• Re: Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement gro

    From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to Sunglasshut on Thu Dec 16 22:14:19 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On 12/16/2021 10:05 PM, Sunglasshut wrote:
    Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> wrote in news:BqVuJ.64077$L_2.51734@fx04.iad:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows

    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone
    in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th
    building electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared
    poised to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction
    ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in
    Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled
    out further support for building decarbonization and electrification.
    The U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop
    the market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas
    furnaces, by announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-ne
    ws-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-move
    ment-grows-67732585

    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

    Okay, "retard far right".

    Exactly.


    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB? Can you open a nuclear
    waste dump on your property? No? Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Diablo Canyon and San Onofre Beach. Ever hear of those, Rudy?

    What about them, neo-Nazi retardo?

    Little matteeeB, your fellow retardo, said that local governments outlawing new gas hookups is "tyranny." It is not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sunglasshut@21:1/5 to Rudy Canoza on Fri Dec 17 06:05:03 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> wrote in
    news:BqVuJ.64077$L_2.51734@fx04.iad:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows

    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone
    in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th
    building electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared
    poised to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction
    ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in
    Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled
    out further support for building decarbonization and electrification.
    The U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop
    the market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas
    furnaces, by announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-ne
    ws-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-move
    ment-grows-67732585

    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

    Okay, "retard far left".

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB? Can you open a nuclear
    waste dump on your property? No? Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Diablo Canyon and San Onofre Beach. Ever hear of those, Rudy?

    Diablo has roughly 6,120,000 pounds of nuclear waste, San Onofre has at
    least 3,500,000 pounds.

    The owning utility company has had Democrats in their pockets for years
    and the taxpayers are going to be stuck with the cost of cleaning it all
    up. That's not responsibility, that's crooked and tyrannical.

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think <--

    Nothing truer was ever said.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to MattB on Thu Dec 16 21:41:52 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows

    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone
    in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th building electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared poised
    to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction
    ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in
    Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled out further support for building decarbonization and electrification. The
    U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop the
    market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas furnaces, by announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585

    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB? Can you open a nuclear waste dump on your property? No? Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but they are not "tyranny." You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MattB@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 10:40:37 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows

    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone
    in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th building
    electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared poised
    to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction
    ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in
    Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled out
    further support for building decarbonization and electrification. The
    U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop the
    market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas furnaces, by
    announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585

    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

    California government equals far left. NYC is also doing it.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB? Can you open a nuclear waste dump
    on your property? No? Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but they are not >"tyranny." You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate.

    Rudy, you lose as you were lowered to the need for using ad
    hominems.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to MattB on Fri Dec 17 10:55:55 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On 12/17/2021 10:40 AM, MattB wrote:
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows

    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone
    in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th building
    electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared poised
    to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction
    ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in
    Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled out
    further support for building decarbonization and electrification. The
    U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop the
    market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas furnaces, by
    announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585

    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

    California government equals far left.

    No.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB? Can you open a nuclear waste dump
    on your property? No? Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but they are not
    "tyranny." You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate.

    Rudy, you lose as

    No. I win. I crush you every time. I did not engage in /ad hominem/. You don't even know what it is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Matt@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 14:05:29 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:55:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 10:40 AM, MattB wrote:
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows

    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone
    in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th building >>>> electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared poised >>>> to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction
    ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in
    Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled out >>>> further support for building decarbonization and electrification. The
    U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop the
    market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas furnaces, by >>>> announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585

    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

    California government equals far left.

    No.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB? Can you open a nuclear waste dump
    on your property? No? Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but they are not >>> "tyranny." You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate.

    Rudy, you lose as

    No. I win. I crush you every time. I did not engage in /ad hominem/. You >don't even know what it is.

    Rudy, I've posted the def before for you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MattB@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 15:13:40 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:49:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 2:05 PM, Matt wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:55:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 10:40 AM, MattB wrote:
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows >>>>>>
    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone >>>>>> in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th building >>>>>> electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared poised >>>>>> to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction
    ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in
    Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled out >>>>>> further support for building decarbonization and electrification. The >>>>>> U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop the >>>>>> market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas furnaces, by >>>>>> announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585

    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

    California government equals far left.

