• Re: Back-stabber Liz Cheney Is No Abraham Lincoln

    From 80%@21:1/5 to trumps bitch on Wed Feb 21 11:02:34 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.conservative, alt.fan.sean-hannity, talk.politics.guns XPost: talk.politics.misc

    In article <t2hor3$3klmc$80@news.freedyn.de>
    trumps bitch <patriot1@protonmail.com> wrote:

    This is what happens to bitchy fat broads who stab honest men in the back.


    As she positions for a presidential bid, the defeated
    representative imagines herself as Lincolnesque. That’s absurd.

    iz Cheney wanted to prove that the Republican Party was not a
    wholly owned subsidiary of Donald Trump.

    She failed. Miserably.

    The three-term US representative from Wyoming didn’t just lose
    her reelection bid in that state’s Republican primary on
    Tuesday; she was wiped out. In the state that has long served as
    a political launchpad for the national ambitions of the Cheney
    family, Liz Cheney won less than 29 percent of the vote, as
    opposed to the more than 66 percent that went to challenger
    Harriet Hageman. Cheney lost all but two of Wyoming’s 23
    counties—Albany, the home of liberal Laramie and the University
    of Wyoming, and Teton, the wealthy ski-resort enclave that has
    long been the most Democratic County in one of the nation’s most
    Republican states.

    Cheney never really had a chance. After she broke with Trump,
    the former president who has made himself the undisputed boss of
    the Grand Old Party, she was doomed to defeat in a Republican
    primary where her last best hope was a massive Democratic
    crossover vote that still would not have been enough to save
    her. Even if every Democrat and Democratic-leaning independent
    in the state had voted for Cheney, she would have lost because
    she was so incredibly unpopular with the Republican base.

    So, in this moment of complete and utter rejection by the
    Republicans who know her best, Cheney is busy making her next
    political move. And it’s a big one.

    On the morning after her crushing defeat, the soon-to-be former
    congresswoman went on NBC’s Today show and signaled that she is
    interested in bidding for the presidency in 2024. “It is
    something that I am thinking about, and I’ll make a decision in
    the coming months,” said Cheney, who on Wednesday announced the
    formation of a new group that could serve as a base for a
    presidential run.

    The group will have plenty of money. Instead of going all in as
    a Wyoming primary candidate, Cheney banked a lot of the money
    she collected from donors across the country. Her last pre-
    primary campaign finance report showed that she had spent only
    half of the more than $15 million she raised for the
    congressional race.

    Cheney, an ambitious and calculating politician, will keep right
    on raising money to keep herself in contention. But for what?
    Her presidential prospects would appear to be no better than
    those of her father, Dick, who before installing himself as vice
    president mounted a failed bid for the 1996 Republican
    presidential nomination. So there’s a creeping suspicion that
    all the post-primary positioning could be more about promoting
    Liz Cheney’s brand than her stated goal of “doing whatever it
    takes to keep Donald Trump out of the Oval Office.”

    The notion that Cheney would be a serious contender for the
    Republican nomination in a challenge to Trump’s all-but-certain
    2024 bid is comic. The Grand Old Party is now Trump’s political
    plaything. Of the almost 200 candidates he has endorsed in 2022
    Republican primaries, 182 have won and just 15 have lost. Cheney
    is the fourth House Republican who voted for Trump’s impeachment
    to be defeated in a GOP primary, and four others decided to drop
    their reelection plans rather than face a Trump-backed
    challenger.

    The likelier route for Cheney is as an independent, or as the
    leader of a new party that would try to attract disaffected
    Republicans, as well as independents and Democrats who have been
    impressed with the representative’s fierce opposition to Trump.

    That’s comparable to what Abraham Lincoln did in 1860, when he
    and his allies pulled former Whigs, Free Soil land reformers,
    dissident Democrats, and abolitionists together in a Republican
    Party that won an election where four major candidates split the
    presidential vote. Cheney would very much like to be considered
    the Lincoln of her time.

    “The great and original champion of our party, Abraham Lincoln,
    was defeated in elections for the Senate and the House before he
    won the most important election of all,” Cheney said after
    suffering her own defeat. “Lincoln ultimately prevailed, he
    saved our union, and he defined our obligation as Americans for
    all of history.”

    In case anyone missed the connection she was trying to make,
    Cheney added:

    Speaking at Gettysburg of the great task remaining before us,
    Lincoln said that, “We here highly resolve that these dead shall
    not have died in vain, that this nation, under God, shall have a
    new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the
    people, and for the people, shall not perish from this earth.”
    As we meet here tonight, that remains our greatest and most
    important task.

    The reference to “the great task” was a marketing move. Within
    hours of referencing Lincoln’s 1863 reflection on winning the
    Civil War as “the great task remaining before us,” Cheney’s
    political team announced that the new group that will serve as
    her springboard for future fundraising and campaigns will be
    called The Great Task.

    Cheney egos are every bit as big as Trump egos. Don’t doubt for
    a moment that Liz Cheney does, indeed, see herself as similar to
    the 16th president.

    But she’s not, personally or politically. And the notion that
    Cheney might form a new party with appeal to moderate
    Democrats—or even moderate Republicans—is absurd.

    While her work on the House Select Committee to Investigate the
    January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol has been exemplary,
    Cheney’s record is that of an extreme right-wing advocate for
    positions that have mirrored those of Trump when it comes to
    attacking immigrants, refugees, Muslims, and Democrats. Before
    her split with the 45th president, she voted with him 93 percent
    of the time. And she has an ugly history of exploiting political
    divisions by promoting Big Lies, as Cheney did when she refused
    to reject Trump’s vile “birther” lies about former President
    Barack Obama, and when she claimed that Vice President Kamala
    Harris “sounds just like Karl Marx.”

    Lincoln, like other early Republicans, read Marx, who was the
    European correspondent for Horace Greeley’s New York Tribune,
    the newspaper that played a critical role in calling the party
    into being. Indeed, a number of Marx’s German followers were
    among the great many immigrants and refugees who helped to forge
    a Republican Party that opposed the spread of slavery, promoted
    worker rights, and implemented land reforms that were aimed at
    alleviating poverty. When the Republican Party was founded in
    Ripon, Wis., in 1854, a number of the people in the room were
    members of the socialist Ceresco commune.

    Lincoln was not as militant as the Radical Republicans who
    supported him. But he was no conservative. Raised in a working-
    class family on the frontier, he had nothing to do with the sort
    of dynastic politics in which Liz Cheney was raised. Lincoln was
    a circuit-riding country lawyer who won his campaign for the
    state legislature as a champion of workers and farmers. Liz
    Cheney came to prominence as a defender of the Iraq War that was
    launched based on her father’s lies, and as a champion of the
    sort of empire-building military interventionism that Lincoln
    opposed as one of the US House’s most ardent critics of the 1846
    US invasion of Mexico. Lincoln took inspiration from the anti-
    colonial pamphlets of Thomas Paine. Cheney perfected her
    rhetorical skills as a Fox News regular who defended the use of
    torture.

    No matter how hard Liz Cheney wants voters to think of her as a
    new-model Lincoln, the reality is that she’s just a slightly
    refurbished Cheney.

    <https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/cheney-no-lincoln/>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)