express train, which ran from Tallinn to Warsaw
    in about 1993, requiring a transfer to a standard-gauge, PKP train at Šeštokai.

    IIRC, it was Balti without 'c'.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk@21:1/5 to Ulf.Kutzner@web.de on Thu May 30 15:13:25 2019
    On 30/05/2019 14:14, Ulf.Kutzner@web.de wrote:
    Am Mittwoch, 29. Mai 2019 02:10:15 UTC+2 schrieb houn...@yahoo.co.uk:

    I thought the problem with the Baltic states' railways was that their >>>>> networks radiated from St Petersburg, rather than having north-south links
    to Poland?



    They do, but they also have a north-south connection.

    Which was not used for public passenger service during Siviet times.

    So, during the Soviet occupation, there was no direct rail service
    between Tallinn and Riga as well as between Riga and Vilnius?

    Which of them used "north-south links to Poland"?

    I wasn't talking about links to Poland when the Baltic States were under
    Soviet occupation, but rather asking about passenger rail between Vilnius-Riga-Tallinn in that time.

    Well, the Tallin - Riga - Vilnius - Grodno - Warsaw service
    used a north-south link to Poland but the one one the
    Piter - Daugavpils - Warsaw line.

    There used to be the Baltic Express,

    That was Balti. https://www.russianrail.com/train-tallinn-st-petersburg-moscow.html

    Are you referring EVR's GO train, which runs between Tallinn and St.
    Petersburg/Moscow?

    There was also a Baltic Express train, which ran from Tallinn to Warsaw
    in about 1993, requiring a transfer to a standard-gauge, PKP train at
    Šeštokai.

    IIRC, it was Balti without 'c'.

    Balti Express?

    Why did they cut that service in any event, no passenger volumes?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk@21:1/5 to Ulf.Kutzner@web.de on Thu May 30 15:23:29 2019
    On 30/05/2019 15:21, Ulf.Kutzner@web.de wrote:
    Am Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2019 16:13:28 UTC+2 schrieb houn...@yahoo.co.uk:

    I thought the problem with the Baltic states' railways was that their >>>>>>> networks radiated from St Petersburg, rather than having north-south links
    to Poland?



    They do, but they also have a north-south connection.

    Which was not used for public passenger service during Siviet times.

    So, during the Soviet occupation, there was no direct rail service
    between Tallinn and Riga as well as between Riga and Vilnius?

    Which of them used "north-south links to Poland"?

    I wasn't talking about links to Poland when the Baltic States were under
    Soviet occupation, but rather asking about passenger rail between
    Vilnius-Riga-Tallinn in that time.

    Well, the Tallin - Riga - Vilnius - Grodno - Warsaw service
    used a north-south link to Poland but the one one the
    Piter - Daugavpils - Warsaw line.

    Did you find an answer?


    About passenger rail connections between Vilnius-Riga-Tallinn? I did not.

    An older SZhD would ideally help, though I also don't read Russian.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ulf.Kutzner@web.de@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 30 07:21:26 2019
    Am Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2019 16:13:28 UTC+2 schrieb houn...@yahoo.co.uk:

    I thought the problem with the Baltic states' railways was that their >>>>> networks radiated from St Petersburg, rather than having north-south links
    to Poland?



    They do, but they also have a north-south connection.

    Which was not used for public passenger service during Siviet times.

    So, during the Soviet occupation, there was no direct rail service
    between Tallinn and Riga as well as between Riga and Vilnius?

    Which of them used "north-south links to Poland"?

    I wasn't talking about links to Poland when the Baltic States were under Soviet occupation, but rather asking about passenger rail between Vilnius-Riga-Tallinn in that time.

    Well, the Tallin - Riga - Vilnius - Grodno - Warsaw service
    used a north-south link to Poland but the one one the
    Piter - Daugavpils - Warsaw line.

    Did you find an answer?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ulf.Kutzner@web.de@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 30 08:01:35 2019
    Am Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2019 16:23:39 UTC+2 schrieb houn...@yahoo.co.uk:

    I thought the problem with the Baltic states' railways was that their >>>>>>> networks radiated from St Petersburg, rather than having north-south links
    to Poland?



    They do, but they also have a north-south connection.

    Which was not used for public passenger service during Siviet times. >>>>
    So, during the Soviet occupation, there was no direct rail service
    between Tallinn and Riga as well as between Riga and Vilnius?

    Which of them used "north-south links to Poland"?

    I wasn't talking about links to Poland when the Baltic States were under >> Soviet occupation, but rather asking about passenger rail between
    Vilnius-Riga-Tallinn in that time.

    Well, the Tallin - Riga - Vilnius - Grodno - Warsaw service
    used a north-south link to Poland but the one one the
    Piter - Daugavpils - Warsaw line.