    No.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB? Can you open a nuclear waste dump
    on your property? No? Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but they are not >>>>> "tyranny." You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate.

    Rudy, you lose as

    No. I win. I crush you every time. I did not engage in /ad hominem/. You
    don't even know what it is.

    Rudy, I've posted the def before for you.


    You haven't. If you had read one and actually understood it, which of course >you never could, you would realize I haven't engaged in it.

    Rudy, you are one of the most stupid people in the NG. You have no
    idea what /ad hominem/ means.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to Matt on Fri Dec 17 14:49:19 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On 12/17/2021 2:05 PM, Matt wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:55:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 10:40 AM, MattB wrote:
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows >>>>>
    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone >>>>> in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th building >>>>> electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared poised >>>>> to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction
    ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in
    Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled out >>>>> further support for building decarbonization and electrification. The >>>>> U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop the >>>>> market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas furnaces, by >>>>> announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585

    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

    California government equals far left.

    No.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB? Can you open a nuclear waste dump
    on your property? No? Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but they are not >>>> "tyranny." You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate.

    Rudy, you lose as

    No. I win. I crush you every time. I did not engage in /ad hominem/. You >> don't even know what it is.

    Rudy, I've posted the def before for you.


    You haven't. If you had read one and actually understood it, which of course you never could, you would realize I haven't engaged in it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to MattB on Fri Dec 17 15:19:18 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On 12/17/2021 3:13 PM, MattB wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:49:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 2:05 PM, Matt wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:55:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 10:40 AM, MattB wrote:
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows >>>>>>>
    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone >>>>>>> in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th building >>>>>>> electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared poised >>>>>>> to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction
    ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in >>>>>>> Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled out >>>>>>> further support for building decarbonization and electrification. The >>>>>>> U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop the >>>>>>> market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas furnaces, by >>>>>>> announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585

    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

    California government equals far left.

    No.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB? Can you open a nuclear waste dump
    on your property? No? Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but they are not
    "tyranny." You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate. >>>>>
    Rudy, you lose as

    No. I win. I crush you every time. I did not engage in /ad hominem/. You
    don't even know what it is.

    Rudy, I've posted the def before for you.


    You haven't. If you had read one and actually understood it, which of course
    you never could, you would realize I haven't engaged in it.

    Rudy, you are one of the most stupid people in the NG.

    No, I'm one of the smartest, and you know it, too.

    You have no idea what /ad hominem/ means.

    I know *exactly* what it means, including that there are two forms of it. I know that without having to look it up somewhere, because I'm educated.

    You don't know that there are two forms, and you don't know what either one is.

    You're stupid. You'll always be stupid, and one reason is that you're illiterate.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MattB@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 15:37:18 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 15:19:18 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 3:13 PM, MattB wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:49:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 2:05 PM, Matt wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:55:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 10:40 AM, MattB wrote:
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows >>>>>>>>
    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone >>>>>>>> in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th building >>>>>>>> electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared poised >>>>>>>> to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction
    ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in >>>>>>>> Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled out >>>>>>>> further support for building decarbonization and electrification. The >>>>>>>> U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop the >>>>>>>> market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas furnaces, by >>>>>>>> announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585

    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

    California government equals far left.

    No.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB? Can you open a nuclear waste dump
    on your property? No? Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but they are not
    "tyranny." You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate. >>>>>>
    Rudy, you lose as

    No. I win. I crush you every time. I did not engage in /ad hominem/. You
    don't even know what it is.

    Rudy, I've posted the def before for you.


    You haven't. If you had read one and actually understood it, which of course
    you never could, you would realize I haven't engaged in it.

    Rudy, you are one of the most stupid people in the NG.

    No, I'm one of the smartest, and you know it, too.

    Rudy, you might be smart if you only include the liberals or
    progressive posters, then you are about average.

    Rudy, the best you can do is ad hominem and grammar flames. That
    shows you to be limited.

    You have no idea what /ad hominem/ means.

    I know *exactly* what it means, including that there are two forms of it. I >know that without having to look it up somewhere, because I'm educated.

