XPost: alt.global-warming, ca.politics, sac.politics
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
On 2/16/21 2:28 PM, Rudy Constipata wrote:
In article <e110dc65-5f33-426b-8d4c-
77d197179ff1n@googlegroups.com>
Bret Cahill <bretcahill@aol.com> wrote:
Penny wise pound foolish.
Musk could make more money with a carbon tax and paying the California income tax.
But is it good business to tax the money money from customers before
they can buy your product? Don't you then have to sell the product
cheaper since the tax goes to the Government and not to you the producer
of the product?
Is it better to inflate taxes or to inflate your own prices?
Democrats don't care as long as a Democrats benefits and you the people
have less money to use and fewer free choices.
The idea is to force you to do what Democrats want you to do and leave
you only choices they allow which is NOT a free choice.
We can still pull it off bit it'll cost some money.
Fuck California. The mountain of anti-business regulations in
that state have driven stable tax revenue to the winds.
The only thing that can save it is killing Democrats
[REGULATIONS AND POLITICAL OFFICES]
by the
hundreds of throusands. Go COVID!
--
That's karma
Banning guns and de-funding police won't lower crime if you follow the Democrats Rhetoric. *And their very own Democrat actions confirm* that
even *they believe they're lying* since they're doing the opposite *to*
*reduce any crimes "you" might commit against the Government* that they
control and apparently they *believe guns and fences and police* *will* *protect* them from your crime and violence. So why won't those same
things protect you from crime and violence?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)