People Should Contemplate Self-Defense Plans, and Thus Mal-Intent, vs.
From
Intelligent Party@21:1/5 to
All on Fri Oct 1 14:34:35 2021
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns XPost: sac.politics
People should contemplate self-defense plans, and thus mal-intent, vs. good-intent, with guns, rather than attempt to ban weapons.
Bearing a weapon with good intention, is legal in the United States and everywhere
in the Universe. Judaism isn't illegal in Germany because Hitler says so. Guns
aren't illegal in Mexico or the U.K. because the Mexican or U.K. government says
so. Malintent with a weapon is another matter, (if malintent by itself is enough
to be a crime).
People should contemplate self-defense plans, and thus mal-intent, vs. good-intent, with guns, rather than attempt to ban weapons.
No one should fear a weapon in the hands of a man or woman of a sound moral conscious. It's like fearing a rock. Imagine a rock to head. Give me a break.
Persecution of guns is racism, here and in Mexico and the U.K. Mal-intent, and thug life, is another matter. And I don't believe it's legal to be in a gang at all.
Don't fear a gun or a steak knife, or a rock. Or a yamaka, or the color of a black man's skin - if you know he's an Oreo or a Nubian and not a thug life gang
banger. He wouldn't be. If nepotism hadn't born him into poverty, and this country was the neo-socialist utopia it's supposed to be. It's outrageous. To let people live in poverty. Gangs are to be expected. And as illegal as can be.
Being in a gang, is saying one has intent to commit felonies, or has, and are an
accessory and supporter, of those who do.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)