    Not by your limited post.

    You don't know that there are two forms, and you don't know what either one is.

    You're stupid. You'll always be stupid, and one reason is that you're illiterate.

    I know you have the CNN mind reading skill. ROFL

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nic@21:1/5 to Rudy Canoza on Fri Dec 17 18:31:18 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On 12/17/21 6:19 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
    On 12/17/2021 3:13 PM, MattB wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:49:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 2:05 PM, Matt wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:55:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 10:40 AM, MattB wrote:
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza
    <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement >>>>>>>> grows

    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a
    milestone
    in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th
    building
    electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared >>>>>>>> poised
    to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction
    ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in >>>>>>>> Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress
    rolled out
    further support for building decarbonization and
    electrification. The
    U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to
    develop the
    market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas
    furnaces, by
    announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585


    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

          California government equals far left.

    No.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB?  Can you open a
    nuclear waste dump
    on your property?  No?  Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but
    they are not
    "tyranny."  You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate. >>>>>>
         Rudy, you lose as

    No.  I win.  I crush you every time.  I did not engage in /ad
    hominem/.  You
    don't even know what it is.

    Rudy, I've posted the def before for you.


    You haven't.  If you had read one and actually understood it, which
    of course
    you never could, you would realize I haven't engaged in it.

    Rudy, you are one of the most stupid people in the NG.

    No, I'm one of the smartest, and you know it, too.

    You have no idea what /ad hominem/ means.

    I know *exactly* what it means, including that there are two forms of
    it.  I know that without having to look it up somewhere, because I'm educated.

    You don't know that there are two forms, and you don't know what
    either one is.

    You're stupid.  You'll always be stupid, and one reason is that you're illiterate.

    Will you two to stop and consider you are not makers of this world you
    are arguing about, concede that your part has contributed to the problem,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to Nic on Fri Dec 17 15:37:49 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On 12/17/2021 3:31 PM, Nic wrote:
    On 12/17/21 6:19 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
    On 12/17/2021 3:13 PM, MattB wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:49:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 2:05 PM, Matt wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:55:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 10:40 AM, MattB wrote:
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows >>>>>>>>>
    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone >>>>>>>>> in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th building
    electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared poised
    to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction >>>>>>>>> ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in >>>>>>>>> Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled out
    further support for building decarbonization and electrification. The >>>>>>>>> U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop the >>>>>>>>> market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas furnaces, by
    announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585


    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

          California government equals far left.

    No.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB?  Can you open a nuclear >>>>>>>> waste dump
    on your property?  No?  Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but they are not
    "tyranny."  You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate. >>>>>>>
         Rudy, you lose as

    No.  I win.  I crush you every time.  I did not engage in /ad hominem/.  You
    don't even know what it is.

    Rudy, I've posted the def before for you.


    You haven't.  If you had read one and actually understood it, which of course
    you never could, you would realize I haven't engaged in it.

    Rudy, you are one of the most stupid people in the NG.

    No, I'm one of the smartest, and you know it, too.

    You have no idea what /ad hominem/ means.

    I know *exactly* what it means, including that there are two forms of it.  I
    know that without having to look it up somewhere, because I'm educated.

    You don't know that there are two forms, and you don't know what either one is.

    You're stupid.  You'll always be stupid, and one reason is that you're
    illiterate.

    Will you two to stop and consider you are not makers of this world you are arguing about, concede that your part has contributed to the problem,


    I'm not a lying hyper-partisan ideologue, so I haven't contributed to any problem. Little matteeeB *is* a lying hyper-partisan ideologue, and those are the ones who create the problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to MattB on Fri Dec 17 15:40:38 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On 12/17/2021 3:37 PM, MattB wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 15:19:18 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 3:13 PM, MattB wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:49:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 2:05 PM, Matt wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:55:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 10:40 AM, MattB wrote:
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows >>>>>>>>>
    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone >>>>>>>>> in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th building
    electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared poised
    to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction >>>>>>>>> ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in >>>>>>>>> Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled out
    further support for building decarbonization and electrification. The >>>>>>>>> U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop the >>>>>>>>> market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas furnaces, by
    announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585

    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

    California government equals far left.