    Did you find an answer?


    About passenger rail connections between Vilnius-Riga-Tallinn? I did not.

    Big problem for you if it was Warsaw - Vilnius - Riga - Tallinn?

    188/187 trains ran Tallinn <-> Minsk.
    The through car Tallinn <-> Vilnius <-> Warsaw https://rail-club.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=10368&start=120#p108700
    ran on a regular basis in later years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk@21:1/5 to Ulf.Kutzner@web.de on Thu May 30 16:57:43 2019
    On 30/05/2019 16:01, Ulf.Kutzner@web.de wrote:
    Am Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2019 16:23:39 UTC+2 schrieb houn...@yahoo.co.uk:

    I thought the problem with the Baltic states' railways was that their >>>>>>>>> networks radiated from St Petersburg, rather than having north-south links
    to Poland?



    They do, but they also have a north-south connection.

    Which was not used for public passenger service during Siviet times. >>>>>>
    So, during the Soviet occupation, there was no direct rail service >>>>>> between Tallinn and Riga as well as between Riga and Vilnius?

    Which of them used "north-south links to Poland"?

    I wasn't talking about links to Poland when the Baltic States were under >>>> Soviet occupation, but rather asking about passenger rail between
    Vilnius-Riga-Tallinn in that time.

    Well, the Tallin - Riga - Vilnius - Grodno - Warsaw service
    used a north-south link to Poland but the one one the
    Piter - Daugavpils - Warsaw line.

    Did you find an answer?


    About passenger rail connections between Vilnius-Riga-Tallinn? I did not.

    Big problem for you if it was Warsaw - Vilnius - Riga - Tallinn?

    Not in the least.

    Was the Warsaw - Vilnius - Riga - Tallinn service the only real
    passenger service between the three cities under Soviet occupation?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ulf.Kutzner@web.de@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 31 00:23:06 2019
    Am Sonntag, 26. Mai 2019 12:39:20 UTC+2 schrieb ulf.k...@web.de:

    see https://railturkey.org/2019/05/25/plovdiv-edirne-train-to-start/

    Official information: http://www.bdz.bg/bg/international/plovdiv-odrin-plovdiv.html http://p.bdz.bg/p/l/plovdiv-edirne-plovdiv-01062019-12525.pdf

    Regards, ULF

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Philipp Klaus Krause@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 5 13:16:46 2019
    Am 28.05.19 um 19:39 schrieb Arthur Figgis:

    Does Rail Baltica actually make much sense as a transport project,
    rather than a geopolitical one? If I lived there I'd probably want to
    know that flat wagons carrying heavy loads from NATO depots could arrive quickly rather than get stuck at a break of gauge, but is there much passenger and freight demand for normal services?


    I don't think it would make sense for passenger transport only. However,
    the terrain is flat, so building it as a 240 km/h high speed line
    doesn't come at much additional cost and makes sense (similarly to how
    Sweden built some new lines for 250 km/h, even where there is mostly
    freight traffic).

    It probably is worth it for freight. The baltic states still have a very
    high rail freight transport market share (far higher than the rest of
    the EU), but it is declining. There is trade with the rest of the EU,
    and the long distances make rail freight particularly competitive to
    road transport. Iproving rail connections to the EU would help stop the
    rail freight decline in the baltic states.

    Philipp

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ulf.Kutzner@web.de@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 11 03:58:16 2019
    Am Sonntag, 26. Mai 2019 12:39:20 UTC+2 schrieb ulf.k...@web.de:

    see https://railturkey.org/2019/05/25/plovdiv-edirne-train-to-start/

    Now they say on June 1st, 2nd were test runs,
    they are waiting for introducing Sofia <-> Edirne.

    Looks like the trains already have been discontinued before last weekend. http://www.bdz.bg/bg/novini/izgotviat-se-varianti-vlakut-do-odrin-da-trugva-ot-sofiia.html

    Regards, ULF

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From hounslow3@yahoo.co.uk@21:1/5 to Ulf.Kutzner@web.de on Wed Jun 12 01:34:23 2019
    On 11/06/2019 11:58, Ulf.Kutzner@web.de wrote:
    Am Sonntag, 26. Mai 2019 12:39:20 UTC+2 schrieb ulf.k...@web.de:

    see https://railturkey.org/2019/05/25/plovdiv-edirne-train-to-start/

    Now they say on June 1st, 2nd were test runs,
    they are waiting for introducing Sofia <-> Edirne.

    Looks like the trains already have been discontinued before last weekend. http://www.bdz.bg/bg/novini/izgotviat-se-varianti-vlakut-do-odrin-da-trugva-ot-sofiia.html

    Regards, ULF


    I've not visited Bulgaria, but can you tell me what the current state of
    BDZh is?

    Have you visited there?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)