    No.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB? Can you open a nuclear waste dump
    on your property? No? Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but they are not
    "tyranny." You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate. >>>>>>>
    Rudy, you lose as

    No. I win. I crush you every time. I did not engage in /ad hominem/. You
    don't even know what it is.

    Rudy, I've posted the def before for you.


    You haven't. If you had read one and actually understood it, which of course
    you never could, you would realize I haven't engaged in it.

    Rudy, you are one of the most stupid people in the NG.

    No, I'm one of the smartest, and you know it, too.

    Rudy, you might be smart if you only include the

    No, I'm just one of the smartest, period. You know this.

    Rudy, the best you can do is ad hominem and grammar flames.

    Neither.


    You have no idea what /ad hominem/ means.

    I know *exactly* what it means, including that there are two forms of it. I >> know that without having to look it up somewhere, because I'm educated.

    Not by your

    By every measure.


    You don't know that there are two forms, and you don't know what either one is.

    You're stupid. You'll always be stupid, and one reason is that you're illiterate.

    I know you have the CNN mind reading skill.

    I have no mind-reading skill, and don't need any. I know everything meaningful about you in the context of Usenet, because you supply the material.

    I know you're not "Native American," either, and you're the one who furnished the proof.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nic@21:1/5 to Rudy Canoza on Fri Dec 17 18:54:50 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On 12/17/21 6:37 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
    On 12/17/2021 3:31 PM, Nic wrote:
    On 12/17/21 6:19 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
    On 12/17/2021 3:13 PM, MattB wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:49:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 2:05 PM, Matt wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:55:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza
    <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 10:40 AM, MattB wrote:
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza
    <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast
    movement grows

    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a >>>>>>>>>> milestone
    in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th >>>>>>>>>> building
    electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy
    appeared poised
    to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction >>>>>>>>>> ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped >>>>>>>>>> up in
    Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress >>>>>>>>>> rolled out
    further support for building decarbonization and
    electrification. The
    U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to
    develop the
    market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas
    furnaces, by
    announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585


    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

          California government equals far left.

    No.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB?  Can you open a >>>>>>>>> nuclear waste dump
    on your property?  No?  Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but >>>>>>>>> they are not
    "tyranny."  You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and
    illiterate.

         Rudy, you lose as

    No.  I win.  I crush you every time.  I did not engage in /ad >>>>>>> hominem/.  You
    don't even know what it is.

    Rudy, I've posted the def before for you.


    You haven't.  If you had read one and actually understood it,
    which of course
    you never could, you would realize I haven't engaged in it.

    Rudy, you are one of the most stupid people in the NG.

    No, I'm one of the smartest, and you know it, too.

    You have no idea what /ad hominem/ means.

    I know *exactly* what it means, including that there are two forms
    of it.  I know that without having to look it up somewhere, because
    I'm educated.

    You don't know that there are two forms, and you don't know what
    either one is.

    You're stupid.  You'll always be stupid, and one reason is that
    you're illiterate.

    Will you two to stop and consider you are not makers of this world
    you are arguing about, concede that your part has contributed to the
    problem,


    I'm not a lying hyper-partisan ideologue, so I haven't contributed to
    any problem.  Little matteeeB *is* a lying hyper-partisan ideologue,
    and those are the ones who create the problem.
    Think of the world, if in some simple way every one who wants a better
    world, simply acted out a helping hand at the right moment in that
    moment i ask you who is providing for you, some say charity comes from
    the heart,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MattB@21:1/5 to Nic on Fri Dec 17 15:41:31 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 18:31:18 -0500, Nic <Nic@none.net> wrote:

    On 12/17/21 6:19 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
    On 12/17/2021 3:13 PM, MattB wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:49:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 2:05 PM, Matt wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:55:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 10:40 AM, MattB wrote:
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza
    <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement >>>>>>>>> grows

    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a
    milestone
    in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th >>>>>>>>> building
    electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared >>>>>>>>> poised
    to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction >>>>>>>>> ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in >>>>>>>>> Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress
    rolled out
    further support for building decarbonization and
    electrification. The
    U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to
    develop the
    market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas
    furnaces, by
    announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585


    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

          California government equals far left.

    No.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB?  Can you open a
    nuclear waste dump
    on your property?  No?  Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but
    they are not
    "tyranny."  You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate. >>>>>>>
         Rudy, you lose as

    No.  I win.  I crush you every time.  I did not engage in /ad
    hominem/.  You
    don't even know what it is.

    Rudy, I've posted the def before for you.


    You haven't.  If you had read one and actually understood it, which
    of course
    you never could, you would realize I haven't engaged in it.

    Rudy, you are one of the most stupid people in the NG.

    No, I'm one of the smartest, and you know it, too.

    You have no idea what /ad hominem/ means.

    I know *exactly* what it means, including that there are two forms of
    it.  I know that without having to look it up somewhere, because I'm
    educated.

    You don't know that there are two forms, and you don't know what
    either one is.

    You're stupid.  You'll always be stupid, and one reason is that you're
    illiterate.

    Will you two to stop and consider you are not makers of this world you
    are arguing about, concede that your part has contributed to the problem,

    I do admit the right and left are both majorly fucked up, say for at
    least the last 2 decades.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MattB@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 15:45:45 2021
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, alt.survival
    XPost: alt.politics, talk.politics.guns

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 15:40:38 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 3:37 PM, MattB wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 15:19:18 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 3:13 PM, MattB wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 14:49:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 2:05 PM, Matt wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:55:55 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 12/17/2021 10:40 AM, MattB wrote:
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:41:52 -0800, Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:

    On 12/16/2021 9:31 PM, MattB wrote:
    Gas Ban Monitor: Calif. count reaches 50 as West Coast movement grows

    The movement to ban natural gas use in buildings reached a milestone >>>>>>>>>> in the second half of 2021, with California notching its 50th building
    electrification mandate.

    Meanwhile, the number of states prohibiting the policy appeared poised
    to top out around 20 this year, as all-electric construction >>>>>>>>>> ordinances advanced on the East and West coasts and cropped up in >>>>>>>>>> Oregon.

    At the federal level, the Biden administration and Congress rolled out
    further support for building decarbonization and electrification. The
    U.S. Energy Department on Nov. 1 advanced its program to develop the >>>>>>>>>> market for cold weather heat pumps, an alternative to gas furnaces, by
    announcing six industrial partners.

    https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/gas-ban-monitor-calif-count-reaches-50-as-west-coast-movement-grows-67732585

    More mandates from the far [sic] left.

    No. Not "far" left.

    California government equals far left.

    No.

    Can anyone say tyranny?

    What's tyrannical about it, little matteeeB? Can you open a nuclear waste dump
    on your property? No? Well, is that "tyranny"?

    Natural gas bans may be unwise (I don't think they are), but they are not
    "tyranny." You're stupid, little matteeeB — stupid and illiterate. >>>>>>>>
    Rudy, you lose as

    No. I win. I crush you every time. I did not engage in /ad hominem/. You
    don't even know what it is.

    Rudy, I've posted the def before for you.


    You haven't. If you had read one and actually understood it, which of course
    you never could, you would realize I haven't engaged in it.

    Rudy, you are one of the most stupid people in the NG.

    No, I'm one of the smartest, and you know it, too.

    Rudy, you might be smart if you only include the

    No, I'm just one of the smartest, period. You know this.

    You sound like a Trump tweet.

    Rudy, the best you can do is ad hominem and grammar flames.

    Neither.


    You have no idea what /ad hominem/ means.

    I know *exactly* what it means, including that there are two forms of it. I
    know that without having to look it up somewhere, because I'm educated.

    Not by your

    By every measure.


    You don't know that there are two forms, and you don't know what either one is.

    You're stupid. You'll always be stupid, and one reason is that you're illiterate.

    I know you have the CNN mind reading skill.

    I have no mind-reading skill, and don't need any. I know everything meaningful
    about you in the context of Usenet, because you supply the material.

    You do know there is more to the world than NGs and tweets.

    I know you're not "Native American," either, and you're the one who furnished >the proof.

    You, and the Pedo-lover Patrick Barker, sound much alike and
    Jonathon Ball.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)